Again on the action report number eight, Bravo personnel and culture number three. Can I have a motion to approve the reemployment and tenure of third and fourth year teachers? >> Moved. >> Second. >> Moved by Elizabeth, second by Bill. Questions or comments?
We don't have to decide that tonight. >> Some Some of the legwork is done though. >> Correct. Absolutely. >> So it wouldn't be $89,000 to do it again. We don't have to hire them, do we? >> We do not. >> And so that consulting company alone was [clears throat] $40,000. The rest would have been legal fees, um you know, what we paid the day of the election, things like that. >> We We most assuredly would have legal fees again. We have >> Yes. >> We have you know, some some signage costs. No, it would not be anywhere near that. And I I in good conscience, I couldn't even recommend that we even pursue it if that's what we're going to pay. >> [clears throat] >> But I I guess I want I just would like some direction as to if the board wants me to pursue that, I'm going to start sitting in on some referendum meetings that the state is hosting to figure out what it is we need to do.
>> Hi, my name is Caitlyn Moore and I'm a senior at North High School. >> Okay, Glenn, I think you're supposed to ask a question or have someone ask you a question. So, my question to you this evening is, are you related to anyone on the board and would you admit it? >> Yeah, >> I'm related to you. [laughter] >> Good step. Yeah. Yeah. >> Sneaky, sneaky. >> My name is also Caitlyn. I'm Canon Kramer and I go to North and I'm a senior. >> Hi, I'm Lucas Hurst. I'm a junior at Memorial. >> I'm Nora Falconer and I'm a senior at North. >> I'm Claire Sterns and I'm a junior at Memorial. >> I'm Wesley Rder and I'm a senior from North. I'm Bana Tyler and I'm a senior at North. >> I'm Blake Padet and I'm a senior at North. >> I'm Brandon Pierce and I'm a senior at North.
>> All right. Can I have a motion to adopt the resolution determining the need for a project resolution? Motion. Motion on the floor. Do I have a second? >> Second. >> Have a motion and a second.
All right. Thank you, Mr. Miles. 3.7 request for the RFP of custodial services, Dr. Nesbit. Thank you, Madam President, members of the board, Dr. Smith. Yeah, in your board packet there, you have you'll see a request for proposal for custodial services. You'll see a couple of those tonight is we have contracted services and as those contracts come up for renewal in an effort to make sure we're getting the best bang for our buck in in these times of passing Senate Bill 1 that we really need to make sure we're getting as saving as much money as we can. We're putting those out for RFP to see what else is out there and and uh that's just the thing to do right now.
Would the applicant like to uh respond? >> Yeah. >> Yes. Good. Good evening. Excuse me. And for the record, my name is Chris Lucas with Lucas Environmental Professional and certified wetland scientist and registered professional soil scientist. Um just going to pull up screen here and we have a presentation. >> Before you conclude uh present, Mr. Lucas, >> do you agree uh with the the summary? >> Uh we genuinely agree. Um I you know when uh John Cusk and I at the last meeting stipulated to the site being in the flood plane, our intent to clarify that was we do agree the site is in the flood plane. I think we may have a disagreement as to the building. Um I'll get into more detail as to that, but we do not believe the building floods or is part of the flood plane. >> Okay. Floor is yours.
The public hearing has closed at 7:42 p.m. And now a vote, a motion to adjourn. >> So moved. >> Okay. Motion made. >> Great. Motion made by member child, seconded by member Deniv. Please call the role again. >> Chair Ston. >> Yep. >> Secretary Webb, yes. >> Vice Chair Childs, >> yes. >> Member Deniv, >> yes. >> Mayor Disorger, >> yes. Member Dman. >> Yes. >> All right. We are adjourned also at 7 well 7:43 p.m. >> Thank you all.
So, I I think we we got to look into it. So, thank you for being here. Thank you for the questions. Okay, I'm going to follow up on this if I can and then Um so, Robert, um right now, you folks get the disclosures, right? So, do you actually review the disclosures? You said you get it at We do this week. You see it at the tail end when there's a complaint. But, what do you do on the front end right now? So, about 2 years ago, um the legislature actually gave us money to hire an analyst who is doing um reviews of um spot audits essentially of different agencies and decisions made and then comparing it to the the disclosures that are made to try to identify things. >> Okay, can't they still do that if it wasn't public? The disclosure wasn't public? Big foot.
>> We use our bus vendors, uh our bus vendor for that. Yeah. So, our bus company transport them from the high school to the facility and back. >> Do Do kids ever transport themselves if they're if they have their license and or are they expected to? >> No. Uh I believe we Joanne, we handle all the transportation on that, right? >> Yes. >> Some programs they do themselves but >> Okay. >> Uh and then I just was wondering if there were any changes to the Fox Valley Career Center agreement or is it the same as previous? No changes. >> No changes. All the terms and agreements are the same. Uh the only thing you might see increases when we have to pay our tuition rates that go up because they're based on the uh Kalin school district teacher contract. So when they're uh teacher contract sees increases we all the member membership school districts contribute to that.
So, tier two pension is kind of something that I was told is going to probably get kicked down the can or the can's going to be kicked down the road a few more years. I don't personally agree with that, so I will have um some conversation about that. I don't quite understand how 15 years is an early too long of a time frame to not figure this out. So, I'm just looking for some clarity cuz when I ask who actually is responsible for it, I can't get any solid answers besides our actual governor, and I don't understand how there's not other people along the way to talk to. Uh the other one is the unemployment um insurance. One conversation they have me going into and I don't think it's actually where I should go, although I did have a good conversation with the group, is they want to start putting more rules and regulations on FOIA.
>> Which makes sense because >> Right, there's a larger impact on >> Yes. >> And the village was very understanding of that from the jump. It was just how we do this mechanically within uh this intergovernmental agreement. >> Okay. So if it's commercial development within that district we're not going to see the the increment. >> You'd still see uh off the top so 8% of any increment gets distributed amongst the taxing bodies. So we don't get a full 8% of that we get a relative proportional uh cut of that increment. So um any new funds even if it's just because of rising property values in the area, we won't be frozen for that for 23 years. That's how long this TIF lasts. Um we'd still see some of that uh just natural revenue generation, but if there's massive improvements along uh the 75th uh street corridor that brings in a lot of new revenue uh in the form of property taxes to our community, we could see a significant uh amount.
Can we answer any questions? So, are you I saw in the Lily Lake's plan you're using the mobiles for your max capacity. At this point, we're just understanding that they are using those spaces in order to meet the they um core class needs. Um I think that if there is a goal for the district that that that would come from that administrative core team that that you want to eliminate mobiles, then we need to understand that, and then we can evaluate the spaces that are available, and then what we need to do for expansion. So, is this the only school you're doing that with? No. No, we have a we have them shown at I didn't see it on It's kind of It's kind of down It's kind of down in the corner. Oh, down there. Yeah, they have an odd year where they aren't having to um use those mobiles for general education.
>> Hearing none. Roll call, please. Madam Secretary. >> Miss Venegas. I >> Mr. Salish. >> Hi >> Miss Wilfolk. >> Hi >> Dr. Hall. >> I >> Zit Stumbress is an I. Mr. Gyos >> I. >> Mr. Brown >> I. Motion carry. Under action reports. There's no fours under under alpha. So we I'm just going to read the numbers now. Can I have a motion to approve number four? the reemployment and accelerated tenure or secondyear teachers. >> Moved second. >> Moved by Bill, second by JD. >> Was that filed >> by Miss Venegas? >> Okay. >> Yeah. Correct. Miss Venegas was second. Okay. >> Yes. Okay. >> Uh Mr. Salish. >> I. >> Miss Veneggas. >> I. >> Dr. Hall. >> I. >> Miss Wolf. >> I. Zites lumbris is an I. Mr. Gagos >> I. >> Mr. Brown >> I. Motion carry. This time I'm going to keep my head up when I read this.
One thing that I will say is that same Zoom call that I'm in, that the there are about uh I've heard with between 50 and 70 school districts so far have said they're going to file for an August, I mean, file by August 1 for November referendum. Which is that is a huge number of 70 would be about a third of the districts in the state. >> The only way to increase funding and operational education funding is the referendum. >> Pretty much or or increase enrollment a bunch. That's the other thing, you know, our enrollment didn't fall last year nearly as much. I mean, it was up seven, I believe. I think plus seven kids, which sounds great, but you know, that's just one teacher, maybe. >> I would say go ahead and look into it. And might as well get the ball rolling, then we can decide if we want to do it, but we might as well get the ball rolling on that just in case if we do.
>> I'm Jackson Burns and I'm a senior at North. >> Uh I'm Landon Hod and I'm also a senior at North. >> We thank you all for being here. >> We have one more. Do we not? Is he? >> Oh, he's just a boy scout listening in. So, he wasn't called to come in here. >> Okay. Are you're you're a boy scout. Is this for one of your merit badges? >> Yes. >> Yeah. Which one? >> Um, what >> what rank are you? >> Citizen. >> Got it. You're a boy scout. >> Cool. What rank are you? >> Second class. >> I'm sorry. >> Second class. Good. Thanks for being here. Guess this would not be a bad time to talk about cancelling spring break, would it? >> We'll table that discussion. >> We're outnumbered. >> Thank you all very much for attending. This is is uh business we do for the schools.
Do you have any discussion on the matter? I think there's a definite need especially starting with Deer Meadow to get that roof taken care of. So >> we got to get on that stuff for sure. Okay. All those in favor?
So, happy to field any questions you might have. Thank you. Any questions, board? I just have a point of clarification. For anyone who doesn't understand how we staff our custodial services, Dr. Nesbit, could you just quickly explain what is covered here and why it was decided to outsource those services? Sure. We've outsourced for about four years now our custodial services. When we looked at again, when you look at budget, we were paying more than market value for custodial services. So, at that time, we we investigated it and we put an RFP and we were able to realize savings through contracting those services out. Thank you. Other questions, board? So, just to clarify on the timeline, after reading through that, this will be coming to us at our next monthly meeting. Correct? That's correct. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. 3.8 request for RFP for security services, Dr.
>> Okay. Thank you. Let me just pull up the share here. Okay, everyone can see that there. There we go. Okay. Um, so tonight we're here with on behalf of the applicant SLV Ashland LLC and Jeff Angler is on virtually on the on the call. We're also here with John Cusk from Bowler Engineering, the engineer of record. We're also here with George Campbell from Campbell Environmental, the licensed site professional for the project. Um, so through I'm going to I'm going to give a somewhat short presentation this. Give me one second. Uh so we're here for 10 to 60 Main Street. As you noted, there is a mass DP file number 0951018. Um this is the existing site highlighted in the pinkish colors. Um it's it's labeled 50 main. That's a relic from the ZBA process, but we are working with 10 to 60 Main Street.
I mean, so for example, we are pursuing an enforcement case right now and I can't give a lot of detail about it um of somebody who's made dozens of decisions with conflicts of interest and probably involved millions of dollars of decision-making. So, we will catch it. Right. >> But, it'll be 2 to 3 years after decisions have been made. But, that one individual, is their disclosure um public or not public? >> In that particular case, the disclosure was not public and the staff did not know. And um there was really no way to screen for these conflicts of interest in real time. >> But even if it was was public, they might not have gotten anyway. >> I think in this particular case, and again, I apologize cuz we're talking about something specific that I can't get into detail about. I think they would have known and it would have been prevented earlier in the process.
>> And then my last question was the school supply lists are they periodically reviewed with teachers? >> The >> yes but I'm gonna need some help on that because I got help on that uh answer to your question. But in general, yes, the when the program began, it uh the listing was created uh with teacher input, but also based on what we knew were supplies being asked for uh people to purchase. And then over time, there's an annual review process. We have a district catalog that is used, so we have a consistent provider and supplier for all of our our needs there. >> The elementary level teachers have a a default list, but they can create their own list based off of that catalog. Anything else? All right. Anyone else? >> Okay. I will entertain a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented and clarified.