001Okay, we are live. >> Okay, [laughter] >> I've heard people do that still. >> All right, everybody. >> Now call the board meeting to order. Please rise for the pledge of allegiance. I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. >> Miss Cook, will you please take role? >> Mr. Wman is absent. Everybody else is present. >> Thank you. Is there any new business to bring before the board? Hearing none, I would seek a motion for approval of the agenda. >> I have a motion by Mr. Welch and a second by Mr. Gist. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> Motion carries. 6. Next item. Oh, sorry. Posting sign. Okay. Uh,
002next item on the agenda is item five, consent agenda items A through E. Is there any item any board member would like removed and discussed separately? I will mention chair Raymaker that the seniority lists we go through a protocol of providing the list to the unionized groups. They review them. There's a certain number of days in which they have to review them and um make appeals for changes if there are any. So those that entire process has been completed. So we bring those to you for your approval. >> Thank you. Is there any other discussion? >> Okay. Hearing none, I would seek a motion. >> So moved. >> Second. >> I have a motion by Mr. Raven Horse and a second by Miss Kefir. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >>
003Post same sign. Motion carries. 6. Next item on the agenda would be item six, high student achievement, and that was the principal and director updates. Um, if there's anything anybody would have questions on, I ask you to reach out. I didn't even get caught up on all of them because I know it was attached a little bit later today. So just catch up if you can and >> I do want to acknowledge all the work that the principles are doing and the directors in moving the initiatives forward that we have in our school district. Um if you can take the time to review the information and just acknowledge the work that's being done by our principles and our staff. It's it's good quality work and we're moving our initiatives forward in a positive way. Thank
004you. Next item would be item seven, AM2. We don't have anything tonight, so we'll go down to item 8, aim three, effective and efficient operations. And item A would be consider and approve the BCI solar for schools grant with uh Mr. Schroeder and Mr. Brock Johnson. Floor is yours. >> They will be going through a presentation with you and you can certainly ask questions as they go through this information. >> All right. So, I'll start this off before I hand it over to [clears throat] Brock. So, as most of you know, we did this a couple years ago at BCI, an initial solar for schools program. Um, submitted that information, got awarded the opportunity to do this. Um, at that point in time, uh, the grant covered about 85% of the cost. And then we
005were able to also then apply for the inflation reduction act tax credit of 30 30% on top of that. So our total project cost was 148,157. Um the actual solar panel cost is about 113,000 but we had another 35 36,000 in um roof seam repair type stuff I guess they'll call it. So basically we reinforced the seams um before we decided to put these on just as a precautionary to make sure that the plan is that we don't have to at any point in time take these off before they're ready to be taken off. >> Um >> try to prolong your maintenance schedule >> basically. So that was part of that plan. Um so that's why the number is 148 but the silver for schools grant then covered about 96,000. Um we took the remaining
006out of capital. Um and then we got the inflation reduction act tax credit back of 47,000. That just recently happened now um that we received those dollars back. So the district cost after all was said and done was $4,858. Um so far we have earned and this was probably a month or so ago the energy savings were $7,000. So actually we're already on the plus side of [clears throat] of this whole project um at this point in time. So that's just kind of a recap of phase one. It was also a much smaller. We had a limit on what was it 40 40 kow 40 kilowatt basically is was the max that we can put on there. This goound is going to be different than that and I'll let Rock kind of touch on on
007that part of it as well. So >> can you remind me again when this when they were installed? August 23 say it's been two years. >> Okay. Thank you. >> So I'll uh I'll let you take it from here. >> So Mr. Johnson, you just tell me when you want me to advance. >> Sure. Um so yeah, basically now the the sol grant program has evolved since the uh this project was put up there. Uh so now you can go with bigger projects over 40KW. Uh basically you can go up to it's a max grant amount per district of $500,000. So um Dan and I looked at we looked at Bonner a little bit with the ground space and you know with the condition of the roofs at at other buildings um we petitioned the
008state to to see if we can you know just add more BCI because we know that roof is is good. Um and they've been great to work with and they said yeah that that would work. So um so basically what we would do is we would propose to be uh this proposal is for a 265 kilowatt DC that would be in addition to the recurrence uh 49.6 kilowatt DC project up there. We might we might want to um now that it's approved look at the interval data from People's Energy and and try to fine-tune that size a little bit. You don't want to go too big where you're putting a ton of energy on the grid. Um because if you're over 40KW, you're not going to get full retail rate for that power if you
009put it back to the grid. Um so that that's one thing we'll do, but this is good good estimate on the size [clears throat] um for now. So, and just to go over kind of the and as far as like the seam stripping and and that goes, we did talk with WHD um so we know what that cost is this time around. include that proposal as well. Um, so we don't have to go over our company. We were the ones that did the provincial project. Um so if you scroll down to project summary page so um what we would do if you decide to go forward is we would we would combine the two projects um so that it would actually be like around 300 kilowatts DC combined and we would stay just under 250
010kilowatts AC. The reason for that, there's some some stipulations with the utility. If you go over 250 kilowatts, that's some other fees and and things like that. So, um this would be about the max size. This would max out most of the roof at BCI as well. Um so, off of the cost of the project, you're getting a 50% state grants and then that 30% federal rebate is still active. Um there have been some changes uh with that that maybe some of you heard about recently at the federal level. Um so those tax credits were good till 2032. They have sunseted those earlier now. So for schools and commercial um the rule is that you have to start the project by July 4th of 2026 and have it completed by the end of 2027 which
011with this timeline with the grant will not be issued. um just want to make sure that um so if we go to the next page six. So if you look at the the total project cost about $600,000, you would get half of that back in the state grants. Um and that would put the district total at about $400,000 in in grants that would be allocated. So you if we if you can find another, you know, building that that would accommodate solar, um you would still have some passive left state money. Um and then you'd get a 30% federal rebate. So the remaining amount out of pocket would be about $120,000. Um you're going to be saving 25 to $30,000 a year now $4,000 a year. Um so you know three to five year payback is
012what will be estimated and then it's just savings and then on we can skip through to page nine that gives kind of a 30-year um try to be conservative cash flow estimate for the district. um we we factor in, you know, some maintenance and insurance costs, replacing the inverters and then decommissioning it and removing it at at year 30. So, we try to factor in all of the all of the um positives and and also the the uh debts as well. So, um over 30 years, you'd be expected to save $800,000 plus. That's assuming utility rates keep going up at at least 3%. more recently did go up higher than that, but um again trying to be conservative with that. As far as the equipment goes, um we would so the equipment that we used
013on the original project, uh some of that stuff there there's another um there's another federal law now called the uh foreign entities of concern. So basically what it's doing is it's targeting solar equipment come that's derived from China or controlled by Chinese companies. Um, so we're we're just trying that goes into effect for any project that starts after the first of the year. Um, so we're just trying to avoid that alto together if we can. So what we would do is we would just it' be different panels than what you had the first time, which isn't that big of a deal. They can have a 30-year warranty on them. Um, the inverters we would swap out just so it's all the same inverters across the entire project. Um, with that I'll just open it up
014for questions. That's usually the best way. >> Are there any questions? >> Seems like it's going well. >> Yeah, I think we had to replace one inverter right away on the original one. They do have pretty long parts. So, >> yeah. So the [clears throat] $120,000 we would build that into our capital and then ultimately I guess the decision could be made on do you want to put that annually back into capital to replenish it and then after that it's it's all good in the in the unsigned general fund. Um, you can do that. Um, or you can just take the 120,000 out of your operating capital and everything would just stay within the unassigned essentially electrical savings. So, whichever I don't care either way. Um, whatever you feel like as a board makes the
015most sense. Um, but that's where we would pull that from is from our operating capital at this point in time. >> There's no nothing that dictates where any savings in future? >> No, I we would we would be definitely within within our rights to basically say 120,000 we pulled we're going to go ahead and on an annual basis we'll move 25,000 back and then in five years essentially we're done and then the next 25 years or whatever it is is just savings and the electrical side of things. If I had to choose one or the other, that would be my recommendation. But >> I think that I would be comfortable taking whatever you recommend. >> I would go with that road. >> That's not something we need to decide for. >> No, we're just voting
016to approve, right? >> Yes. because what so the process we have the initial approval um and then now if we decide to move forward we've got to go fill out a full grant application [clears throat] and go through all the things and then we got to go through the bid process and all that because it's beyond the dollar threshold for that type of situation. Um and then uh basically once that's all done and we've got a a vendor then we'll start to go ahead and begin the process and get the timeline together on when it's going to take place. So, as far as the operating capital, you approve that at the end of the year. We give that to you and ask for your approval on our capital expenditures. And that's when you would decide
017whether or not you want to just take it out all at once and then not replenish it or put do a a payback motion to make sure that that 120 goes back into capital. Okay. Are there any other questions? Okay. Um, hearing none. I would seek a motion. >> Second. >> I have a motion by Miss Kefir and a second by Mr. Ravenhorst. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. Post. Same sign. Motion carries. 6. Thank you very much for your time. Dan, thank you for >> finding the grants. Writing the grants. >> Thank you for coming. Next would be 8B the cyber security grant presentation by Mr. Conger and Mr. Sharter. So Joe Conger is our information systems uh coordinator director does an amazing job with uh three team members that
018he has himself uh Sam Grock and Jacob Thompson. Um they manage the entire system of our uh internet infrastructure and all of our devices. Um they're a rockstar team. They do an amazing job. Uh he and Mr. Sharter worked together on a cyber security grant and I'm excited to have him share the information about the grant and what we're going to do with it. >> Well, thank you, Glenda. Uh yeah, so this summer MDE um had a cyber security grant that uh any school uh was eligible for. One po 1.4 million was set aside in funding. Um and the school districts were broken into five groups. The groups were broken down by enrollment. Um, and we were in group three and the funding cap for our group was set at $60,000. Um, the application window
019ran from July 9th to the 20 to August 29th. And what you had to do to apply for it was pretty much just submit invoices that had to do with cyber security. So, we submitted all kinds of invoices that we have that help us with cyber security. And then in uh September, we were we found out that we were awarded the $60,000. So, uh, good things. Um, our [clears throat] biggest cyber security, um, expense is Artic Wolf, who we partnered with three years ago. Um, and what they do, just as a recap kind of, is they're just a cyber security company, um, headquartered up in Eden Prairie, so pretty local, which is nice. Um, that helps organizations protect their systems from hack hackers and cyber security threats. Um, they provide a team of experts who
020monitor our network 247. They detect any suspicious activity and help us respond to those incidents. Um, their services include the threat detection, uh, risk management, and then security awareness, which we just added on, I believe last year. Um, and I'll talk a little bit more about security awareness here soon. Um, so yeah, they help us kind of in the background 247 watching our network all the time. Anytime uh, anything is detected or alerted, we get an email about it and then we're able to go out and fix those threats. if they if it is a threat, uh they have recommendations on how to do things and then we just our team goes out and fixes those or alerts gets alerted to those. Um as I mentioned, the managed security awareness training, we just added that
021on last year for all of our staff members. Um and so weekly um what they'll do is they get an email that's either a short quiz or a video just dealing with cyber security and then sometimes they'll get a fishing email. um if they click on that fishing link, they'll be notified with the popup window that you know they filled the fishing. Then they have some remediation um things to go through to kind of pass that. Then um everything is kept uh tracked. There is a scoreboard that gets kept that I uh quarterly I'll send that out to the staff so that they can have a little competition amongst themselves on who's doing the best. [clears throat] Um but yeah, it's a real short like uh we have a video here that we'll show you.
022It's a the videos are real quick about 3 minutes. Um, and what what you know, the goal is to make everyone kind of that stronger first line of defense, not only here in the school district, but also your personal life. You can take this, you know, a lot of this information you can give to your family members um so that they're aware of some of this stuff that's going on, you know, in the real world so they're not um get caught by cyber security. So, we'll let you watch one of these real quick. Make sure my body is [clears throat] Linda wouldn't have got credit for that because she didn't click finish. [laughter] But >> yeah, so that's kind of what they're about. Most of them are pointed more towards, you know, education kind of
023deals, but a lot of them are things that you can use every day. So, um, yeah, that's pretty much, uh, the gist of it. >> I think, uh, one story that, uh, Joe told me was about the fishing email. How many staff actually open the fishing email? You want to tell them about that? >> Um, at that last one, >> yeah, we have 250 staff members that get these emails. But the fishing one >> we uh it was a good the very first fishing email that was sent this year was regarding chat GPT which was great because we had just gone through a chat GPT class at our workshops. Um, and what was awesome was I think out of the 250 I believe it was only like 3% which is very minimal actually clicked on
024that link and it was a legit looking email chat GPT you know it'd be something that you would think >> um would have got sent to us because we had just done something like that um to so to see and and the amount of emails that my team receives from staff members when they get fishing emails even if email may not be a fishing email but they report it to us right way and they ask us to look into it. Um, and I usually respond back. I don't tell them it's a fishing email, but I'll respond back and just say, "Hey, if this is something that you're not expecting, delete it. If it's important, they'll get back to you somehow someway." So, just like he kind of says, kind of be, you know, safe and
025sec. So, yeah, our staff does a phenomenal job. >> Yep, they do. Um the other thing that we are learning is K12 schools are becoming the biggest target for cyber attacks and so protecting our data which is not just about students it's about staff. You can think about the amount of data we have on staff with accounts that make we deposit paychecks into accounts that we transfer money to for 403bs. All of that is at risk. And so as a staff collectively, if we're not making sure that we're monitoring all of these attacks, it's really important that we stay on top of it. And I want to credit Joe and Dan for their commitment to make sure that we are on the front of all of this. Um, [clears throat] I'm just so grateful that
026Joe has taken this on as another thing on his plate to ensure the safety and security of our data and our school district. So, >> thank you. >> Thanks, Joe. Any questions? They did. I did ask them a question because I thought maybe it'd be asked, but I asked them, you know, will this be available next year? And they said that funding is available. They do plan on opening up something sort of like this again. They don't know how much money they'll be able to, you know, give away, but if they do open it up, we will definitely go and apply for that again. >> Thank you for your time sweating with us for a little bit. [laughter] go outside, cool off, walk around the block. Thank you. Have a good night. >> Okay, we'll
027move on to item C, which is consider and approve the contract and working agreements with all of the following groups that are listed. >> So, you have an attachment that is in front of you, and I'll project it onto the screen. Um, with uh what you'll see is on that data chart. Um we on the top line for Sue which is the teachers uh negotiations group we have a tentative agreement as of tonight um we just don't have the data finalized so it's not on the table but you do see all of the other groups so our paras are unionized group sap our assistants who are unionized and then local 70 which is our custodial and maintenance uh tiger time district staff directors coordinators and managers are either under working agreements or contracts depending upon
028their position. Our goal and our guard rails that were set forth by the negotiations team from the board was anything under seven. We could not go to 7% or more. And so when you look at the way right column, you can see the total package percentages are all under seven. They're in that 6.8 to 6.9 percentage range. uh the teachers are as well as the tenative agreement but I um assured them that I would not share the data before they could share with their membership. [clears throat] Um what we will do when we have the teacher settlement is we will fill in that top row. We'll fill in the total which is third from the bottom. You can see our anticipated revenue. We will have a shortfall for this year and for next uh we
029know that we are going to receive 5.75 from the state. So going up to 6.8 86.9 is going to give us a shortfall. We'll have to deal with that this April um for this year and for next year. Um all of the groups understand that that is going to be an issue for us. Um and so when we work through all of these agreements, we were very clear with them about the outcome for that. Uh the tiger time assistance scale is uh the students that work for us were giving uh 50 a 50 cent increase on each year in their hourly rate. and you turn it over to the back side. The language agreements for every language agreement for all the employee groups, we are removing the school district's maximum contribution to 403bs. And so
030we will match that contribution in their current contract or working agreement with no maximum. Um there's not a $40,000 maximum contribution in the past. And what that did is it penalized the employees who'd been with us the longest and had been contributing to their 403b. And so we've just removed that maximum and as long as they contribute, we will match. Uh, as I mentioned, the Sue agreement is pending for the SCSPs. They must work at a minimum 80 days within the school year to be eligible for an annual increase in pay. Um, we brought this forward because there were employees that were hired towards the end of the school year who would be eligible for that pay increase, but had not put in the work hours that those who had been here the whole year
031had put in. So, they agreed to that. uh we did revise their longevity scale so that they get their maximum payment after 16 years of service and then the payment of the men mentor stipen will be based on completion of specific guidelines and expectations that they're going to work on together with the principles to set those expectations up and then determine how they're going to ensure that those are met in order for the mentor titanium to be played. All of those things were factored into their percentage increase. So they actually took a less of an hourly increase to get this benefit, these benefits rolled into their percentage that were above that 6.8 and 6.9. For the admin assistance, they have the same language. They work a few a long a few longer days in the
032school year. And so they have to work a minimum of 95 days to be eligible for pay increase. And they also wanted to have a set rate for L uh PTO for those work that work 210 and those that work 235. It was a graduated scale and they just wanted to have the same number of PTO days no matter how many years you worked in the district. Again, these two benefits were rolled into their package. So they took a little bit less than an hourly increase to get these two benefits. local 70 if they have to come in on the weekend and they are not um scheduled to be here on a Saturday a Sunday um sometimes they come and they're it takes them 20 minutes to travel in they work 15 and then they
03320 minutes to go home it's still a disruption to their weekend so we agreed that they would be paid their overtime rate on those two days for a minimum of two hours even if they're only here for an hour just to give them acknowledgement that they're taking time out of their day off to be here. And again, that benefit has been rolled into the percentage increase. So overall, what you're doing tonight is approving the increases for the groups that you see on the grid. We will bring the teachers to you either on November 10th or November 24th, depending upon when they get a chance to notify their membership of what their agreement looks, their tenative agreement looks like, and they can take a vote to for ratification. Once that happens, we'll bring theirs to you
034as well. Um on that evening that we bring the Sue data to you, I'll have this table completely filled in so that you know what the totals are and our anticipated budget for shortfall would be for uh when we consider the agreement with the teachers. There any questions? Okay. I do want to acknowledge the contributions from Mr. Gist, Mr. Raven Horse, Mrs. Ray Maker, and Mr. Welch in this process. They were members of the negotiations team. It does require quite a bit of time and effort outside of board meetings to stay informed, to come to the meetings, discuss our strategies, those kinds of things. So, thank you to them for their time to uh get this process completed. >> Thank you. >> I just want to thank myself and Dan Schroer for the work they've
035done on this and all of the extra work you guys did and doing. I also would like to thank the negotiating groups for making this a great easy smooth process this year and everybody came in ready to work with each other. It was really great process this year. >> I was going to echo what Troy said a big thank you to all the groups. um they they they clearly understood what we're up against and everything and and you know obviously like nobody's going to get exactly what they want and that's how it works every time we do this but uh I just want to say a big thank you that it's it seems like everybody came to the table with a full knowledge of what we're doing and and what the challenges that we have
036so big thank you to them. Thank you. Is there any other questions or discussion? Okay, this would be a motion. So, I would seek a motion. >> Second. >> Have a motion by Mr. G and a second by Mr. Ravenhorse. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. Post same sign. Motion carries. 6. Next would be the superintendent update by Miss Sers. So, we have an enrollment update for you. Um, for the grade levels that we have closed, open enrollment, we are close to maximum. One grade grade level is closed, but we're monitoring that dayto day so that we don't go over the number that the board had predetermined. Um, we are at 1543 resident students, 411 open enrollment, 18 students are placed in uh uh in placements. We have a net enrollment
037of 1936. I do want to talk about federal funding. Um, as you're well aware with the government shutdown, federal funding is at risk for our school district and many other public entities. We're not the only one. The amount of funding that we receive from the federal government every year is 1.2 or 1.82 million. It's about 6% of our budget. 1.4 4 million and change supports academic services and programs like mental health, career and teched, science, math and teched, special ed, and access to broadband connectivities. So, um, in the middle of the school year, we are contracted with our teachers. We can't let them go if funding runs out. And so, if this were to occur, we would just incur the deficit spending that would end up as a result of that. um these programs that
038would have to be considered for continuation and reducing staff or elimination of the programs. Um we also have about just over $400,000 that funds free meals in 2023 24. Just to give you an idea, we did over 70,000 free breakfast and 215,000 free lunches. And so if the funding discontinues for free breakfast and free lunch, we'd have to determine what our next steps would be. Obviously, the state would have some guidelines for us to follow. Um, but it would be significant for our families to have that be something that is paid. And then without federal funding, just for these services and programs, that 1.8 million funds 19 teaching positions that would either have to be discontinued andor we'd need an increase in state and local aid that would be necessary to keep these things going.
039So, there is an impact. Um it can be devastating for us if this doesn't get resolved and these dollars go away. So we are concerned and we are monitoring it. There any questions? I have one quick one. Um the free breakfast and lunches. What year was it 2021 where families it's because it's been free for years. So when you say it would be detrimental or hard for our families to come back after getting used to not paying for so many years because it been free for three years now. >> I think three years. >> That's what I thought. Okay. >> I was just trying to remember. All right. >> It would impact family budgets for sure because you're not you're not thinking about it now, >> right? >> And you haven't been for the last
040three years. So that's where I was curious. >> Um I do want to give you an a legislative update. So we are on an off budget year. Um, typically in the second year of a bienium, there's a lot of policy discussions that are held for school districts. The minute that they create new policy, it ends up in mandates that are not funded. [clears throat] And so, we're really trying to stay on top of that and continue the mantra, if you're going to pass a mandate, pass the funding to go with it. If the mandate is not going to be funded, don't do it. Make it optional for school districts. Um, there are several commissions that have been put together. The blue ribbon commission on special ed is supposed to find 250 million in savings in
041special education. If they cannot do that, that will become a cross subsidy. And what that means is the district will get less special ed aid and have to take it out of our general fund, which is going to impact our programming that we have for all students. The compensatory revenue task force also has to find a way to identify the families that are eligible for um free and reduced meal eligibility. With free and reduced meals no longer being uh fake because all meals are free. Families aren't filling out the paperwork and so it's really hard to determine what your eligibility numbers are. I still contend that they collect tax records on every employee in the state. They know what the family income and the family size is of every family in the state. There is
042a way to determine this by school district. And so it's just a matter of the right hand talking to the left hand to share the data. Um but this task force is apparently supposed to figure out what's the best way to get this done. The seclusion working group is working on seclusion as an emergency procedure and wondering whether or not we should continue to have this as an option in our school districts. Um suspension is no longer available for kindergarten through third grade, but seclusion is something that you might need to do for a student who is extremely disregulated so that you can get them calmed down and get them reintroduced into the academic setting. The last one is a developmental delay working group. uh they're working on the current age limit in special ed
043law that restricts the eligibility for de developmental delay to kids under the age of seven and then extending uh the impact of the eligibility to children under the age of nine. They have to report their findings also by February 1st. So three groups that could have an impact on funding in one way or another. The budget outlook, this was just released last week. The economic update from the Minnesota management and budget office showed that the general fund of revenues are totaling 2.14 billion which is 86 million above what they forecast. Individual income and sales tax were also above forecast. At 22 million it's.5%. So total is 4.7% above the forecast. That's not a lot of cushion for an overage. Um that can go away within a month. Um they're going to release another update in
044October and the most complete picture of the state fundance funding and finances will be available in November when that will be released again in December for us. So we're continuing to monitor the status. Um funding is tight. The state is not experiencing a lot of uh increases in revenue. They're really kind of maintaining where they are, which is not going to bode well for us if we're going to look for increases in funding. Any questions? Okay. The next thing I have is the Minnesota Schoolboard Association conference on January 15th and 16th. You have a form there available to you. Uh we do need to know tonight what your plans are if you want to have a reservation for Wednesday and Thursday evening or just Thursday. Um housing blocks have opened and so we'd like to
045get that reserved tomorrow. a reminder that cancellations on rooms are now charging $50 um if you cancel. So, your commitment needs to be solid so that we can avoid that. And then we also want you to complete the schoolboard member visits to schools form. If you didn't have one, I have a l in front of you. You can get that me to me tonight and I'll inform the principles of your plans. That's all I have for the update. Thank you. Next item on the agenda is item 10, board committee updates, facilities. >> I do have an update for you. Um, ISG has sent out a survey to all staff asking them for their input on the condition of their working environments. And so it's separated by role in the district and building that you work
046in. And it's very wide open, so you can contribute any information or input that you have about the conditions in your building. Um and they'll compile that all the board and present it to you so that you're aware of what the staff are feeling and thinking conferred. Now that we have uh negotiations completed, we'll put together our team and start to set some meeting dates for working on the calendar for 2627. I'd like to bring that to you by the end of November. It's the goal. >> It's a good goal because our families appreciate it too. uh negotiations. >> We finished. We did. We did. >> Um policy? >> Nothing right now. >> And has anyone gone for a school member visit yet? >> No. Coming up. >> Coming up. >> Okay. Next item on
047the agenda is adjournment. I would seek a motion. [clears throat] >> I have a motion by Mr. Ravenhorse and a second by Mr. Guys, all those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. Both same sign. Motion carries. Meeting is adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Sit here. >> Thank you.