001Mr here Dr heran here Mr Grio here you have a flag the United States of America the stand one nation under God indivisible with liy and justice for all not seeing any MERS of the audience is this just a hold over from the last meeting yeah that's an error okay sorry yes sorry all right so policies wondering command now there is a presentation but it's not by the director of Technology kind of just we have the overview of the surveys that we've done at the end at the end all right so view policies for second reading nondiscrimination if you recall all the way back in 2024 uh we were talking about this it feels like it's like years ago it's actually like six weeks ago or something but um we contacted our attorney to take
002a look at our non-discrimination policies uh and they beram and Moses that's why it says Revis B BM there uh came together and basically told us you've got the two policies both the um non-discrimination and sexual harassment policies that are uh kind of dub tail one another and operate in concert with one another so if you recall we kind of said all right well we bump those back to First readings both of them and this is now U moving that into a second reading um nothing we did not change anything um given the you know the fact that the attorneys had already reviewed it and this is what they put together again to act in concert between the uh non-discrimination and sexual harassment versions the uh I think another thing you might remember is that
003there was that question about how can we have like so many different policies that address uh uh non-discrimination and kind got folded into this one policy so what is the uh underlining that's uh grammarly that if it doesn't like the way that the sentence is put together it highlight student parent either right so if you get the pro version tell you how to more clear if you're like that so it's going to um it's such as it should that's actually accurate I agree with it yeah AI the red one AI will yeah if it's if it's really bad I think the yellow ones are just suggestions whereas the red ones are there something wrong you know I just fixed all those job so I'm not sure why they're coming up this was the link for
004the agenda I know I switch those inquir this is the link off of this pop so is there anything mind shattering beram and no like this is the um second one the sexual harassment so you see that's where it folds in certified non-certified students and so these um complement one another they there're much uh they're much more succinct but then you get into the regulation right which tends to be you know more cumbersome and this is how do you implement said policy I know sometimes we talk about like um the not naming people if we can but this is a requirement you name the the person designated as the talked about that before so if Robin retires we you know obviously change that you going have to change the policy right just change the name
005right yeah the um oh because this is this is regulation this is the regulation but the uh uh these how to address these things like how to file complaints and stuff are listed in here but if you recall they're also on our website information we have a safe School climate plan if there's issues and you want to file something there's sexual harassment discrimination um this is requ by the law now the training has to be posted the training that people received gets posted there there's a complimentary video from the office of civil rights that's here so if you want to make a report and it's this this is the same link off the other page too so you can go to any of these like here's the sexual harassment one um once we update the
006policy update the link obviously so we did that several years ago to be able to make reporting clearing and straightforward I like I said those that's one that Rebecca both of those policies and regulations are ones you put together so any questions on those no feel like we've looked at them a l the security check fingerprinting one this one this one is just kind of crazy um it's pretty long uh but we spent a lot of time on this one too this is a third reading uh if you recall this is the one where uh we weren't sure why School n were singled out but that was because it was redundant per um because it's already required under law we don't identify every single group that's required so why School nurses um but this walks
007through the the regulation is the one that's really cumbersome so is uh the criminal justice information system the cgis there are a lot of regulations on this so like I had to do uh training a few other folks in the district had to do a training provided um by the FBI and State Police about who gets access to the databases who gets access to that information I don't know if you've probably heard um like sometimes in the news you'll hear about a law enforcement officer using these or somebody who works in that domain accessing something that they shouldn't be we really don't have that level of access but we have to be really careful about the information that we do pull on people on criminal records checks and we have to store it a certain
008way and all that's outlined in here um our HR people are trained including our new HR person who was just hired right before the break um you know Vin myself I have to be train and then yeah but it's it's pretty Common Sense actually so you know the level of detail here so if you have uh criminal history record information and you're arrested and convicted of a crime you'll have your your access suspended to the outcome of the arrest it's like all that level of detail and this that's why it's pretty cumbersome but again we went through this in the past it's a third reading I don't know if anybody has any questions specific to the security background checks yes sir just one the uh so the regulation is based on procedure provided by law
009enforcement or state law or both or more so it's not necessarily um provided in the letter of the law as much as it is provided by FBI and law enforcement about best practice regulations around and some of it is dictated by law but it's it's written the law is a reference for this this isn't word verbatim in the law so that's going to the full board for vote then yes these third reading this would yeah like how to how to um sanitize records if you have them stored electronically you know you have to overwrite it multiple times and these are just different ways of destroying records that you have as it relates to somebody's criminal record history so there's a whole bunch of this is like the Playbook on all different situations as it relates
010to criminal records checks so when you when you do a criminal record check do you get electronic file listing everything is yeah nothing like nothing to report or this happen this in most cases it would be nothing you know in some cases and they'll tell you out of state yeah whatever we the fingerprinting um usually through the chure PD submit that online and then it it takes a little bit of time to turn around which is permissible by law um in addition to that criminal record stuff we also um uh are required to contact previous Employers in Connecticut and ask if they've if the person's been let go under the course of an investigation and things like that sexual harassment claims things like that so there's a few different ways you know that background checks
011are enhanced of course none of it's immediate on the turnaround you don't get anything that day but you know um we do get it and then when we do get it there's a storage protocol there's a destruction protocol all that's in the in the regulation want to talk about social networking let's go this is um one that was reviewed by Floyd uh if you recall earlier this year we had a somewhat noteworthy uh situation with social networking and this uh again was reviewed by Floyd and um this is what U there weren't really honestly many changes that you see the ones that are highlighted in yellow um are the ones that were changed pretty limited I think we so in a nutshell update St social this is social media social media using social media you
012can't our staff you can't um represent ches public schools and go online and nor can you during the day be just accessing your social media or posting without the uh permission of your supervisor basically you should be posting any CPS related content without the blessing of your supervisor so like we'll have sports teams that do some stuff and things like that a lot of the Social Media stuff is not posted by the team itself uh by the coaches it's you know parents or right students will post things which we yeah we have limited um we provide guidance there but like we don't control it per se but if you if you're posting on like an official cheser Public Schools I think there protocols for that that you can't so this has been effect for a
013long time um few years 2019 yeah 2019 so that whole teacher business this wouldn't have mattered anyway because she wasn't representing herself as a right she wasn't representing the ches public school public school right so there's freedom of speech as it relates to everybody um regardless of their job I guess but this is a a good it was a good uh prompt to review it yeah update it and this these were the updates that Floyd recommended so the updates in here are still very vague when it comes to um what's the ter olog here subject to discipline it is subjective it is to be subjective yeah yeah within the Judgment it's kind of like you heard that definition of pornography I can't Define it but I know it when I see it kind of thing
014like this is it is subjective to the leadership at any time of day let alone 7:19 p.m. so yeah I mean there is a degree of discretion and judgment it's placed I mean things like um you know prohibited from using their District title or affiliation that's very cut and dry as it relates to the content it's a bit more subjective so go um well I think the phrase that sticks out to me because it it it sort of implies a a a stepped process is that in the uh last paragraph um it says if the board or superintendent believes that a staff member's activity on any social networking site violates the district's policies the board of superintendent May request that the employee SE such activity so it's it's almost like you're asked to stop instead
015of being subject to uh penalty automatically is but if you look at the next line though depending on the severity of the incident the staff member may be subject to disciplinary action so if that this is the intersection so it's a kind of confli though what you're talking about and that those two sentences are the intersection of free speech rates and um our policy the Desire by public entities to maintain a certain standard in decorum right so um I you know the first thing when that situation happened was take it down first like talk to the person get them to take it down um because we can make such a request if the if if an individual said to us at that point no that's my free speech they could have a real good argument
016there when um those posts create a uh make it create an environment that make it impossible to operate in the course of business that's where you start to get into the severity of the incident um and easier for a disciplinary process to take place um and it's not cut and dry it's subject to the interpretation of the courts is usually what it boils down to somebody's going to make that determination because if we fire somebody and they say That's My Free Speech right I I wasn't representing the cheser public schools I was speaking on a topic of public interest things that are gerine to the law they could have an argument um is I mean can we speak about this the situation oh well how about this the what if we uh can we set
017a level of severity such as incitement of violence because there's you know like you were saying 98% of you know that incident was free speech right it was a the part about violence some people could argue 100% And I think that's that's the tricky part and that's why this is vague you know because it's necessarily vague and and Floyd reviewed this intentionally to be left up to the lawyers after the fact then yeah and that's why Floyd we had Floyd review it after the fact to see if things like that would be helpful you know okay let profanity is that appropriate or not I would argue it's probably not a great idea for our staff members to be posting profanity least tiroides on the internet regardless of content it's but I can't say to our
018staff that you can't do that because that'd be a violation of their free speech rights however however if it got to a place where it made the course of business kind of impossible to conduct then I probably could you know given this sub you know that last severity of the incident but it's it's not black and white and it makes it a lot more difficult to manage if there was something that said if you're inciting violence and that would still be subjective there were different people who had different perspec perspectives on that in our recent history so it's it's um it's not as black and white is it makes it much more difficult to officiate when the rules aren't crystal clear and this is where this is Floyd's uh our attorney's recommendation of of how
019to navigate this policy yeah but a positive spin on that is that ows the discretion to treat each and every instant as as its own separate yeah case which really you want to do you don't want these blanket rules that say you have to do this if this happens because you're going to catch people it makes it a lot harder when it shouldn't happen yeah makes it a lot harder but I I understand it from talking to and living it and talking to our attorney about it yeah number nine yeah that's where I thought that uh Adam was originally going oh that's where I'm going have we made any attempt or have our lawyers made any comments about gender neutral language in this case changing his slash her to their um no that was not
020I would that's never been discussed not not in this I mean we would have to go through thousands of pages of policy manuals to do that I mean at some point maybe that's that's not been brought up here well I've I've brought it up so if we ever get to I can certainly ask about uh recommendations on that on that front I'm not saying that I want us to take this on at this saying you know this may be an issue yeah I'm sure it will be an issue trust me let's not be theocr next you know the Title Nine is changed know twice in the last few years and I wouldn't be shocked if it changes again so this may change again anyway any other questions on these I can ask about that the
021um going back to the uh the situation the Tinker standard do that have any carryover to faculty as far as being disrupted to the educational process you know um the the famous quote from that Tinker versus de Mo case is you know you don't leave um your right to free speech at the schoolhouse gate yeah um from the uh Supreme Court ruling on that people can teachers can express to a degree their free speech rights um and Tom Mooney has written quite a bit about this uh as it relates to teacher freedom speech I'm happy to try and pull some of that to I was just curious yeah because technically a little bit off the rails but it was political and that was the the Nexus of yeah if she were saying those things in
022school oh that's different yeah Crystal Clear yeah right but you have the right to say and do things outside of school that a much different threshold than school so like if I wanted to wear a cross or David or something um you know around my neck that's that's one thing um if I said to everybody well today I'm going to lead lead us in prayer during class that's a totally different you know so you do have a right to free speech but there are certainly significant limits to those Free Speech rights as a teacher uh as an employee uh in a public setting yep yeah this it's kind of fascinating like all these issues and some of the challenges that come up that hopefully we don't have to deal with again for a long time
023but yeah um BS of completion that was just a change in date they change see if we have that highlight think that was [Music] see 25 it went to 27 that what all it is so the graduating class at 27 has to have a completed faf spot um so we've got a couple years to worry about that why is that um I'm sure it has something to do with Federal uh aid but this has been ad done but if you're not getting federal aid or not even no I mean like at the state level um I'm sure that some of the federal money that flows through Connecticut um has to do with for example do you and you may remember Adam when uh the state started requiring us to like build to Medicaid uh for
024special education services so we still have to do that uh if students release to the state we can build through Medicaid uh the state then gets Federal money for the services that we provide and we get a trickle down of that minuscule amount but the state it's Pennies on the dollar kind of thing but the state saw it as an opportunity everybody in the state is doing it that's a lot of pennies and we don't get much for it um but the state gets a fair amount for it it's kind of like that is the way I believe that the rationale for pushing everybody to complete a F Well personally I think completing the fasta is burdensome and I don't think people should be required have to do it just because the state wants some
025money but we don't have any say in that is that correct this is a St State yeah maybe we have some fodder for our meeting with the politicians and what do you mean by that when the state wants money is that because they can use statistics to apply for well that's what yeah I'll look into that to confirm that but like with the Medicaid thing that's Federal money gets funneled through the state um to us me we get pittance of that money uh for the services we provide but all those is that how they determine the pittance yeah so this is I'm wondering you know if this is the same rationale um yeah because remember it just sort of appeared what a year or a couple years ago and so you know we haven't ever
026had to do it because it keep pushing the date back um so I haven't invested a lot of time to fully understand it to be honest with you yeah that sounds like a good one for our yeah legislative meeting 22 is the original adoption so we can ask about this at the legislative one and I can even try and give my heads up so maybe they can get some information on so that they might understand it before they come yeah put them on the spot yeah uh the alternative education program this was um the chainer it's not really relevant to us per we um we farm that out but this is the credit uh recovery program as part of their alternative school program uh we do offer a credit recovery program through the wng for
027public schools um credit recovery program is a separate entity is like uh you basically students are have access to these packets or whatever it's not um they they get tutoring and access to these packets they complete the P packets and you get a separate degree it's not like a traditional chure Public Schools diploma um but here we do we have intensive intervention supports for high schoolers who are not making uh progress toward graduation and we provide a lot of academic support um and sometimes it's you know through an alternative program like available at hon sometimes it's just um tutoring but we provide a lot of support uh for for students to that's why we have a um graduation rate that hovers around 99% so and what this red says is that so you don't have
028to actually change your where you're going to school right you don't have to go to huming to get access to that support because I'm assuming somebody somewhere in Connecticut was forcing kids out of the if you weren't on track because that I've seen that in other school systems where yeah if you're not on track they bounce you to another place kind of thin in the herd um creates a really tough situation some of those in a public school yeah really also counts against your graduation yeah yeah so they put him into an alternative school so your graduation rate looks a lot different that alternative school doesn't have a graduation rate like right the regular school has kind of published differently which kind of moving the Coconuts on the table you know wasn't really above board
029so I'm sure that had something to do with this policy but again this is not really something that's germine to our stuff but it's a state law so required update so that's that and now we have you know the the excitement of our survey for parents and staff and students that I'll walk you through um can I ask you a question about the third reading when this comes to the full board will be Thursday no no next business Mee next business meeting um do we vote on all those at once it's not they're not separated one by one they don't have to they typically aren't but I guess they could be if we I mean we could potentially choose that now right we could yeah I mean these are pretty b i I don't see
030any reason to I just just wondering yeah I mean I know um like the calendar you know last time around you know split those up but diversity split So Adam could vote Yes for one of them and not for the other right right right right that's what it was you know much appreciated if there's any objection here but like I said these are all kind of statutory and um the RS responsibilities and social networking I guess is not but the others are pretty they're all pretty vanilla really unless you wanted to split them up no I wasn't asking I wanted to split them I was asking just to be sure how this sure the process um this is just an overview I put together for you there's a lot of information here um and so
031the first page uh in the stapled packet is the existing expectations at each grade level these are the rules basically if you will it's not the policy if you recall the PO policy talks a lot about beepers and pagers um it's a little bit dated um like you can't bring a cell phone to school our policy per se that's just not reality though u in 2025 so the next page is of this summary piece is just feedback that I Consolidated and pulled through this is um percent of teachers who feel current self phone practic is working well and um its most 35% agree uh 25% strongly agree for a total of 60% it gets to 70% when plus when you add in the neutrals the disagree 60 a third of the those came from or
032twoth thirds came from chesher high school with it working well because they cited issues with um colleagues not having consistent enforcement of the policies um in some cases it was we really want them locked up the the cell phones locked up they would um so it was either consistent enfor or we just don't want them at all on campus was most of the the um well have we changed that yet or are we going to change that I mean teacher should be consistent yeah and so we work on it um with a hundred people it's it's harder to get consistency almost 100 teachers at jure high across the board so you try and get consistency um with everything but uh it's easier said than done sometimes but we do reinforce we have a we have
033a rule yeah well as as ches high school has a rule on school rule on electronics and we try and reinforce that with teachers and for a m of reasons you know some deviate from that even if it's only sometimes uh all the time they deviate but there is some deviation um but we can re I mean we can create a policy well that yeah that reinforces that or or we can just let ad admin should be we have a we have a rule so Administration can they should be addressing it with yeah absolutely Y is there aware of it and just for clarity um this issue was not brought up during the negotiations no right there was no you know like an anticipation so the what I'm just wondering is is the the disagree
034or the the agree the disagree because uh there's a a faction of teachers that feel perhaps they should not have to enforce a rule like that not necessarily or is it that's not that's like is it like a a rebellion type situation or is it you know not my job force that that wasn't the sentiment expressed in the in the survey responses that was not at all so I I wasn't I just wanted to ask the question yeah yeah yeah it really wasn't the Senate okay well that's good and in the sense that it's not working well you know it was predominantly the like I said the concerns about colleagues not reinforcing it um is was the lon share of the I mean that's like time and Memorial kind of stuff right if it wasn't
035a cell phone it was you know back in the day it was something else right yeah or it's hall passes or it's dress code or it's you know it's um kind of a Timeless challenge yeah uh from our elementary parent responses we 450 Elementary parents respond percent who believe current practice is working well um on the agree and strongly agree that's 56% the neutral who are basically a lot of folks who my kid doesn't have a cell phone per the comment so I don't know I'm not really aware is 31% so you if you lump those together at 90% roughly at that point and so it sounds like you know there's 8% disagree 5% strongly disagree that it's not working well so it's pretty limited um by comparison at the middle school of our 312
036parents who responded um the what's thaten that's a good amount so yeah about uh half students represented there I guess about half um the parents who agree in strongly agree again 60% you lump in neutral it's over 80% well over 80% so um again pretty good um not something that and I think one thing that I've learned from reading the feedback and looking at the data is that there it's almost like a bell curve and you see that here with the 23% in neutral even at the middle school it's like a bell curve there are people with really strong feelings on either end um who feel like cell phones should never be allowed inside of a school ever then there are people on the other end who are like yeah everybody should be able to
037carry a cell phone what's the big deal um I will never let my child go to school without a cell phone on their person um usually it's a security concern that the person has um and the vast majority of people fall inside of those Tails right and here what we see in the survey data is it's not really a true bell curve because there's a lot more people who agree than disagree but there are there are definitely details on both ends I have real strong feelings about always and never and would you would you agree that the middle school is probably the the most strict uh in regards to a school that is probably more applicable yeah than let's say because like you can do a strict at elementary school but most kids don't have
038lot of kids don't have a fun but we in middle school it's yeah but we start to see it in fourth grade you know fifth grade fourth fifth grade now kids getting phones um which again I would make a plug for if you're going to do that because maybe you got a family circumstance that I'm not talking about kids who have devices because of monitoring diabetes or something I'm talking about you're purchasing a cell phone for your child I would strongly encourage you purchase a phone that doesn't have social media accounts on to tied to it you can buy phones we've publicized different brands that have just phone technology and text technology and you know um I don't know the one that I use with my family life 360 where you know where the person
039is but it's not like a social media app so um you're right Adam it's the middle school is where the rubber eats the road where almost everybody in that population has a device um and so it becomes so so I guess the the question sort of a leading question I gu so if the middle schoolers are more are used to a stricter policy should that then be uh graduated into the high school as the students who have been used to it age through the system and then now every my my response to that would be no because in my that's my opinion but we're here to decide we could always change my opinion would be no because developmentally there's huge difference between a 13-year-old and 181 19 year old and so I think you know
040we're trying to prepare those 181 19 year olds to go to you know maybe a college campus or a workplace or the military um and use those cell phones responsibly U and so I think there's a balance I I think it makes a lot of sense to be really stringent in the middle school and strict about those policies I think it it makes you know sense as well at the high school to have a little bit more latitude with some of these policies as we're teaching kids about appropriate use um so middle school students mind you um I found it really fasc this is where you start to see the bell curve kind of kick in again uh the you know 42% % of middle school kids are neutral on the topic of whether or
041not their cell phone policy is working well 12% strongly disagree that it's working well 20% uh disagree that it's working well so about a third of kids um don't like the restrictions um more than a thir kids are neutral and slightly less than a third of kids think it's going fine this is this year's data right this Falls and this is so the rules put into practice just this year keep yeah that's a great point and because keep in mind that the eighth grade class it was much more LAX they didn't have those so restrictions about 50% of these kids are used to I wouldn't say no holds bar but it was much more LAX so I think to your point that's where we're seeing a little bit more hey I don't like this um
042in this this data that we have at the high school level I promise you I'm not going through the entire packet just this level of kind of interesting stuff but it is it's it's kind of interesting we knew it was going to be kind of interesting High School parents we had 149 responses that obviously it's participation it's going to be a little bit different uh to what degree do you agree with the statement again that cell phone expectations exist in my child to are working well 10% strongly disagree again so you're less than a third strongly disagree or uh disagree a a little less than a third um are neutral and almost you know 45% almost 50% are um supportive the and these are the 149 parents that responded students again this is very Bell
043curvish 45% are neutral at the high school like that's astonishing to me that's almost the same as the middle school yeah it's astonishing to me you would think you would think that you know any sort of restriction on a cell phone your hypothesis might be that any restriction on a cell phone kids are are going to viant push back against that but that's not the case they might not know the restrictions they don't like I you know I think from reading a lot of the comments they just they get it you know the the kids who are frustrated by it say things like you know I'm a a good I'm an 18-year-old with good um with good grades responsible person why do we have any restrictions I'm not doing this anyway it's it's almost like
044they feel offended that there is a like but it's but it's not mean you need it for some boo ISM for you yeah you need it for some Bozo who doesn't get you know isn't responsible and takes their phone out during class you know but at the same time we've discussed how social media can be addictive yeah and sometimes if you're addicted to something you may not be truthful about it yeah right or you may not even realize that you have a problem right right sounds like You' heard me talking to my teenage one of them dude what are you enough with the they me too so yeah enough for the Instagram dad so anyway that that's that's that's pretty uh it's isn't it really interesting so supplementing all of this information is school by
045school data I thought that you might be interested in this this is reflective of all the questions so on the chat and one just alphabetically elementary through High School uh parent cell phone survey elementary students should not be accessing 82% strongly agree another 11 a half% agree like nobody thinks elementary kids should be accessing cell phones then you see the Middle School it goes to 67% strongly agree they shouldn't be using cell phones during the day and then at the high school 40% strongly age so what you see is that maturation piece I think Adam that we were just talking about like super restrictive at the Elementary grades little less restrictive at the middle school um you most flexible at the high school and that's the what that's what our current practices reflect so um
046do little parents you know kind of feel the same way you see that Trend throughout right like super restrictive element Tre little less restrictive in midle U most flexible at the high school um then we have the do parent ones which is interesting yeah I think that's really interesting yeah when you look at how the parents elementary students um should not access cell phones only 22% all the elementary parents feel like no way should they be accessing once you get the dot it's whatever let's pass that now it's just kind of interesting to look at some of the data but I mean this at the middle school where almost a third of parents strongly disagree that they should not be accessing cell phones during the school day I found kind of interesting something that that
047sticks out to me also though is the K through six um It also says on buses doesn't it yeah yeah or on the buses is that yeah because we don't want to you know what that though it's hard it's hard to enforce behavioral expectations on bus with because our you know you've probably seen Elementary buses in town are pretty pack like that's a Full House bus that's not the SCH bus so the Full House bus um with one driver uh is hard to enforce but because we have less students that have phones in jail grades because they're you know our parents are pretty good about that and if there's an incident that happens then you can say right should have had your phone anyway yeah it's a more it's a more of a disciplinary issue
048for the student so then we have that we have the High School parent and student is it is it only buses at the elementary level it doesn't say that in dog yeah Middle School doesn't we don't call that out at the middle in high school yeah okay but we do have guidelines while you should be filming other people without their knowledge and things like that we have cameras in every bus I'm sorry do we have cameras in everys not every bus no no I think we it's evolved incredibly since my days of being an assistant principal where you literally have an old school VHS but I'm not positive that we have the mon every single bus I think we're close but I I would think I know some of the ones like that we have
049Chester public school but not dco Chester public school buses that are more like special transport runs and stuff I'm pretty sure we don't have them on most of those but we also have several adults on most of those right for students with you know different then you have a a CPS cell phone service I broke out um in the overview on the you know at the beginning of this packet teachers this includes teachers par Educators and other staff in the building so like secretaries other folks that don't have have direct instructional responsibility so I thought that that might kind of skew the data to a degree um and wanted to just break out the the teacher perspective which is at the beginning of the packet so I mean that brings up an interesting thing even
050at the elementary level in my mind is um like the playground monitors and lunchroom monitors I mean they shouldn't be on their cell phones either yeah not during U not when they're working and that's that that's the other well it shouldn't be like posting or anything like that um but even electronic that's not the electronic Dev it's the social media one yeah but even as um modeling behavior when they're around kids they shouldn't have their phones out yeah I wonder how they feel about I think most it's generally the expectation around students that you're not doing that yeah but it's funny how many kids will say to me if they see me start to take a picture as a super Trasher that always has the most engagement when kids are like Oh Let's do let's
051do a selfie here you know get on Super Treasure it's funny yeah they like that at to high school anyway I don't do it any place else with kids but U anyway so this is just information for your digestion today and um if you guys want you know we'll we'll come back next time I'll put together a draft policy that reflects the and we can discuss it or not like for a first reading see we want with it but you have the data there I didn't see anything in the data that makes me think wow this our practices are way off base here like like I said there are going to be a fair number of people on either end of the tail who don't like it for one reason or another but generally speaking
052it's certainly more contemporary than the policy we have it makes more sense are we taking this data to the full board yeah I made extra copies to get to the board members yeah great so that's all I had we just need a motion thir do we have to move the other ones forward or the third is for the full board yeah um I'll move like to make a motion to move um policy 0521 nondiscrimination and policy uh 4000.1 42001 SL 51444 sexual harassment SL tile 9 uh for a second reading second all in favor the thir you can do it I'll second it all right and we'll um leave them all together yes yeah yes yeah um move that uh policy [Music] 42125 security uh Security check fingerprinting criminal justice 4118 51 rights responsibilities duties
053social networking uh policy 6 48 FAFSA completion program and uh policy 6172 alternative education program uh be moved uh to the board uh for a third reading third and final reading is that third and five third reading and then the board one is the board motion is approval in um waiting in the approval okay great second any discussion all in favor move to a Jour move to aour yes to a Jour all in favor we are a Jour all right