They mention measure K and measure C. um I their ADA dollars that they're getting and they mention Proposition 2 and a loan, but there's no um information about how much each one of those funds is going to contribute to the project. And we'd also like to see an overall cost estimate on the uh construction costs. Um, additionally, um, we'd like to give them an another opportunity to answer number five, which was, um, the impact on district students. So, in in our minds, that was districtwide. So, how how does building their school affect districtwide, you know, the students and the community? And their focus was primarily on Blue Oak. So, we would like to give them another opportunity to um address a couple of those items as well as a description of the project. How many classrooms are they planning to build? Uh so, I think they just need to just give us a little bit more information.
Um so we plan to um provide those notes to them and ask them to resubmit um July 31st which is the next uh application deadline. Moving on from there we have the application from Inspire School of Arts and Sciences. Um we also scored Inspire's um application. Um out of 100 points they scored a 97. their application is very thorough, but I'm not surprised that it's very thorough because they have a shovel ready uh project. Um they've been working hard, we've all been working hard on their project for a number of years. Um so tonight we are recommending funding of their application. Uh the next application came from Sherwood Monttoauri School and um we're also asking that Sherwood provide a bit more information on their application. Sorry, there's so many documents here. Um, primarily it is the likelihood of them uh receiving Proposition 2 funds, which I know is difficult for them to answer because the state isn't yet done with creating all of the criteria and how the Prop 2 charter school funds are going to be rolled out.
Um, so we want to take a little bit of a wait and see. they are working with a consultant, get some information from the consultant on the likelihood of them receiving those funds. So, the recommendation from the facilities um department this evening is to hold on Blue Oak and Sherwood and to consider funding inspire. Open that up for questions. Um thank you Julie for the presentation. I um when I went through the inspire application, one of the things that I wanted to express as a board member is that as the other charters are looking at making application for these funds to use the inspire model of um complete information as something that we want to see. And um yes, I'm in support of approving inspire, but it's a lot of it has to do with the completeness of excuse me, the hiccups of their application and it there are so many um variables I know and they they inspire has used consultants to put this together properly, but once it's done and it is let's use that as a model for what we would expect from the other charters.
The scope will be different because the charter sizes are different but and the projects will be different but that's my request. I also think at this point it's useful to just remind the public that this particular process we're using uh to score and then allocate funds from the bond sales is different than what we've done before. So, we as a board are still and as a staff are still going to be kind of feeling our way through this. Um, that said, uh, yeah, I really strange to say you enjoy reading it reading a, uh, a funding request, but the inspire one was very well put together. Um I am I think Sherwood raises a lot of really good points about how they are sharing um with Chapman and what that will look like as we move forward with our own uh rebuild on the Chapman site.
So um I think waiting to get a little more information for them makes a lot of sense as well. Any other questions or comments from the board? If we don't have any from the board, I know we have some representatives here from uh the schools. Um, is there any public comment on this item? Okay, Julia, you done? I'm sorry. I didn't mean to cut you off. Yes. You're still up there. Is there any public comment? Thank you, guys. Okay, seeing none can look one more time. Um, and also just for the board's point of view, we can separate this into into separate motions if we need to if it's too clunky to have, you know, all these three recommendations wrapped up into one. But do we have any motions associated with it? At this point, I motion that we approve the application for measure C funding for Inspire as presented.
Seconded. All right. Mr. Chairman, were you wanting a second or did you second? I did second. Yes. Um, thank you. Um that said, is there any further discussion or debate specifically about the motion on the table which is regarding Inspire? Seeing none, um I'm going to go ahead and ask for a voice. All those in favor signify by saying I. I. I. That any nays? No. That appears to be unanimous. Are there any other motions associated with this topic? So, in there being no other motions, we have not approved the other two. Um, and my understanding is that, uh, Miss Kessle, you and your department are in talks with those schools about, uh, bringing those back possibly in June. Yes, that's correct. Okay. Okay. As long as it's not a surprise to anybody, sounds like everybody knows what they're doing. We are safe to move on to the next item, I believe.
Yeah. All right. I was laughing at your comment that we looked like we knew what we were doing. I just want to make sure that we're not surprising anybody by saying, "Oh, we're not going to fund this this time around, and here's why." I I assume that Julie's had those conversations ahead of time. Um, that's all I meant. Oh, everyone knows, you know, what we're doing. Um, we're going to move on to item 10.2.3. This is a discussion action item uh regarding the guaranteed project cost approval for Inspire at the Fremont Street Canyon View project. Thank you. Um, as you know, we brought on Modern Building Company as our lease lease back entity for this project and we're pursuing the lease lease back delivery method because we knew we needed a lot of upfront work on the project as far as bidding out all of the trades on the project, figuring out the schedule, figuring out the modular building, manufacturing, and delivery.
as well as scheduling a couple of crazy summers uh to get this project completed. And Modern is here tonight in support of the project and we're happy to have them as a partner. We also have uh a group of people from Inspire here tonight. Um this is kind of the last big hurdle uh bringing forward this guaranteed maximum price, this guaranteed project cost. Um, as you know, um, we initially bid it in April and then almost all of the scopes were bid again on May 8th. That's why you didn't have the number in front of you before tonight because we had to compile all of those bids over the last few days. So tonight uh the number that we'll be entering contract with with modern building company for a guaranteed project cost of $33,916,954 new school for Inspire School of Arts and Sciences.
And we'll open it up to any questions that you might have. Does the board have any questions regarding this one? I'm just excited to get this done before the cost. I mean, right, the longer we wait, the more cost go up and you guys have been waiting a long time for this. So, I have no questions except how quickly can we get shovels in the ground. Anybody else? Um, no. Seeing none, is there public comment on this item? Okay. Um, is there a motion associated with this item? So the motion you're look the action you're looking for what's that? Yeah. The action you're looking for is just to approve the um how do you word that? Approve the project cost. Yes. Approve the guaranteed project cost as elucidated here. Okay. Anybody want to make that their motion? Sure. Okay. I motion that we approve the guaranteed project cost um approval for Inspire School.
I'll second that motion. Motion from member Hayes and a second from member Robinson. Any further debate? Seeing none, all those in favor signify by saying I. I. Any opposed? It is unanimous. Awesome. Thank you guys. Congratulations. That is it's been a long road. Really exciting you guys. Thank you. Um, switching gears a little bit. We are on to 1024. If you guys want to take off, by all means, have a wonderful night. Thank you for staying so long. Thank you. Take care you guys. 1024 is discussion action approval of conceptual designs to proceed with schematic design and construction documents through completion for Chapman Park View and Rosedale new construction projects. Thank you. So at our last meeting you were presented with the concepts that were developed by the architect and uh now they have gone and put a proposal together to move to the next step of the project which would be schematic design for each school.
So tonight we are here to um uh get your approval for DL Architects to proceed with construction documents, schematic drawings all the way through construction, administration, and closeout for the sum of 9,24,875 for all three schools. Very good.
Um, any questions for Miss Kissle, the rest of the staff? So, what this is doing is is they're going to create the schematics for each of these three. And yes, that is correct. That's what we're approving. Right. Okay. It's the schematic drawings. Then the there's a step uh there's a stopping point at each phase where they will create schematic design and then we have a check-in and then they will continue with construction documents and then we have a check-in and then they go out for bid and we have a check-in with the board. So, you know, at each one of those phases, but the the $9 million fee gets us all the way through construction for their services. Yes, please. The question mark is up again. The question mark is up again. I just wanted to comment that in working with the DLR group and attending those meetings first at Rosedale and then Park View.
Um you saw an evolution of um they're taking the input that they were hearing and coming back with that input representing what the staff and parents and others that had attended those meetings were expressing. And I just wanted to to say thank you to the architects for being responsive to what was was being um requested. Right on. Any further questions of clarification? Is there any public comment on this item? Seeing none, um is there a motion associated with this item? The requested action is approval is approval of the conceptual design and authorization to proceed. I move approval. I'll second. All right. We have a motion by member Robinson, a second by member Olsen. Any further debate? All All those in favor signify by saying I. I.
Any opposed? It is unanimous. All right. Well, we just spent $40 million, you guys. That's pretty exciting. Um, sorry, it's getting to the point. It's 9:30. I starting to turn into a pumpkin. I'll try and keep it together. We are on to item 10.2.5, which is approval of conceptual designs and authorization to proceed with schematic designs and construction. Uh, this time for Citrus. Thank you. So, similar to the item that you just um discussed, uh the same presentation was provided at our last meeting regarding the concepts that have been developed uh for Citrus Elementary School. And I'm asking tonight for your approval for Lionus Architects to do the same. Uh move into schematic drawings through construction documents and then to DSA approval and construction. Um the amount that they are asking for that service is 1,672 uh,720. Would I be correct in assuming that the amount is so much lower because there's only one school because we're not doing a full rebuild on C.
Correct? Yes. Okay. Thank you. Any questions for the board? I I do have a question. So, is the board uh I had uh asked Kelly about this. Are we going to see like architectural pl I say plans like um we got to see the the vision for the other architects of what you know Rosedale might look like and Park View and Chapman and I guess I I realized though um Citrus isn't being you know is isn't a rebuild I still would love to see like what are they thinking of for flooring and what are they thinking of for lighting and what are they thinking of for the projects that that are going to be covered? Are we going to see that at some point? Yes, we typically don't bring all of that detail to the board. Um, you know, down to the type of flooring that's selected.
Um, but we'd be more than happy to share with you and the rest of the board whatever you want to see. Um, or you can come and look at it at our office and we can discuss it. Um if not everyone wants to hear it at a board meeting. So you're are you already have it? Oh no, not yet. It's not developed yet. Okay, definitely. We're just in the baby steps. Okay. I'm just I'm just wondering what they're picturing to like maintain the integrity of a of the historical site, but also, you know, make it, you know, updated and more lovely. Me, too. We're on the we're on the same boat there. We're very interested to see what kind of ideas they come up with and we do have uh several successful projects under our belt with both of these architects and we have a lot of confidence in their creativity and their abilities.
Y and typically in the past we have seen at each step more and more closer to actualized uh images and documents and I'm sure that will be the case here as well. As Julie said last time, there's always kind of those step stopping points of okay, where are we now and get more board approval, I'm sure, at those points. Yeah. I'm not I'm not looking for like for floor samples. I'm looking for like what a general idea like right like gym floors aren't always this color, right? People have different visions for, you know, different spaces. And that's I guess what I'm not looking for fabric swatches and and paint chips. I'm wanting to say what what are y'all what are you thinking of just generally? Yeah, I also look forward to seeing what they come up with. It's a good it's a good question. Thank you.
Um, is there any public comment on 10.2.5 regarding Citrus? Can I ask just one question? Of course. Um, I'm I'm just assuming I just want to make sure that my thinking is right that that staff at the site has been consulted and like offered their wish list, if you will. Yes, very much so. We've had several meetings um with their steering committee which represents each grade level, special education, food service, and the administration and custodial Right on. All right. So, we've got uh there was no public comment on this one. Uh any further questions or clarification? Yeah, please. Um just for a point of interest to to anyone, there is a uh a nice um description of what they're doing and how it's going to come back to us. on pages where it says basic services and some there's a lot of de there's a lot of detail in that part of the um presentation from for the agenda if you're looking for more specifics on what the vision is.
Yeah, I think she's looking at basic services on page two. Am I right about that? Huh? You're looking at the basic services section of the Yes, I'm I'm looking at exactly where it comes from Lionus to Miss Kissle with the description of what they're doing and what the visions of, you know, what they're going to include and what they're not going to include. It's just more information. On page one, they discuss um what's going to happen on the site, what's going to be newly constructed, um what the site work entails, and what the modernization entails. And then it walks through all of these um steps, these check-in points that I discussed previously. So, the schematic design and then the design development, the construction drawings, the submittal to the state architect, uh, bidding and negotiations, and then construction. I just found that very helpful in getting an idea of what we were doing and how it was going to work so we would know when to expect, you know, and what we're expecting.
just to let you and them know that that presentation of information as a board member it was helpful. I'll let them know. Thank you. Right. We have any further uh questions of clarification for Miss Kle. Seeing none, do we have a motion associated with this topic? I move approval of I'm looking sir for the um is there an identifying number? No, it's not a resolution. It's item 1025. Thank you. I move approval of item 1025. I I'll second that. All right. We have a motion from member Robinson, a second from Vice President Conin. Any further debate on this one? All those in favor signify by saying I. I. I.