>> Um, you know, I think Sandy, you and I had questions about um, ACR, AC, and GIC. >> Those policies are on the next agend. >> Yes. Just to clarify, we'll yeah, >> we had the first reading on those in May. >> We will be voting on those at the June 16th meeting. The handbook will reference what we approve on June 16. >> Got tricky. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Um and if you recall, like we had said in May, we're going to adopt the DOJ recommendations to make us compliant and then make sure that we're continuing that conversation. So the question the question was when are we having that discussion now or are we going to have it on the 16th? That's that was my question. >> We're not have we're not going to have it tonight. We we have the second read on the 16th.
Um, so I would just recommend they sent us the the sample resolution, but I'd like to have us consider putting it on our next meeting so that we can just go ahead and support um a state operations and support plan to help local educational agencies close the achievement gaps. Is there can I get support on Sure. Sure. Okay. Anita. >> Yeah. Okay, that's Are there any other All right, the next regular board meeting will be Thursday, June 11th, 2026. Wh Just kidding. >> No, you're right. I just want to remind the board that you will be having um we'll have two posted. So, you're going to have um because they did the readout to um extend the timeline for my evaluation. Um, we will be dealing with my evaluation uh during a special board meeting um on the 11th beginning at 10:00 a.m. and then we will um show up for the 1:00 board meeting for the um board so that we can just deal with the evaluation.
And then, how long do interpreting that how long an advance the community do you get that? And then, how long do you really have one week to Yeah, for a long time, you don't book them out fast two weeks. Yeah, for a long time, you don't book them out fast two weeks. Yeah, for a long time, you don't book them out fast two weeks. But but, but the critical thing Yeah, for a long time, you don't book them out fast two weeks. But but, but the critical thing Yeah, for a long time, you don't book them out fast two weeks. But but, but the critical thing is. So, so one of the things I'm hearing is, for me, it's not So, so one of the things I'm hearing is, for me, it's not So, so one of the things I'm hearing is, for me, it's not clear that seven days, uh?
So >> everything just has to align. That's why this is >> so policies on the 16th >> before we vote the handbook. >> Yes. >> Technically yes. Yeah. because then you'll have the policies and the handbook in >> and between now and then I'm going to get you Brian and Katie are working on there's a few CCHS specific things that we need to in consolidating the book a couple years ago we just there's a few CCS EHS things we need to reference that they're pulling together this >> okay did you have edits that you sent through >> No I didn't have edits but I when we I saw they were up and they were in the packet. >> Discuss it bigger. >> Yeah. I didn't realize they made it into the packet. I think >> Yeah, I I think they're on next week. >> They're on the next agenda >> because we were going to do one meeting with all of this in it.
>> So, it's back into close session mode. There's two closed sessions. You will have um one close session for the be for the first meeting with only um the one thing agendaized the superintendent evaluation. The second board meeting will have all of the regular business um in it and not take the close session for that for the superintendent evaluation. >> So two board meetings >> two board meetings a special will be posted just to get that done. >> Yeah. At 10. >> All right. And that meeting um will take place the the regular meeting approximately 1 pm educational support center. There being no further business to come before the board of trustees, it is recommended that the meeting be adjourned. I'll move it. >> Second, >> we'll be taking a vote via roll call. Mrs. Longshore >> I. Mr. Raleigh >> I. >> Mrs. Tucker >> I.
That So, so one of the things I'm hearing is, for me, it's not clear that seven days, uh? That So, so one of the things I'm hearing is, for me, it's not clear that seven days, uh? That receiving it 14 days out and hearing is, for me, it's not clear that seven days, uh? That receiving it 14 days out and hearing is, for me, it's not clear that seven days, uh? That receiving it 14 days out and then having seven days to submit clear that seven days, uh? That receiving it 14 days out and then having seven days to submit clear that seven days, uh? That receiving it 14 days out and then having seven days to submit questions that that seven day receiving it 14 days out and then having seven days to submit questions that that seven day receiving it 14 days out and then having seven days to submit questions that that seven day period is long enough.
Clearly, this meeting needed to be split into two, which is >> and so all the policies and a few more town things will be on the next meeting. Yep. >> All right. Anything else with the handbook for right now? All right, we'll move on then to adas working group updates. >> So, um we haven't had a meeting since the last update that I gave, but we're in closing stages of that working group. Um presenting to the select board on the 22nd. Uh we have a meeting coming up next week. Um and just to put the finishing touches on the presentation that we're going to make to the question for you. Is there I know when Paul presented the chair presented to the uh DEI commission there was sort of as an aside that there was going to be a hearing formal hearing thing. >> I did not know that happened.
Expensive, depending on the time. Now, like just being real, Expensive, depending on the time. Now, like just being real, Expensive, depending on the time. Now, like just being real, yeah? You get. Weekend. Ask the back by Friday, but we really, just You get. Weekend. Ask the back by Friday, but we really, just You get. Weekend. Ask the back by Friday, but we really, just really need to buy Monday And so it's usually that first weekend at the next weekend. And so it's usually that first weekend at the next weekend. And so it's usually that first weekend at the next weekend. They still have time before And so it's usually that first weekend at the next weekend. They still have time before And so it's usually that first weekend at the next weekend. They still have time before Monday when we look at them and weekend at the next weekend.
So I I did not attend the the DI on this meeting >> he he had mentioned that then and uh I guess the other point I would want to make uh since March when we've had this this item as Sandy pointed out this body is going to cease to exist in June 22nd. >> Yep. >> But our issues advice and I hopefully they'll diminish but they're not going to go away. Again, I bring up that we should consider updating the focus to look at what's going on in our school campuses and perhaps change the item name to make certain that we hold this talk about bias climate across our campuses going forward. >> I appreciate that. >> I agree. I agree. I think it would be helpful to continue talking about it. >> So, yeah, I've been asking since March and like to have some determination on.
They still have time before Monday when we look at them and weekend at the next weekend. They still have time before Monday when we look at them and answer. is seven days, and it all fairness. Like, I know, I've is seven days, and it all fairness. Like, I know, I've is seven days, and it all fairness. Like, I know, I've submitted questions late, but is seven days, and it all fairness. Like, I know, I've submitted questions late, but is seven days, and it all fairness. Like, I know, I've submitted questions late, but maybe. they still get my answers, so I think at least efforts are still they still get my answers, so I think at least efforts are still they still get my answers, so I think at least efforts are still made to answer those questions. they still get my answers, so I think at least efforts are still made to answer those questions.
>> Um I hear you. I don't have any immediate um determination at this point, but um >> something that we can discuss as a commit. Do you want to I mean I'm wondering as we are putting together our um you know as we're working over the course of the summer and working through through goals if um >> I don't know necessarily has to be a goal. I'm asking for something to be a standing item for us to discuss a standing item on our agendas going forward. That's what I've been asking since March. Can Can I share my thoughts on it? >> Yeah. >> I things on the agenda I I believe should be items that we discuss and then we move forward to the next one. As you rightly pointed out, I don't think these are issues we'll uh ever get done addressing. So I I I don't again if if it's a let's say semianual update on climate culture, we'll look forward it.
they still get my answers, so I think at least efforts are still made to answer those questions. so? So, from coaching think at least efforts are still made to answer those questions. so? So, from coaching think at least efforts are still made to answer those questions. so? So, from coaching perspective. Our main concern made to answer those questions. so? So, from coaching perspective. Our main concern made to answer those questions. so? So, from coaching perspective. Our main concern is. That you all have a system that you've written down of exactly That you all have a system that you've written down of exactly That you all have a system that you've written down of exactly what the plan is and that you That you all have a system that you've written down of exactly what the plan is and that you That you all have a system that you've written down of exactly what the plan is and that you are honoring the plan.
But it's a standing element just to say we're still tracking this. I don't necessarily see the value in it. >> Well, there are other things other than ordinary business meetings, Sandy, that could be vehicles for getting into this topic as well. Could be a working group, could be a forum, could be something maybe outside of an ordinary business meeting. Is that what you're getting at? Where it would have a sort of timebound focus where we would open in a more wholesome way than perhaps a 10 minutes can on a bi-weekly basis would even begin to approach which I agree with you. We want to make progress but how do we make progress in the best way possible? Is that sort of >> no >> like having it be a forever thing is hard I acknowledge but also having it be and that never is also hard to make progress.
That's, you've written down of exactly what the plan is and that you are honoring the plan. That's, you've written down of exactly what the plan is and that you are honoring the plan. That's, that's step one. And so, what the plan is and that you are honoring the plan. That's, that's step one. And so, what the plan is and that you are honoring the plan. That's, that's step one. And so, whatever your timeline is, yeah, are honoring the plan. That's, that's step one. And so, whatever your timeline is, yeah, are honoring the plan. That's, that's step one. And so, whatever your timeline is, yeah, we're kind of agnostic on that, that's step one. And so, whatever your timeline is, yeah, we're kind of agnostic on that, that's step one. And so, whatever your timeline is, yeah, we're kind of agnostic on that, as long as it's 7 to 14 days.
I also not what I said. I said let's let's have >> Oh. Oh, sorry. I misunderstood you. >> I said let's have periodic updates instead of every meeting >> regional meetings since we had made a point to make this something at the so we'd be at our regional meetings and also if I look at what our agreement was, we're supposed to be assessing our incident of bias uh timely at least over the next 12 months through June of 2027. That's part of the agreement that we signed. U is that correct? >> No, I'm the I'm the one who has to do that. I've been charged with that by the DOJ to do that >> and we shouldn't >> I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that I'm the official review of the incident because I have access to the >> agreed >> private information. >> Agreed.
whatever your timeline is, yeah, we're kind of agnostic on that, as long as it's 7 to 14 days. whatever your timeline is, yeah, we're kind of agnostic on that, as long as it's 7 to 14 days. And so, whatever the timeline we're kind of agnostic on that, as long as it's 7 to 14 days. And so, whatever the timeline we're kind of agnostic on that, as long as it's 7 to 14 days. And so, whatever the timeline is is at written down somewhere, as long as it's 7 to 14 days. And so, whatever the timeline is is at written down somewhere, as long as it's 7 to 14 days. And so, whatever the timeline is is at written down somewhere, and then you know, so we can say And so, whatever the timeline is is at written down somewhere, and then you know, so we can say And so, whatever the timeline is is at written down somewhere, and then you know, so we can say yes.
And again, we're not necessarily in private information. This is just sort of again a request to look at the what's happening in our camp in our across our campuses over time as suggested in our DOJ agreement and something I've been asking since March. >> So, and I do think it's a good idea to a periodic review. I agree with you, Sandep. Um, I can't think of an item on our agenda in the past few years that we've had on every single agenda except for this one because you requested it and I made the commitment for the rest of this year to put the hate and bias working group on. And now I think that, you know, maybe the chairs will discuss it together and figure out how we move forward and and what should it be every meeting? Should it be quarterly? You know, how we're going to do that.
This is what the plan is. is is at written down somewhere, and then you know, so we can say yes. This is what the plan is. is is at written down somewhere, and then you know, so we can say yes. This is what the plan is. We're following the plan, and and then you know, so we can say yes. This is what the plan is. We're following the plan, and and then you know, so we can say yes. This is what the plan is. We're following the plan, and then if the plan is not working yes. This is what the plan is. We're following the plan, and then if the plan is not working yes. This is what the plan is. We're following the plan, and then if the plan is not working for folks, then you can adjust We're following the plan, and then if the plan is not working for folks, then you can adjust We're following the plan, and then if the plan is not working for folks, then you can adjust it from there, but we would say then if the plan is not working for folks, then you can adjust it from there, but we would say then if the plan is not working for folks, then you can adjust it from there, but we would say step one is make sure that it for folks, then you can adjust it from there, but we would say step one is make sure that it for folks, then you can adjust it from there, but we would say step one is make sure that it is, in fact, written down.
So maybe that's for you guys to decide over the summer. Um yeah that's that's good feedback I think yeah if we do it every meeting it might feel preuncter and >> be performative >> performative >> yeah um >> so have to be performative unless we look at it that way >> if if we do something with that it'll feel like us checking the box saying we're doing this things are done right >> my kids are still in the schools they have to deal with these issues every Right. So, so let's take tangible steps, tangible actions instead of putting something on the agenda and saying our problem is done. We swoop at it. Let's move on. >> Yeah, we definitely don't want to do that. I don't think anyone's proposing that. >> Definitely not. >> I think that will happen if we keep doing it every we nothing happened in the last two weeks.