001All meeting order to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Um we we start with the reorganization of the school board. So I'll turn this over to superintendent. Thank you. This evening looking for nominations for our president. >> I nominate Lisa for president. >> I second that. >> Are there any more nominations for our president? Seeking additional nominations for president. Hearing none. Move to elect Lisa Barry as president of the Sebastical School Board for the 2627 school year. We'll call vote. Sue >> I >> Jerry. >> Hi. >> Jeff. >> Hi. >> Oppose. Hearing none. Lisa I turn the G. >> Thank you. Um we will then accept nominations for the vice president. and
002Keith Bolton. A second. >> Are there any other nominations? Any other nominations? Any other nominations? Is there a motion to cast unanimous ballot for def. >> All in favor say I. >> I. Opposed. Motion carried. >> Um we'll move then to clerk. >> Move. >> Second. Second. >> Are there any other amendations? Any other nominations? >> Any other nominations hearing? None. Is there a motion to cast unanimous ballot for Jeff Isacson? >> So move. >> Second. >> All in favor say I. >> I. >> Opposed. Motion carried. Assistant clerk. Move to nominate Jerry Warwick as assistant clerk. >> Second. >> Are there any other nominations? Any other nominations? Any other nominations? Hearing none. Is there a motion to cast unanimous unanimous ballot for Jerry War assistant clerk? >> I make a motion to jury assistant
003clerk. >> Second. >> Is there a second? Yep. Second. All in >> favor say I. I >> opposed. Motion carried. Um, treasurer and I'm going to take a trigger. >> Second. >> Um, any other nominations? Any other nominations? Any other nominations? Hearing none. Is there a motion to pass unanimous ballot for white? So move. Second. All in favor say I >> oppos. >> Did you anybody hear anything from Elizabeth? She Oh, there she is. >> I wasn't watching. Okay. Um, did everyone have a chance to look at the committee silence? And is there committee you want to be removed from or added to? If not, the committee assignments will remain the same. We are um I'll read them. Athletic Committee, Keith Vman and Jeff Isacson. Property Building and Grounds. Dick White, Jeff Isacson, Communication, Jerry
004and Lisa. Finances, the board of the whole personnel is the board of the whole strategic planning board for the whole policy Sue and Jerry. Um, booster club is Keith Education Foundation and Lisa Barry and Megan for members will rotate. Um, town of a Carver is I'm the leazison. and I don't go there very much because they don't have many people at their meeting and they really don't seem to care to hear from us. County Jackson board I go to a lot and talk to them. Um Dick is town of Sebastapole if you don't want to do that and somebody else would. >> No, that's fine. That's fine. >> Um Sue is the Wisconsin Association School Board delegate and Dick is the alternate. Sue is the CISA 7 delegate and um the legislative lean on Sue
005today. So if you want to change on anything >> otherwise we'll just um leave those as is. >> What is our certain population? >> Would you like to >> No, I I'm not but I'm just wonder >> it's not very big and I know I went there. >> I went to Thomas Bay. I know. >> I remember going to the town of Sturgeon Bay meetings when we were doing the building referendum with five and there would be like three or four people there. >> So if you'd like to take that, it's yours. >> If there's anything >> I usually just I go >> you think the city is no town. I said you can take the city sometimes there must be kids looking to say it's different their their borders come out into our district
006>> there's just a couple boards there just there's a couple of boards when I go I if I if something great is happening I'll report it like the their annual meeting is always the night of the schoolboard meeting so I just write a report for the town and say these are the schools accomplishments from the year these are the high points just >> stay in touch with them. >> Um our our official newspaper is >> we need a motion on that. >> Motion on the committee appointments. Oh, you want a motion? Okay. Um is there a motion to approve the committee appointments as as presented? >> So move second. >> Questions and discussion. All in favor say I. >> I. >> Motion carries. Um, our official newspaper, it would be Peninsula Pulse. Is there a
007motion to approve Peninsula Pulse as our um, official newspaper? >> I make a motion to approve the PL as the official newspaper. >> Questions and discussion. All favor say I. >> Opposed? Motion carried. And then um our official board meeting date would be third Wednesday subject to changes needed. So is there a motion? >> Move to designate the official board meeting date as the third Wednesday of the month >> at 6 o'clock. >> Second >> questions or discussions? >> Why don't we do sixes? Why do we have to move from seven to six? >> Six just gets in the middle of everything. Yeah. Seven if they go to 10 minutes later. >> Oh, an hour turn into a >> either either you start or earlier. >> I'm taking this from from our lifestyle. We used
008to be able to have dinner and then come to the meeting. Now you you you don't eat then you have to try to get something. >> Jerry, I work in Kiwi 4:00. I get home at 5. I'm just saying we all make adjustments. I mean, we can go a little later, maybe six or eight. >> Some of that was also to accommodate the staff. We've got the superintendent, the office staff, the principles. >> Principles are commuting from Green Bay >> that have been here >> support. They've been here since early morning. So, some of it was to accommodate the staff too >> um after a long day. >> Very accommodating. >> There was a motion to second on that. Maybe we should change it to 605 so >> I'm calling the question. All in favor
009say I. >> I. >> Opposed. Motion carried. >> Um do we have any community members? >> I guess. >> Okay. Um is there a motion to approve the consent agenda? >> So move to >> Is there a second to approve? >> I'll second. All questions or discussion. All in favor say I. >> I. >> Opposed. Motion carried. For the benefit of the camera. $250 from the Door County Medical Center and Senior Party. $300 from St. Paul Luther Church to the lunch angels program. $2,449 59 from the mighty pioneers to the high school football program. and $5,000 to from Rotary of Door County North to the Forest Days program which benefits our eco lab. >> That's nice for the >> eco lab. >> And then we have resignations. Alexandre as high school football coach, Randy Katrina
010as a special education support staff, and Brian Keane as a J basketball coach. Then can I have a motion to move um >> from Jeff, >> I'll make a motion to move our speaker under 8D to form our next section. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Questions or discussions? All in favor say I. >> I. >> Opposed? Motion carried. >> All right. Thank you so much. Um, this evening we have two presentations from two different engineer companies. Um, the first engineer company here is REI. You want to come on up to the front and I will introduce Matt and Matt will then share a little bit about yourself and um, one minute. >> Um, hi, my name is Matt Machki. I'm a hyper geologist with REI Engineering. Um, understand you got some PAS
011identified in your well. We've, uh, assisted main elementary school in a PAS treatment system and I'm currently assisting a local tech school for center. Um they've been approved for the grants. We've just gone through DSPS review of the system and now are coming in on cost adjustments with the grant coordinator. Um generally the way these work so far is with the DNR treatment is always considered the last option. So we have to do an assessment looking at if a new well would be acceptable to provide safe drinking water. um drilling the deep current well deeper or like connecting to municipal water or with another system. Um so far the DNR has been very receptive to treatment. Um my understanding talking to some of the DNR drinking water personnel trying to install new wells has not
012been going well for facilities. They're ending up with about the same concentrations maybe slightly better. Um and I do apologize. I'm not the greatest at public speaker. You can tell I'm turning red. you. >> Um, so with that, so the cost for actually applying for the grant is not considered grant eligible and that's what was included in our proposal for that cost. I generally keep that a little bit on the higher end than what I truly expected to be. Understanding that from my discussion, um, there would potentially need to be an addition to the building or a separate building for the treatment system right now. and that may require some additional environmental reviews to get that through due to the federal um dollars being allocated towards the grant. Um beyond that once that once we
013can determine that treatment is the best option with the grant pretty much we have to have the system designed and started going through the approval process with the DNR when the grant goes in. Um and with that what we have been doing is because they recommend that you don't incur costs that are grant eligible um we've generally just been holding on we don't invoice until the grant's approved to simplify that for any of the school districts. Um it is a reimbursement grant so the dollars do have to be paid and then you're reimbursed um up to quarterly depending on the cost incurred. Um, and then there's just a little bit of reporting with that, a semiannual update report of where the system's at being installed, and then also annual finished once the system's up and
014running and completed. Um, sizing of the system is mainly decided by the number of fixtures, plumbing, toilets, kitchens, and the type. And that's based on the DSPS code. Unless if we were to put it in a separate building, my understanding is then DSPS no longer would have to review the system. There's kind of a gray area where if it's from the well to the pressure tank, it's DNR's world, but not if the pressure tank's not in the building based on the last system I worked with DSPS. Um, not saying we're going to try and get around it. I do still would recommend that we size it based on their recommendations. Um and then even if that system based on that sizing we can get a rough estimate of how many gallons we expect before that
015carbon will break through. Um with the granular activated carbon systems we've done we've always done a lead leg. So all the work is done by the lead vessel and it's broken down into however many lead vessels running parallel and then the leg vessel is 100% safety factor so that if there is breakthrough you're not getting peing into the drinking water. Um and then that supplier what they do is once that's determined that the breakthrough is occurring through sampling they come in the leg vessel gets pushed into the lead position and a new vessel with clean carbon put in. Um, and to simplify it, they take the vessels off site to swap out the carbon and just bring in extra vessels so there's no downtime on the system. >> Based on the preliminary usage, does it
016seem feasible that we can contain that uh system within our building? >> Um, I guess I've never been in your building and it's the biggest thing is going to be like I said that DSPS, the maximum water. Um so like the population served for main elementary school and the technical college it's almost the same number of the population served by those wells. Um but because the technical college has a lot more labs and just faucets their system is twice the size. Um that's kind of the downside of the maximum water usage calculations on the DSPS side is it's not necessarily they know that their well if they pump more than six gallons a minute that they will run their well dry but how many faucets they have. Um, how many faucets they have, the DSPS
017calculator comes out that they could theoretically be pulling 26 gallons a minute that system. So, that's why we had to size the system to treat. So, right now they're looking at years and years before the carbon has to be treated. So until we install a meter and uh actually get a a solid number on usage, that's what you're going to base your design on. >> You won't even get a meter. It's based on like how many faucets there are and toilets and urinals and what type jet siphon water closet. Um and we do partner with a company that that's what they specialize in. They're engineers that specialize on the plumbing side just because we have we have professional engineers that could sign off on the paperwork. They're civil engineers. So, I'd much rather use someone
018who is specialized in that. >> How did you get underwater? >> That's and that's one of the things. So, with having to determine if it's viable to potentially put in a new well, um usually what I've been doing is I and other non-transit systems that have sample also to try to verify if it's a regional issue. Um, >> it's not >> I haven't looked into that yet. >> Oh, >> it takes some time digging into all that information. Um, >> but it does there's a multitude of sources and especially >> man. >> Yep. Um but so you like no one knows for sure but like I in the Wasa area for main elementary school and the technical school they're both in relatively close proximity wells are both pulling out of granite bedrock that's why their
019wells can go dry when they pump on too hard. Um, most people feel it's more than likely kind of like the Thomas where it's due to historic land spreading. >> Circle what? >> Uh, land spreading with like paper mill sludge. >> No. Up here. No. Um, but even like if any of the wastewater treatment plants in the area, they're bioolids. It gets part of the bioolids as part of the wastewater treatment process and if that gets land spread and especially here with the shallow dolomite bedrock that can have issues with just manure getting in it. >> Yeah. >> It's going to have a direct path. >> Yeah. >> I think it's important to know too that you're measuring this in parts per trillion. >> Yeah. >> Which I mean I mean it's not a new
020concept or technology but >> No, but you are looking at extremely small quantities. So extremely small. >> To help people get an idea, um did the math, a 16inch cast iron frying pan is about one part per trillion in the land area of the state of Wisconsin. And currently this federal standards are four parts per trillion. Um from what I remember, your well was just over two, which puts you just eligible for the grant. >> So is this funding at all dependent on federal standards? >> Well, >> because federal standards, now I just saw something. The EPA is is written off PE. >> So they haven't they're looking to get rid of so I believe right now they have standards for seven POS compounds. They're looking to only keep the P4 and P food and
021get rid of the other ones. Um I believe the idea is those were going to be done through a hazard index which a little bit it takes a little bit more to calculate. It's notable. I'm not exactly sure why they're doing that. No. Um, so you're going to be held to ultimately you'll be held to the state of Wisconsin drinking water standards, but they're just going through that. Um, state of Wisconsin cannot be less restrictive than federal standards. So they're going through that right now to get the drinking water standard for the state of Wisconsin updated. But no, the grant eligibility that's already been determined and that's the two parts per trillion for P4 PU um or if you were have a hazard index of 0.5 or greater for those other compounds >> and that's
022state money. >> It's federal money but it's being the DNR is the one who's putting it out. So it was originally federal funds and that's it's a little bit unique because now systems the DNR is reviewing the systems and if DSPS needs to DSPS is um that's kind of what caused some issues on the last the technical school one. Um normally when DSPS reviews the system the DNR would not review it but they are because of the federal dollars tied to it. So, state of Wisconsin is lowering those standards as of July 1. And so, our water is underneath the standards that would um set a violation, but we're occasionally at the standard that would require quarterly moderate moderate moderating monitoring. Sorry. So that's why we qualify for the grant is to be able to
023put it in so that we're able to monitor the water. Um, one of the pieces that I think is important that and correct me if I'm not correct here, but one of the components that we don't know is and that's because most of these systems are fairly new and just going into place. So, what we don't have a good handle on, unless there's new information, is that's that replacement of the carbon. And is that a three-year replacement piece? Is it a one-year replacement piece? Is it going to be considered hazardous material or not hazardous material? And so, that's a little bit in full transparency of our unknown right now. Um but the systems that are put in with the um reference calls that I had is they're they're into year one and they're not going
024to have to do any replacement this year with the systems that they put into place. So that gives us you know kind of a safety net to say well it's not something that we'll have to be replacing annually. um timeline if we were to choose you as an engineering firm 6 months a year >> I mean the initial assessment to get the grant together I'll say two to three months at the maximum usually once we get in that DNR DSPS review um it I'm hoping we go smoother this time um the last system I did was kind of the first time I did that and the DNR person and the DSPS person don't talk to each other So everything got pretty much bounced to me. I tell the other guy, he say, "I don't care
025what they said. Tell them this." And so it slowed down the uh slowed it down quite a bit on that end. Um we were able to get it through. Um, and just so you know, one thing is, um, so if we go with like granular activated carbon, which is what's been most used right now for that, it can in theory become biologically active if it's not used enough. Um, as an additional safety feature for when we're putting these in school, so we don't have to chlorinate the water. um the system we put in at Bane Elementary School and the whole system for the technical college, we're putting in UV treatment as a tertiary just so that if any bacteria were to go in there, um it's the UV should take care of it. >> So
026you're you're I mean I see, you know, $15,000 for design that was in the contract. Does that include a a UV system for uh coar? So the the the propol in the proposal I believe it was $4,000 but 15 is about what I would anticipate be for designing the system that would be grant eligible the approximately $4,000 would not and that should be on the high side. >> Okay. >> Um >> estimated cost and I know it's a rough estimate but estimated cost of the entire system from start to finish. >> So main elementary school is just under 90,000. Um, now like the technical school because there's some construction and having to rerun water lines. That one was previously at about 220. I'm guessing we're going to be right up to pushing the $240,000 maximum
027for the grant eligible. Um, >> and that's just for that's nothing else but just >> Well, the granular activated carbon is going to pull a lot of stuff all the chlorine and some other but it won't pull any bacteria out. No. >> So, I mean, if we're looking at this, would you recommend it that we look at a UV system for our >> We've been recommending it just as a safety factor. Um, like I said, looking at you had no bacteria in your well that showed up in your distribution system. It's just because we've only been recommending it because of the granular activity carbon. Um, and it initially came up because initially the DNR was looking at this through the lens of what's the requirement for municipal systems and with municipalities you have to chlorinate.
028So initially they wanted main elementary school install chlorination with this system. Um, and Maine wanted to avoid that because the system was being installed in a janitor's closet right off the gymnasium that's used as a lunchroom >> about the same size as ours. >> So we were we wanted to avoid having liquid or gas chlorine sitting that close to students. um and they were worried about, you know, people having complaints with taste or anything like that. So, we have been recommending the UV as a safety factor. Um again, unless there's bacteria coming into the system, the carbon should not become bacteria active, but just as that safety feature, we've been including it. Um with your water too, I know you currently it looks like you have ion exchange, I'm assuming, for hardness on your system.
029>> Um that's one And so that 15,000 did include some analytical of the raw water because there are certain uh parameters hardness, pH, iron, maganesees that they'll affect how effective that carbon is or if it's going to break through because there's stuff that will either scale it over. So you have a lot more pressure loss through the system or will preferentially bind to that carbon and then it will be spent quicker effectively. um taking out stuff that you don't need to but >> the pathways in the carbon will be blocked or taken by other organics and uh instead of PAS. >> So if we're using our existing well system and pumps does that affect the flow water flow or we have to upgrade our pumps? >> No, you should not have to. Um >> we
030got on demand we've got an on demand system. >> Yeah. Yeah. So if it has a something like that with a variable frequency drive which is what both me and the technical college have that will adjust effectively. >> Is it in our best interest? So we also have an irrigation well that we've never tested. Would it make sense as part of this front end piece to test that irrigation well to determine whether or not a blending model would be something to to consider or they're significantly apart from each other and everyone asking the question put me on the spot here. >> Well, I looked into it because I saw you had a transient well listed as being for the concession state. Uh with that being a transient. So your other two wells are non-transient non-comm
031community. Those are grant eligible. Your other the concession stand well is registered currently as a transient non-comm community water system. So that would not currently be grant eligible. Now if we're looking to use that for blending water, I'd have to ask some questions on that. Um more than like well effectively what would have to happen if that well is tied into the school. is going to have to be reregistered as a non-transit non community well. Um that would be tied into your other two wells as part of the school system. >> Something to look at or >> something to potentially look at. Um my other thought too is I know you're pulling from two wells currently and generally your samples for PAS are going to be taken from the entry point. So that's going to
032be that water blended already. We could, if there's fixtures available, take raw water samples from both wells to see if one well is impacted, one's not. Um, sounds weird, but the technical school that I'm working with, they actually have two separate water systems. So, half the buildings are served by one water system, the other half are served by another water system. The wells are relatively close together, about 150 ft apart at approximately the same depth. The one system has PAS, the other system does not. At the same time out there with the granite bedrock, the fractures can pull very large difference in that if they're pulling from different fractures. Um the dolominic bedrock out here generally the fractures are largely more connected, but you could run into the same type of thing. >> What's the
033what's the health impact of what's >> depend on the specific chemical. Um right now when you look at it depending on the specific compound um high cholesterol I know there's some birth effects >> um potential like I said it's you're looking at thousands of chemicals in the POS group um and it does vary from compound to compound >> but this is like one in a trillion parts. So right now based on the current science and the so the drinking water standards are based on a not that if you're consuming water at that four parts per trillion that you'll become sick. It's a increased chance that something could a health effect could potentially be occurring cancerous or non-cancerous. Um and I apologize I cannot remember exactly what that percentage is of what it is but it's
034a relatively small increase in a health effect. Um, but that's how the drinking water standards are set up. Um, >> what's the timeline for eligibility for funds? >> So, I know for this current round applications, the application deadline is September of this year. >> Um, but until DNR and DSPS have done the system review, they don't officially approve the grant until those. But as long as the application's in by that deadline, you're still eligible effectively. >> That's we did that both with main elementary school. They got in on the first round of grants that were eligible for the system. NTC, we managed to get their application in just towards the end of the second round um just to get them in because there was questions if there was going to be a third round initially.
035Thank you. >> It's very informational. >> Um so then we have another presentation this evening and Stephen will connect uh Brad from MSA virtually for us. Thank you Brad for your patience and welcome to Sebastical School Board meeting. Thank you very much. Can everyone hear me? >> Um, so thanks for letting me join virtually. Appreciate the opportunity to present uh MSA's proposal to help the school district with PAS mitigation. Um, just to clarify, does everyone on the board have MSA's proposal letter? >> We do. >> Is that in the packet? >> Yes, it's in the packet. >> Okay. So I'll just walk through that and share a little bit of experience. Uh first as a as an introduction, my name is Brad Suchinski. Um do a lot of have done a lot of projects on
036PAS with municipal systems and a few with smaller systems that would apply to um school districts. Most recently we did a project in Monacqua Hazelhurst where um did went through and utilized the small systems grant program. uh that is that would be applied that would be applicable to this uh school district and uh in that after doing the evaluation looking at potential of well reconstruction uh we did decide to go with treatment at that and that treatment system has been online since uh last fall or summer of 2025. So um also I'm currently working on a number of municipal systems looking at feasibility studies. Um this would be I've I've personally worked on six different feasibility studies for municipalities trying to evaluate all the alternatives um when it comes to well reconstruction blending new wells
037treatment facilities. So I guess that's a little bit of my background and and why I'm here tonight. Um so in the letter just going through and and understanding what the what's at the high school there. Uh there's the two wells. They're both approximately 350 ft deep case to 260 ft deep. So they're very similar in construction. Um they were installed in uh one with the the most recent building expansion or the school expansion. both have pumps that can pump up to 110 gallons a minute and they're on VFDs. Um, but looking at the water usage uh at the school, it it really amounts to a much smaller amount of of water use uh on an average day. And so that becomes important when sizing a system um if if we do go the treatment route.
038Um so what we understand is the the water samples from the both wells and there it's a combined blended uh sample. It there doesn't seem to be any data for each well individually. Um but that those samples have ranged from 2.6 to 4.66 with PFOS. Um, so that would mean it's above uh the eligibility requirements for the funding program as well as the proposed federal and state limit for PFOS. Um, but I think the main thing is that it's it meets the criteria for eligibility for the small systems uh grant program. Um, so there is the irrigation well. One of the paragraphs of MSA's proposal letter notes that uh the irrigation well, you know, if if they could determine that there is isn't POS in there, there could be a potential for for blending or
039at least learning if there's a possibility to drill a new well that would have lower PAS levels. Um I think in any of that evaluation, you'd want to understand where's the PAS coming from and can we go deeper? Can we move the well? Um, and I guess having some additional samples of PAS around the area would help. Um, knowing a little bit about the geology with the the limestone uh bedrock, it's tends to be rather porous and PAS can can move through that um fairly fairly easily. So, um it may not be uh a good bet to to be able to drill a new well and avoid the PAS. So, um what we're thinking uh might be the most cost effective solution for for the school is uh PAS treatment at Wells 2 and three.
040Um so that would be we understand in the mechanical room there's probably about 10 ft long by 5t um of open space in the mechanical room that could be used to to house two vertical vessels. Um the two most common media types are granular activated carbon and annion exchange. uh annion exchange would be the preferred if we're trying to uh minimize the amount of uh treatment vessel size. Uh you can have considerably smaller vessels if you do the annion exchange versus the granular activated carbon. Um and that's what we used at the Manqua Hazelhurst School was two smaller annion exchange vessels. So um and I think given the levels here I you know we can do some some estimates as to what how long it would be before you replace the media but I think
041with the low levels um should be able to get a good um I mean would be on the order of probably one to two to three years before you'd have to change out any media. Um it is unfortunate because the media ex uh replacement is is costly and that would be if you go the treatment route um then you'd be committed to to changing out that media um in the future. So I think specifically I think what possible in that mechanical room is two 36 in diameter vessels. um you'd have to have a place for backwashing and uh not that you're backwashing the PAS off the media, but to backfluff and keep the the media from uh I guess getting hard and um improves the treatment if you have regular uh back fluffs or back
042washing events. Um, so then the potential grant funding as has been discussed, but I I think with the DNR uh EC or emerging contaminant small and disadvantaged community funding, there's up to a $240,000 grant. Um, it's a reimbursement program and uh MSA utilized that on on the elementary school up in Manakqua. So I guess and what we're proposing for for this part of the project is to do the evaluation and do the study and the preliminary design. So I think we'd like to confirm uh some things if if there is a possibility for a deeper well or reconstructing. I guess that would have the long the lower long-term uh cost to the school. Um, but I think there's there's good reason to think that that may not be uh that good of an option. I
043guess things that I'd recommend immediately or in the near future is to sample the irrigation well and potentially another um private well around the school district area and see how widespread the PAS is. Um, and and I think the to help with the sizing, I think one other near-term recommendation would be to to meter um just because if you have pumps that can do 110 and that's more based off of the DSPS uh methodology of sizing, you may be able to downsize the the treatment and lower the project costs if if you know the true use and the true peaks uh which would typically occur at the beginning of the day and that lunch at the lunch period and maybe at the end of the day. Um so I think once once if we get
044through this study phase MSA would prepare uh cost estimates um for the projects uh and the recommend and have a recommended project that would be um that we'd submit for the grant application as was mentioned it was due September 30th of this year. Um, and with that preliminary design, there would be laying out how the vessels would fit in, making sure there's enough room, uh, confirming backwash requirements, and did the floor drains have the capacity to take the the backashing events? And then there'd be a meeting with the school district to to review and make sure we're all on the same page with the the design and the approach going into uh the grant application. So um our proposed fee is $7,000 for the the mitigation study and we'd have that done within two months
045of approval. So I guess I'll leave turn it to the board if there's any questions about MSA's proposal. >> So I mean you're going to be installing meter probably school is letting out in within you know two or three week period. So you know if your meter is is measuring water usage during the summer it's not going to be accurate. And you know if we uh the deadline for the submitting the proposal is September 15th. Is that the right date? >> September 30th. >> 30th. >> Yeah. So we okay we could get maximum usage sometime middle of September with that meter >> possibly or you could I guess there are strap on meters where you don't have to have a plumbing a plumber done and might still be able to capture some peak data um
046before the end of the school year. And I guess without that we're going to make assumptions um as to what the sizing would be. >> Okay. Have you thought at all about a UV system um for bacteria? >> Um so for for the UV system um I guess it does it has some credence if if there's low flows and and biological buildup on on the media. Um, I guess that would be something that um may or may not be absolutely necessary. There isn't uh a history of backt samples um or bad back tees at at the school here. Um so I guess that would be part of the design is to look into that. What is the cost difference of replacing the resin versus the carbon? >> Good question. Um and with that there are
047some some unknowns in the future as to um what what is you know where does this where does the media go? How can it does it have a second use and a repurpose? Uh, I guess typically what we find is the resin costs a little bit more um than the granular activated carbon, but you have to replace it less frequently. Um, so often they tend to be fairly close in terms of uh long-term change outs and often and there's less annual uh there's less exchange resin compared to to granular activated carbon. So that also um kind of balances out the cost. Um I guess on the on the system that we designed in Monaco Hazelhurst, we were estimating um $12,000 just for per vessel for a media change out. So um that could be a
048cost that we'd want to estimate, provide a good estimate to the school to understand what the what the cost could be in the future. And how many vessels would we have? >> It'd have two vessels. So they'd operate in a lead leg situation. Um so they would go the water would pass through both in series and then um and then once you've determined that PAS was breaking through or detectable in the first vessel then you'd switch uh replace the media in one and then reverse the flow and and go and use the second vessel initially as the first vessel and and keep going back and forth uh throughout the life of the treatment. >> That's not what I care about. So, $24,000 approximately for the two vessels. And how often is that replacement period approximately?
049>> Um, I would say maybe one to three years. It depends. Um, I think this is relatively fairly uh lowle PAS concentrations. Um, hoping to get, you know, around that 3 years between vessel change outs. >> Okay. Thank you. Any other questions? >> Thank you. That was very informative. Would want to know about PAS mitigation. >> Yeah, it's un unfortunate that you have to deal with it. Um, I guess looking around it, there are other communities nearby that that do have um, PAS and are are dealing with it, but I guess this concentrations here seem to be um, yeah, more significant and um, so I guess here to to help and be a resource um, and try to help the the school with the the PAS contamination. >> Thank you so much. Thank you. So
050I guess we need to choose one of these for the engineering proposal. >> Thoughts on >> if I need to ask Dick what have we all just did with it because it's a school. >> Well that's what I mean. That's what I'm >> It's probably not, but the school is >> somebody comes back and says >> medical condition was caused by pe and you're wonder >> has it always has it has would it always have been there or is it just >> appeared not how does that >> luckily we're not in around or any paper else because um I can't remember the town near lander. Uh, but they are off the scale with >> But I mean, he talked about the waste treat, you know, could come from waste treatment plants that's been over there
051for a long, long time and we're just finding it. Oh, >> you mean our our our um >> and we're just finding it in the water now. >> Yeah, >> I know you're not. Sorry. I think it's part of testing and just the technology to detect it has improved. But also these are the forever chemicals that we've been using for the past 75 200 years and that's what happens. They just kind of accumulate over time. So it's teflon. It's like it's >> teflon is one of the most common compounds you know in cooking. It's good. >> But anyhow, >> well, does anybody have any Well, I >> I just like the idea of having both the option of the resin and the carbon. Um, so just >> yeah, >> I think the reason MSA went
052with I'm making an assumption here, so this is just an interpretation, but I think the reason he went with the resin rather than the carbon is the size and the space of our building where REI didn't come out of the gate making that determination until he has more numbers to be able to say what the option is. I think MSA made the determination that we wouldn't be interested in a conversation about additional space, which I learned today that actually additional space or yesterday is and could be a part of the grant. So, if you look at a system coming in at $90,000 and then I have to just add 10 feet to a building, I don't know what I can do that for full disclosure, but I might be able to get all of that
053into um into the system. I will say that the carbon system, the numbers that were given as total estimates was $3 to $5,000 for replacement rather than the 24,000. I have a hard time swallowing an, you know, every three-year cost of $24,000 if I could put a system in that's $3 to $5,000. So, I think at the end of the day, both references, we did references on both companies. They both came back good. Both companies have put systems into a to school systems. They're just new. So, we don't have that data on that replacement cost. I think we either one that we would choose will serve our purpose well. Um we'll be able to get that deadline in to the grant um to be able to determine. My understanding is the meter on the system
054if we make the if the board makes a decision tonight, we can get that meter fairly quickly. We have two weeks left to be able to get the numbers. That's the biggest piece is our wells can produce way more than we consume. And so the question is if we build to the capacity of the well we would need additional space and that's why they want to find out what the consumption is to be able to say this is what your consumption is that I could build at this size and be able to go that way. So the first the first presentation he he he wanted he's basing his usage a lot on all of the you know faucets and the um >> about the DSPS guy though. >> Yeah. So he's he's just doing you
055know and I suppose if they're all running at maximum amount that's what he's going to base his on. And the second guy is actually going to put a meter in. Um >> I don't think he was talking to put a meter. He's telling us to put a meter. first guy was talking I was he was talking about >> I don't think he was going to put the meter >> he was saying we we wanted to know that >> my understanding is that they would provide the meter to put on the well >> so I mean we could okay so the first guy I don't know the range of this is like 4,000 15,000 for the the mitigation study and the sizing of the of the so that's quite a quite a range This guy narrowed
056it down to seven. But >> no, I think wasn't his 4,000 for the study. >> Yeah. >> And it was 15,000,000 for the design. >> For the design. >> Oh, okay. >> Cuz they can only 4,000 is nonreimburseable >> For the study >> and their study was 7,000. >> Yeah. And we came upon this information as a result of what? >> So, um, the DNR reached out to us when I first got here two years ago and asked if we were interested in um having a conversation about accessing grant dollars for the well treatment of PES. At that point in time when we took a look at it as a district, nobody had done it yet. So there wasn't any data around that reoccurring cost. So we shied away from it. DNR reached out to
057me again this year to say, "Hey, the grant funds are available. you know, your numbers. Like I said, we don't have numbers that would cause for us to be cited for a violation. We have numbers that would say you need to monitor every 3 to four months. So, we thought, well, this is a great opportunity if we can get a system in place. So, then the DNR provided me with um districts and community entities that have put these systems in place. So, I called those people. They then connected me to the engineer firms that they used and then I reached out to those engineer firms. We had conversations as a leadership team with the two engineer firms, asked them to create the proposal to bring the proposal to you. This is not my expertise. Um,
058we need to have engineers being able to determine what is the best fit for us. Like I said, I believe both companies would be very viable. Um, I am a little concerned about the resin system and the replacement cost piece because that's an unknown that that we don't know where the carbon um is a little less of a replacement cost that's reoccurring that it's not able to be built into the grant. >> Have I heard you right though? I'm not trying to get sick about this. I am often sick in my old age. The other option don't do anything. We just have to monitor every 3 or four months, right? >> Correct. >> But if we if we >> and then if we go over then we're going to pay for a bucket. >> Well,
059there's no grant like then you lose the opportunity for the grant writing on the fence a >> system. Huh? for the system >> for the system. >> Even though that your numbers aren't at such difficult health risk, >> but if you don't take advantage of this, you're going to have to replace it. You got to do it on your own eventually. That makes no sense. >> It depends on what happens to our numbers. It's not knowing. >> No, I would think the I I'm just think I'm as a slavement now. You would think they would have a system if you had a real bad situation then like anything else the government would come in and help you solve the problem. >> Which government? >> Well, the state's money. And now they're saying, "But you your
060numbers aren't really that bad. But if you don't take care of this now, >> yeah, >> you're not going to be covered in the future." But why is there what's the logic of that? >> The money is available. >> The money's available now. >> Where's the money going? >> The money is coming from federal. This is federal dollars flowing to the state >> and that won't be a good chance right now that might be lost. >> They don't even know if they're going to get this route. >> Yeah, because right now the EPA is is lowering their standards or their um what would I say action levels on FOBS. And um my advice would be um take advantage of the funds right now that are available now. >> Is is there a motion to accept
061one of these proposals or not proceed with the study? >> Well, if we okay, so if let's say ARI designs a system for us, we still have to bid it out. So we'd still have to get another bid from the other company. >> No, we just No, we would move. So you're making the determination to go with that engineer. Then that engine there's contractors that would have to be hired. And that is one of the conversations that both companies said is it's hard to find contractors up in this area that actually know how to install these systems. And so we would be relying on those contractors, but that would be all handled by the engineering. So, >> so they would they would contract it out. I mean, they would ask >> they basically take over
062the project management for it, which I would be very grateful for because this is not my expertise. >> Talk about instruction assessment curriculum. I'm all in. But >> yeah, I I thought I had a well kind of a weak presentation, but you know, he's geocientist. is not his forte. Um, so just understand this not to belabor. So we're going to get a grant. Go ahead. We're going to get a grant to take care of this problem. And it's possibility that in the very near future the feds may change the limits. So we won't even do this in the first place. >> Raise the limits. Just >> they won't lower the limits. They'll raise them. >> Raise the limit. So you don't even do it. Okay. No. You sure about that? No. No. No. I'm just
063saying what I what I just heard as >> So what just happened? So two I don't >> I'm saying that but basically the limits are getting w the state of Wisconsin is lowering the limits as of July 1 that align to what the fed limits are. So right now we're not in alignment with the fed limits. We're going forward as a July one to inc to lower that's not so lowering the limits of PAS in our water >> lowering the maximum amount. >> Yeah. >> I would like to see us support one or the other proposal because there are dollars available. >> Okay. >> I do you need a motion on which company or just a motion to >> on a company. I know I like the cheaper option the less up front the less
064well the replacement versus >> they both offer the same >> and that first guy also talked about the we don't not that we need it but just as a fail safe or whatever >> the the UV UV treatment on the back end whatever I I would make a motion to go ahead with REI as a contractor. I'll second >> questions or discussion. >> All in favor say I. >> I post. Motion carries. Thank you. >> Um we're going to go back to reports and try to get through these. Mr. Schaefer, you have anything you'd like to highlight? >> Well, it's hard to follow up that conversation. Um this uh this last month uh May we we had an opportunity to appreciate our teachers for teacher app appreciation week and not only that we extended it
065to all staff. Uh we feel very fortunate um and it was a tremendous opportunity to recognize the contributions um our teachers make each and every day. Uh, Sebast I feel is very fortunate to have teachers and staff members who invest their time, energy and care into supporting our students. Uh, not just academically, socially and emotionally. I think as we know all great schools are built on relationships. Uh, our staff work tirelessly to create these longlasting relationships as well as environments where students can feel safe, encouraged, uh, supported and and challenged. Um the impact that our teachers have on students goes well beyond uh graduation as well as um we're just all incredibly grateful for their dedication, professionalism, and all that they do for students. Uh we have so many teachers who go above and beyond
066what's asked of them and and doing whatever they can to help our students be successful. And I'm just very proud of uh the people I'm blessed to work with each and every day. It's a tremendous school and it was a great opportunity to honor them with uh the card of awesomeness bingo and and just kind of highlighting and having some fun and appreciating them for all the wonderful things that they do for our school. Sebastul is what it is because of the people who work here. So, um yeah, that's all I want to say. >> Okay. Thank you. Um we all have the athletic director gift report. So, if you had question, you can direct those superintendent report. Thank you. Um, first and foremost, I want to make a shout out to our team that
067presented at the state was conference. We were accepted to present at the national rural schools conference in October. That'll be Mr. Hilts, Katie Broers, Sue today, and myself. Um, presenting on closing that academic achievement gap for our students that are in poverty. So, huge shout out to the work that happened um over the last five years um looking and identifying students and being able to close that academic achievement gap. So, that's wonderful. Just a quick couple of updates um buildings and grounds. Before we go on, I just wanted to mention that we have a nice um blurb in the uh state schools association on the presentation. So, we'll shout out on that. >> Just fantastic work. not many people are able to close that gap. Um, couple of things. We're waiting on the engineer on
068our library. Um, so until we hear from the engineer on what we need to do there or what the recommendation is, we're kind of in a pause. Um, we did meet with the insurance company today and do believe that we should have something within the next couple of weeks to be able to bring to the buildings and grounds committee to make a decision about that. We do have a couple of bids um for our locker room flooring and our kitchen flooring and we'll bring those to buildings and grounds in early uh June. I was going to say January, but we're not there yet. And then the last piece I want to mention is a shout out to our DI teams. We have six teams for the first time attending globals. So, we make globals often,
069but not have we ever had all of our teams, to my understanding, meet globals. So that's a huge accomplishment. The time commitment that those students and staff and coaches put in is incredible. It's absolutely incredible. So good luck. I think they compete on Friday if I understand correctly. Um and we'll we'll hear from them. So then you >> Thank you. Anything from finance that we need to hear? No. Okay. Um we don't have a student here tonight. I don't have anything. Um, athletic committee, >> we have >> a hand. Yeah. Is there anything we need to hear about important tonight on legislatively? So, >> yes, unfortunately, >> I think we all know that we >> we don't need to talk about that any further. It's we, you know, >> shut down. Uh the WFD is
070calling on the governor and the legislature to return to the table and to set aside the political gamesmanship and find a path forward on behalf of Wisconsin students and communities that support them. You know, Dwayne does some good work and so does those other groups, but I've been on this board for 20 years and they're always talking about calling on the legislature, calling on the government. They have blue written commissions and nothing gets done. Nothing changes. I think we have to think out of the box and find a diff a different group to go to those legislators. It needs to be needs to be business people and a group of taxpayers that say that's enough because for 20 years we've spun our wheels. >> Lobbying costs money. >> Lobbyists are >> I well so everybody's
071paying lobbyists and nothing's getting done. Right. >> So, >> I have this on my mind that >> there's a different path that needs to be taken. A different group of people somehow a a different message sent >> a paradigm shift. >> Huh. >> A paradigm >> because the message isn't getting through to them. >> No, I think I think it goes back to grassroots uh big organizations like that. I think it's incumbent upon us to take care of our own house. bring in our local legislators, look at them in the face and say, "What are you gonna do about this?" >> And we've done that. We've had a one time we've we've had Joel Kitchens for >> We haven't been here for a long time. We never talked about that. Joe's chairman of the education.
072>> We've talked she talks to him every month. >> Um I did attend his legislative session and there were ground swell of people there. And I also know 20 years ago, Gary B sat in front of us and said, "This is never going to change because if you take money away from someone and give it to someone else, those big schools, the big the schools that are getting all the money >> are going to yell and scream." Gary Biden, I think he he hit the nail right on the head. The same goes in healthcare. The rules at the bottom of the feeding trough and the big medical centers and the big 500, 600 and 800 bed hospitals take the the bulk of the feed and big cities take the flow and it slowly gets out
073to rural because they were left over and that's the same thing. It's the same. They have more pow we don't have it all. They have multiple legislators who cover their areas. They have bigger pockets and more loggers. I think this is the this is the I think it's the way it is. >> Well, WB has just released a survey through school perceptions. So, you can have input into that survey. I would encourage everyone to do that and uh provide your thoughts to uh what you think WSB is doing or shouldn't be doing or what else you would recommend. I think what the BASB should do is put together a report to all the school boards where where they have been successful and where they have failed, what they've been working on and just a report
074card. >> Yeah. Well, that's what the survey of. >> No, it's no don't survey as they tell us. They know what they've been working on. They know where they've been successful. >> Yeah. But I mean some of us kind of like I think what Lisa is saying you can hit continue hitting your head against the wall so long and if you you can set things may not work. I don't know what works in this it's it's all screwed up. >> I I don't know what works either but it's not working. >> This isn't working. So you have to look what other ways are there to make it work. >> And I think I don't I I think it'd be interesting to bring you the legislator in here and say this isn't working. What do you
075recommend? >> It can't hurt. >> Joel would support the funding. >> No, that's not the question. >> Special ed. >> The question is the way schools work in their lobbying efforts appears not to work. You're close to the you're close to the fire. You're close to the action. What do you see? What changes do we make to get our message across? >> I don't mean this politically. It's going to sound political. I don't mean it that way. Let's bring the governor here and say why did you veto? >> He didn't. No governor. >> Didn't the governor meet? >> But let's bring >> Governor Governor Quitting his job. >> Let's bring some of Well, anyway, so that's my grant for tonight and I've got it in my mind. I don't know what the answer is. Okay.
076Um, we have a second reading of policies. A motion. I would move to approve the second reading of policy 4213 student supervision and welfare and policy 8462 child abuse and neglect. Second >> questions or discussion? All in favor say I. Opposed carried. >> Um then we are looking to approve the Johnson Controls contracts contract. So this is an annual contract that we have with Johnson Control. Um as I shared in my board memo, this is a slight increase. Our um wish with the increase is to be able to address the um ongoing heating and cooling issues that we've had at second floor. Also to um do some general maintenance on our building across the system and be able to increase our ability to be more consistent and have a better performing HVAC system across the
077board. I'll make a motion to approve the service contract for Johnson Controls. >> Second. >> Questions or discussion? All in favor say I. >> Opposed? Motion carry. >> Um then we to renew the school resource officer. >> So the resource um contract has historically been a three-year contract. Last year we just did a single year moving back um superintendent of Jibralter and Superintendent of Southern Door met and brought to forward to um the county or the SRO three-year contract seeking for you to approve that. That is a huge asset to our district for community and just awareness across the board. Our SRO is is an invaluable resource for us. >> I agree. But just a question when this all started I'm just asking the school board members. When we first started this, was this not
078a free service provided by the sheriff's office? >> It wasn't free. It was a split cost between the county. >> Yeah, the county paid a big chunk of it and we paid the balance, but the county do they pay any of it now or is it >> No, it's all us now without >> I'm just saying that's how it started. The county they >> So, did we ever ask the county why they changed it? I I asked last year and um she was unable to do anything and this year was >> she um budget >> but her budget is approved by your supervisor. >> Yeah. But no, she could have kept this in the budget and they could have debated that. >> This is just an easy way out. I'm going to say my budget
079so I'll just take this out. My understanding is that she had tried and again tried this year because we said it would be really nice to have a 9010 8020 but they were unable to budge and as >> 5050. >> Yeah. I mean this is really local. So why don't we just ask our county reps why they are in favor of buring this with more costs? They they're people down the street from us. They're the ones that vote right in. I mean, this is we're talking about what we just talked about at the state. Now, this is at a local level and we can't even ask our county representatives why they changed the policy. >> I think >> because they didn't have money in their budget. >> I think we said if we don't cover
080the cost and not against the service, >> don't get me wrong. I think though as a responsibility to our taxpayers that you know why this is a big budget cost. >> We should be able to ask the county why they changed the policy. >> Well, I think the sheriff submits her budget >> their budget >> to the county board, >> right? >> Okay. So, really it's in the sheriff's department's decision in their budget to include Yeah, >> but the county actually gave her the message. >> Well, we don't know anything about that. >> Well, we know how government works. For God's sakes, we're yesterday. >> I move to approve the contract renewal for the school resource officer. >> Second. >> So, you all don't care about why this just went up 100%. It's the bill
081without ever asking a single question. Well, we can approve the contract and then ask the question. >> I know a county board member and I will ask for some background. >> Is our >> huh? >> U one of our county board representing last >> I don't I know a different one that'll answer me that'll look into it and answer me. >> Dale I'll ask I'll pick on DO. >> Okay. Very good. >> Okay. Um there's a motion and a second >> to approve the school resource officer contract. All in favor say I. >> Opposed. Motion carried. >> Um and we look to approve the CISA7 services contract. This is a professional development contract for CISA 7 services. They're invaluable for our instructional coaching and leadership to be able to continue the growth around academic achievement,
082closing achievement gaps and the integration of our ELLL and special education population to close those achievement gaps for the future. This is the same um number of days and resources that we use this current year. I make a motion to approve this 7 service contract for 267. >> Second. >> Questions or discussion? All in favor say I. >> I. >> Opposed. Motion carry. Um then we look for approval on the 26 27 athletic handbooks. Make a motion to approve the 26 27 athletic samples as presented. So ability to change anything for spelling or whatever >> questions or discussion. >> Is there a group of parents to >> athletic committee? >> I'm a parent. I reviewed it. >> Okay. >> Jeff's a parent. >> Brook's a parent. >> Could you restate your motion? It was hard
083to hear back here. >> Right. This >> Yes, it's hard to hear. >> Uh make a motion to approve the 26 >> 2026 2027 athletic handbook with provision of being able to make any uh spelling changes. >> Second, >> I've reviewed 50 years of handbooks from the time I was in school until now. >> Just for your information, Mr. report. >> Thank you. >> All in favor say I. >> Such a fun thing. >> I opposed. Motion carried. >> Then we look to approve the 2627 employee handbook including the salary and compensation guides. Just to highlight a couple of the changes. Um the personal leave updates. We removed the um requirement of staff to cover their sub costs in the unpaid leave. We clarified the travel expenses for staff that are attending professional development opportunities.
084Um we removed the salary ladder with a min and max for um certified staff, adding a longevity pay structure for certified staff beginning the 26 27 school year. Um added the longevity staff for um support staff. Adjusted the hourly rate stipens um to include the 2.6 63 that the board approved last month and then made some general edits for recommendation of legal on terminology and consistency across the document. >> I think I think it was a great move on the schedule, salary schedule and longevity pay. I think it's a positive move towards uh rewarding teachers that stay with our school for a long period of time and um I hope we can build on it. >> Is there a motion? >> I'd make a motion to approve the uh employee hand. >> Is there a
085second? >> I'll second. >> Questions or discussion? All in favor say I. >> I. >> Oppos. Motion carry. Um then we'll look to approve contracts. First the professional staff. >> So there were just some minor um really clarity points on the teacher contract that you had in your packet. Nothing significant, but I wanted the board to approve that contract language change. Um it didn't change any meaning. It just brought clarity to it. Is there a motion to approve the professional staff contract? >> Move the approved professional staff contract as presented. >> Second. Questions or discussion? All in favor say I. >> I. >> Opposed. Motion carried. Then the administrative contracts. you approved the um salary increase for all staff at the last board meeting of 2.63. This is just approving all the administrative contracts including
086superintendent with that 2.63 and no um content change in the contracts. >> I make a motion to approve administrative questions or discussion say I >> opposed motion carried. >> Was there a second? >> Then I just didn't hear it. >> Um yeah, who seconded that? >> I made the vote. >> No, I made the motion. I didn't >> I'll second. >> Thank you. Um then we have two new hires to um approve. Terresa Matsky is the school nurse. I'm excited to report that after you gave me permission to hire a health aid. Within the next week, we got an application for a part-time RN. We interviewed and um would bring Terresa Mansky with decades of um RN experience. So really excited to be bringing her on board and her schedule will be more conducive to
087our district needs of Monday through Friday and right now it's tenatively set at 11 to 3. So she's able to cover that noon med and the accidents that we have out on the playground which is typical needs of the school nurse. So very excited to to bring her to the board. not to burn you with those stuff. Now, since we're going to be the employee of an RN, >> correct? >> You're going to need a policy of how you annually review and make assures that her license is current, up to date, and there's been no issues with the state. >> Yeah, we've had a I worked with legal. I have a contract to be able to provide DRN with the supervision is defined in our handbook. I mean, we have to do the checking to
088the every every so many years to make sure she's still carrying her license and there's no other stuff out there. >> She provides that to us just like teachers do. So, our district employees responsibility is to pay for their license and to submit that license to DPI. Um, and we monitor that every year. So, if there's additional pieces that we need to know, um, I'll double check, but I believe we're in compliance with what we need to >> cuz Okay, because in my old world, we they didn't manage. We checked that out ourselves because there's there's computer banks of like physicians and all that stuff. We go and check all that. They don't come to us. It's just the website you can go on any license by the state. >> They have a process to
089do it >> well physician like clinicians have NPI numbers but like nursing you can go because it's the Wisconsin board of nursing so you can go add that to our wise patient is in or this nurse is in good standing >> add that to our wise >> license. Is there a motion to approve? >> I don't think so. I would make a motion to approve approve Theresa Matsky as the school nurse. >> Second. >> Questions or discussion? All in favor say I. >> Motion carried. And then Gretchen as an occasional bus driver. >> Yes. Um very pleased to present another bus driver to help relieve some of our route needs for our field trips and our sporting events. Um, she came licensed and is a mom of one of our students and is thrilled to
090be able to pick up some of our sports runs. So, >> awesome. So, how are we fixing the bus drivers now? >> Are we covered or based >> as best as they can be? >> Is there a motion to approve? >> He should be a lawyer. >> Mink as a bus driver, >> politician >> or politician. Yeah, better all the same. >> Second on second. >> Questions or discussion? All in favor say I. >> I. Opposed. Motion carry. >> Um, grad high school graduation is May 31st, so we should let Mr. Schaeer know if you are going to attend so he knows how many chairs to set. I plan to, but I'm the labor of delivery doctor. >> Always hold their breath. I'm sure. >> So, >> I plan to be there. >> Mr. War.
091>> Yes. >> Mr. White >> probably out of town. >> Mr. Isacson. >> Mhm. >> What? >> Oh, Keith. >> Yep. >> And I will be there. And then I think the note said we're supposed to let Brook Tom know if we're going to attend >> Yeah. >> 8ighth grade graduation. Uh, our next meeting is June 17th. Is there a motion to adjurnn? >> I make a motion to second. All in favor say I. I. >> Success. >> Post. Motion carried.