001They can see it, but they can't hear nothing. It's just the strategic plan doesn't get >> like we change we made a couple little changes last year, >> but >> it's not it's made to be a living document set for five years. So, it should just be some amendments to it as we go along. And I think there were some pointed out a couple meetings ago when we get to the review on that that there just been some changes with staffing and we're going to have to change some wording with the strategic plan and our goals. >> Yeah. >> Maybe not what the actual goals are but just how things are reported and that type of thing. >> Okay. I did have I left mine blank on 929 on 1.2 or 2.1 at the bottom
002longitudinal longitudinal data just is that the graphs that you show us or what? Yeah, in typically in May we'll end up looking at that and it'll be we've got a report of map scores for the last nine years, wide top scores for the last nine years and and looking at the trends that are there long term. Okay, >> got I wasn't sure what that and then we look at data about twice a year. three times because we do it on the back end of uh our map tests both fall and winter and then we do our big spring when we have white top as well. So we've got Aadians the three times map three times and then top is the spring. Okay, >> we've got a two in there. >> I'll put a two. It
003talks about superintendent will use appropriate strategies to guide the organization through change. I think that's been on a lot of the public comment and such that there are some things I could do better there. I think I have proven, but I I don't think that where These numbers look okay. Any questions? Anybody else? Okay, Gina, you missed one on 2.1, the very last one. Okay, we'll move on. Book study chapter nine. totally different. >> There was just some stuff that's very different than what we do interesting to me like putting executive session at the beginning and public comment at the end. There's no question which is interesting. Not that I necessarily think that's something we want to do. It was just different ideas. I guess it might be an interesting thought to move public comment
004to the end because then I don't know because at least you thought of your discussion. >> Yeah. It says as a board you'll want to get as much business done in your board meeting before offering members of the community an opportunity for commentary. It then goes into talking like you don't want to put it too late in your your meeting is going to go late because that's not considerate of the public's time but just basically make sure your business gets done in a timely manner. Great. Just interesting thought on reviewing our agenda and if you wanted to move it around it's an option >> I think yeah something to think about. I mean it does say like board meetings are not town hall meetings. They are not intended to be meetings where the public arrives
005to demand actions and operational decisions that are left to superintendents, principles, teachers and staff members. So I guess the question is like what are expectations out of public comment then? Right. There was a few statements that just kind of surprised me in this chapter. Yeah, mostly just logistics. And >> I think the premise around the executive sessions in the beginning was just to get anything that was really pressing out of the way and not have any big surprises during the meeting, >> which I mean we technically if we do like an executive session Tuesday night, we do it before any action on Wednesday, right? So it's kind of the same >> beginning the other kind of intrigued by this moving public comment. Yeah. Uh there was also it also gave an option for like giving
006two public comment sections like one at the beginning that's very short time limits and then one later that allows for longer conversation but something okay I said be ready for the meetings do your homework Okay. Board meetings are generally not the place for optimal discussion of problems. Even even though they naturally find their way there, especially if the problem involves contentiousness, these things should be resolved in private. So that's okay. Any other thoughts? No. I love the timing of this book. It just seems to be more right along with what we're experiencing. >> Yeah, it's pretty good. >> It's good to see the second time around. >> Yeah, >> for me. Me, too. >> Dusty. >> What? thoughts, comments, >> mind. >> All right. Administrative reports. Any questions on any of these before we get
007on to Mr. Roars? I um was just asking Mr. Christensen. Uh there's a note in that the food's director um report that we might not have enough players for a high school basketball team like next year. Those options would be Travis through that but it sounds like our kids are able to play maybe with another school if we know there's not still have opportunity. We'll see who comes in next year, too. >> Yeah, you never know. Thought we had two kinders coming in right now. >> Six. >> Never know. >> Could be great. >> Um, I have a question on the athletic report. Um, why is the boys team not participating in regionals this year? >> They won't qualify. Okay. You have to be in the top four of the six. >> Thank you. Okay,
008good. Questions on any of the other ones? This summer works out like how far how long do you let them push that back until you find somebody else? >> Not beyond that. >> Okay. >> Go back out to bed. >> Oh, okay. Sure. Because we haven't paid anybody yet. >> No. >> Okay. >> You're up, Mr. Roar. >> Okie dokie. All right. Month of January. Okay. Um, start with the general fund. Um, January expenditures as a whole was $274,630. Again, there's the breakup before that was spent, the different funds in the general fund. Um, so if we break those down, instructional was $133,981.79. Again, non-payroll expenses and payroll. So, we have 56.09% of that percent of that budget remaining for the year. Okay, any questions? Instructional support was a little over $11,000 for the month
009of January. We have 73.19% of that budget remaining. Next is administration, $47,916.39. Break up that school board administration and the business office expenditures. We have 44 58% of that budget remaining the year. Maintenance was $14,41121. Um again just break up utilities and then there's lady's expenses and payroll. 45 and a half% of that budget. Transportation was 17,18869. >> And so we have 34.53% of that budget remaining point. No expenditures for wellness this month. So we're still at 88.3% of that budget remaining. We did make our first um transfer in January. So $50,000 to the food service program. So we have 84% of that budget remaining to transfer of all the transfers put together. Not just food service but the other ones we budgeted. So, as of now, for the fiscal year of 26, as of
010the end of January, we spent um a little over $1.7 million. >> What happens with the money that doesn't get transferred at the end of the year? >> So, usually we do unless we need it for something else. >> Okay. >> So, that's when we do a budget, you know, we revise the budget and um check move some things around if we need to. >> Okay. But usually um so like all of the food service we've always transferred all of that and it's just a matter of the only ones that we really have this year is that and appreciation reserve just in case and then the rentals and those two the rentals and the food service will always get transferred because we usually end up using that money. >> Okay. And the depreciation reserve again
011is just there for what we didn't budget and so that number can change. >> Okay. >> So >> thank you. >> So basically for our budget expenditures at this point we expended 45.21% of the budget for the year. Um for salaries this past month um foundation was um about was $343,000 local. It's one of the bigger months for our local taxes. So we got $276,680 special ed reimbursement $23,377.3. And then the new one is the money that we received for CTE. We received that this past month of $28,672. So a total of 672,39.77 for January. Okay, moving on to our other accounts. First, we have our lunch fund. So, our expenditures for the month were $14,45262. Again, breakdown of those. Um, we have 43.78% of that budget remaining. Major maintenance, no expenditures for the month
012of January. So, we're still at 62.69% of that budget remaining. rentals. Um, $16.98 we spent on something. And so 38.15% of that budget remains. Depreciation reserve. Again, no expenditures for the month. And so we're still at 100% of that budget remaining. Capital construction was big costs expense for the month.4 $48,3730 which again was a agenda for the project or whatever call it. So for that we have 13.79% of that budget remaining. Uh special revenues are grants um we expended um $12,3810. There's a breakdown of the four different grants that we used expense this month. At this point, we have 47.75% of that budget remaining. Um, so expenditures year to date for our general fund um is um oh wait, this is all of our expenditures for the month. Sorry. 2,325,3689 is what we've expended for
013the fiscal year at this point with all of our different funds. Breakdown of the general major maintenance, all of them right there of where that money came from. It's expensive. Any questions? >> Mr. Roar, can you tell us where um the money for the library? I knew general and extin the um the the instructional not instruction but the I just went to um the second one instruction over support. Thank you. Sorry about that. That's where it comes from. That's where it's support instructional support >> and the whole amount eventually will come out of that. Yeah, that's worth it. >> Thank you. >> And then just the last thing, because this is years in the making, we finally got our first supply of ground beef, locally raised. >> Oh, how wonderful. >> It's in Aubrey's freezer
014and she's just excited to start using it next week. >> I'm excited. >> Absolutely. >> That's great. Thank you for all your hard work getting that done. >> Well, you guys did all the work. I just listed That's awesome. >> That's great. >> Shared Ranch has donated the money and we purchased it from Cross Beef. >> Oh, very good. >> Good. Good. >> Perfect. Okay. Um, policies. >> My only question was if these could all be combined. >> There are a few of them. >> And I like three. Well, not the first one, but most of them like three senses. Is there a reason why I mean why we could combine some of them? >> If it's cleaner to leave them separate, it's fine. >> Transition is pretty short. >> And then you got the
015>> then it sits as a >> placement of the is a form to fill out. So it makes sense deleting this. >> Yeah. >> Oh, we have I can take a look back through. >> I mean, it's I just make it look smaller, but certainly not a big deal. >> 5025. >> So, can we Sorry. On 5025. >> Yep. The first paragraph, maybe I'm not reading it correctly. A non-resident student is any student who is not residing within the school district with the intent to make their residence within the school district or should be with no intent to make their residence within the school district or permanent residents. Maybe either without the intent or with no intent, whichever is your preference. >> Just without is fine. Just the word for me, non-resident student means out
016of district. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Out of district student. And then students who only move into the school district temporarily for the convenience of attending school without intent to reside because they leave back in the summer or they're not living with an actual guardian is still considered a non-resident student. Okay, that was the only thought I had. >> Gina had a question about the screener. Did you get to look at that? >> Um, I think Isoline is coming tomorrow to I just had questions of what it requires to get a kid a child into kindergarten. You know, the requirements and what they're looking for and stuff like that. the screening process. >> Yeah, >> I went down and visited with her to I was going to take a picture of a few things and
017send it to you and it's a it's a full bag of stuff. So, she she'll be here tomorrow night. You run down and visit with her. >> Otherwise, I didn't I didn't have any other questions on any of these. Okay. >> I'll get 2730 to combine. >> Okay. Yeah. And if it doesn't make sense. >> Yeah. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. We've got the right now there's a bill in the legislature that says that every district has to adopt a policy speaking to cell phones and smartwatches. and we already have what we would like to do with that in our handbook. So, if we have to adopt a policy, what my recommendation would end up being is just writing a policy that says we'll have something in our handbook to talk about it. That
018would all >> Yeah. >> policy would have to say. >> Makes it a lot easier to institute changes and things. >> Yeah. TS Mechanical. That's the rest of our mini splits. It's >> the install on the mini splits. >> This is the last payment. >> Yep. Perfect. >> There I think there'll be one more payment for electrical, but not to TS mechanical, to the electrician. >> Do you have any idea how much that's going to >> the electrical? I I went out of memory, but I think what was it was 26 discussion items? WSBA information? They've been sending out emails. Yep. About all the updates of what's going on down south. So, am I sending those to you guys twice? You guys get those. So, I don't need to send you. Yeah, you don't. Okay.
019>> If you're bored, >> yeah, it doesn't hurt to have twice, but yeah, take it off your to-do list. I have been >> I have been writing a nightly update for principles in the state and I I was I think I might have even included you guys on the first two and then once WSP started rolling theirs I stopped with >> sure >> those but if you'd like them back I back up >> there were a couple that didn't even make it to the floor that got thrown out. Oh, there there was a lot >> for education specific. I know there were a couple that like parental rights that people were worried about that don't think we did. >> Okay. >> It looked like the last I I didn't look at today's update, but they
020will categorize funding. They're just kicking it out another year. Am I understanding that correctly? >> I No. uh the amendments that were made yesterday maintain categorization um didn't kick it out a year. What they did is they brought the funding for nurses and counselors back a year so that they're in it would be in the model starting next year and some other funds put a $10 million fund to help with dual enrollment costs. They pushed health insurance off another year. So it would be two years before we would have to join the state health plan. >> They've also allocated $150,000 to study the costs of it. So if they I think if that study runs its course and they see that it doesn't make sense that that that would give them the opportunity to pull
021back on that requirement. Um there were some some positive moves. The it moved from a teacher salary of 79% of the comparable wage to 85%. So it went from $70,560 to $75,383 something like that. and uh specific for our district. The bill as it's written right now and I would anticipate as it's going to be passed through the Senate does include a minimum of 17 FTE for district. So that was added in on Monday as well. >> What is the support for the categorical funding? >> They don't feel like districts are using it as it's meant to be in the funding model or >> Yeah. um specifically even coming out of last year there was the 8 and a half% ECA that legislature provided and there have been legislators all over the state that have
022that have been giving boards grief about not having an 8 and a half% raise for teachers despite having that 8 and a half% ECA um and that's that is going to be I I met with staff yesterday even I I think the bill is in pretty good shape for our district. I think it is a good bill for us except for the categorization because what we are able to accomplish with uh some of those funds provides monies like food service and I mean as recently decisions being made that allows us to spend what we would like to spend on a library rather than what we're allocated. Um, if they tie up all of the instructional money in a fund, that's going to be uh Greg, what do you think? 60% of our budget. >> Yeah.
023>> 60% of our budget tied up that we cannot utilize elsewhere, which limits the ability to to pull funding to do some of the things that we that as a district we choose to do for our students. Do you, as a little side note, what if if the federal lunch program changes in the future, I feel like it might go in a good direction here, like your smile, where we're maybe adding some healthy fats back into our children's diets from the federal perspective. Is that something that might be looked at? >> I'm not going to answer that question. You got two two people in the room. Well, though >> I think it's you know it really isn't it there was a lot more to it than just the the labor. I mean there's a lot
024of paperwork involved. >> Okay. >> I think the biggest thing when it first came out was the portion size. So everything is based on you can only provide so many calories and you can have to serve this and in order for it to be a reimburseable meal they have to have three components and one of them has to be a fruit or a vegetable >> which the kids will tell you we're just going to throw it away. I think the biggest thing that's that program is the waste. It costs us more money and there's just a ton of waste. So, we'll even say that when we were on the program, we had two of those big garbage cans full every day. >> Now, we're lucky sometimes if we have well, we're just lucky because like
025even if it's just a quarter or not even that much, >> not even that. >> We don't have the waste because we're not forcing them to take something they're not going to eat. >> That's my biggest thing with this National School Lunch Program is that you're forcing them to trying to get them to be healthy eaters. So, you're making them take something that they already just sit there and tell you they're standing. >> Sure. Okay. >> I will say as well, the the National School Lunch Program is designed to fund districts for the food cost of their their lunch program. And that's not really where we need to help. >> Just curious. All right, move on. Community engagement. >> Well, quick question on the WSBA March public officer training. If we've done that before, we'll
026be required to do it again or is it No, >> just new once. >> Just once. Okay, gotcha. All right, so we're good. >> Okay. >> What about Hang on a sec. We might have to back that on our um committee reports. Did you want to share anything on the >> today? Huh? >> Or do we will we touch on committee reports tomorrow? >> There's a library update right after >> you have yourformational session tomorrow. I just wonder if there's anything that I guess. >> No, I don't notice my group >> and then um do you want to hear from the what's committee report now or you want to put it on for tomorrow? >> I thought it was on. >> Okay. Tomorrow. >> I was just looking at committee reports and thinking maybe I
027missed my window. I was supposed to talk. >> Wait, where are you looking? >> No, where I saw it. >> Oh, committee reports. No, we then we just went over board policy and they kept going and I may have just >> maybe that's but it probably for tomorrow since >> I don't know. It's up to you. >> Um I guess if you want to do a house committee report that would be fine to do. But we can back up for a minute. >> Jeff, do you feel like today is fine? >> Oh, yeah. We're fine. We're good. >> Okay. Yeah. >> Um, so the House committee has met multiple times. Um, we had a few three parents, >> two board members, two >> two students. two students um two staff members and um and one
028of our staff members like put a survey out and people could give her feedback. We got some feedback as well, but we all took to that. So, um the the biggest thing we heard was that there wasn't anything wrong with it to begin with, I think was most of what I heard. Uh there was a few um students and parents alike that would like to have some study hall time. Um I think where we landed as a committee was um to reinstitute another um panther cloth. So there would be one K12 and one 712. right now with just having the 1K12, the 712 is kind of feeling like they're missing their time. Um, and then the committee kind of decided to put it back to the staff on what to do with the other two
029with the >> two Thursdays. >> Yeah, the other two Thursdays with the caveat that that a study hall is an option for those that are needing it. um which there's some some juggling there. So, we talked about the staff more so than we just don't know that realm, but there's a couple staff members that are probably going to have a hard time getting to pan the clock because they're probably always going to be needed for the students that are needing help. >> So, how to juggle that, >> I'm not sure. which is where we felt like we didn't have the the knowhow to give advice. Um the point system from my understanding we can't pick up where we left off anyway because of the system that's being used but Mr. B wasn't at the last
030meeting to advise on that. Um, we did discuss having points brought back for the elementary on a behavioral type basis. >> Never got rid of elementary. >> Okay. And then the high school would just be activity like house activities would earn them points. Am I missing? >> I think that's good. Yeah. >> Uh, head of houses could keep their titles but have staff mentorship and supervision. What else? >> Yeah, because they really wanted their activities. They knew all that planning for the month, right? >> Yeah. So, we wanted to make sure that 7 to 12 gets that back. Um, we talked through a few just different options of things that might be fun. >> I think that's it. I'm missing something. Oh, I have Kristen. Did you wanna I think the only piece maybe that
031had been communicated to me other than that was pulling back together at the end of the year. >> Yeah. The committee. Yes. So um I from the beginning we talked about as a committee staying intact letting it a few months which kind of puts us at the end of the year now. see how everything is going, see what we need to change if we need to for next year. And then the same thing like maybe quarterly for next year. Just see how things are going. >> Change if we need it. Um >> it's very good dialogue because we got really from the the students the family parents and then from the faculty we got a better understanding of the whole thing. >> Yeah. >> And really want to make sure it happens again. And then
032what we do next year, it's going to be kind of up to I think up to the faculty and >> yeah, I think we'll stay intact to monitor and change for a little bit and then turn it back over. >> It was worthwhile times. >> It was Yeah, it was really enlightening. the the information that we got from the students and the staff was >> opened our eyes a little bit to what we didn't know about the program and just the the day-to-day of how it's working and and then the implications of our decision to pull back while we figured it out. Um that was good information to to find out what that had meant for everybody that had to figure it out. Um, and we talked about different ways that maybe there could be
033some more like panther centralization versus houses and maybe some more like more than just your sister houses, two houses working together here and there and getting to know each other between houses. Just a lot of ideas thrown out there that then the staff members of the committee can take back. It sounded like from staff that it might be nice for the staff members to be able to meet and discuss some things so that like they know what Panther CL activities worked well and they can plan so they aren't doubling up and some things like that that more staff communication might be helpful. So I learned a lot and it was nice to just be able to sit down and have that conversation with all >> appreciate everyone's participation. Yeah, >> answering our questions and giving
034us guidance and opening our eyes to some things. So, it was really good. Appreciate it. >> Thanks for doing that. That together. >> Yeah, I'm excited to see how it moves forward >> with that. And if I could ask for your committee as well as yours. I got a public records request today for all committees that we have upright. just send me everybody that's on it >> and meeting times your your meeting times are over but if you're think you have to a meeting time when that could be >> yeah and we haven't scheduled anything um but we could give you an ETA kind of there's also in that committee drive um Kristen took notes and they're all Okay. Mhm. >> And if they don't have I don't know if I'm seeing dates on them,
035but I can get you those dates that we met too. >> I think it's forward looking >> forward. Yeah. So, it' be more of a when meetings might have once. >> I think we talked about April like in April. trying to avoid May because May such busy month for the whole district getting together sometime in the summer or teachers get back or something. Perfect. >> Yeah, just let me know. >> Good. Thanks and Deb and all those who participated. Yes. that. Okay. Community engagement community lunch Wednesday, March 4th. Aubrey's making >> the beef. >> Not those. Not not that. Just the ground beef. Um the patties we get pre-made >> possibly in the future, but not there yet. Excellent. All right. Library update. >> Met last week with members on library and had good discussion.
036We came to a few things that are going to be work of probably most of April along with volunteers for the next few weeks. First one, we've got to get a library management system stood back up and then work through inventory or or sort through the books that we had that have been returned and put some of those in the library and some of those in uh we're going to establish a free library to be housed in the multi-purpose room and that will be kind of a leave one take type library and have good offers on the table for assistance from the community as well as potential funding from the community should that become necessary. And we're going to be purchasing quite a few books to finish out this year. And I think we I
037signed off thing that we dedicate $6,000 in budget over the next three years uh to efficient operation of the house library for the students and community. And we would have continue ourou at the public library so that we have that rotational capability of student needs and still have full access to the inter library loan and the larger libraries as need be. >> Who's making or how making determinations on our books? probably be mo mostly April working with some some of the help and but I think April's going to be making a lot of that decision. um she's going to be getting guidance from Amy. And then um Amy has also provided us quite a few resources for um how to select and and places that we can efficiently get start purchasing books for a library
038because it's been a while since we had done that. Then I think the community members as well brought that the libraries in the area are constantly getting rid of books as well and may be able to if we say hey here's a book we want we can check around the area before we necessarily uh where I left it I there's plenty of resources for library just the the main resource missing the past was human resources kind of dipped into that legislative update earlier. Uh the the recal bill as amended right now is a strong one for our district. I think the the message I'd like to leave the community with is if if you are reaching out to legislators, it's going to be important on the House side to maintain what has come into the
039bill in the last couple days and if there's any possible way to get that categorization of funds out of the bill. That's that's the number one thing that's kind of a a catching point for us right now. >> Uh Senate file 81. >> I would anticipate that it'll pass the Senate without a hitch. Uh it seems that the Senate has acted in a fairly coordinated fashion that they decided this is what we're going to do and everybody's got on board. It came in unanimously. There was one amendment made in committee passed unanimously. I I would anticipate much of the same until it gets to the house. And it's just >> I sent all my emails to the house. >> I did too. And then it just fail. I'm gonna pretend that I did that, but
040I know it make it in front of them. >> I did have a really good meeting with uh more than half of the Senate Education Committee last Monday. They met us for lunch and and we were able to discuss a lot of what they ended up amending. And so I I am satisfied with how they're working to go right now. I think it's I'm glad your emails went to the house because I I think that the larger fight is going to be in the house. >> I did um plug on my I took the board chair training for WSBA and at the end calibration was brought up. Um there were a few from other districts that said they had gotten the impression that they were the legislators there were some legislators that were not listening
041to super school district employees. So that makes our job even more important in the community. Um, and then there were some that said their um, legislators had specifically said to text them that they're just emails just don't get through too many of them and they don't suck through them. >> So, gotten some nice replies on my emails. Okay. But I would like to test emails. >> Yeah. That was just some didn't match up necessarily with ours, but got their hair in that. And a lot of who we're contacting right now are our own represent. >> Especially important if you are sending emails is just to make sure that your subject line is meaningful >> and maybe even starts with Claremont, Wyoming or Shared High School. I >> said concerned parents and school board. go over
042the agenda for tomorrow. We'll go over our strategic plan. Okay. Make sure you action items. We will be if we come tomorrow for the information session we will just be in the audience right now prepared to >> No. So are you talking about for the Yeah. for the life skills committee. It'll just be those of us who are on the committee will be presenting or answering questions for anybody who has them. >> What time is >> 6:15. >> Yep. And I don't have any questions. >> Anybody else? The only thing I the contract with the right design um the numbers that he's got in there for fencing project are probably low. >> This is going to be right here. >> Yeah. Yeah. Across the across the driveway and then over here and wrap into the
043building. >> Do you think we need it? >> I think so. >> What's it for? What? Why? >> Yeah, just security. I mean, it's it's >> coming back into the building or how does it go from? >> Yeah. Back into the building and then over against the adjacent properties fence. >> So, is there going to be a gate at the driveway thing? >> Yeah. And that's the part that Levi probably was looking low on is that that's that's not a cheap gate. >> Is it going to be same height as the playground? >> I think so. Probably six foot fence. >> Okay. It's one we know we've talked with the state in the past. There's two security projects that they've been interested in. There is a bill in in session right now that uh provided
044bunch of money for security projects just of this nature. Um the security vest deal has been one that the district's been looking at for >> 12 years. Greg, >> yeah, >> I think if we had to pick between one or the other and go with that one. I think fence on the highway just that our egg shop a lot of times for eating the shop for noise for other reasons they throw that garage door out >> walk in. >> Yeah. Or drive in >> or drive in. >> Okay. I like your respon your comment down here. >> Yeah. That's awesome. >> And just if I could mention something, when we meet with the insurance people that do our property insurance, that's one of the things that they highlight the most that they are very disappointed
045is they walk into these schools and they're not secured. The doors are open, things are open that shouldn't be open. I mean, again, they're concerned about it. So I think we're just doing what we can to keep the building safe and the insurance people feel very strongly about that want the school safe because of things that can happen because again that does affect them. >> There's any kind of shootings and stuff like that. So that's what they point that out every time that that's one of the things that they see a lot of is just not keeping things secure as they should be. Is our vestable vest of view insecure? I mean, >> I don't like our vest view because uh as soon as anyone in the office clicks it open, it gives full access
046to the school. >> And and what we would be looking to do is make it so that upon entry into that secure vestibule, the only way into the building would be to come through the office, >> check in, and then come back into the building. Mhm. >> I've seen that in high schools throughout Wyoming. >> That's quite a little work. >> How would you How would you do that? >> Worth it. >> Bring bring that wall in so it angles across and then have a a man door into the office and then that man door's out of the office already. >> Everything that comes into the school has goes through the office. That trying to do >> there would be doors there, but those doors would remain locked so that you could exit through them.
047But anyone that's coming into the building during school hours, yes, it would be entry into the building, go to the office and then check in, come out of the office into the building. >> So, are you moving the wall that's there or you going to add another? >> Move the wall that's there, the the glass wall, >> right? >> The door right now. bring that further in, angle it across the the lobby area, and then there'd be a door that goes into the office on the closest side to the street and then door on the opposite side to come back out. >> And you'd still have that second set of doors to bypass that for events. >> Okay. >> Yeah. And this is it. They aren't new plans like I said and this is stuff
048the district had drawn up in 2014 2015. We spent we talked about it all the way through and just >> I don't I don't have them. Well, yes, I think that Levi did send to me. I I'll email you the plans if I've got them from otherwise I'll ask Levi. >> It's kind of short. >> It'll be interesting. the one like trying to think of how Casey's works, but so I think you come through double doors and then there's that glass window and you have to sign in but you don't go through the office. >> You talk to the people window right there to the side and then they let you through. >> I think that's how you protect those. Probably not because >> Yeah. I just can't. >> Okay. But I do know at
049the new 10 sleep school, they do have signs posted at their school that says that or employees or whatever may be carrying firearms. They have a big sign right by their door that says that >> picture. Yeah. Oh boy. >> Anything else on tomorrow's agenda? >> I noticed that when I >> Okay, >> a motion to move into executive session. >> Session. >> Yeah, she's got to say the statute. >> The appointment, employment, and right to say the statute. of statute 16-45 a July 25. Okay. Second. Oh, >> Kelly seconded. >> Uh any discussion? Proceed to vote. All in favor say I. Same sign passes. Um having you guys in a chase will join us start.