>> And while options come from committees, they don't exclusively come from committees or working groups or whatever you want to call them. They could also come, like I said, from a parking lot conversation that somebody had an idea that you're bringing. So that doesn't necessarily preclude, you know, it doesn't have to live in some sort of committee with representation from each side or whatever. That's fine. I just think we need a deadline because otherwise everyone's going to keep bringing things and then it feels nefarious feels. I'm not saying it is. I'm just saying that's the feeling that I was getting from the group outside is that there were things conversations that are happening and things that are bre and at what point does that do we have a a stop >> to ask a question could if we decided in like 30 minutes to bring forth something will we have the ability to bring it forth even though it wasn't in a committee >> I that's happening like that work has happened in here already like again if we go back a couple meetings ago when we started addressing working conditions and we started there I think because we didn't have all the data around uh enrollment and budget stuff and all of that.
No, it was it's helpful information, but I just wanted to explain that I think that it was my um request to have it on the agenda. That >> sounds good. >> Um next on our agenda under all new business is update on 40B projects. Uh I know that uh some of the projects uh are currently now in in front of concom >> and um I'll anything else you want to add to that? >> Oh uh well I'll start with ZBA. So, um just they're they've got 55 um West Union in front >> in front of them right now. >> Um and so their next hearing is on March 10th. Um that meeting is going to be Zoom only. Um so they've completed their storm water peer review or the traffic peer review is complete. Um and they're just now going through the civil. Is it on their Is it on is the track view on their uh site?
But I would like to summon either Daryl uh or Miss Carl to speak further um on regarding the the difference between professional time and earn time uh for I can't have Miss M because that will be a conflict of interest in one of our coaches. So Miss Carlile, would you be able to speak on the difference between personal time and professional time? I didn't read your memo, but um professional PD is not limited where the earned leave is and um they've been using earned leave, not PD. So what he's stating is that the earned leave will be placed back into their leave pot, I guess. But PD is is just professional development. I don't know how we're going to pay do that since it's crossing over fiscal years if that's what it No, it's for this year only. Now, we're not going to go back from other fiscal years.
So we start there because those typically are non financial decisions and then as we get the information and you don't have all your data from your insurance then you have that and then you move forward.
>> It should be. I haven't I did. >> Okay. I because I hadn't seen it. All right. So, >> but it should be under the cases before the board. >> Okay. All right. >> On on their web page. >> Thanks. >> Um let's see. And then just conservation. Uh so, >> excuse me one minute. my update of course froze. Um so they had the first update or excuse me the first hearing for 10 to uh 60 main on Monday. Um so they uh you know concom has a a very uh established process for 40bs. Um and so they started basically spent that first meeting kind of describing what the process is and um what they're looking at doing. Um you know I think probably the the main topic of discussion was um a peer review of the RAM report. Uh so it looks like there might be some disagreement there uh between the applicant and the conservation commission.
Any other questions? >> Miss Silia. >> Any other questions from the board? >> If not, a motion to approve the use of professional time for coaches during athletic events. Is there a second? >> Second by Miss Dion Leonard. >> President Mia >> Mozappres. >> Um Dion Leonard >> four. >> Okay. Motion passes. Number five, discussion and possible approval of an exceptional student service aid at the Indian Oasis Primary. Mr.
>> Can I call for three minutes? I'm so sorry. Uh, can give me one second because I thought I saw a couple more hands or not. No, I'm gonna make it. Ivonne, >> I was just going to say that an example of an option that didn't came from a committee or a working operational group. It came a few years ago, Ariel, and it was, for example, the idea that came from the group over here was the $10,000 bonus. It didn't came from a consultant, Triad, anybody. It came from people in this room. And so I don't see what's the difference having the resources that we have from Valley School wise when they talk about benefits and there are no teachers in this committee or this work. Uh I don't see the the need for having teachers. We're just talking about people being overwhelmed and now we're saying well we cannot bring unless somebody is in there or like we have a lot of resources.
Um but um >> can you remind us what the RAM report is please? >> Oh sure. So um the RAM report is uh what remedial um remedial action plan which is >> what the applicant would send or the land owner sends to DP. It basically says this is our plan for re redeveloping the site. >> Okay. >> Etc. >> And they have to do that because of the plume and everything. Y and the other contamination. >> Yeah. So not every not every site has a RAM. >> Correct. >> Specifically related to the >> the scenario, right? >> Yeah. And so so the RAM was is it created by the um owner or is it created by the D? The D writes the RAM and says okay now this is what has to be done. No, it's written by the um applicant's LSP. >> Okay. Licensed site professional.
Diaz, >> President, members of the board, I would like to summon uh to the podium our director special ed uh to be able to speak more for any questions that you may have. Um per an IEP um one student will require additional support. Um we do recommend that the Bab School District governing board to approve the use of prof. Sorry about that. It's um we recommend the B County Fire School District Board to approve uh the ESSA for the primary school as presented.
Uh so just like Kelly saying there can be options that come in parking lots in this group outside in all of the other resources and if they're good resources let's consider and then and then just represent every voice in every requirement. >> That's it. >> But my whole thing is like I asked the question like if CA says okay we want to bring forth this recommendation. We're saying that we've already established the recommendations in the last previous meetings. Those things have been done already, right? >> But we didn't say that. That's the whole point. We never said that, which is why there's new options today. >> So, I'm asking for clarification because I just asked the question. So, if CA in 30 minutes decide, oh, we want to bring forth this recommendation, could we? >> I mean, as of now, we don't have a deadline.
>> Licensed site professional. And um so yes, that's submitted to DP >> for review. >> Okay. And so I I feel like there's been more than one ramp for this project. >> Mhm. They need to be filed um I think every three years. Okay. In fact, one of the things that came up at the conservation uh commission meeting was that their current ramp plan that they had submitted had actually expired since they had turned in their application. So, >> um, you know, the commission, I think rightly so, um, you know, requested an updated updated relay. >> Yep. >> And and there so it's their LSP that I did attend some of those meetings where they did talk about the LSP now who in Massachusetts is paid for by the um the applicant or the developer. um which I know some people understandably so find that a little bit troubling, right?
Um and again, this is per um one of the services stipulated on an IEP that we would like to add an FTE um for one of the students, but we'll be happy to answer any questions.
So, >> he just said no. >> I I was talking about the working condition. So around working condition we we came to consensus that once we addressed the um the issue that we identified specific to that that we were finished with that particular area. Now what I would say is if there are other benefit options or other compensation op options that you all and there may be an opportunity for that today when we get to the compensation piece. Um, but you've got things that you already tasked a group to do to bring forward and the budget is what the budget is. And so we're going to have to work within that. In some cases, I can just tell you like for example, I've been in a a place where, you know, they give you the dollar amount and they say, "Okay, here's your dollar amount to work with with compensation.
But um it is tied to their licenses and all of that. So >> and then we could have an LSP review it or or the D reviews it, right? And it has to meet certain things with D. So >> yeah, D reviews it, but um actually like our conservation commission wants to do a peer review from the um from the environmental health angle. So, um, so again, that that was kind of I think a sticking point it sounded like between the applicant and commission >> and and and that particular project has the plume, the Nenza plume that it's on and then additionally because it was an industrial site, there's contaminants in the soil. >> Correct. >> Yeah. >> All right. All right. Thank you. >> Yeah. And then uh 61 Waverly is uh you know moving forward at the concom. You know one of the the bigger issues was related to some storm water um infrastructure that you know originally 61 Waverly seemed a bit resistant to participate in helping fix but uh they have come around to being willing to do that.
>> Any questions to the item? If not, >> go ahead, Miss Silia. Sorry. >> No, I was just wondering that is this for the FY27 or does that start now? >> Start. >> So, you'll be able to position. >> That is correct. >> And the funding is from >> Yes. >> memo states uh funding through impact a >> impact. Oh, impact. Sorry. >> Impact. Sorry. >> I had that question till I read the memo and I was like, "Oh, okay. Never mind. It says where the funding is coming from. If there's nothing else, a motion to approve the uh exceptional student services aid at Indian races primary school. Is there a second? >> Second by Miss Sylvia Hendricks, >> president Hendricks. >> Mos Leonard. >> Thank you, Miss Baldes. Motion uh carries. Letter G is our consent agenda without objection. A motion to approve. Is there a second?
How do you want to spend it?" let's say and groups divide up whole group comes back together we go through this process by evaluating the options and then we say okay what do we see here what can we move forward we come to consensus on that um so I agree we can talk about putting a deadline on options I don't believe other than what we're talking about today insurance pay for pay for performance and compens compensation and within the compensation umbrella there are multiple things compression uh holiday whatever some things that were already previously identified and then whatever's left over budget wise >> also want to clarify this is not about the whatever this is the precision account it's about the process because I don't know the processes seem kind of murky to me can I have three minutes outside can we call copy >> can you can you tell me when you say the process are you talking about the IBN process.
So, that's really kind of helped them keep moving, I think, in the process. >> So, did I did I miss something? Because I was I was watching that um that specific uh portion of the meeting. >> Were they willing to fix the um cover that's on one on Waverly Street, which is 135, or were they willing to fix the pipe that goes to the culver? That's what I couldn't understand. I thought they were going to do um replacing the stone box culvert or installing a liner or um a and replacing the the 12in pipe. >> The 12-in pipe. Okay, then I misunderstood that. Okay, so they are working on the cover itself. Okay, that's good. >> Thank you. You're welcome. >> Appreciate that. >> Okay. >> Any any other uh >> no >> tidbits? We're good. >> Okay. um discuss the legislative earmarks and I know that we'll be meeting with um Senator Spiler on the 18th.
Second. >> Second by Sylvia Hendricks. >> President Windia. >> Vance. >> Hendricks. >> Uh Dion Leonard. >> Okay. Motion carries. Letter H is our vote to convene into executive session per ARS 38-431 3A13. A motion. Is there a second? Second by Miss Kathleen Vance President >> Kathy Vance. >> Um Hendricks >> De Leonard >> four. >> Okay. Well, we convene into executive session. Thank you all so much for being with us this evening. You all we have nothing else to do. We will be here. >> Did I send you that? >> What are we going into? Did I send you the I added the signature, but I do know I don't know if I send you the the document or not. I did. Okay. cuz he was still
>> Yes, I'm trying to because this is the way we're doing it is brand new from any of the way we have ever done it. >> Which part? >> The entire thing. So I want it's pretty different very different. So I want to make sure I have a clear understanding moving forward about what this process is. So let me I just want to make sure I understand because on the very first day I did a training with this group about what interestbased negotiations is what we do how we look at issues we identify interest or we tell the story we develop options we use uh standards to evaluate those and we came to consensus on this particular process. We even came to consensus on consensus which I think was a new consensus versus what you all used um in prior years. So my question is is there something different than from that first day than where we are today in the process?
Um, if there were any concerns or questions that you folks have with respect to budget, additional funding, which is drying up faster than actually receding faster than my hairline, I would say that um we're uh we need to make sure we we ask, you know, the pointant questions to, you know, to Karen to make sure that uh we have some information that could help us budgetwise down the road. So, >> unless you have any additional things you want to bring up. >> Yeah. Um I I think I provided a memo to the board just uh with the with a few ideas. Um I think, >> you know, and I'll just run through those. Um you know, number one, we did hear about, you know, earlier the the capital expenses in the schools. Um, and I I I don't I don't think we'd be able to uh get like a $12 million earmark, but um you know, I do think we would be able to get some support.