001It's um Monday, June 16th at 6 o'clock and the uh meeting is being held at 1440 Rochester Road in Addison Township. If we could all stand for the pledge, please. Ed, you're a veteran. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States and of America, to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Let our audience stay standing. We thank you for the opportunity to be in front of you and your representatives for the township. We ask that you give us wisdom as we make decisions. We do these things in your name. Amen. Okay. Thank you, Ed. Okay. Roll call, please. Yes. Linda Garrick, here. Ed, here. Karen Gel, here. Mary Frost, here. Mike McDonald, here. Bennett, present. Supervisor Pearson here. All accounted for. Any
002announcements? Department reports of course are always available in my office. None. Okay. Petitions? None. Okay. Approval of the agenda. I make a motion to approve the agenda as written. Any comments? Not hearing. Could we have a roll call on that, please? Mary Frost, yes. Linda Garrick, yes. Ed Brafield, yes. Karen Gel, yes. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. Okay, move on to consent agenda. Yes. It's a long one. Approval of April minutes. Approval of the April and the May 2025 invoices. Approval of SEMCOG 2025 dues. Affirm and approve the auditor invoice for the 2425 fiscal year. Approve the 2025 MTA dues legal defense fund and the pass. Affirm and approve the 2025 workers compensation renewal. And approve the resolution for the 2526 healthc care benefits that include health care, vision, dental with lifelong
003term, short-term disability insurance. I'd like to make that motion, but I'd like to add one small thing to the consent agenda from item D. like to make the motion to approve the consent agenda with item D being specifically $3,000 coming out of account number 206 336 80700 0 $3,000 coming out of account 207301 80700 0 5,000 coming out of account number 101223 80700 0 and $1,000 coming out of account number 101371 support. Okay. So, we have a motion and we do have support. Support. I was going to I was worried about that. And I understand that's to cover all the bills. Makes it so that we don't have to do an adjustment. So, okay. So, we have a motion and we have support. Any comments? Not hearing any. Can we have a roll call, please?
004Linda Garrick, yes. Mary Frost, yes. Ed Brefield, yes. Karen Gel. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. Okay, we'll move on to item number two. Oh, resolution adopting ordinance to uh um to the code of ordinances. Um do I have to read all this? Appendix A, zoning in the following sections. Article 4, Ordinance 25-02, Open Space 25-03, Water Well, Septic Wastewater Systems, Article 24, Ordinance 25-04, Sections 24.01B, 24.01 C, 24.01H, and 24.01P, 01P and article 25 ordinance 25-05 delete. Uh the board authorizes ordinance reviews and recommendations from the planning commissioner for these ordinances. These ordinances are approved by our legal council. Uh Linda is our representative. Um do you have anything to add on this at all, Linda? No, I think they planning commission did a great job looked at this closely and I
005think it's the right entrance. Okay. And it's been a long uh time coming as the planning commission uh went through all the ordinances. Any questions from the board? Not hearing any. Okay. Uh I'll just put this a motion a motion is in order to uh move the resolution adopting ordinances to the code of ordinances appendix A zoning in the following sections. Article 4, Ordinance 25-2, Open Space 25-03, Water Well, Septic Wastewater Systems. Article 24, Ordinance 25-04. Sections 24.01B, 24.01 C, 24.01H, and 24.01P 01P and article 25 ordinance 25-05 delete. That's the motion. I'll move the I'll move the res. Yeah. Are you making the motion? Well, I read it all. I must make the motion. Okay. So, somebody else doesn't have to read it again. I'll support. Okay. Thank you, Linda. For the rich. That's
006the first one. We have a motion and we have a second. Any discussion? Not hearing any. Could we have roll call, please? Linda Garrick, yes. Ed Brefield, yes. Mary Frost, yes. Karen Gel. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. And motion passes. Okay. Now we're on to item number three. uh station uh seal coding recommendation independent ashall $12,15 from 2134.975.0000. Okay. The fire chief letter uh pretty much explains the request and he solicited uh three estimates which uh wasn't easy. Um it's hard to get bids out now. Um but anyways uh the motion to approve uh for station three of course is a seal coding recommendation independence ashfall $12,15 from 1213497500 0. Anybody have any questions on that? Okay. Well, I can make that motion too if you'd like to second that one. You
007don't have to read it again. Okay. Does anybody have any questions? Uh, we do have a motion and we have a second. No questions. Roll call on that, please. Karen Gel. Mary Frost, yes. Ed Braggfield, yes. Linda Gar, yes. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. That motion passes. Don't expect me to read all these, okay? Somebody else going to have to step up. Uh, number four, Lakeville Cemetery Road Repairs. Um, we've tried um I tried uh last fall to get somebody to come out, but I guess everybody is really really busy. And um Pauline got a hold of uh one person that finally came out and I guess a couple other people said they'd come out, but um doesn't look like they all did. And um anyways, it's very hard once again to
008get three estimates. So, what we're looking at is repairing the cemetery road. It's eroding away and taking away some of the uh burial plots so that you can't get to them. So, um um we did get a hold of uh I think it was Southern Bees Excavating and they went out there and looked at it and they think they can remedy the the issue. Um, so first of all, what we're looking for, I think, is um, uh, I think we need a motion. Well, we did have three bids, so we need just need a motion. First of all, we should not receive three bids. Oh, well, we tried to. Yes, we tried to get them. I'd like to wave the uh, we need to wave it first. I'll support. Okay. So, uh, I've had this
009says uh, that motion to a wave and you supported. Does anybody have any questions on that part of it? Okay, we have roll call on that one. Mary Frost, yes. Linda Garrick, yes. Karen Gel, Ed Brafield, Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. Okay, so that pass. Now we're on to the actual repair uh with Surby. I'd like to make a motion to authorize the repair with Sutherby Excavating LLC contingent upon proof of insurance and signed agreement with and also to include a time frame for the $6,384 from 101567 97500. I do have one question. What is a DAB? I think that meant dam dam. Where's that at? Um there's uh I had the same thought and uh when I talked to Wayne it there he calls it a dam hammer but it's um
010just uh gravel or large stone put across the it's wrap down the thing so that it catches put to to check the water flow so it won't flow fast down. So they're like swailes. Yeah. Well, yeah, a swale, but it's perpendicular to the flow. It's perpendicular to the flow so that it's within a swale. It's like a ditch. And they put those little barriers. Exactly. Slows the water down. Yeah. And they're called damps. Okay. Didn't know that. I'm not sure that's the proper spelling, but that I think that was his in that was his intent. Well, it's it's throughout the whole I have a question. Yes. Oh. Um, the name Sbe Excavating, right? Does that name sound familiar? Have they done work for the Well, the whole town is full of southern cemetery. Um, it's
011his brother. Kelvin does the uh longass long snow removal. And I'm like, okay. And next question is, um, like, have we had to do this before? I mean, um, the downpour that we've been getting these last few years are just really eroding this one area away. Um, previously our Sexton was able to maintain it with the tractor, but it's just it's just not being able to maintain. We have to do something with it. I'm just wondering if there's something more this year with more rain. What happened is that the uh the culverts have kind of filled in so they're not there anymore. So they need to rebuild the culverts back. They need to put those dams in there. And then there's a culvert. Then it goes under one of the roads. What happens is that
012now because everything's filled in. The gravel is coming right down filling in the culvert so that the water doesn't go through. Goes around it and then throws all the gravel farther down the cemetery. So now by fixing it up the hill and putting the valley in, you know, the and then coming down and then putting where we can regulate the water to go around so it doesn't go over the road. It's um it is a fix. We've had two uh two people look at it and that's kind of how they said it has to be fixed. So this is actually quite extensive compared to just putting gravel in there. This is actually designed to fix the problem with the heavy rains and not going where they're supposed to go. So hopefully it fixes it for
013several years. If you know Yeah, if you know where it is, it's by Dun's Tomb when you get all the way over to the end and then there's a big slope there at the very end of the cemetery and it's it's it is a difficult area because of the terrain that it's a steep hill. Um but anyway, uh so we did have a motion, but I didn't hear who seconded. I'll second the motion. And we have a second. We need to go um Oh, that was just to wave the purchasing ordinance or was it to move the I moved to We did the purchasing ordinance, which is now on for Surby 10156797500. It's cemetery improvements. Okay, thank you. And the amount was was in the motion 63.84. So So we have a motion and we
014have a a second and we have a second on this one now. Is there any discussion on the price now and having Sutherby do it? Not hearing any. We have roll call, please. Mary Frost, yes. Ed Brefield, yes. Linda Garrick, yes. Karen Gel. Mike McDonald. Yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. That motion passes. Okay, we'll move on to number five. Wave the purchasing ordinance ordinance for competitive bids and approval for 21,148 to steel solutions for uh from 2073019340000. And that's uh for the sheriff's department. In the sheriff's office, um the locker rooms have lockers. They're not very secure. They're very cheap ones. All of the other uh substations have upgraded to more secure ones. Um the sheriff's department has uh many more um high-owered type weapons and stuff like that that need to be secured
015better. Um I'm very familiar with these lockers and the lockers that um we have right now. You can actually uh the hinges are on the outside. And you can pop the pins off of them and get into them, which is not. What's it been since we How long has it been since we 10 years? 10 years. 10 years. But everybody's moved because they've got they have now obtained more high-owered weaponry and stuff that needs to be secure. And I did uh go in there and look. Anyways, this is Steel Solutions. It's a one vendor. All of the stations use this one. Um, so, um, they they absolutely do need it. Um, I'll move to wave the purchasing ordinance has no benefit in advertising. I'll second. Okay. Any questions on waving the purchasing order because it's
016a one vendor. Uh, can we have roll call on that, please? Linda Garrick, yes. Karen Gel. Mary Frost. Ed Brefield. Yes. Mike McDonald. Yes. Bennett. Yes. Supervisor Pearson. Yes. So that passes. Now what we're on to is a motion for the 21148 to steel solutions um for the um So moved. I'll second. Okay. So move we didn't want you to read it. You make the motion. Forget it. Any any any comment? Not hearing any. Can we have a roll call, please? This this does include installation. Yes, that's one of the reasons it's higher. Yeah. What we normally see Mary Frost, yes. Karen Gel, Linda Garrick, Ed Brefield, yes. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. And that passes. Move on to number six. Auditor agreement dated June 3rd, 2025 for 3 years at 13,500
017with a two-year options at 14,000. We asked our auditor to give us a a term of an engagement um so we could appropriate budget for the next few years. Um we're pretty pleased of course with Raina. She does an excellent job. Uh she's maintained that 10,500 since 2005. Um so I think it is time that of course she's got to increase her um fee a little bit. So, um, what I'm looking for is a motion to approve the audit agreement dated June 3rd, 2025, uh, for 3 years at 13,500 with a two two-year option at 14,000. I'll make that motion. Second. Okay. Agreement or do we have something? This is this is all our auditor will submit. I've tried. There's a reason why this is as low as it is. I know in the village
018of Leonard, we paid more than this for our audits, right? So, contract. Yeah. We promotional. Yeah. Um that's why we get it such a good price. Okay. Anyways, uh so we do have a motion and a second. Any other further discussion? Roll up. I'm just curious. So, with with the auditors, um, we don't have like RFPs or anything like that where we go out for bids or Well, we could I'm just saying, do we have to wave a purchasing ordinance or No, no, because she's already working with us. She's been with us all these years. She does just about everything. I think she does the Apale trailing our ordinance for professional service like auditors or legal or planners. We tend to do it for the planners though just so that we can get a fair
019shake but we don't have to for this one these prices are Yeah, I know. Yeah. Yeah. So, just so you know, she's We have a motion and and a second. Any other discussion? Nothing. Roll call, please. Karen Gel, yes. Mary Frost, yes. Linda Garrett, yes. Ed Brefield, yes. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. And that motion passes. Okay. Now, what are we on? Number seven, Civic Plus Agreement. Um, this one's real confusing to me and I know Pauline knows more about it. Um, this is this is about the uh codification purposes. uh that that this is about twice a year or doing it more four times a year or uh the price has gone up. Um and it's about um if you get a subscription. So I'm going to let Pauline explain this
020one. Yes. His his estimates were confusing to me. So I went ahead and broke it down into two options. Both options I truly feel and I included it in your um board pack. adopted ordinance not yet codified. We don't subscribe to this at all. I think this one, no matter which option we decide to go with, we should include because especially if we're only doing it twice a year, I think it's important that people see that these have been adopted since we do have a website. So, with that said, option one is currently what we have. We pay a n $900 fee for them to host. They codify our ordinances only twice a year. And what he was trying to show is that currently we're at $18 a page and their increase come July is
021going to be $23.40 a page. So then he went ahead and he did for three years. So I went ahead and gave the example that in 2024 at $23.40 40 cents a page. Our expenditure with the company would be $3,92.75. The subscription rate, we pay a flat rate. They will not cover if we went in and redid all of our ordinances, but they'll cover the majority of our ordinances for this flat rate. he will throw in the um ordinance and not codified yet starting at $250 a year instead of the $375. Uh and with that one we would pay 25504. So of course we're all saying, "Oh wow, we're going to save money, but that's because we had a lot of ordinances that went through. We're also going to have a lot of ordinances this
022year in 2025. We will save money in 2025. Next year, if we don't have ordinances, we'll still be paying the 254 and there might not be a savings. So, that's why I'm really trying to bring it to you guys to decide, do we want to do a subscription so that we budget our money every year for this amount and be done with it or do we want to gamble and pay the per page? The other benefit for the um number two with the annual supplement service, he will update our ordinances four times a year. So it will go four instead of two. And also there they're already planning increases 5% increase every year if we stay with what we're doing. And he went down to 3% a year if we go with a subscription. So,
023they're they're really pushing the subscription. My thoughts are we go with the subscription because I think there's probably going to be more things coming from the planning commission. We still have three more ordinance plus the ones the ones that we just adopted. I'm going to sit on them until Well, when you codify um I mean they they go through and they put all that stuff in there and it's a big project. I get it. But I I mean, but like next year we might not next year we might not have that many. This is good for. So one year, just one year. So next year we would have to do it again. Um typically with these they just it's a continuation just like with BSNA. We don't do it every year, but we could change
024it after a year if we want. Yeah. But I'm sure they're going to change that soon because I asked that same question. Oh. So, I'm sure that after a year or two, it's going to be in there that you have to stay. But anyways, what's your recommendation, Pauline, since you handle a lot of this? I think this year we're going to save a lot of money because all of these ordinances we just adopted are going to end up going at that $23 a page. So this year, no doubt the election years or years that we don't really have time to to focus on ordinances, we might it might not be that way. So that's why I I'm just trying to share with you that yeah, we're going to save a lot this year. Might not
025be the same next year. So what's your recommendation? Probably to go with a subscription. Doesn't the subscription having the quarterly updates um means that when we make changes they hit the system faster and the public can see them at that? Yes. So it'll actually be codified and then he's going to get throw this one in for 250 versus the 375 and our annual increase is only going to be 3%. Um, so I think it's a better bargain, but I just wanted the board to be aware that the years that we don't do a whole lot of ordinances, it it might not be that much of a cost savings. I'd like to make a motion that we subscribe to the annual supplement services. And there's a thought behind that. We've got a lot of ordinances coming
026right now. If we looked at it that we could transfer those ordinances to next year, we would still make money doing it this way because it would just save us a lot of money just going to subscription. Mhm. And even over a long run, it would save us money. Anybody feel the same way? That would be like a second. Second. We have a second. Okay. Just want to wake everybody up. Okay. Okay. So, we have a motion and we have a second. Any other discussion on this? Just so I'm clear with the price difference of the two is the 1573 and the 2500. That's about $550, I think. Based on that one year that I used, 2024. So, I took the 2024 total of pages and I did the math on it. So based on
027that year, we would save $500. I'm still confused. I was looking at two bold numbers and I'm just curious what I'm trying to understand. These were the options that you checked out, right? So I'm just curious like this 1573. So right now we're at 11.88. That's with the 288 and the $900 fee comes to 11.88. I no matter which way we go, we should do the um custom order bank which is 3.85 unless we do subscription. So the subtotal was$,573 and then if you take the 2340 per page from 2024 it would come to 3,92. Whereas a subscription, he's going to charge us 160475. It includes the 250 for the um where' it go the posting the ordinance not codified and then you have to add the 900 annual subscription fee that's not included in
028each e either one. So that comes to 254. So I proposed after the first year you only getting 3% on top of the 254. Correct. Whereas the other one we're going to get 5%. Okay. I just need to wrap my head around the numbers. Not enough. It took me a while on this one. It's like there's too many. So, we do have a motion in a second. Any other comments? Not hearing any. Could we have roll call, please? Mary Frost. Oh, sorry. Yes, you're fine. That's you. I was still looking at this. See, she's Yes. Okay. Linda Garrick, yes. Karen Gel, Ed Brefield, yes. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. And that passes. We'll move on to item number eight now, which is a resolution authorizing the 2025 L429 millillage rates with the
029special assessment districts. Um, this is the annual approval of the millillage rates and the confirmation of all the SADs within the township. Anybody first of all have any questions? What what we're talking about the special assessment districts? Okay. Um, so what I'm looking for is a motion to move um resolution authorizing the 2025 L429 millates with the special assessment districts. I'll move the resolution. Do we have a motion and a second? Any further discussions? Not hearing anything. Can we have roll call on that, please? Linda Garrick, yes. Ed Brefield, yes. Mary Frost, Karen Gel, Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. And that passes. Move on to item number nine now. uh wave purchasing ordinance and authorize the clerk to solicit vendors for the playground equipment design price and bring back to the uh
030bring this all back to the board. I'm about to sneeze here, so just hold on a minute. We have an estimate that um is over 5 years old and created by landscape engineering equipment is costly and we all know that. We will continue to budget for the purchase of playground equipment, but in the meantime, if we had a current estimate, we could apply for grants or a very low interest uh loan. Um, first of all, is there any questions on that? Okay. So, we're just looking at going and getting get moving on getting some bids and stuff for the playground. What I'd like is a motion to wave the purchasing ordinance as a professional service and uh so it doesn't limit contractors. so that we can just go out and start bidding on this. Pauline
031um has already started on this talking to different vendors and um there's so many variables out there, but we'd like to get started on it. So, that's what I'm looking for. To be clear, if we wave the purchasing ordinance, that would give Pauline the authority if she gets the low bid to just buy it. No, come back to come back to us. What what I'm envisioning is I have three names already. So I want to contact those three. I'm hoping that based on like I I have a book of different designs. So I kind of want to give them an idea of maybe what we would like. They're the professionals. I would like them to design it and then those who want to participate are going to hopefully make a really nice design, bring it
032back to the board with an estimate and the design and all of us decide which one we want and then that'll be the one that I can use to apply for grants and and use it for at least two years to try to to raise the money to achieve that goal. And why are we waving it now? Wouldn't we wave it when they're here and let you because if I start contacting them and they start giving us prices, it's kind of known then. Okay. Bid. It's just, you know, the prices. Yeah. So, it it's necessary to wave before I start making too many contacts because those that would would give me a price then their their bid is known. Okay. I'll make that motion. We wave the ordinance allow this playground stop. And did we
033have support? And we have support from Karen. Any other comments on that part of it? Yes. I I just wanted to say that it's it's maybe not as obvious as it seems, but the playground manufacturers, they all have their own designs, and it's pretty hard to compare apples and oranges and and make them look the same. you have a functional category of swings, things like that. But to try and compare um the different manufacturers products and then say which one is cheaper, which one's best, it's more in the eye of the township what design we like and what looks good to us. And is and we can't go with that design somewhere else because either they're not it's not available. the the items themselves are not available or they're different. So I think Pauline is
034correct in saying that we we need to wave that so that we can talk earnestly with the providers and not all of them have a hammock for the supervisor's afternoon n say I remember those sets I'll say it that were real flimsy. Yeah. Um, so they said they knew a huge ball. Um, did we wave the purchase? We already did that, right? So, now we're on to a motion to authorize the clerk to solicit vendors on the playground equipment design, price, and bring that back to the board for selection. They are all different. If you look at these, there's no there's no rhyme or reason. Everybody's got their own design and and nothing is there. It isn't like you just buy one set and you just have to look for that one set through different
035people. They make there everything's a different design. So, it's whatever we decide. I think we have to vote on the waiver, don't we? Did we vote vote on the waiver or not? Okay, first let's vote on that then. A roll call on that. Linda Garrick, yes. Ed Brefield, Mary Frost, yes. Karen Gel, yes. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. And now the second one is to allow the clerk to go out and solicit the motion. Since that question is so much out, we'll make that motion. We'll have the clerk and we have support. Any other comments? Do we have roll call on that part? Mary Frost, yes. Linda Garrick, yes. Karen Gel, yes. Edfield, yes. Mike McDonald, yes. Bennett, yes. Supervisor Pearson, yes. And that passes. Okay. Move on to item number 10.
036appointment as a planning commission representative to the ZBA. Um I I spoke with Mark Smith and um you know he's very wellversed in this. He's been around a long time. His father of course was the representative between the uh planning and the ZBA and um um and Mark um I've asked him before on many occasions and he was really really busy but now he said he has time that he could do that. So, I'd like to appoint Mark Smith to be uh the represent between both boards. I move to approve Mark Smith as a member to the zoning board of appeals as representative from the planning commission. I am happy to second it. Okay. So, we have a motion and a second. No. Any comments? All I need is a yay if everybody's in agreeance
037with that. Yay. I I yay. Anybody opposed? Okay, that's done then. Thank you very much. I know he'll be a great asset. Okay, where are we at now? It didn't you on the next page right here. Okay, now we're on to public forum. Anybody in the public would like to speak? I'll ask one more time. Anybody in the public would like to speak? Not hearing any, we will then move on to Addison Township board reports. Anybody on any of the boards or any of the different uh committees have anything to add? Mr. McDonald, just a quick update. Um in not there's a new intergovernmental agreement in the works and work on that continues. We should see that uh before the end of the year. The Polyan Trail is working on the master plan. Um they've
038asked Addison Township for a a map with as yet to be specified contents on it. Um but that'll be happening this year as well. And then material management, they've canled the last two meetings. There is now a new meeting scheduled later in June. So that's where that is at this time. Yeah. And I got a a notice of public meeting for that meeting. So, I think we already have it out there. I just want to let you know that it's June 24th. Yeah. Okay. Anybody else? Anything at the uh cable? Nothing. They're happy now. Oh, yeah. Well, they're happy, but they're Yeah, okay. Very good. Um well, then we'll move on. and we'll go on to uh any uh legal reports or communications. Nope. Supervisor report real quick. Um we did have power outage. Um
039and I did find out it was because of trees. We had a big wind blast that came in and uh one tree can knock out 90 people. That was a big blast. Yeah. And um came right through. And then of course, you know, I mean the trees, they have done a good job at trimming them, but once in a while there's one that, you know, they can only go back so far in people's property. Anyhow, so anyways, um that and it was fixed within um by 2:00 that afternoon, it was fixed. So that was that was good. Um uh Marine Division um on Lakeville Lake, we always used to collect money. the residents would collect money on Lakeville Lake to fund the marine division. Um I contacted their representative and uh at this time um
040they said they had no action on this. Um I will uh state that I've told them that um that the Marine Division is always available. There's a boat. They have a jump boat that goes from lake to lake to lake. And um so uh if they need any marine division, uh they can immediately call and they'll bring a jump boat out that uh can handle whatever. Also, our deputies are are trained. If they need them, uh you know, it's a lake. People if something happens, they can comeander a boat on the lake and and and then call for assistance. And you if there's something that goes on on the lake, the people still have to get off the lake. So the deputies be waiting for them when they get off the lake. So um uh
041Mr. McDonald was there with me when we asked because um you know, we wanted to get a contract signed because only the township can sign the contract and we were told that there they have no plans for any action this year. So, I just want everybody to be aware of that and I'm fine with that because none of the other lakes have them either. There's only one other lake I think as Wixom Lake who contracts and um Lake Oran still does it with um the uh residents contributing but um Wixom is the only one that the city actually pays. Um so there, you know, and there's hundreds of lakes in Oakland County and and it's all by volunteer. So anyways, other than that, um, what I'm looking for is an adjournment. I'll make that motion
042we journ. All those in favor of adjourning, say I. I. Anyone opposed? Now we're all set. Next meeting, July, uh, July 21st.