001meeting to order. Jackie, could you do the roll call, please? Kristen Bailey here. Nick Atwood here. Steve Buyers here. Jose Jquiz here. Boy, here. Mark Sherbad here. Anti Bayham. All right. And I'm going to make a slight adjustment just kind of with the agenda already. I'm gonna move the pledge of allegiance so we do it when we start open session just so the public's here for it. Do you want me to move that going forward then? Yes. I object to none of that. Good idea. Good idea. So at this point I will seek a motion to adjourn to close session for the purpose of the appointment. Yes. the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees, specific individuals who serve as an independent contractor in a park, recreational, or educational setting, or specific
002volunteers of the public body, or legal counsel for the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee, a specific individual who serves as an independent contractor in a park, recreational, or educational setting, or a volunteer of the public body, or against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity. However, a meeting to consider an increase in compensation to a specific employee of a public body that is subject to the local government wage increase transparency act may not be closed and shall be open to the public and posted and held in accordance with this act. Do I have a motion? So moved. Second. All right. discussion. Yes. There was a whole bunch of stuff listed here and just for transparency purposes I know we list a lot of things. Um,
003is there any way for the public we can specify what particular section of this without going counter to what we're talking about? In other words, without disclosing like which particular item here, there's a laundry list of items here. So, just for transparency purposes, there's a lot of stuff. I can ask Steve. I think we either can read just basically the 120-2 instead of reading the whole thing or or I need to verify. I I think more what Mark is looking for is is there a way for us to essentially say like we're discussing employment or we're discussing a contract or whatever. Well, we can, but what I hear is maybe some other things are going to be brought up. So, if I don't know that, I can't post it. Okay. Okay. So in that case,
004do we have any other questions or kind of concerns with that Mark or No, I transparency I I would like to see maybe going forward we can talk legal about if we can specify which which section going forward for the public. Absolutely. All right. Hearing no other questions. Jackie, could you do the roll call? Chris Bailey here. Yes or no? Yes. Oh, sorry. Steve Buyers, yes. JJ Jquz, yes. Christopher Boyce, yes. Mark Shervat, yes. Okay.