001I don't know what anybody else thinks, but your your weekly reports I find very in-depth, very informative, >> to the point yet verbose enough to give us the information. >> Yes, >> I've been accused of being verbose on many occasions, so that's okay. Thank you. >> No, they're appropriately agree. They're great. I hope >> Yeah. And I just want to thank you for all the time. I know you have spent a lot of weekends and evenings meeting with community members and groups and um just really appreciate the time and effort that you and your family are putting in. >> Of course. Thank you. >> Any further questions or discussion? Move on to the LTFM funds. >> So annually we have to uh look at the 10-year projection for LTFM revenue and expenditures. Um it's my
002understanding that in around 2019 we borrowed against our LTFM and that's really kind of put us in a hole for a while. Um so what I did was I put everything into a summary because the bulk of the LTFM document doesn't apply to anything that we're doing here and it makes more sense just to put it into a nice concise this is what we're going to get for levy. This is what we're going to get for state aid and this is what our expenditures are projected for for the year. Um the beginning balance of $876,000 and the negative was straight out of last year's audit. Um the revenues and expenditures for 2025 are where things are at currently. The 26 is what was budgeted and then everything else out here is a projection. Um, if
003we can be prudent with our spending and our LTFM, we can get out of this hole >> and sometime in 27 28 and then once we do, then we can put the pedal to the floor and get some projects done. >> Okay. >> So, but until then, we'll have to be a little bit more strategic about how we're using these funds. >> Okay. I like knowing that you're always conservative, but I was very happy to see how close that is to being around the corner. I thought it was much further out before we declared it. So, >> yeah. >> And of course, you know, depending on how things play out in those buildings. >> That's right. >> That we don't have any control over, >> right? it. You know, if we have a big expenditure
004that needs to happen to keep something moving, whether it's plumbing or electrical or >> or anything like that, obviously it's a it's a moving target, but hopefully the sooner the better we can get the into the positive. >> Great. >> Any other questions or discussion for Sean? All right, we'll move on to our student activity account related to SAD. >> Okay, so every year when the auditors come by, they want to look at our student activity accounts. They are looking for basically four main things. Are we using the funds appropriately? Do we have a statement of purpose that's been signed? Uh does it have a positive balance? And um is there activity in the account? Almost always a district gets dinged on one of those main the main three are the activity um negative balance
005or statement of purpose. As to far as far as I know at this point everything has a positive balance. We have statements of purpose for everything. We did have one activity account that had no activity this year which was sad. Um, and the auditors have told me that if we bring this to the board and say, "Yep, we recognize this activity had no activity in fiscal 25 and we wish to continue to operate it," then that satisfies their audit concern. So, I really want to get these audit findings on student activities gone. >> Yeah. Great. >> There's they're frankly kind of silly >> findings that we could easily avoid, >> right? So that's why we brought that to you. Looks like a little bit later on we'll be running on keeping that open despite the
006inactivity. >> Do does anybody know is there still a presence of SAD in the >> From what I've seen it's an every other year kind of thing. >> Okay. >> Just in looking back historically. >> Okay. So >> do we know who's in charge of it? When you when you say there's some activity in there, is that I mean, how are we talking like two or three,000 bucks or not even? >> Doesn't even have to be that. I don't think they I don't think there's a lot of dollars going through that account. >> Sorry, I thought I heard you say that there is some act, but there has not been >> there was no activity in fiscal year 25. No revenues, no 24 was there or >> there wasn't 24, not in 23. >> Okay.
007>> Is that what you mean by like every other year then? Okay. >> Yeah. And how much money are we talking like in 24? >> I I don't remember. >> Okay, that's good. >> Because I wonder like sometimes for things like that, you know, they'll do a like a mock crash or they'll bring in like a speaker or they'll do something like that and sometimes they just get a grant and those she'll have to find another. >> Okay. >> All right. Sounds good. And then how about a financial report, fund balance update, and some really cool graphs. >> Some really cool graphs. So, I'm just going to go right up to the board here and kind of just kind of play teacher even though I'm not a teacher. >> Um, so this chart looks probably
008a lot similar to some of the things that you've seen from previous finance directors. Um, so we've got our revenues here, uh, with our budget through 25, which is revised, and then our actuals. So, we can compare our year-to- date actuals with our revised budget all the way through. Um, currently we're looking at about $700,000 over what our revised budget is. That's what we like to see. Okay, that means that we did our budgeting correctly. Um, we already got some feedback to move the percentages from way over here to a more appropriate spot. Nate, just don't make anything. >> I'm trying not to. >> Um, sorry. And then below below this, we've got two different ways to uh explain our expenditures. Expenditures by program where we're looking at like is it administration um and wait
009here. So we can see what special education is, people support things like that. The one that I tend to prefer is expenditure by object just because that's just a personal preference. So salaries and salaries and wages, employee benefits, purchase services, uh supplies. You notice the numbers are all the same here because they're the same figures. It's just presented in a different way. Depends on how you want to look at it. Okay, I understand this is a wall of numbers. It can, you know, your eyes can go across to looking at it. So, uh, what I started doing the previous stop was went to a chart. So, just going to pull up the graph here real quick. So, first one is uh revenues by source. So all that same information just put in a nice handy
010bar graph in school colors or as close as Chad GPT would get it to. So I figured out that Chad GBT makes graphs a heck of a lot faster than Excel does. >> So hey, you know what? I'll tell I can tell it what font I want. I can tell it what colors to use, tell what's on the X and Y axis. >> And it's like 30 seconds to do. >> And it's on brand. >> It's at least as close. Yeah, >> I told it to I told it to darken the yellow and it went like to like an old gold yellow and like that's kind of gross. Um, so you can see local revenues 103.1%. Those are going to be like um tax, you know, property tax, things like that. So, um, maybe there
011was a slight change in the budget there. Um, state revenues means we did a pretty good job of budgeting our state here because we want to have that over 100%. It means we were nice and conservative on those budgets. But overall, it's a 10 2.4% of budget, which is perfect. And we'll go up to the expenditures one. Again, like I said, I prefer expenditures by object. So across here, we've got our salaries and wages and all of them here. One thing I do want to point out, the salaries and wages and the employee benefits is still missing one batch or two batches of the teacher payers. So that's going to account for about $2.4 million. Okay. So that is going to change where these end up, but not to the point where it's going to
012be hugely impactful as far as a negative situation. Okay. Um, any questions about the graphs and the wall of text, the wall of numbers before we move on to the next one. >> Do you guys want to see? So, this one's one that I haven't done a lot of before. Make it just a little bit smaller. Sure. Okay, so fund balance is something that we've all been talking a lot about here as we talk about levy and things like that. Um, so I've taken all of the data that produced the numbers and graphs and put it into where these buckets fall, right? 422 is obviously unassigned. Um, these are restricted accounts. We can only use them for certain amounts or for certain uses, right? So, like any other revenues we get for learning development, we
013have to follow what the state guideline is for that. Um, one thing I noticed obviously when I was preparing this is um some of these should have dollars in here. Um, haven't had a chance to get it fixed. So, I'll be reallocating a lot of this into these areas. So in order to get a little bit better of idea of where this is starting to settle, um that's what these transfers are. So right now operating capital 163,000 but expenditures of 547. We can't really have negative. So we're transferring this is say we're transferring 379 out of the general unassigned into operating capital. So this is looking at 3.3, but remember we've got 2.4 or sounds are still coming through here. Okay, this is very very preliminary. Um, as we get through as I start working
014through the audit breath a little bit more, this will start to crystallize a little bit better, but it does give us at least a starting point. Um, as Nad and I were talking after the budget committee in for July numbers, we won't have this extra uh payroll not included in here. We're only going to see this overhang at year end. >> So, it'll be a lot smoother. There's still going to be things I'm going to find that I need to change codings around to as we go through it. But, um, we go up a little bit, Nate. >> Sure. That's the general fund. Um, food service looks to be uh growing at a nice healthy rate. Same with community education. So again, very very preliminary. Um, but it at least kind of gives us general
015feeling where things are going. questions. >> Thank you, Sean. Thank you. >> I would just offer if um as Sean sits down um I'll look at Nadia and Alicia who were at the budget committee meeting earlier. Um any reactions, thoughts, budget committee meeting, any other things that you would want to share from our discussion that we didn't have? No pressure. If it if the answer is no, that's okay. Um I just think it's important to understand that those you know those um the things that were not coded correctly the and I think you said the revenues did hit like that that number is correct. >> Yeah. They're in the books. >> Yeah. So >> all the revenues have been accounted for. They're just not in the right buckets. >> Right. Right. So that's reassuring. >>
016Yeah. Thank you. Yeah. >> Okay. Do we have any old or unfinished business? I don't think there was anything that I thought of. All right, we'll move on to new business action on the line of credit. And this will be basically just a renewal. So, it's still active. Correct. >> Correct. >> And we have the full availability there. We haven't used any credit. >> Do you know how long it's been since we've had to dip into Not off the top of my head. I I believe >> I believe uh during fiscal 20 sometime in fiscal 24 it was touched. >> Not during your tenure. >> Not obviously not when I've been here. No good job. >> And all all three weeks that we had >> and that's at least one payroll. >> The goal is
017to make sure that I don't touch it. >> Right. Right. >> But it's nice to have the safety net there just in case. >> Okay. Do we have any questions or discussion on the line of credit? Otherwise, I would entertain a motion to move forward with that. >> Um, and then the only other thing I want to talk about with this because it's been a hot button topic in the past is I just want to verify that you have like we have the controls in place so we're getting appropriate notifications if we have dipped into it. Um, the >> I would hope so. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. That wasn't happening at one point. um the the finance director and neither nobody was >> reportedly nobody was getting notified. Um so I'm sure that's all
018been addressed but that would be my only request. >> Both Sean and I have gone down and we've signed on so they have our signatures and >> know who we are. >> Great. >> Okay. Great. >> Right. So you need uh >> make a motion to move forward with the line of credit. I make a motion to move forward with the line of credit. >> Second motion and a second. Any further discussion? >> Okay, we'll take a roll call vote. >> Carrie, >> I. >> Jeremy, >> I. >> David, >> I. >> Nadia, >> I. >> Lisa, >> I. >> Alicia, >> I. >> Kelly, >> I. >> All right, we'll move on to the resolution of safe and supportive schools. >> Carrie, if you'll read that resolution. Oh, in a second. >> Sure. >>
019Starting with background. Am I not? >> Why is this not okay? There we go. >> Couldn't get my >> Oh, there it is. Okay. >> Mouse. That's what I'm trying to say. >> Starting with where is >> um I think on this one start at the top. >> Okay. Whereas the education and safety of the children of Byron public schools, ISD 531 are our top priorities. And whereas the Byron school board is committed to the success of all students by providing a safe, secure, and supportive school district. And whereas we believe each of us individually and collectively are responsible for creating and providing a safe and supportive school environment for all students. And whereas the Byron staff is committed to create creating the conditions necessary to foster academic achievement for all students. Now therefore, be
020it resolved, Byron Public Schools, ISD 531, condemns all discrimination within our schools. Two, commits to fostering a school environment that promotes respect and curiosity of all cultures, affirms the equal humanity of all members of the community, and rejects all forms of bullying and discrimination. three commits to instituting schoolboard goals and policies and district educational curriculum that reflect the values expressed in this resolution. >> So that's the resolution. Are there any questions or any discussion about this resolution? >> I do have a question. Um so the resolution I mean we've we've always had this haven't we? We just reup this every year. >> Yes, that's correct. >> Okay. And then the policies that we have in place to deal with uh discrimination and all of that that comes into play if the if this resolution is
021broken somehow. Right. Okay. >> I don't know if she can hear your head. >> Oh, sorry. I'm sorry. Yes. Yes. Definitely practices and to make it so people aren't discriminated against. Yes. Lots of those. >> Okay. Any further questions or would entertain a Uh motion to accept the resolution. >> A motion to accept the resolution of the endorsement of safe and supportive schools. >> Second. >> Motion and a second. Any further discussions or question or we'll have a roll call vote. >> We have Carrie I. >> Jeremy >> I. >> David >> I. >> Nadia >> I. >> Lisa >> I. >> Alicia >> I. >> Kelly. >> Hi. >> Okay. Okay, we'll move on to action on the November operating referendum. >> Okay, I'm going to put a couple of charts up here. Sorry,
022this one. Um, as I indicated in the um, and I'm going to just use the agenda from the budget committee to kind of guide the discussion here. Um, as I uh indicated in my board report, the um after looking at all the information presented to us, um I feel comfortable um recommending to you that we ask the community for a $700 per pupil operating levy and that that levy is indexed to inflation um year-over-year and that the levy goes for 10 years, which is the maximum. Um, I also recommend that we do a second question on the ballot and that we would ask the um the folks for uh to approve a capital projects levy which would generate $250,000 of revenue annually for 10 years. Um, couple of facts on there. The first one is
023the tax impact for the operating levy ends up being about $36 for a $350,000 home. And that um the capital projects levy at um ends up adding an additional $3.75 per month on a $350,000 home. When you combine both of the revenues generated by these levies, um it ends up being a little over $2 million a year. Um, and it's important to note that those levies assuming passage would begin during the next school year. So that' be 2627. So there's there's no change in the upcoming school year. It's the next one that it falls into place. So this has been the question. This is kind of the the the question and then once um once we decide collectively what we want to do um then all the dominoes start falling. So, um, uh, for example,
024tonight, assuming that we come to an accord on on a question, um, I have a press release that I'll hand to Karen before she walks out the door. And >> breaking news. >> And, uh, and then starting tomorrow morning, I'll send them to uh, other news agencies. I'll send them to the staff. I'll send it to all the parents. And then um kind of the campaign begins. >> So >> do they get to see that breakdown then like that? >> Yeah. Cool. Yep. Yeah. We'll uh I'm not going to overwhelm them with a tsunami of information at first because they'll just they'll just get >> but all these charts and all these things that we've talked about um this ends up being the number and then we spend the from now until November telling them
025why that's the number. >> Um and we do it in a lot of different ways. So >> I feel good about this and and maybe somebody can help me with this but I think when we went out for 800 it brought in 1.7 question mark. So this really does set us the school better while still maintaining a better opportunity for the citizens I think by combining it this way. So I'm glad to see you put us together like that. Was it only 1.7 with the 800 per pupil? >> I thought it was either 1.7 or 1.9, but I can't >> in today's like the projected revenue for if we went for 800, it's it's just a little more than it's like 2,36,000. So the two questions combined are about the same as $800 a pupil.
026Um, this allows for a little bit less of a tax impact on the residents >> or on the residential homes um uh while ending up generating some more, you know, about that level that you were hoping for in the fall. We were hoping for in the fall. I wasn't here, but I'll just be part of it. >> Yes. >> Part of the team. >> Yeah. I feel like that like like this amount will allow the community to say, "Hey, they were listening to us." And so now it's 700 versus the 800 that we first went out for. And they really did listen to the community surveys and what we were comfortable giving. Um I don't know. What do you guys think? >> I agree. I think it's a good I think it's a good idea.
027Um, we talked at the budget committee, some budget committee members especially liked the two question option because it gives voters some power. Um, you know, if and I know we will do a good good job explaining why we need the capital projects levy for this, you know, the safety and security of our schools. And um but it gives people you know a little bit of power over our choice or you know like I guess how this affects them. >> Um yeah I think it's I think the two questions are good >> at the same time it still shows that we still need the same money. Right. >> Right. >> But we are giving the option. >> Right. Right. But we were trying to be creative and found a way to, you know, have it impact
028the average home buyer homeowner a little bit less. >> Um, but also because I do think it's not a great look if we come in lower and then people are like, "Oh, they didn't even need that much last time. They can get by on less." But this is showing like, "No, that's not true because we know it's not right." Um, yeah, I think it's a really good I think it's a really good Any other discussion questions? Because this is where once uh once we have this decision locked in, we can start promoting and set and delivering the message to the community of what we're looking for, why we're looking for it, and the impact it will have. and and so in addition to starting to talk more I mean we're obviously going to be open
029about the numbers um in the back end a few things that start happening is we connect with Ellers our financial advisor to to let them know that hey we voted on this these are our numbers and then we also get the attorneys working on official ballot language and that at the August 4th meeting you'll be voting on because we have to have that submitted to the state by August August 12th at the latest. >> Okay. >> Um and then um when the administrators come back, which is the first week of August, um one of the most important parts of our communication is to say what happens if the levy passes and what happens if it doesn't. And so when they come back, um I'm going to be working with them on what those lists look
030like. So for the next, you know, let's call it a week and a half. Um, we're more going to be speaking in glittering generalities, to use a propaganda term. Um, but, uh, as as the as August starts arriving, uh, we're going to be a lot more specific. >> So, question, but on the ballot is these questions are spaced, right? Okay. >> Yeah. So, there's there's one, and the way the operating levy um question reads is it'll say $700 a pupil. So, part of the challenge of winning an operating levy is you have to help people realize that's not $700 a month in taxes or $700 a year in taxes, >> right? >> You know, you So, that's really because you can't put how much, right? >> Because everybody's different, right? >> Right. >> And so,
031that's part of the challenge of question one. Um, for question two, I'll admit I haven't I haven't haven't run a capital projects levy campaign before, but I do know as part of that ballot language, in addition to speaking of, you know, here's the amount of money the district is going to generate, um, you also have to list what your intended uses for it are. And so the attorneys help us with language that allows us to um to both confine the funding to the tech sources that are allowable while also providing us a certain degree of flexibility as technology changes over time. >> What's the length of the capital projects? >> They're both 10 years. >> Okay. >> Yeah. the capital P. The other thing to know about the operating levy um because as we communicate
032this with the citizenry, this will come up. The school board is allowed to renew an operating levy one time as long as it's the exact same thing. Um and you could renew that any time up to, you know, year nine of it. Um the capital projects levy, uh you you don't have that power eight or nine or 10 years to to renew. So that just um we obviously can go back to the borders and ask at that time. So >> for question two to make it through, does question one have to make it through or are they independent of each other? >> Yes, it is conditional on question one. >> Okay. >> Good question. >> Does anyone have any concerns about Yep. Muted. Um, so there is no one without the other. It's a package
033deal. All or nothing. Is that right? >> One can pass without two, but two can't pass without one. >> Okay. I mean, I think 700 is the best number that we can do. >> We probably still need 800, but 700 is feasible to the community. I think we need to do that. Agree. I'm prepared to make a motion, but I want to make sure everyone's questions or concerns are addressed before I do that. Does anyone else? Lisa, any other questions or concerns before we Okay. No. Didn't correct me if I'm wrong. into all the groups when we looked at them say I think the $30 mark per month was where they wanted to be and we're going just above that just a little bit. >> Right. And it sounds like there's some data that shows
034us like under that $40 mark is kind of the magic number just looking at >> um >> yeah the the community survey said 40 was >> an electrified rail. won't touch that. >> Okay. >> Um but the the real question was how quick does the support drop off between 30 and $40 a month. So it is true that there there was I'll call it 55 45% support for 30 and then the 40 was a no. And so it is true that um not only the operating levy independent is above that but then also when you combine the two of them they're both above that as well. >> And does it both does it have to be a unanimous decision or majority? majority >> and I'm with with you on the you know am I nervous
035yet but I think with the communication >> right >> and the marketing I I think we can justify why we couldn't do 30 >> I think that's going to be the hard work right there is we have to make sure that this isn't for us this is for the the students this is for you know the well-being of our students and we aren't doing them a service if we're not meeting in this point. So, I think it could be risky. I I think but at the same time, we're not I don't for those just extra couple dollars, I don't think we're going to solve as much as we could if we had a different price point for just a couple extra dollars. I it's a tough decision >> cuz we are listening but but when
036you provide the back story and and let allow people to understand what this serves, who it serves, that that's where the work is. That's what we need to do. That's our job to to get that information out so they know that we are listening because if we take away programs or if we take away teachers you didn't listen >> and that is going to happen. So either way so I think that this is it's much better to help the students. So >> and to me the bottom line is if we go lower than this we will be right back here very shortly. So, I feel like this is I do think this is kind of the lowest we can um >> consider per that's how I personally feel any other questions or concerns we should
037talk about. Okay. I make a motion to um add two questions to the ballot in November for the operating levy. Question one would be asking voters for operating levy at $700 per pupil with adjusted with inflation and question two would be a capital projects levy asking for $250,000. Okay, >> we have a motion on the floor. Do we have a second? >> Second. >> Motion and a second. Any questions or discussion on the motion? >> Was there anything I forgot that I should have added to that motion before we >> for a period of 10 years? >> 10 years. >> Oh. Oh, 10 years. Thank you. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Yeah. Thanks. >> All right. So, uh, we will take a roll call vote, please. >> Yep. Carrie. >> Hi. >> Jeremy. >>
038Hi. >> David. >> Hi. >> Nadia. >> Hi. >> Lisa. >> Hi. >> Alicia. >> Hi. >> Ellie. >> Hi. Wonderful. You'll take it from here to the attorneys and >> this. All right. >> We don't have to write the questions. >> Well, it's all boilerplate language. >> So, they've made it many years ago and they still charge $300. >> All right. Now, we'll review and possible take action on the open enrollment weight list. Okay. So, the recommendation is just for the one student in 9th grade and to remain uh to keep the rest of them on the wait list. Is that correct? >> We only have one. >> Yeah, there's only one student in grade. >> Gotcha. Okay. I guess I I got thrown off when I saw the red at the top. >>
039I I was nervous when you asked the question like that. I was like, I don't know what you're talking about. I was confused to take one ninth grader and then I look I'm like we got a weight list for five grades >> like and even prepared me and I don't know what you're talking about. >> I over complicated. >> So we're looking for a motion to approve one ninth grade student from the wait list to be accepted for enrollment. >> Yes. >> Yep. >> Anyone have any discussion about >> does this student the student doesn't have any uh siblings in the Byron public schools? Not that I'm aware of. >> That part we don't know of. Yeah. >> Okay. We put us. >> So that student is not included on here, right? It would be
040202 instead of 2011. >> Are you sorry, my computer's kind of wonky right now. Sorry, it's just this computer's a little wonky tonight. So, >> are you looking at the enrollment sheet? >> Yes, the working copy. I just updated that today. So, right now we're at 2011 for registered kiddos. So, that would include that >> I think you may be looking I'm the same one. We have 2011 registered in red and then three >> and then we have one student moving out. So even with this one coming in >> that's okay. >> Okay. Any questions or discussion? Uh if not would entertain a motion knowing what to do with the weight list student. >> I make a motion to approve enrollment for the one weight listed nth grade student. Second motion and a second. We'll
041have a roll call vote. >> Yep. So Carrie >> I. >> Jeremy >> I. >> David >> I. >> Nadia >> I. >> Lisa >> I. >> Alicia. >> Hi. >> Kelly. >> Hi. >> All right. We'll go back to our 10-year LTFM revenue and expenditure. This is a resolution. Um I think it's just >> down here. Just that little >> Yeah. >> just be resolved in plan. >> Be it resolved that the school board of independent school district number 531, state of Minnesota approves the attached uh FY27 long-term facilities maintenance 10-year plan. That's it. That's it. >> Good. >> All right. Any questions or discussion on the 10-year plan that uh Sean had presented? Is there anything we should have asked? I feel like it seems like you said it's >> it's kind of
042a fluid plan, >> right? >> Cuz you're looking at 10 years down the road, >> right? >> As long as our buildings behave, we'll be just fine, >> right? >> Okay. >> Right now, the main part of the plan is to dig out of the hole. >> Yes. So, a lot of times if if we wouldn't be in a hole, we'd be we'd have more protracted discussions about, oh, we're doing this phased approach to replacing sidewalks or, you know, we want to start swapping off rooftop units or whatever. But, um, >> that makes sense. >> Yeah. >> There's not not much fun to talk about besides pay the bill, >> right? >> Yeah. Is there a list of like Jim Hegna has a list of potential like hey this is coming up down the road.
043I do you have one started? >> I I met with the the lead custodians last week and we're going I'm going to be doing walkthroughs with each of them in their buildings and we're going to have a list. I think there was a partial list somewhere that was started but we're going to work together. We're going to work together and get a nice list going. >> Thank you. Okay. If no further questions or discussion, would look for a motion. >> Make a motion to for the adoption of the foregoing resolution. >> Second. >> Motion and a second. >> Uh roll call vote, please. >> Yep. So Carrie >> I. >> Jeremy, >> I. >> David, >> I. >> Nadia, >> I >> Alicia, >> I. All right, we'll move on to action on the SAD
044student activity account. >> I feel like we've already discussed it. Um, so I make a motion to recognize that SAD did not have any activity during fiscal year 25 and continue to keep the account open going forward. >> Second. All right. Motion and a second. Any further discussion? >> Roll call vote, please. >> Jerry, >> I. >> Jeremy, >> I. >> David, >> I. >> Nadia, >> I. Lisa, >> I >> Alicia, >> I uh action on the Minnesota State High School League dissolution resolution and this is regarding the Alpine Girls Skiing Co-op. Um we had girls in that. >> Yes, a few I think. Okay. Not very many, but a few. >> That's a Cool thing I didn't have any idea about. >> I know. I'm curious if this co-op dissolves if they'll be
045able to continue a co-op without material. Okay. Okay. Great. Great. >> Great question. >> All right. Um I believe that you have to start and read the whole thing. >> Okay. Whereas it is the desire of the school board of independent school district 531 of Byron Minnesota to dissolve the alpine girl skiing co-op with Lewon Alura Byron Rochester John Marshall Carter WA Wabasha Kellogg Lake City and Rochester Lords in grades 7 through 12 effective July 21 2025 due to Lewon Alura dropping from the or dropping the activity for lack of interest and to save res uh >> registration. Thank you. State resignation registration fees. Be it resolved that the school board of independent school district 531 does hereby agree to approve the dissolution of co-op agreement between Lewon Alura Byron Rochester John Marshall Carter Wabasha
046Kellogg Lake City and Rochester Lords for Alpine Girl Ski for students in grades 7 through 12 commencing on the above dates. >> Okay. Any other questions or discussion on this? Look for a roll call vote. >> Need a motion. >> Motion to approve the resolution. That's right. >> Second. >> All right. How about a roll call vote now? >> Carrie. >> I. >> Jeremy. >> I. >> David. >> I. >> Nadia. >> I. >> Lisa. >> I. >> Alicia. >> Hi. >> Ellie. >> I. >> Okay. Do we have a Zed update? That's probably this week, isn't it? >> It actually is. We do not have one in the month of July. So we we in June we went over the the graduation um which was in May. Um we 20 graduates. Um we honored
047staff at the end of the year with the school lunchon in June. Um and then we pretty much did a lot of our um rehires for the next year. And then um I was wondering did you get your new super meeting with Patrick? What do you think? >> Yes. Uh he's phenomenal. I had my uh tour of the place today. >> It's amazing. >> Anyway, I told him I said uh not that I'm the most welltraveled person on in Minnesota even, but I I think you'd be hard pressed to find a better building for special education co-op than that one. I mean, >> just the amount of intentionality and long range planning and just like thinking about kids and what they need. I I don't know if I've ever been in a building like that.
048So >> you can literally call somebody to tell them to turn the heat up or turn it down. >> Yeah, >> that's it's super cool. If you haven't been there, I recommend. So Patrick will take anybody out. So >> have all of our members do it yet? >> And we can go up to three at a time. So if anybody wants to go, I'll even take you out to I love the place. >> I encourage you phenomenal. >> It's awesome. >> Okay. >> Byron City Council update. Lisa, I know you were running a million miles an hour. Did you happen to make it? Uh, no. And actually, I talked to Al and uh Justin Blum before their meeting the day before and they said, "Don't even worry about it. It'll be like a 15minute meeting
049and there's nothing to cover." So, >> okay. >> I didn't go. >> Perfect. >> I The only thing I would add is I am collecting data about the I don't know what we're calling it, the land swap issue. Um, but anyway, I do have some estimates on what it takes to repair the repair a >> parking lot. >> Thank you. End of a Monday. Yeah, repair the parking lot. Um, and then also I'm just trying to collect some data on market conditions for land so that we can make a good decision. So, >> appreciate that. Thank you. >> All right. Any questions or uh discussion on the consent agenda as presented? If not, we' entertain a motion to approve the consent agenda. So move >> second >> motion and a second. Roll call vote, please.
050>> Carrie, >> I. >> Jeremy, >> I. >> David, >> I. >> Nadia, >> I. >> Lisa, >> I. >> Alicia, >> I. >> Kelly, >> I. >> All right, we'll move on to donations. >> Sure. >> Yep, I can see. Chad Rollinsson donated $400 to heavy duty treadmill to the FIAD and health department to be placed in the fitness room at the high school. First Security Bank donated $10,000 to the food pantry. Harvey Berg donated $200 to the food pantry, also donated $200 for Bearpacks. and Morgan Stanley Gift Fund donated $2,000 to the Garden Outdoor Learning. Amazing. >> God bless him. That's so awesome. You guys are awesome. >> All right. Any questions on the donations or would entertain a motion to approve the donations as presented? >> I make a motion to approve
051the donations as presented. >> Second. >> Motion and a second. Roll call vote. >> Jeremy. I >> Alicia. >> Hi, >> Kelly. >> Hi, >> David. >> Hi, >> Harry. >> Hi, >> Nadia. >> Hi. >> All right. Information on the miscellaneous items. Got one adjustment maybe there. >> Yeah, I'll send you an invite or sorry, an email about the August 7th board retreat. Um, we might be just adjusting the timing of it during that day. Um, look for an email tomorrow. Um, and I'll give you some more more details on the email. >> Great. >> August 1st was not a correct date. >> That's the one I was talking about. >> Oh, sorry. >> No, that's my error. I was editing it today and >> just messed it up. >> We were trying to
052throw Nate under the bus. >> Oh, sorry. >> I didn't even That's my eyes focus on that. August 18th. >> What's up? >> I think it's August 18th. >> Yeah. Question eight. >> Look at that. Boom. Keep an eye on seven. What time are we thinking? >> Um I think we'll be starting I look to start at 8:00. Um but then instead of it being an entire day and we're going to reduce it down to maybe just 2 hours at the moment. So >> I'm giving you the gift of time as opposed to asking you to give me more of your time. So >> but like I said, more details coming up tomorrow. Okay, which brings us to our our final uh item of the night, adjournment. >> Make a motion to adjourn. >> Second.
053>> Okay, we'll take a roll call vote for adjournment. >> Yep. So, Carrie, >> yes. >> Jeremy, >> I. >> David, >> I Lisa >> I. >> Alicia, >> I we are. All right.