001Everyone I'm going to lose that. We are miss people. Call this meeting of the Stone Area School District to order. Would you call the role? Uh, Mr. Tim Buban is excused. Miss Mia Croyle here. Mr. Jim Moser here. Miss Don Garcia here. Mr. Zach Masa Myers is excused. Miss Lisa Pew here. Miss Allison Sorg here. Dr. Sharon Milin Bartlett here. Um, student rep. Michaela Becker is excused. and President Joe Patterson is excused. Thank you. Uh moving on to item 2 A. Do we have any public comment? No public comment. Item 2B, work uh workg groupoup reports, employee relations. I know that Zach is absent. Is there anybody else who was there that can provide us some? Yeah, I can help out. Thank you, Don. Yep. Hold on a second. Sure. Okay. Okay. Sorry for leaving
002you all in suspense. Um um so we talked about a few um policy changes that were more um updating for to be more in line with the the state and with the um they put together a um a group of both um educators and staff um to look over the um policy updates. And so there are a few here um that we'll be voting on later. And um but we will be voting that they'll all be shown later in this agenda. I'm sorry. Um but mostly most your meeting was at the policy update. Yes. Um Jessa, do you have anything? Yeah. So our most recent meeting was regarding policy updates which um Don's referring to is in our policy we have different sections for administration professional and support staff policies because language is the same
003across either two or three levels. Combining a lot of those so we don't have multiple policies of the same That it all right. Um, back to Don opportunities again. We um went through a lot of policy updates um um regarding the Start College Now program, student privacy, summer or in interim school attendance, and um again, we'll be voting on all of them. I'm sorry. Um I'm just thrown into this. Um uh let's see what else. Um advanced learning and graduation. Oh, right. Graduation requirements. Um, it's uh revised to u reference the 0.5 credit requirement in financial literacy literacy for high school graduation which is a law that just um went into effect starting this coming school year. Any anybody any other workg groupoup updates or anything to add? Any questions for Don? Uh, moving on.
004Legislative update. Okay. Um, so I'm going to focus primarily on state budget issues because that's been the big to-do. Um, so on Friday, was it just on Friday, the joint committee on finance approved um a motion. It's an omnibus motion outlining Sorry. Their proposed budget for education. Um the proposal includes a very modest increase in special education reimbursement rate. um which would increase the rate to 35% for the 2526 school year and 37.5% for the 2627 school year. Um the budget also includes a whopping 0 increase in general school aid. So the um the revenue limit increase will have to be funded entirely through property tax dollars. Um there is no increase in per pupil aid and um very minimal increases in mental health, transportation and sparity aids. Um what they did work to expand
005is um highcost special education which I think we spoke about at a previous board meeting. Um and they are funding under their proposal the highost special education aid would be funded to provide 50% reimbursement in 2526 90% reimbursement in 2627 at a some sufficient level. Um but as we talked about that's a very small percentage of the um cost. Um I'm just looking if there's anything else. So they did include a lot of money for um school uh for vouchers and uh school choice charter schools etc. um which is not a surprise. Um so where this is in the process is that the finance committee has voted and approved it. It's come out of committee. It still needs to pass both bodies of the state legislature and get the governor's signature. So, this is a
006time for if you if there are things in this budget that you don't agree with, um there are definitely things that would be financially not positive for our district. Um, if you wanted to take any action on that, this would be a time to reach out and encourage your representatives as well as the governor's office to not support uh this finance committee's proposal. Any questions for Mia? I had I had a clarification for Erica if you would. I know it's your birthday, Erica, so I don't want to put you on the spot. Happy birthday. Happy birthday. You had you had told us in the beginning of the budget process the a preferred percentage for us to get to in terms of special ed reimbursement for for it to really make a difference for our school
007district. And I think you you're saying they want to get to 35. Is that the top number? 35 this year and 37.5 37. But where what was our number we were hoping for? I'm sorry I don't remember. Oh. that but I do remember I mean we talked along the way around sort of joint energy to really support a 50% reimbursement right initially initially reflected I believe yeah actually underlying might have asked for like that and I think the intent was to really create combine the amount of 60% and that would be pretty significant for for all school districts because um reimbursement of all special ed costs basically pro provides to our our general fund which is essentially what we use to pay for all of our our program that high and I know I didn't
008send an email but high cost special ed a kids that get a certain threshold in terms direct and it's only a reimbursement of cost that exceed $30,000 and that 30,000 that once you do the $30,000 level then it's very specific where you have to reduce that you're receiving for their cost. If there's any cost, those don't apply. So, there's a lot it's it's a pretty complicated thing. I mean there's a whole there's like a man that you use to determine what costs are not versus a straight special reimbursement pretty simple in that they look at cost which is essentially salaries and right now we talk about I do right no you're fine um right now the state has identified here's amount of dollars that that we will use for reimbursement. We estimate that to be
009we'll say around 30%. But then depending on what districts actually spend, they look at what spent they did up that pot of money which could be 30% could be 32 or it might be 27%. Um what the request was initially was to make that certain meaning if they guarantee in our 60% specialized cost reimbursement if looking How much did everybody spend? Here's your percent reimbursement. It's not an estimate. And then we do the backwards math to figure out what I think in your email to me today about at what percentage we have been um reimbursed in the past for high cost special ed. It was quite a bit lower than what they had promised, right? In some years. Yes. And again, like the the high cost depends and certainly wouldn't benefit all consistently from year
010to year. It depends on the number of students that meet the criteria. That's a bad thing. But the advocacy is around if we can just increase that overall special reimbursement rate that applies to all kids and a better way for district. Thank you for that. Mia, what's the advocacy uh directive to people? Who should they be emailing or calling? So, um let's see. The um Wisconsin public education network education network has a letter that you can sign on to to the governor. Um they're they are also just encouraging you to contact your legislators and let them, you know, tell your story. Make sure they know um that you value their vote to meet kids' needs and the current proposal does not meet kids needs. Um and then there is on Tuesday the uh tomorrow um
011there's a day of action phone bank if someone's really motivated there um is a phone bank from 5 to 7:30 and they're going to be calling Wisconsin voters and asking them to connect with the governor's office and telling him to veto any budget that doesn't um meet need meet our needs. Asking for a veto of the budget. Yes. Okay. Um I will say there is Oh, am I going to find it now? Um our current rates, sorry my eyes are so currently for highcost special education the reimbursement rate is 25.9%. um for regular um special education it's currently 32.1 okay so um like I said a modest increase the other thing is that there is a proposal um for um referendum changes to the recurring referendum. Um, so is that a bill? I believe so.
012Okay. There's a bill that was introduced. So that's another thing to pay attention to in the state around school districts. Any other questions for Mia? All right. Thank you, Mia and Erica. Uh, moving on, uh, at M2D student representative report. We do not have that update tonight. And number 3A, Dr. Keyzer's report. All right. Just have a have a couple of quick um updates and perfect. So, construction update. We're into um knock on wood, our um final second and final summer of construction. Um, Fox Prairie is in a full refresh very similar to what Kagansza went through um year ago. Um the in checking in with um the maintenance department um the front half of the building, all the rooms, floor and ceilings are out. They're already um um getting a quick start on that.
013Sand Hill first day of summer Excel and yet they're still doing some um refreshes up there. So they are working um around um summer Excel. So there there's things that are have been um calendared so that it doesn't interfere with summer Excel and then they'll have have uh time after summer Excel finishes. at Riverbluff in the high school. They're finalizing work. They're doing some internal work um as we speak. And so if you happen to be up at the high school or River Bluff over the summer, you'll notice things shifting and moving around. Um we are planning a end of construction ceremony on Tuesday, August 19th. More details to come, but please, this is your save the date um uh notice. And the picture is intentional because at the high school they have some um
014work that they need to do um on the roof and dropping some equipment on there. And so um they are um finalizing the schedule. So if you happen to hear a helicopter the last week in June Wow. It's intentional because they're they're going Yeah. Not mentally. Yeah. They they are going to be airlifting some equipment up there. So that'll be that'll be pretty cool. Oh, you should let people know. Kids would love to watch that. All the little They will be those daycarees right around they will they'll be um there will be communication going out out and about. Um and again it's all weather dependent so the communication will be quick. I thought that was a drone, but yeah, I guess it needs to be a helicopter. Go for it. The timing of the communication
015is going to be such that we don't have people showing up because could be a safety. Thank you for that. [Music] Yeah. Okay. Yeah, they will be coordinating off that entire area because of that. So okay. Um and the second piece um there since uh and this takes us back a a few um school years to when we had the committee structure. One of the things that um committees were looking at were opportunities to support um this the school district and we have a very supportive community. Um and part of the work has been how do we increase the plate so that every slice on the plate gets a little bit bigger and that has turned into a educational foundation tied to the mission vision of the school district. is an outside entity um with
016a mission to um support the school district. And right now we have a founding advisory board made up of individuals that you see on there, some of whom you will recognize. And they are currently working on their bylaws and um developing exactly um how they will go through the discernment of um accepting applications and then um decide how to fund those applications. That being said, there is a kickoff um being planned um in uh concert with the chamber of commerce through the lunch and learn which will be during the lunch hour from um noon to 1 on July 28th. More information to come um with that. You said anything you want to the community will be invited up to the July 28th right it's not just going to be limited to chamber members the information
017goes out to chamber me chamber members and that that will be the first kickoff for that so but that July 28th is supposed to be open to more than just chamber members I think yeah there the chamber is extending that but it um there this will be the first time that kicked off yes is that group like incorporated in such a way that like they can accept charitable giving. Correct. Okay. So, they they are their own 501c3. They're partnering with um Community Foundations of Southern Wisconsin. They carry all of the um and doing all the filings and legal legal work. Um, this has been a multi-year conversation and inclusive of talking with a Sten Community Foundation who will continue to be the um um conduit for all of our scholarships. So, this is not focusing
018on scholarships. This is scholarships will still continue to work through um the Stone Community Foundation for those the more information to come probably from you. Yeah, it's exciting stuff. All right, questions. All right, moving on to item uh four uh the consent agenda. Could I have a motion? Move approval of of the consent agenda as presented. Seconded. second uh by Garcia. Um any discussion? I had a quick question, I guess, sort of on the history. Um I just noticed that all of the resignations are from River Bluff. Is it unusual to have a batch from the same school? Is is this um something that we can monitor, do anything about? Anything we should know? Jess is coming to the microphone. Sharon, hey Sharon. So, we do monitor them. We do um exit interviews with all
019of everyone who goes unless they don't want to do one. Um I wouldn't say it's unusual. Um it it's for a myriad of reasons and I I just can't share what those are because most of them are personal reasons. Um, but we do monitor them and keep track of them and if anything that raises a flag for us, we we talk about and we certainly move the principal on. So, any followup, Sharon? Nope. Thank you. That makes sense. Thank you. Jessa, would you say that are there more first year new teachers that come into Riverluff than in some of the other buildings? No. I mean, we've had No, I honestly I've seen it go in spurts. We have another building in our district that has a lot of younger in their career staff with them.
020Um, and also to be completely honest, there is a level of turnover that's to be expected when there's new leadership. Um, good or bad, right? So, um, I I just don't want to paint with a broad brush because we look at each individual case and there's a myriad of things that go into it. Thank you. Any other questions about the consent agenda? Um, all in favor? I. Any opposed? Any abstensions? All right. Consent agenda passes. Moving on to Oh, we're moving on, aren't we? Uh, discussion action items. Item 5A, educator compensation plan changes. Who's helping us with that? All right. So, we've um this came through um the employee relations workg group. Um and so we'll have um Erica and Jessa come join us because that um the next two will um have both um
021have the opportunity to have both voices if there are questions. This was um talked about at the last board meeting with some of the changes. You board members and the community uh the staff received an email with the um proposal and a video with the slide deck around um the changes. And so in our two-step process when things go through the workg groupoup that is the first of the two steps. So that's why it's notice under um discussion action. So um if we wanted to open with the with a motion and then if after that um if there's a second then we can open up for questions. Okay. Before taking action. Could I have a motion to start our discussion? approve the recommended changes to the educator compensation plan as outlined in doc the document
022presented. Second. So any questions from anyone in terms of um either the the um document the video or the slides that were presented and thank you Erica for doing the video getting good at those. Did you put them on TikTok? Oh no. I know somebody who could help you. Yeah, I have one view. I do want to take the in in the in the space. I do want to take um the opportunity to thank Erica for being able to take things like finance and um all all that's encompassed in that and be able to explain explain to a wide audience. I think that has been an asset to this group and to our staff, but I think it's also been an asset to our community when we've gone to referendums. Knowing that I've only been
023a part of two, but in both those times, it's been a great opportunity to see how people um take in that information. And I think the fact that a lot of the questions have been um thankful for presenting the information, putting it in a way that's understandable. I cannot take any credit for that. That's Erica. But well, thank you. There was a lot of feedback from from the team. So appreciate us. So we have a motion on the table to approve the educator compensation plan as outlined. Any just asking again, are there any questions? Should we take a vote? Yep. All right. Does there have to be a roll call? Does not have to be unless someone wants it. All in favor of the motion. I I I. Any opposed? Any abstensions? The compensation plan
024um is presented. Thank you. Moving on to the employee handbook. Um can I have a motion? Move to approve the changes to the employee handbook as presented. Second. Moved by Sorg. Second by Garcia. Any discussion? So this also came through employee relations workg group. And so as part of our annual process um which was established prior to me being here, we um survey our staff and um Jessa and and HR, collect that information, sift through it, and then with the help of um Erica and myself, we go through and see what um suggestions lead to recommendations. We then take it through employee relations workg group to as the first level of discernment get feedback from them and ultimately um take all of that feedback and bring it forward to hear. So it also has gone
025through the workg group in the first of the two-step process. And so, um, I'll turn it over to Jessup for a little bit of context and then questions. Your microphone. There you go. That's better. So, the document that you have are the most notable changes. Um, and just calling your attention to the last two rows, both of which with are with regard to educators subbing for other educators. We have two components that we are updating to this one. We are no longer requiring it to be a prep period at the 612 level for someone to receive compensation as long as they're subbing for an entire class period for their peer. And then um but but are keeping a a limit on once per day that they can do that. Um and our language for elementary
026stays the same that they can um cover for up to one class period per day. The second component that we are adjusting for this is we are adding long-term internal substituting language. Um this is come out of just a growing need as we continue to um decline in enrollment, having to share FTES, things like that, or if we have vacancies that come up. wanting to have a structure in place that would allow staff to know ahead of time of what any compensation might look like if they were to take on an extra class period because they have a colleague who's out ill or a colleague who's out on paternity leave or perhaps there's a vacancy that is not yet filled. So, what we have here is for our classroombased educators, the long-term substitute assignment compensation
027will be for taking on that extra class, 10% of their daily contract rate if this is a class that they're already teaching. So, no additional prep is needed or 12% if an additional prep is needed if it is um a different class than they're currently teaching. Or $36 per full class period, whichever is higher. That is a caveat to catch some of our people who are younger in their career who that 10 or 12% u might be a lower dollar amount. We want to make sure that that's higher than some the $30 for someone who just jumps in for one day. So we wanted to make sure there was a stop gap there. The second part of that is for learning strategists and other PST team members um may be eligible also for compensation when
028covering for long-term assignments based on the pration of time worked above and beyond normal expectations of the role. This is laid out in much more detail within the handbook. Um, but basically we've had a some people that were wonderful this year and really stepped up for some of their colleagues who were out for various reasons and working with Kelly and working with our principles decided that we wanted to come up with this kind of structure that would allow an avenue for those team members to receive compensation as well in those long-term subs. Mia, how long is longterm? Like what's the parameters around that? 15 days is long term and that's the same for our external subbing as well. Okay, any other questions or discussion? I just want to acknowledge that um this process does start
029well in advance of the end of school but always dovtails into that. Um and so this process I think serves serves us well in terms of bringing that and we have um hopefully in the workg groupoup format opportunity to um take our suggestions in terms of tweaking the process to perhaps um allow for the same result um and shorten the amount of time that it takes for us to collect all all that information. So, um just to give some context that um we have some ideas and thoughts and we look forward to working with the work group um to bring some of those recommendations on the process forward for some improvements for the next school year possible. So, thank you for putting this together. I know it's a lot of time and effort. Uh do
030we do we vote? Yep. 10 times. We're done, right? We have to vote. Oh, time to vote. Okay. Uh, all in favor? I I I. Anybody opposed? Extensions. It passes. All right. Moving on to item 5C, policy updates. All right. So, we just have a couple few several policies that we've been going through and again um employee relations and um educational opportunities um and I want to take the opportunity with um thanking Kate for coming and um we've got the work group put um pulled together last week um late. These are there are um some process updates as you heard from Don in employee relations. You'll see um in some in the grid some have three policies side by side by side. If you pull those up the they are the same policies. They are
031just three different employee groups. Administrators, professional staff, and support staff. those that's how um our policy book divvies up our employees and where we have where they need to be separated they are but Niola is working diligently to try to consolidate so there's a couple of examples in which um ADA and nursing mothers they've started to consolidate those into the 8000 series and rescending them in the other areas so where you see the the rescend um language I try I am trying to point us to it's being rescended because it's being added somewhere else. Um so that is that is a large bulk in there for employer or for educational opportunities. As Don also mentioned there are some process updates um the most um pressing of which is the act 20 um which was passed.
032there's policy updates that need to be put in place for looking at um promotion retention as it pertains to act 20 and again keeping core to our beliefs around students and making sure that we are thinking of the student first. Um we've adopted language here that keeps keeps at the core um having a professional team along with the um parents to look at the child and doing u making the best decision for for that student. Um the other ones are a lot of updated language around clarifying um or if there were policy updates within state statute and so forth. So I apologize for a lot of these and I want to foreshadow that usually come July 1, Neola does another process update. So, you'll see some policy um updates over the next few months. I
033guess I would I would say one policy to draw the public's attention to is around the class rank, which is a policy aligning to new state legislation that has guaranteed admission for students that rank in the first 10% and 5% of their class. So the policy um that policy which is uh 5430 just outlines which might be something for families and we talked a little bit about that in our work group about um how the district can communicate to families if this is if they are looking at their student qualifying for guaranteed admission. That policy would outline what what that's going to look like here in store. Right. in in essence it's looking at um our using our GPA to do class rank and all ties. So, um we want to make sure that we
034are um staying true to staying true to the state law around direct admit um and also um state laws around the guaranteed uh emissions um statutes and then also preserve what we've been doing all along which is as you can see in the in the upper half we had a single sentence around it And this just says that single sentence in a whole bunch more words. Great. That's actually a nice change for students to know that even without applying, they can automatically be admitted to a lot of our statements. So, and we and we really work with building administration, counseling, um with um with curriculum and instruction so that we um are doing right by our students. And so should we just have open general discussion about any of these policies if people have questions
035and clarifications that they want? Yes, I think that's a lot of them. So and if none then we can call the questions. So if anybody needs additional time just to think and look over the summary if they hadn't had a chance to really think of other questions, we'll just give a give a minute or so because it is a lot. And now I can't find it. There was one where it looked like we struck language and the language we added was exactly the same and now I can't find it. Do you if it was an employee relations one or do you think it was the educational opportunities one? I think it was um it might have actually been the in a couple of these. How did I think about it? Okay, that's 8450. Yeah, I'm
036trying to I have it up on my I don't know why I can't find it right now. There we go. Um, yeah. So, in the second paragraph, it says, "Per purposes of this policy, we crossed out casual contact and put back contact." What What was that supposed to be? We've done it a couple of times. I mean, it's 8450. Yeah, it is. In pink, casual contact is crossed out and then in green, casual contract is written in and it's two, three. Oh, yes, it's several. Yeah, it's throughout the document. And I don't understand what what that is. It it might have been that they when they do track changes, if they delete something out and then type it back in, it's going to show both the deletion and Okay. and then a dash. And I
037mean, I guess it doesn't change the meaning of it. So, I'm still okay with it. I was just wondering if there was supposed to be something else there. No. No. Um in in this one it there were um this was really looking at who is um who is to be like the um contact for like with initial exposure. It used to be just teacher and school nurse. We don't have school nurses in each of our schools. We have a district nurse and then we have health room staff. and so and in their absence office staff. So we wanted to make be more inclusive of who are the people that are responsible in many of those. So that this was more about the options. Okay. Um and all right. Y I just had one question for
038Kate. Kate, did you get an answer on the Star College now language that we discussed in the workg group regarding the um extraordinary expenses? Okay, we've already made those changes in there. So, the recommended changes from the from the work group were incorporated in the We had talked a little bit Why that was that and I had not been I had not been um emailed back why thank you for making the change. So we did if we did it incorrectly then I guess we'll get corrected. Yeah, that's right. Again, rightly that we wanted that we were accounting for the possibility that there may be many there may be other students uh for whom we would make the same to identify one particular group. For folks who are following along, it's policy 2271 start college now.
039And there we had discussed that under a clause on undue financial hardship, there was um a specific reference to that a student with a disability who had some extraordinary expenses could be excluded from the program because it would be considered a hardship. And we just discussed that why would it just be a student with a disability? There might be some other reasons. It seemed pretty pretty unique that it was just kids with disabilities that were identified there. So we struck the language and we will find out if that's the right legal way to go. Yes. So we Yes. based on the based on the work in the work group, we accepted those those changes and then I sent this to Nola. So if we need to revisit this, we can always bring this back. Jim,
040did you have a question? Yeah. Um, if I have the number right, it was 3139, which is staff discipline. Yes. It's in about the middle of the first page there's there's a paragraph that talks about you know cause and that kind of thing and below the Gity stuff um after that and there's a there's a looks to me like what was added was something that said other pertinent factors and it was I I guess I'm from an administrative point of view I like that because I don't know what that means and I then claim I know what it means. Um I don't know from a staff what does what does other pertinent factors mean? Who decides what other factors are pertinent? Are there are there case laws type things that govern that? Um, it just
041seems oddly vague to me. And I would assume we're talking about factors pertinent to or pertinent factors would be related to our overall mission and professional conduct and it'll we either say as determined by or inconsistent with or something like that that would explain what other pertinent factors means. Um, so we don't get in a situation where we think, you know, you think it's pertinent and this staff person says, "Well, that's not relevant or pertinent. How do who decides?" And so I just thought it was an odd end to that paragraph. And maybe there's maybe there is a reason in discussion, but that a Neola recommendation. Um uh it's been it's been a bit since since um we drafted this one. So we can certainly uh look uh look back into it and then follow
042up with the Yeah. And I understood it kind of follow the employee handbook and you know no matter how well you do this stuff you can't capture everything. So it seemed like well let's stick that in, right? Because there may be something we didn't think of in the handbook or it's not in the handbook or some conduct that's detrimental to the students that's not necessarily covered in the hand. you know, there's all these kind of potential things and that and in re rereading this that paragraph, that would be um my initial takeaway is that by by saying if you list it as just the employee handbook, you're limited to what's there. And this provides if there are factors and I would say on both sides that fall outside of that, it's it's a both and,
043right? So, it's for the investigator and the investigatory that they can bring in things that are outside of the employee handbook as evidence for them to state their case. But that being said, we'll dig into it and we can provide an update at okay um at the next uh could we pause the approval of that particular if the if the if the group feels strongly that we need to pull pull that out. um for that or kind of like with um the Stark College now it can be approved and if we need to bring it back as a with the modification with modification we can always we the board can always bring back policy. Is there any consensus of the better direction to go? Jim, do you have I mean I I think that I
044mean I'm I think I' I'd be inclined to sort of go ahead with it, but knowing that we may want to get back to that a little bit to see if we can't Can you from both sides think about that as as some qualifying language that may or may not be necessary, but Dan will report back to us and put that on one of our followup items. That's one of the action items. Yep. Any other questions? Yes, Mia. I'm just wondering for the two committees that these um policy changes are coming out of, were there any of these policies that sort of had your attention a little more? Any of them that you know had substantial discussion and or concern? Um I was in at opportunity so I I can start Don and then if
045you want to hang on too because you gave the record. Um we talked a lot about the third grade promotion and retention at risk students 5411 that's that act 21 and um that as you can imagine act 20 is very political there's a lot of statewide debate on what should happen for students with literacy and and third grade retention um you'll see in that policy that our our values Kate would say as a district are that we believe that students should continue with their age same peers but there's there some specific intensive supports that will be provided to students who are deemed at risk. So, um, very rarely are we ever holding kids back um or not promoting them at even at that critical age level for literacy, but there's going to be very intentional
046supports provided. So, we spent a lot of time talking about that. I don't know, Kate, what else? Anything else? Yeah, that was really what the that our students would be receiving that practice that we had for a while. [Music] in the fall and uh the really signing just kind of ratify the practice that we and then we did spend some time on the class rank because there are some districts that will weight their grade point averages based upon the types of classes that students take. So, um, they might we have quite a few students that end up ranking as number one in the class because they all have a 4.0. They've they've and also our grading system in the past has been straight A, B, C, D versus minuses. So, there's some room for future
047discussion about that, but we um you'll see in the policy that we're continuing with that um grade point average as the premise for class ranking. And if there is any future work around you know waiting of of course work or you know um differentiating in grades I think come in the future. Did I miss anything Kate Don? What did we talk about? Anything else? No those were the big ones and and the um and the um what was it? The advanced learning instruction. There was just a few questions about um getting if if a student is disabled, does the um does the school district pay for transportation? Um yeah. So I have a quick question. Um does the high school give like B minuses or B+es? Just B. Okay. Any other questions or clarifications on
048any of the other policies? Meaning none. Can I have a motion? Right. We didn't do a motion. No, we did not. And this will have to be a roll call does need to be roll. So I move approval of the policy changes as presented. Second. Okay, we have Croyle and Mr. Moser. Uh, and could you call the role, Miss? Yep. Um, Miss Garcia. Hi. Miss Pew. Yes. Dr. Milin Bartlett. Yes. Mr. Moser. Yes. Miss Sorg. Yes. Miss Croyle. Yes. Okay. All right. The motion policies are approved. Uh recap of action items is item 6A. What I have is um that Dan will be getting back to us on uh any potential recommended changes to the staff discipline policy 3139. And um I also have uh there will be a helicopter delivering some items of the
049high school at the end of June. It's fuzzy when that might happen. Don't get too close, but it could be kind of cool if you catch it. Um number two, I have July 28th, there will be new information coming out about the new Stoen Excellent Experiences and Education Fund. So watch for more information on that. And then um there also look for more information on an end of construction celebration coming on August 19th. No hard hats required for that. I'm awesome. All right. Anything else? Our future meetings, uh item 6B, regular board meeting on July 7th and then another one on July 21st. Both at 6:30 for now. Anything else? Motion to adjurnn. Could I have a motion to adjurnn? I move we adjourn this meeting. Second. Moved by Coyle, second by Sorg. All in
050favor? I I posted. Okay, we are jermed.