001good evening I'd like to call this March 10th 2025 so Board of Education Mee M hofman here Mrs conin here Mrs Lavalette here Mr fell here Mr here please Jo i al to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with libery and justice for all okay as we do have to have an executive session as we have no um people attending our meeting one of us needs to leave for uh a very important family function so we're going to go into executive session the beginning of this meeting we're going to Comm back out it C so I Mo we go to Executive session for the purpose of deployment of person personel second Julie yes GRE yes Tammy yes Kim yes D
002yes okay we will come back and have the regular meeting okay thank you we are out of executive session and ready to move on with our regular agenda this is the first opportunity for public participation for items which are on the agenda but seeing no one here I'm going to assume there isn't there isn't anything and so that put us with you all right so uh 3.1 uh I'm going to do a state and local funding overview um so this is the last fiscal year of the state budget so we're coming up to budget season and and the first Governor's proposal came out um a couple weeks ago so we're dissecting uh what that kind of looks like uh so I wanted to take that this opportunity and kind of explain give a funding overview
003from the state side and then with Lucas County um the property tax reappraisal that kicked in this this January for last year's value I wanted to kind of give an overview of that and then it's tie it all together on how fed local taxes and local values impact State funding as well so uh just a quick overview um and we'll talk about all those things the funding history kind of look at our actual collections um and estimates uh for the next two years based on the state revenue and local Revenue um and and really see how that all ties together um so I wanted to take this opportunity to just kind of paint the picture of kind of where we are in the funding model so back to 0609 there was this building blocks model
004and then every two years then it changed and then changed and then changed but what where we're at now is this Fair funding plan model and it's it's in the fourth year of implementation um and it stuck so it started in fy18 so that is where we are today it's an actual model that that kind of ties to enrollment and ties to local funding and local values and and it's a really a nice model that's not throwing you know a art at a dart board right so I think you know back to all those other models it it it just changed every two year new governor comes in right new new budget new kind of um plan but here we are with the fair funding model and it and it really is it was a
005bipartisan group we've talked about that over the years like it's a real model that has that's still hard to follow and hard to understand but it it really does a nice job um for public dead um so that's kind of where we are now can I ask a question about that is the fair funding I know that for years we heard about how Ohio's school funding had been deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Ohio and that was because it was based on property value so students that were in low-income areas were getting had less Ed resources for education and so that I guess I just want to make sure I understand is that fair funding plan model meant to satisfy the the reasons that it was previously held unconstitutional well I think it's still
006in terms of dollar and what percentage the state pays I think it's still considered they're still funding that lower than than that the roong decision but it aims to be a more fair mod so um the base costs so this is really the the the fair funing plan a nutshell and then we're going to watch a quick three minute video that does a really nice job of explaining it um it really aims to take in your base cost which is the buckets for you know what it costs to educated typical student so in the base cost it has averages of teacher salaries superintendent salaries treasur salaries operational costs utility data like even how much the average School spends on insurance plans like that's all included in that base cost and then they give additional funds
007outside of that base cost for your specialized services like your students with special needs your English Learners and you know poverty and so on and then the local contribution to figure out the local and state share that's how property taxes and median income value gets factored in the formula and I'll get into it in the next couple slides after we watch the short video that kind of allows you to understand how the changes in value impacts how much actually we receive so bear with me for 3 minutes I think this does a really good job Columbus uh City Schools put this out and I think it really does a really nice job of explaining uh the fair funing let's face Ohio's current education funding system has its challenges every 2 years legislators debate refine tweet
008reconcile amendments and changes to how school districts receive funding it's tough to understand the formula has changed every couple of years and often what's best for our students has been set aside to reach a compromise just to pass the funding bill it's time for something new something easy to understand that's transparent and Equitable the Ohio Fair school funding plan is a bipartisan agreement that is fair to our students and taxpayers it was crafted with input and guidance from Educators treasurers and superintendents across the state not just politicians so how does it work let's jump in it's done in Three Easy Steps step one base cost what every student needs for a basic education step two specialized Services above and beyond what the typical student needs we layer on additional dollars to students who need it
009most step three state local share recognizes the appropriate way in which a community and the state participates in the sharing of these expenses at the foundation of this plan is something called the base cost the dollar amount required to educate every student this is defined as a student with no disabilities no special gifts who do not live in poverty and are not learning English think of the base cost as a bucket designed to meet an average student's needs from prek through grade 12 it pays for core classroom teachers electives such as art music physical education and more substitute teachers to cover for classroom teachers school supplies and Technology clubs activities and Athletics Transportation principles counselors Librarians cafeteria and custodial workers and building level support staff and because AS school is part of a local school
010district it also pays for district administrators and support staff fiscal officers data Specialists operation and maintenance workers and more while this bucket provides everything the typical student needs some students require a little more to be successful think of it as a bucket that is handed out as students pass by according to need this bucket pays for specialized services such as gifted education special education English Learners Career Technical education and poverty assistance so once we determine the base cost and any extras how is this funded it's a local and state partnership first we look at what a local school district can raise based on the value of the property in the district for each student but property valuation and property taxes only tell part of the story so we next look at the income of the
011district's residents both with the paying income taxes for each student as well as how much the person in the middle of the pack makes these are all combined to determine a local capacity factor a fairer way to recognize the community's ability to participate in the state local partnership then Ohio pays for its share and funds the remaining balance it gives more Aid to disadvantaged districts and less Aid to those who can fill the bucket Higher by themselves to summarize every student gets the same bucket the base cost those who would benefit from specialized support get an additional bucket after this is all totaled up we then look to determine how much the Local District should pay with the balance being made up by the state easy to understand yeah I mean it's there's a lot
012more to it but I thought that did a nice job so kind of here's where we are with the fair School fund funding plan and the implementation so like I said um you know this is our this fiscal year 25 is the fourth year of it so it started a phase in of 177% and then obviously increase from there so in the you know so the next budget bill is kind of where um where we are with okay is that going to get fully implemented to 83 and then 100 and then the wild card is is that column and base cost so all of the that those buckets for base costs have an average cost obviously and right now those are funded at 22 levels okay so we're obviously in fiscal year 25 so that's
013already 3 years behind so and and we'll wrap it up at the end but the really the need for us is the base cost in the governor's proposal is still the 22 levels so that'll be four years you know and then 5 years you know in the past so does that mean that we're only getting 177% of the state's share according to the plan according to the according to what the right now we're 67% you mean by so 67% of what the cost was in 2022 it's not taking yeah so so so if the base cost would get in increase to say let's just go 24 right if if if we keep that same model of increasing it you know by two years every two years right so that would be the base cost so
014it' be like the average teacher salary we're getting funded based on the average teacher salary in in 22 okay but it's going to be fiscal year 26 the average has gone up right inflation whatever right so but we are going to get the 67 % which was the plan yeah so here's the budget in the nutshell from that was now there there's reason this is a budget process right this is just the initial you know Governor dwi's initial you know simulations came out and this is how it shook out so we're obviously in the top there for traditional schools this is aggregate across all traditional you know Public Schools we're looking at you know a decrease in funding there now look at the asct I mean there is I don't exactly know how that shakes
015out for us but there is some additional preschool special ed and special transportation that are not included in those numbers um but as you can see stem schools Joint Vocational and the vouchers they have increased in the budget you know and and traditional funding for other schools have not so this is the last bucket kind of of how the funding formula works and I wanted to do a a a prior your history of of where we were the yellow is the the state is the local share and the blue is the state share so in 21 before the funding formula kicked in we were 6434 now I will say the next year you know it dropped but they there was an actual funding for we we received more money right so they they funded the
016plan so we did benefit but I I just wanted to put that last be the last year before the funding plan in there to to kind of for my own knowledge so I just threw in there but as you can see relatively consistent 24 we actually jumped up you know 5% there and then we are in pH schal year 25 so right now it's 7822 but it the way the governor's budget is projected out it takes us from a state share of 22% and to as we sit here today and in two short years it goes down to 12% that's that's somewhat alarming in terms of of the that St state and local share and it really is I mean it just puts um you know it just means we have to rely more on
017local tax dollars and local funding sources to provide the education for our kids um and this is this is actual dollars and cents um so you'll you'll see you know back in fy22 with the that was the first year the fair school funding almost 17 million 17 million we did in the last budget cycle um because the continued phase in of the formula um and more dollars overall to public Ed we did see a big jump there um a little bit less this fiscal year because mainly we're down 100 kids so it actually funds kids which is I think a positive of funding for the way it should be um and then the in the gray there is the estimated uh based on the governor the wi's budget over a 2-year process over a 2-year
018um cycle it's it's we're down $2.2 million so that's that's a big decrease um and that gets you obviously to the state share of 11.7% uh which I referenc there so so it's just something to keep in mind on how we work through our legislators I'll talk at the end maybe if we could put a little road map and some communication uh together to our public and and try to get some advocacy there but as we stand today there's a lot of changes that will be made between the house and the Senate it's the standard budget cycle so I don't want to oversell like oh my gosh Adam said we're going to lose two $2.2 million it may happen it may not I mean generally so you're not ringing a fire alarm not the fire
019alarm but is yeah oh yeah where's the where's the discretion I'm trying to if that's the plan then what is it because we haven't adjusted for inflation is it so yeah so where we asking our legisl well I I'll discuss that right here this so why does our funding decrease so if you look at the top two lines our our ADM which is you know basically FTE kids that we educate is is pretty consistent right but those two top lines if you notice in fy4 those blue Numbers 22 21 and then every year it gets updated okay so as our property valuation goes up those numbers get reflected as the median income in our community goes up those numbers get inputed and increase every year in the formula okay base cost in the red rectangle
020there you'll notice it uses fy22 in inputs in an in an FY 24 Bas to get a base cost those numbers don't change so they using our current valuations and um District average incomes but using 2022 inputs as far as the cost of educating students correct that is the that is the primary driving Factor as to why our numbers are expected to down by 2.2 that's how the F the funding formula works so if you did an FY 26 if you said Okay I want to use the FY 24 base cost we're going to get more money in that bucket because the costs have gone up and that's what we need to add that is what we they said what they're doing with that yet or that still they still Ed 22 yeah that's what
021the governor's budget and that's what we need all of our community to advocate for do we know if they used F schal year 24 costs as the input would we still be looking at a reduction in funding they not put they have not put that simulation out there but I actually I actually had had a phone call today with um Josh Williams and he mentioned that if they updated the base cost to fy2 we're talking billions of dollars that it would cost and that's the problem because updating the inputs that much is a tremendous dollar amount State it's 2.2 for us yeah compounds to every other District so so yeah that's that's the funny formula we'll talk about a game maybe a game plan at the end but let me talk about you know kind
022of how the taxes s so as we get into property tax 101 keep in mind how it ties into the funding formula with that first line property valuations so those are those are increased every year change so yeah like us yeah still looks like me sometimes so so property taxes so I figured I I thought this would be the easiest way to explain it in terms of you know one mil equals a dollar for every $1,000 taxable value so you take a $100,000 appraise value home take that times 30% and you get we're actually taxed on on that 35,000 and you divide that number by ,000 which is $1 for every ,000 in taxable value and you take that to say 1 Mill and that get you a $35 tax that's as simple as of
023a math for as as as you can put there's a lot more to go into it but that's in simple terms that's what we collect for every Mill and for every dollar value of a praise value how many mills is our current operating ly well let if you give me 30 seconds I got you all right so tax rat so be as we get into the numbers I just want to explain first on the tax rates so we have so voted tax rates are all the levies we've had since the 70s right and that for those even outside of the school district you have Library taxes you have SAR you have you all that right that is all encompasses your taxville at you know in January that you got now every County gets 10 mills
024that's non voted that are guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States those are called inside Mills okay in our taxing district we get five of those 10 okay so those are non voted five Ms will always get and they do not decrease in value as values go up so those always stay at five mil so the effective tax rates so we you've heard me mention House Bill 920 a lot so we have 80 some Mills as voted rates okay voted tax rates but because of House Bill 920 as values go up the rates get rolled back and that's called House Bill 920 because our levies are designed to collect x amount of dollars and that's so that's why the reduction factors happen so we collect relatively the same amount of money every year and
025those rates just get rolled back so here's that in action so in 23 collect this is before the valuation change so 23 collected in 24 we have a total gross or total voted rate in our school district of 85 Mills okay in last year at this time those were V those had an effective rate of 43 Mills so then 2024 happens Lucas County values go up based on where we are with the economy and home values and all that good stuff those same 85 Ms got rolled back even further to 33.9 mil that is our effective rate as we stand here today so that is a reduction of 9.25 Ms the lowest so House Bill 920 part of house bille 920 is the lowest millage you can have is 20 Ms you you'll often see
026you'll hear it happens more in ruler you know rural schools not so much City but the 20 mil Flor the 20 mil floor um so we're 33.9 I mean we're approaching the 204 uh but you know I don't see a 9.25 effective rate happen again for for several years that property tax value spreadsheet or that image right there is is again I I swear by it that's easy I'm a visual person so top of that line as values go up school districts receive relatively the same amount of money because effective rates and voted rates get get rolled back down so the amount we're getting is not changing it's just the rates Mills are going down y the only piece the only Levy that we continue to get the full collection on and that is why
027our rates go up even a bit is that inside Mills so those five Ms stay at 5 Ms and that's our increase that we see so that's just in total um valuation based on the different properties whether it be egg industrial commercial public utility that's kind of the breakdown so this is this is key to for my next slide so our total valuation every Community member every commercial property every Power Line gas line in our district those values went up 28.8% okay so now what does that look like to real dollars and cents so it's still shaking out I still have a few settlements to get but it looks like in fy2 our estimated tax revenue is going to be 1.88% increase so that's a big difference from 28% people were like okay you got
028our values went up 28% you guys should bring in all this money know you got factor in House Bill 920 you have to factor in that those reduction factors in pure dollars and cents we got 1.8% more which is you know two you know 1.5 easy as F much is the 1.8 did you say 75 million some oh I yeah million and a [Music] half so then next year hold that by real quick next year you'll see that 2.7% and that's really just because we have a full year of collecting the higher rate that we got this year so that's why in that's why in FY 27 it goes back down to less than 1% which is similar to the increase we receive from y 223 sorry is the inside Mill the five inside Mill
029five part of the 20 mil floor or is it separate from so that's the bottom MH the 20 Ms is the bottom and that includes the five so when you're on the 20 mil floor you actually collect all of the increase in value like it's part of the formula like I we won't ever get there but if we were on the 20 mil floor we would we would see a significant increase right because you you get the revenue on the full value so I like to sometimes just this Lucas County sends this every year I just it's not really relevant to to you know but it puts in perspective kind of a cost of a $100,000 value of a home you'll see from 24 to 23 we're down on the list um so I just
030wanted to kind of see where we are from a tax burden standpoint um on you know us compared to other these count schools so cuz I I mean I think often times you hear it's you know we've you build the highest taxes and and whatnot I mean we we don't um and and that puts it and this kind of solidifies that and I would assume Fair's might be uh yeah I'm not sure cuz they they're notas County they're not lcas County and they they have different obviously different um funding structure they have a they actually have an income tax as well so so then I just wanted to this this presentation and this was all about revenues but I I kind of wanted to tie it in and to okay you did a lot of
031Revenue talk but where do we stand financially on the expense side and expenditures per pupil is the one area that the state gives us it's they they use it to compare us it's on the report card data it shows kind of how much exactly how it says how much we spend to operate per per kid that we have and you can see there we're pretty efficient at what we do um we're lower than the lcas county average we're lower than the state average the department of uh workforce and development um provides us a list every year of similar districts that based on our tax you know you know values and and based on how many kids we educate you know they put us a they put like-minded schools together uh so I tallied those up
032um and and we're under that aage as well so I think doing a really good job of of managing our expenses and and and putting money towards kids and I think this is one area where can highlight that from a thousand F people on the expense side so wrapping it up um you know I think our key priorities is is is stabilizing that state share and how we do that is is by getting those base costs increased as much as possible if we can get those base costs to increase the funding formula will work um in in more of a real time because of what I talked about our values being changed every year as our median incomes changed every year um and I I think we should continue to Advocate to to fully fund
033the fair school funding plan I think we've devoted a lot of time and energy and resources into a plan that is that that that does kind of work for for all schools and we we got to play together in a sandbox a little bit and I think to to to get rid of a funding plan and get rid of a formula I think would be detrimental I mean we've done a lot of lot of great work in the last four years um so I think we need to continue to Advocate uh for the fair from you know I think um I've reached out to like I said I had a had a phone call with Josh today I have uh emails in to uh Mrs gavon we're trying to connect um and that's the advocacy
034that I'm going to be doing with our local legislators um and and I think that we should start a small campaign I have an email um partially done to just email the community this presentation have a little summary of of kind of where we are in the budget cycle here's what the governor's proposal is the $2.2 million cut I just think our community and I've had some conversations with Tammy about this really believe our community should kind of be up to speed on on where we are and what some of those decisions at the state level could have on us um and these are our two local legislators um and then you know from the house side and the Senate side you have groups you have the finance committee the education committee I think those
035would be two two solid groups to to kind of to advocate for whether it be check up the phone email you know obviously Dr mle and I um organizations that were a part of O asbo Bassa Cape um that she's a part of Alliance Alliance you know osba like we're all all advocating the same thing same message everyone's got their own kind of unique story and that's kind of what tonight was was to show you know our story with the past and what it looks like in the future um so that's what I I put together just to kind of give you a you know a thousand foot view of of our two Revenue sources that they a significant amount of money for us um any thoughts on you know community outreach um in terms
036of that I mean an email work and try to gather some a small group together to see if they wouldn't mind emailing and calling local legislators small group a large group we can expand you know through social media we can use to reach out yeah I think if people are aware and you know saw this presentation they would want to have the community community members and neighbors specifically neighbors who say hey my property tax is went up 28% your school district is SLE the answer that's only about 2% that justifies some of those reasoning for and I think that's the assumption that many people make when their taxes go up we automatically see more so it's really addressing that narrative and giving them this type of information so they can better understand how it works
037and it's complicated you took a lot of challenging complicated information and made it easy to understand but nevertheless how do we broaden that platform so as Tim said you could talk to your neighbor and said yeah I understand they went up but listen we didn't get all of that um we did a very small very small very small and then budget was what you know we're losing there from the state and costs are going up when we talk about fully funding the fair plan the the fair funding plan does that mean does that mean using the correct year for that base cost bucket valuation it's kind of both so in and this is like in the leads that I may at explaining it so every two weeks we get a foundation hand from the state
038so in the documents right now it has if it the the calculated State funding what it would be if it was like fully phased in would be about 800,000 more than we're getting this year so so that's because it's funded at 83% right so if we got more of the if we got 100% of what they said we should get that's 100% of what we should get with base cost at fy22 so if we go to fully fund we would fully fund it at 83 and then 100 and we need those base costs increased and is that the amount that Josh Williams is saying is the I think that's a billion do a large but that was the plan in terms of the fair funding plan that was passed yeah it's been stuck in 2022
039but it's just stuck on that 202 and even if that were increased would we still be um experiencing a reduction because of the increase in our property values that haven't been captured in terms of of potentially I I don't know exactly how how that simulation would run but it's not going to hurt us does that effective rate calculation change with if we were get a new Levy yeah the new Levy would be added on because it would take away okay it wouldn't impact the state funding kind of things because that's just part of the values but if you would if we would increase you know voted rates that that effective rate on that that last number there that 3 3.9 that is basically the effective rate of voted Mills so if we put a new
040levy on that would go up so the fair funding plan doesn't take into account what we collect and what the funding it only takes into account what we could collect based upon Val and median income and they assume the higher median income the more likely to be able to pass that is there a way to calculate what the state thinks we should be able to afford and determine what that Mill or what that millage would be it sounds like a bad time okay I know you kind of answered it indirectly but State funding is still unconstitutional yeah I I believe that is still the case cuz I think I was in one of the webinars I was in I I think that based on when that decision was decision was made it was like 42%
041State share in the average that was what the average was in the first year the school funding formula but as it goes the fair funding school as the values go up and the base cost at the same the state shares like going down to like an average of like % Statewide and ours you know like I ours is projected to be next year 16% 12% didn't you also say that we are one of the districts that's taken the highest T yeah we're one of the I think we're top 10 I think we're the 10 from Dollar like true dollars and cents did some rough math based on the numbers you were looks like it' be a 9.8% deas the first year is that you have and then one point May year than so I factored
042some of this in my for in in in the forecast that we approved um I thought it would take a little longer I thought FY 27 we would be our bigger cut because of of the threeyear average of values but you know based how it's shaking out it's it's as it stands now yeah that was really great excellent thank you and you said you got plans we're going to sign this out to yeah I'm going to uh work with Amy and and Dr Motley and and put an email out with a link I'll have this presentation on our website just so it can be it can be just clicked on and not attach a document or anything um that they can share I um with a with a narrative and um hopefully people would reach
043out and and ask further questions or um you know ask for Clarity on some things and put together a Google form and if people want to you know join a join a group with me and and have a meeting and and Advocate with us um I think it would be a be a nice thing for our community to get behind definitely thank you thank you thank you still with you yeah let switch gears here all right so 3.2 uh is a power for schools resolutionary agreement every two years we are part of power for schools it's a joint Cooperative uh kind of electricity Cooperative with hundreds of schools throughout the state of Ohio um through SDA o asbo high schools Council so rates jumped tremendously uh the previous two years and this is thankfully a
044decrease of 6% so uh just on the electric one portion of our electric bill uh but is projected to go down um if we approve this by the 31st of March to go down by 6% starting July of 25 Mo approval on 3.2 second any comment questions Julie yes Kim yes Tammy yes Stan yes uh 3.3 is an urgent necessity resolution to repair roof leag here at the adman building on on third floor um was raining pretty good up there in the last couple weeks um and then um it will be about $90,000 repair Mo approval on item [Music] 33 any comments or questions so this is a repair not a total replacement well it's a repair of that section so it's a replace of that se so they're just they're going to do a
045whole new section y okay Julie yes Tammy yes Dan yes Kim yes uh 3.4 is it urge necessity to repair uh a larger section at uh Arbor Hills so we did a resolution in January for one section and this is a much larger [Music] section stough who we got here Tammy J is this going to be the complete roof at this point between the two how much what percentage of the roof has been I was wondering that same thing because it was like we did a section before I got2 I think yeah maybe it's a large building yeah and I think that like this is the part if I remember correctly that is still like the gravel surface so they've been doing the the other part was ground but then this part started leaking like
046libr over there I think it's the rest if I remember the gravel portion of the the original gravel is it going to be still gravel or are we changing it to well it's still fire up so yeah you got got to add new membrane and and things like that but it's still FL yeah and if you think about it as old as the building is we we got our money out of it it's time it's the original I do believe am I correct on that I think it is the original the gravel I know they're having some of the same it's the original and I think this one is coming up next because my understanding is this is very similar where they walk out it in certain spots it causes new weak spots because it's
047older stop walking on it but no um I will find out what percentage now will be underway but thank you for moving forward with this has been a challenge now that you have approved the resolution I will be sending communication to our staff and parents that we will be moving forward to address the issues thank you tamy yes Julie yes Dan yes Kim yes 3.5 uh my last one for the month um is just a resolution to initiate the procedures for the retirement and re Reemployment of uh teaching positions so we did anou um with the sea a couple months ago um just to sh up our retiree hire uh procedures and this um like I like I said just kicks off um we'll do a public hearing like we always do um and then
048we'll hire them um in May so the resolution um posting you know with the names that to put in the paper too blades going in on Thursday approval second any comments or questions Julie yes Cammy yes Kim yes Dan yes this will save if if we do all six that um that applied it would be about a $260,000 savings that's great thank you you thank you Miss Hoffman um we are looking at item 4.1 which is a resolution for special education Pol model policies and procedures um I do need to clarify for a moment um to make sure we are asking the proper recommend recommended action um Tim I'll need to defer to you I see that this is for under public comment um a resolution for a first read but I see above it
049says action yeah it's actually just just a resolution I don't think so it's not a first read it is an action it is an action so we have special education model policies I can share that with these about 4 Pages um just shows how we follow our education law um handing the schools whether it be IEPs um change placement just everything we follow IEPs etc etc there were some discrepancies between federal law recently and our current policies that we use so basically this resolution is just stating those discrepancies based on our guidance from the means we're going to continue to follow that uh policy that we already have in place a lot of policies and some of the inconsistencies of the federal law and cause with it um we're going to continue to follow the
050like I said the mod policies that we have in place this resolution so I would like to recommend that under public comment that this resolution is not for a first read it is for an action as noted in the agenda so we will need a vote for the resolution Mo approval second [Music] question Julie yes Kim yes Dan yes Tammy yes thank you item 4.2 I recommend for a first read the policy for release time for religious instruction during the school day as posted oh I'm sorry it's discussion moving on to item 4.3 I recommend approval of a University of Toledo Nursing education agreement as provided um in administrative content this is an annual agreement that we have move for approval a second any comments or questions Kim yes Tammy yes Julie yes de yes
051thank you I recommend item 4.4 this is a memorandum of understanding between sea and the board of education for Staffing procedures approval I'll second any comments or questions mam Cammy yes Kim yes Dan yes Julie yes thank you item 4.5 I recommend for approval for remove teaching at the de Virtual Academy second any comments question Julie yes Tammy yes Kim yes D yes thank you my final item for this evening is a recommendation for item 4.6 which is an overnight field trip for Hol Buck to accompany four students to Columbus to attend the state competition for skills USA second any comments or questions Julie yes Kim yes Tammy yes Dan yes thank you thank you with you Mr thank you I will recommend items 5.1 through 5.5 on a consent agenda basis 5.1 are licensed
052retirements congratulations to Paul m mie and Teresa anco three great ones there uh 5.2 is a licensed resignation 5.3 is a LIC substitute resignation 5.4 license leave from absence and 5.5 license I'll move for approval on consent dat basis items 5.1 through 5.5 second any comments or [Music] questions thank you to those service thank you Kim yes Tammy yes Julie yes yes thank you I will recommend items 6.1 and 6.2 on a consens agenda basis 6.1 classified to hires and 6.2 classified personel changes Mo for approval on a consent agenda basis item [Music] 6.1 any comments or questions Tammy yes Dan yes Kim yes Julie yes thank you I will recommend items 7.1 and 7.2 on consent basis 7.1 are athletic volunteers for the 2425 school year and 7.2 are non-teaching pupil activity contracts for
053this school year I'll Mo agenda item 7.1 7.2 second any comments or questions yes Kim yes Julie yes Dan yes Tammy yes thank you thank you this is second OPP for public participation it on the [Music] agenda Julie yes uh Tammy yes Kim yes Dan yes thank you