Discussion hearing none. We have a motion on for sex uh for improved policy on sex discrimination sexual harassment personnel. All those in favor? I >> I 70. Thank you, Mr. Sha. I move we adopt uh the conflict of interest policy. >> Okay. Questions, discussion? the it it it it specifies that if a a board members relative and it explains who that would be applies for a job in the district it can be approved the board of education approves >> can't be a position of supervision I think right well that's a different policy >> oh I'm sorry okay then we we me jump ahead >> uh it it clarifies than it is from the past. >> Uh and it's quite clear about >> none of us could take a paying job in the school system. But if one of our relatives applied for a job, that would be a possibility, but it would have to be approved by the board.
But, um, and if that's what you're preferring, but I I think there should be language in here that gives the superintendent direction. >> President Wade, what if we kind of I kind of like D in there. I don't think that that's a statute that's going to kind of go away. So, I kind of like D in there. And then what about if we change the three years and the threeear cycle to a five potentially at this point? And this is our first read, right? We've got a couple other reads. This isn't >> actually this isn't our first read. This is to provide me direction of whether you would like me to continue with looking at changing the policy because you know typically policies when policy changes come from us, it's because we had a law that changed and we got an advisory from ASBA and so we bring those changes to you.
>> I got that right, John. >> Um it it it's a shipment model policy, which is different than the uh cave policy that had been uh determined before. and and I'm gonna I'm going to read it directly for uh conflict of interest. It's it has two elements. The first is no member of the Canton board of education the board shall be employed for compensation by the board in any position in the school system. So you do not have the opportunity to get paid by the Canton public schools. Um and then second, if any member of the board is employed contrary to the provisions of this law, the office to which that board member was elected or appointed vac. It's really about appointment of or pay for board of education members. >> Okay. The part the second part I talked about is actually the next policy right from my my >> further questions.
This is a little different process when it's been recommended by a board member. So I just want to make sure that the entire board or the majority of the board right is ready for us to move forward in doing it. Then after this direction could be do you want would would work with board member Van Hook or any of other board member right to to put it something together for me to bring to a first read. >> I motion to have the superintendent bring something else for us together. [laughter] Could you I didn't I couldn't hear you. Sorry. >> I motion for the superintendent to to reestablish this document and come back and present it. >> Is that what that is? >> Sure. like to work with me on it or to figure out how to [clears throat] >> I think we have an idea of kind of what you want.
All those in favor I seven Amy >> I. >> Thank you. Uh, I move we adopt policy 9270 contend the other one first. >> Let's resend um policy 927. Oh, conflict of interest. >> We're rescending that one. >> The old one. >> Okay. I move I'm sorry. I move we resend policy 9270 conflict of interest. >> Wait, I'm not following here. >> That we just added a new conflict of interest. Correct. So, we need to get rid of the old one. >> Oh, okay. Thank you. All right.
So I let's um I motion to table this to reward. >> Madame President and the German could I take a stab? >> Yeah. Okay. Um I and correct me if I'm saying this wrong. I think you're directing the superintendent to take the feedback that the board has provided and bring back a possible first read or regulation of this policy at a future meeting. >> Yes, absolutely. [snorts] >> This did that motion count? Okay, I motioned it. I motion to Yeah. motioned. >> I'm so sorry. I know I don't know if I'm interrupting, but I did not hear the motion at all on the table. >> You're not alone. [snorts] [laughter] I'm so sorry, you guys. I don't know the wording. [gasps and sighs] I motion to table agenda item. >> Hold on. >> Oh, Mr. Bry. >> Okay, let me take it. I'm going to try to say it again.
>> Um discussion hearing none. All those in favor? I >> Amy >> I >> seven. Thank you. Uh I move we adopt parental access to instructional material uh policy. uh that it it's required by law that we make our spoken sequence available to parents on our website. Um been doing that already and we'll do it more thoroughly beginning immediately. John, right? Curriculum talked about this. >> Correct. Everything will be live July 1. >> Right. >> It's required by law. >> Okay. We we have a motion. Any further discussion?
Okay. So, I think what you're saying is the table >> directing the superintendent >> to take the feedback of the board and possibly bring back policy JJ or a regulation for a first read or actually it wouldn't be a regulation for a first read. Oh, I'll see JJ for a first read. I'm motioning to direct the superintendent to take the feedback from uh discussion possible actual or from IGG textbook >> JJ textbook supplementary material selection and adoption and come back with something that's suffice for the district So that motion is not seconded. Um which means we can further discussion. Correct. Okay. >> Um so again I I am in a position in which I go I I hear you why you like section D. To be clear, that's already included in other policies. We already have to ensure that the materials that are presented are in line and age appropriate.
Hearing none. All in favor? I >> I >> Thank you. 70. Mr. Shan. >> Okay. I move we adopt the child abuse, neglect, and sexual assault reporting uh policy. It uh the biggest change is it allows uh a preliminary investigation is the wrong word. preliminary >> inquiry uh by a by a member of school personnel who's properly trained. Doesn't require it, but allows it if there's a report of child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault.
That is there. So I am resistant to updating the policy in that we are compliant with the law. What I think we should look at is having district come through with procedures and policy or uh procedures to go through those materials. I don't feel as strongly in that it needs to be directed in policy. I think to be fair, I recognize why there could be a world in which you have a superintendent who just does things in a way that's not compliant with what we as a board want. And good news, whomever is on the board at that period of time can make changes at any date. I have respect for the people in this position. And what I am more looking for is what district wishes to do in terms of regulating that policy because again they are in the position to know. So I would like to make a motion that we make no changes to policy JJ.
Doesn't mean we'll have to do it or will do it, but it allows discussion hearing none. All in favor? I >> I >> thank you. 7. we adopt the curricular exemptions policy. Uh there are four areas where it's required to allow exemptions if a parent requests the child not be exposed to HIV instruction to u firearm safety instruction and two other things. John, >> uh it's it's actually five five areas. Um, hold on just a moment. Uh, dissection, family life, education, HIV, AIDS, sexual abuse and assault awareness and prevention, and firearm safety. And the and that's nothing new there. What is new is there's a paragraph that says it allows the principal to hear a request for a student from a parent for a student to be exempted from some other instruction and allows the principal to make that exception if he or she so chooses.
>> Ir >> the JJR would be false. I'm stopping with the motion. I have a question. Mr. Lotsenheiser or Mr. Bergshire who can answer that because we you guys presented new regulation or is that just old regulations what we have here? >> No. Yeah, that no that the the JJR is the regulation that went along with governing board member Ed's recommendations as I have not brought forth the new regulation. I wanted this conversation to happen first because if the conversation was this is what we're doing then we're good. >> Okay. So that's >> I just provided uh I just provided regulations to match the changes that I made >> just to make it easy so they can see how it moves to the regulations. But >> okay, I appreciate that. So, I'm going to try this again and you can keep me honest. In that I motion that we uh ultimately I think I will keep similar language to what you have described in that I motion that we have district provide a recommendation on JJR in terms of reviewing supplemental material and what that process looks like.
Okay, we have a motion by the chair for curricular exemptions. Any further discussion? Hearing none. All those in favor? I >> I >> Thank you. 70. Mr. Sh and I move we adopt the nepotism policy 4015. Uh it limits the uh opportunity for a relative of the superintendent or district administrator or board member to be hired as a in a supervisory position and spells out a number of other issues that we're very similar to the conflict of interest policy only different. John, you want to add anything to that? >> You did well there. >> We have a motion on nepotism 4015. Uh any further discussion? All those in favor? I >> I >> Okay, that's 70. We've already voted on the um the resolution for the um K delegate. So now I'll take a motion that camp board of education enter into executive session inviting Dr.
Um, I I I do not uh feel that we need to come back with a policy read. So, I'm looking at JJR. >> Second. >> It was a terrible one. >> It was okay. Um, so to be clear, the motion is for district to provide regulations on a supplemental review process. Mr. Glover has seconded. I hope you got that motion on there because I did not write that down. That was a hot mess. All those in favor? I >> I all those opposed. >> Nay nay. >> Motion carries 3 to two. >> President Wade, I do have a quick question. Um, so the policy that is currently in our system, is that an updated one? Um, Madame President and board member Van Hook, I believe I reviewed your policyj on the website and it was the model ASBA policy and there's nothing in the policy that states um, as far as like an annual report to the governing board.
Gman for the purposes discussing strategy and negotiations concerning pending litigation in the matter of polling versus Kent. I'll take a motion. Maybe Joe second. Thank you, Michelle. I have first and second.
Correct. No, it it the policy does require it says the superintendent will establish procedures for the purchase and distribution of all necessary textbooks, supplemental books, and other related instructional materials from the adopted list uh free of cost to students. So, um you know that the superintendent has discretion on those procedures which could include a review. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. 5.4 Approval of agreement for alternative transportation for private day students with Everdriven Technologies fiscal year 2027.
Any discussion? Hearing none. All those in favor? I >> Okay. >> I >> um what we going to go? We're going to go to the band here. You just got to put a message that the board's going to be an executive session and we'll be back here. >> This will be clear. Oh yeah. Yeah, good reason. >> All right. I won't read the motion. I'll move it as chair. I'll take a second of this too, but uh move that the Canton board of education approve the settlement in the Holland versus Canton Board of Education HHD CV2306169743 in accordance with the discussion the executive session. I'll make the motion. I'll take a second for this one. Thank you, Jordan. Um no further discussion and all those in favor I. And Amy, you are part of it. Hi. >> You in? >> So that's 770. Is there any other business to come before the board of education?
Any questions or comments from the board before I motion? >> I just had a quick question about this. So, uh, just so I understand, it's 250,000 for transportation services for two students and possibly um, uh, uh, homeless students. I think I saw that on the >> our uh contract with Everdriven covers are some of our sit students and then it depends. So it varies from year to year. So sometimes if transportation is unable to do a route that meets the needs of the student, we will contact Everdriven. So right now I do believe it's two students. Um but the PO may be for more for that >> because we add kids as the year goes on. >> Okay. Yeah. cuz I think the contract said two students. Um and then 250,000. Um and how is is that covering just like the salary of the driver?
Like what is covered under that amount? is and then is that based on like mileage if or like what is covered? So it just covers the transportation of the student to the location in which they need to go to. So we don't it's not pieced together based on those things. So it's a quote that we receive from the outside contract company. >> Got it. So, it it doesn't matter how many miles is is driven or >> the quote may change based on the location to which we're taking the student, but we don't I don't know what that would be. I can find out more information on that quote. >> Okay. Yeah. I'm just curious if this is just based on like the driver's salary, like we're I'm in the wrong business. [laughter] Um, so >> I I do know that for our mileage for students that we do transport that we do get reimbursed.