CorpusRecord 42371

Kuna School District Board of Trustees Regular Meeting - July 8, 2025

A searchable transcript preserved as part of the Discourse Corpus. Passage numbers provide stable references within this record; verify quotations against the original recording when available.

Source
YouTube / Kuna School District
Date
2025-07-09
Location
Ada County, ID
Material
Transcript
Extent
5,134 words · about 29 min
Collected
2026-06-09

Transcript

Verbatim source text

001and appoint Kevin Gford as our sup substitute board clerk for this meeting. I need a motion. I make a motion that uh Mr. Gford is our substitute board clerk for just this meeting. Just this meeting. What? All right. Kirsty. I Michael I and I'm an I. Okay. The next thing is we need to uh go into executive session. We'll need a motion, but it will not be C. It will be F. And that is a change to communicate with our legal counsel about a legal um opt some legal options for us. So when we make the motion, it needs to be changed to F because we're not Go ahead. that we go into executive session in accordance with Idaho code section 74206 um for the reason F to meet with legal counsel correct to look

002at some legal options. Okay. Okay. And uh all in favor I Michael I I and I we're all eyes. Okay. During executive So it is 6:36. We're out of executive session and we will start with regular session. So let's start with the pledge of allegiance. Let's all stand. Ready? Begin. I I pledge algiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. All right. Do we have any patrons who signed up? Okay. You want to approve the agenda? Oh, that's a good idea. Let's approve the agenda. Do I have a motion to approve the agenda? I so move. Second. Have a second. Okay. Any discussion? And let's vote. Kirsty. I. Michael. I. JD. I. And I'm

003not. Now, do we have any patrons? Same people know. Okay. So, we'll move right along. Uh, unfinished business discussion. Safe schools manager uh Foley Fuller and Assistant Superintendent Bon Graves on our change orders. So these were um the change orders that I just tore the company uh Curtis Curtis Plain came to us and said these are the ones that we needed to come to you. There was there was a small one at Hover and there was a small one at King Middle 10,000 were easy to fix. These are areas that they have to completely take out and then replace. Um, so I can I can there's tons of pictures. There's tons of data. I brought um Johnny here to answer your questions when you guys ask questions that I can't answer. Um, if you look

004at the pictures, if you click go click. So like are these are these um areas that were not part of the original bid or the original bid was to just seal coat and then crack fill and these are areas that they said if they were to seal coat it would literally they would you' be calling in 3 months saying why haven't you seal coated yet? So their suggestion is if if if we're not going to do the repairs don't seal coat it be a total waste of money which to me is a standup move by the company. They're saying that they would do less work for us, which means we wouldn't pay them as much, but they're just areas that are so bad. And were they not like on site to do the bid to

005begin with? Was it just like like they didn't see this stuff before? Is that uh they probably Johnny they did see it and they did mention it to us. Uh right now we just went into the price for a sil code. Um they did dig into it a little bit more on some of the schools, Ross and Indian Creek mostly. Um and then they came to the conclusion that if we still code it, it's not going to do anything at all. So does that mean changing like the big divot in Fremont? Would that actually be like uh they're actually No, ACD was doing that actually. They they had filled it in for us, but then I don't know if that prompted AC, but AC they did a temporary patch last week and then they came

006back for a permanent fix. Okay, good. And I had a question. Why is Indian Creek so much more than the others as far as changes? Because they square footage. So if you it increased the entire parking lot. Oh, okay. That I was just trying to figure out why cuz I'm like unless you didn't fit as much. Also within there's going to be some grading issues. Um I don't know if you noticed it's kind of tease off and one side that goes towards the office, it is able to go around into the street and go down. Okay. The other side is building up in the corner. Um, and we're actually just recently had some issues with the sidewalk caving in and it's all because of the cracks, the water slipping through too. Okay. So, this is

007to fix that. Obviously, it'll be it'll if we don't do this, it'll soon look like the front of Kun Middle in front of the gym, which was another question. I didn't see Kun Middle on here. That was an alternate you guys approved. So, we had to do engineering and all that stuff. We haven't gone. That's a hu that's going to be a huge one. So this is like this is quite a bit more than what we had originally set aside and and so correct me or help me understand I guess when you go to bid to begin with like this is kind of what we're looking for is an assessment of the project and so and then we're comparing apples to apples with contractors. Um, and then so like we haven't done the the job

008and I guess to me it feels like how does this compare to the previous bids now again? And were they going to reduce some of this and and that's why their bid was higher? Like all of their bids were like they were only just seal coat and crack. Um, now they could have also come back and said because this is kind of a whole a completely different scope of the project. So to me it almost feels like a rebid would be helpful. I mean this is not small dollars that we're talking about. If we do rebid it would just have to become a next summer project which means the asphalt becomes I mean because like what's the total in what we were difference I guess like it's if you click out one more time we're

009like 300,000 or something. It's an additional which one do you want? Number two. What was the original bid? So like how much are we spending total now? So this project we estimated at 1.25 million. The original bid was at 325504. The combined four change orders are 290. So a total of 600. So we're kind of the original bid was 3 325 and so we're really almost doubling it. Um, so where where are the funds coming from to pay for the extra 290,000? Still the house bill. So what projects will not get done if we allocated 290,000? We estimated this project at 1.25 million. So you set aside extra money just in case? Is that like a just in case estimate? You did 1.2 million just in case. So if we don't do it this year

010and we wait another year, is it going to cost us more because of more damage? That's the $100 question. Indian Creek and Ross. Yes. Because the water's seeping in at a very fast rate and it's it's messing up the foundation. So, absolutely. And we budgeted 1.25 million. Yes. That's from here. So, and this is at 616, right? 2006. Okay. And Trusty's Low is right. If we didn't do this as a change order, we would have to go out and get bids for the again for the repair. Also to answer your question a little bit, um when we did it, we've had several companies come in and give us bid just for the seal and paint in Crackville. Some companies don't do asphalt at all. They don't do any kind of repair. So that's kind of

011what we were advertising to them. And then a lot of people during this process came up to us and said, "You need to look into these schools a little more." And then we got a look into the more they got back to us. Can we say the other bids that we had previously? The other like previous to hiring Curtis. The bids that came in when Curtis came in like what was the other? Yeah, I don't I don't have they were all within a measurable amount of money. But he's saying that they don't do asphalt so they wouldn't even it wouldn't even matter. Curtis does. They're one but the other companies. any other companies they don't even do it. So they they wouldn't even fix. So it wouldn't even matter. They just look strictly seal crack

012and we can't seal if we don't fix. Exactly. In this situation, their recommendation is to not waste the money. Jason's looking to see if he could find Do you guys remember what month it was in? It was last month, right? May or May. May I think it was May? It was either April or May. There's There we go. If you go to the very last slide, if they don't if they I mean I look at the pictures we broke it out in case you want to do anything by school or you want to look at it differently. So the 1.25 million set aside for parking lot resurfacing. So we have enough money to do Kunis High School too with that. Like the additional Uh we we haven't gone to the engineering and done that yet.

013No, we're we knew that wouldn't be a this summer project. We wouldn't be able to get this done this summer. But Kuna High School is just resurfacing. There's no app. Correct. Yeah, we haven't gone. It's just Fremont Ross and New Creek. So all of this you guys approved us to get to go out to bid for additional parking at Kuna High and correct it for repairing middle. We haven't gone to VH. So the parts in blue were which parts are going to be completely torn out and redone. So we need crease easy. That's the part and that's going down to the grout the road mix or whatever and then redoing it completely. Yeah. Doing the grade a little bit better because due to the rain and all the cracks, it did mess up the grade

014quite a bit and um so yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. And what about all that space behind Indian Creek? Is that asphalt, too? We're not doing anything there. Most of that is concrete. That's playground. The playground will be re playground. It will be resurfaced. It'll get resurfaced. Yep. And then if you click backwards to Ross, it's this portion. As you pull into Ross, there's a tiny little red spot there. Most of it is this part and then a little bit and that'll be completely taken out and rehab and the rest will be just resurfaced. Correct. And then the next ones are really test of your eyes. It's every little red spot that came high. Does that mean the big hole in the back too? I don't know what you mean by the big hole in the back

015when you come up in the first driveway in the back. You're talking about Oh, yeah. There they are. students going to paint their parking spots on this stuff. Your car is coming. That would be so question. My car just loves them. You're on the record. We are on hold until we get this figured out. We have nice shiny parking lot. The red here is is is just that they're redoing all of this. This is just the playground, but these are the areas that are being corrected. And remember, we did a huge correction here and I think here last year. Same thing. And then one more click shows you Fremont. It's the two entries and then right by the trash can. Yeah, I emailed all of you a screenshot of the previous bids and order. I

016I guess the other option would be to decide which ones we would want to do and then go out for bid again. That's well I guess I just feel like I don't like this bid this operation standard for bidding something picking a bid at 300,000 and then coming back to a double. Like I can see that maybe I feel like we need to ask more of our bids to do some research in the in the future particularly now that we're learning this is possibly the case. But like we move forward at $300,000 and then we sort of feel like we're stuck at 600,000. If if we go out to bid, this will put the project off another year. Correct. Yes. The repair part. Absolutely. Which could cause issues at Ross and Indian Creek. Cost us

017more. I make a motion that we approve the request for the asphalt repair at the following schools from the KMS or KHS FMS and Ross and India Creek. Do I have a second? I'll second. Any other discussion? Okay. Kirsty I. Michael. Hi. I for me also. Thank you very much. I wanted to but I just don't like it. Uh the next one has to do with awarding bids for Hubard restroom and again manager John Fuller for assistant superintendent by grades. uh these were the two bids that there were two other companies that did chose not to get bids and then they basically said that August 18th deadline was just too short for them and and the workers they had. Um LKB and Muskro helped us with this one and all the engineering. If you've ever

018been to the annex, this will repair the urinal situation in the floor that was built in the 60s7s maybe. Yeah, who knows? 70s I think. And then there's some there's some very tiny toilets that will be repaired and then there's some ADA stuff as well. That's what I wanted to know. What does this bid take into consideration? Is it tile work? Is it toilets? How many? There has to be tile work because of the the replacements in the urinal. That's what I tile work adjustments of the toilets. Height where was an issue? And when they take those off and they see the plumbing, are we going to re need to redo plumbing too? I believe some of this quote is for some of the plumbing for the room right in the backyard. Is this the

019main bathroom in He or the No, the boys bathroom pretty much. And there is one toilet, two toilets in the I believe two toilets and the girls that are a little too small for the schools. And what's 62,200 plus 4500? Their bid had an an addition. So whether we took the addition as well, um it it's not the preferred bid. What was the addition? Ah, it's on the bid. I don't see. It was on. I think it would be super great if we could have the bids to look at specifically like when we have these things so we can kind of have questions. They're in their folder. It's they not have them. Um, I think we've got Is it in the um the bids what they were going to do? I did see that, but

020I don't see it. It's separate partition. So, they must be Hold on. Where would where for the in the July Hillary in the July 2025 board folder there's a folder called hover bathroom that's got the in are in there where's the July like in our maybe I saw that on something else but I remember seeing three oh that was a score table sorry wrong bid I would I kind of agree I'd like to know a little bit more what this is about and why we're getting the 4500 or what that entails. I think it's it's written on the bids. So I I just assume because she shares the bids with you guys looked at it. So I I can have a more detailed presentation next time as well. Well, do we not need this done

021this summer or we plan on using that? I do. Yeah. No, this does need to be done. Yeah. This if you guys don't approve this today, it won't be finished. It won't be done. And we need it for the annex. Now, that used to be like for little kids. We're making the toilets more for regular students now. No, second grade. Second grade. Okay. So, I wanted to know the annex has a separate bathroom or they come into the They have a separate bathroom. That's okay. Is it on here? So, is that what we're fixing or are we doing the main bathroom? No. No. Just the hover. Just the hover. Yeah. And there I don't have like a folder specifically. I didn't see any that's all I ever saw. You don't Would you know why they

022don't have a folder? Let me share it with you. I'll email it to you. I just don't know where they don't have it. It would potentially not been shared with No, it's shared with the group. I just share with the group. I'm like really? Um those bathrooms were made that was correct. I can share [Music] more but she's supposed to I put a note here in the notes for the end. You guys should which understandably you don't can't see all the details of the info. Yeah. So, you all got an email to a link. I feel like it's a blind thing kind of to the 20 25. Did you get it, Hillary? What does it say? Yes. Um, Hoverard bathroom. Hover annex bathroom. Hover bathroom. Did you get You should get it, too. You should

023have a kid. We should all have it now. You know how technon [Music] partition. We'd like plans plan spec partitions including partitions per spec. However, please note they would not be available to ship until at the very earliest mid August. So that's what the extra 4500 was for. And so we don't need partitions. We're just going to use the ones we have. This bid has partitions. And this is the one. This is separates the urinal. So you're not touching ours with your neighbor. I make a motion that we approve the Pacific Source construction bid of $53,775 for the annex for Hover. Second. Any more discussion? No. All right. Kirst. Michael. Hi. JD. Hi. Hillary. Hi. And I'll be I would Can I ask a question? Do you normally get this? Would you normally have this

024folder? No. No. But usually it comes attached to the bids. Yeah, normally it's on the agenda. Okay. Like when we do the score table, we saw the bids. They were all on there. So we just need to make sure that we get the bid that we can see. Okay. Because that was my question was like, okay, is this just toilets? What exactly are you waiting for? Yeah, makes sense. Yeah. Okay. So, all right, moving right along. New business. First thing is Kim Beckod and um consider donation. Um so chairperson Nixon and members of the board um tonight this is just uh for you to consider um to approve the amendedou with diode. Okay. Do I have a motion that we approve theou motion that we approve theou from diode. Do I have a second? I'll

025second. Any discussion? And we'll start with Hillary this time. Hillary, um, can we just say that it's it's now for two Can I say the amount? Sure. Okay. I just think it's now it's for 2.3 million to be paid over 10 years. The first payment will be 100,000, the second payment 400,000, and therefore thereafter 200,000 per year. It'll be 10 years. And previously it was 500,000. Yes. And I also like the fact that there's no strings attached that we can use it for what we need. Yeah. So I appreciate which was also not part of the previous. So no feel good about the Thank you for and so hi. Okay. And Judy and Michael Hi and Kirsty. Hi. And I'm an I. All right. Now we're on to the uh purchase of the Kuna High

026School score table. And Dr. Yes. So, this this falls under the the diode agreement or the MOU that they're signing and the first $100,000 that they had talked about was going to be for athletics. And so, that's they are as we speak, redoing the gym floor at the high school. And then um Luke would like to purchase a new score table because the score table that they have in the gym. They have to um cart it in and out on wheels and and the wheels are the the little carts those wheels are broken. So anyway, they are looking at a new score table and the bids are in there and he has a preferred bid for that. They have not ordered it yet. They're waiting until we do have the funds to order it. But

027just looking for your approval so that we can move forward once we do. Is it true that there was um vandalism to the score table? I don't know. That's what I was told from students. So, but they went in one day and there were but all of the cords were cut. I don't know if it's anything. But Brian, you know more about it being old and older. I just I know that when you gota you got to climb under the bleachers to get everything plugged in in those courts about every two or three years and get cut. That wasn't that was the scores table. That was the video board. Different thing. Yeah. I know Bill has cast a couple times because those cords have been changed. So we also need a new video. They were

028able to duct tape those. Okay. So which one is the preferred bid? Um the preferred bid is the top one. Okay. I make a motion that we approve the Nevco quote scores taper table for $24,6375. Okay. Second. Second. Um for discussion, I just want to say I like the way this was where he checkar how much it was the bid was and then we could see what was needed to be and then he added it. So I do like that. So that's my discussion part. All right. So, here we go. Kirsty, hi. Michael, hi JD. Hi, Hillary. Hi. And I'm I also Thank you. Is this going to be really a nice one that'll have all the helpers? Yes. That's what I just asked. Like I remember when I went to Middleton, I was like,

029"Wow, these guys are like professional over here." Same as I was like so nice. Yeah. And he you did send a picture of the gym floor. I was going to send that to you guys on on Friday. Do you know the jumpers after? Okay. And now we have some let's see uh first reading policies with Brian Craig sister. The only time they'll be this long is when there is the quarter one set by by Jill by our attorney. These were quarter two and these were all following the the legislation's new changes in laws. So there wasn't a lot that we had flexibility with. I stand for any questions for the is there 10. Um is 912 one that we have brought forward before? And oh sorry we're on a sorry we'll go to that one

030next. So basically like for 222 is this everything that we had prior and you just added in what needed to add in. Okay. I just want to make sure I I think there is some change to it. the green all the green changes to it. Okay. Like it is opening up a little bit of um opportunity for board members sp um spouses to be employed differently, right? Yeah. For smaller districts. And then I don't know what it was before, but also now if it's like a contract employee like or a 1099 employee, they can be employ a board members house can be employed because it's a temporary. Yeah. So like seven uh no like I think if you were to hire them to be like teach choreograph dance to the dance team then you 999.

031Okay. They're a temporary employee. Okay. And this is our new system, too. So, by the way, I was going to compliment the new system. I like it a lot. Do you like it? Uh, yes. I'm still on the double. Yeah, it drew me off. Oh, what is it? I like the top where it says original do adopted date, the last revised date. I like that I know what super easy for the public to the red and the green. Oh, the red and the green is perfect. I do have a question about the health and welfare instruction. Health and wellness. Sorry, they said wellness. Sorry. And then I think it was down below where it says opt in procedures. So it used to always be opt out. Now it's opt in. Correct. And why is that?

032State law. State law. It's a state law. A new a new legislation. Okay. That's I wanted to know. So I guess my question is for those parents who don't receive it but want their kids to opt in. How are you getting that message out so parents can see it? I because I'm just thinking of my voice. It was in the bottom of their backpack and I wouldn't see it for two months. I would say probably parent square. It's like amazing. That's what See, I just want to know. That's one of the things. So, it will be on parent square. If you miss it on Yes. Right. Okay. Because that's what I want to know. I can't I don't know what to tell you. I tell people if you miss that. Well, then one person's like,

033"I get too many." And I was like, "Listen, I I can't help you with that. I'm not a person." Well, as far as like same with other things that we get, people say, "I never saw it." You're like, "Okay." Okay. So, that was my one question. You get to choose if you show up, otherwise your kids opt it out cuz like parents can also allow the teachers to message parents so they can do a big option can respond. And that's my whole thing. I want to make sure everybody has a chance to see it and to opt in. I want to make sure that occurs. Okay, that was my question. I'll make a motion that we amend. Just a second. I was going to look to see Oh, I'm sorry. That's one on the 504.

034Is that this one? Yeah. Section 671. So, my question about the 504 and I guess I just need to know um so with the vouchers coming up, parents come to the school district to see if their children have any special ed issues. So, will that um is there anything about that? Then we have to test them whether it's a 504 or if it's special ed. Is there anything I couldn't see anything in this about that? Is it just state law that they get tested automatically? Is there anything that we need to look at as policy for that? That's my question. Um, you scroll back to the top. You mean if they have a 504 coming to our district or if you want a voucher now and and you want to get the 7,000 instead of

0355,000. Oh, I see. Then you have to go to someone to okay that your child needs it. So, one of the ways would be maybe a 504. So, if they're coming to us, is there any policy that they may never go to school here? Is there any policy how we do that? They just have to live within our zone. It's federal law. State law that was changed. And so we have to test them so that they can go somewhere else. Correct. But I just wanted to know if there's anything we need to put into here. That's my question. No, not that's you're talking about two different things that the thing I'm talking about 504. Yes. Sure. But in order to identify as a 504, would it go here or would it go into some other

036policy? Other policy. Okay, that's my question. Does this cost us money? Cost us time. Yes. Somebody's going to have someone's going to have to do it. That means that it will cost us money. Yes. And time because then they won't be able to take care of our students depending. So yeah. Can we get some of the 7500? Well, you know what? I will I'll be honest with you. Here's my question. I'm sorry this is maybe we're going down a rabbit hole, but my question is let's say you take the money, you have four kids, you take 20,000. You do what you want, but halfway through the school district you or school year you go, "Nope, I want to go back to school. I want my kids to go back to school." Can they do that?

037And pay back that money. Well, then no, they don't have to. See, that's my Well, they don't have to pay back the money. I don't think so. It's retroactive. The voucher is It comes off their run it and then the state reimbures them. Reimbures them so they can come back. So let's say you wanted to go to Disney. So maybe they would only be reimbured like half the year. No. Would it be the whole year, wouldn't it? I don't know. See, that's my question. There's a lot of questions because it's not implemented anymore. No. No. But that's one of the questions I have. So anyway, I just So that would be another policy then, Brian. It would go under the 504. Okay. I just want to make sure that we're if we're looking at something,

038I'd like to have some kind of policy written about that. But how does this change to what we had before? Like is this a big major change or is this a minor change? Are you talking about the vouchers or just that specific that specific? So we've had 504s forever. It's just it just updated the um procedures for what we have to do in order to put So like our previous procedure was this not the same that we had before or is it a little different? All the green is out. All the green is new and red. Not all new. No new know. And she's asking about vouchers. I know I'm not. I'm asking about the 504 procedure. Like what makes this different from what we used to have before to what state law has done?

039Like is there just a minor change in our procedure or is a major change? No, this isn't going to change very much at all. No, it's just the correct for. It's just the verbiage. I just had that question. Well, I was just curious like how much it really changed. It's fair. It's a fair. Okay. It's fair. Okay. All right. I make a motion that we approve the first reading of the of policy 22. I can name all those. I mean, you read them all. The 22 262.1 276 40 409.5 524 544 634 or 648 uh 671 877 942 Did you include 6:30 as well? I did. Okay. Pretty sure second. Any other discussion? All right. Uh Kirsty. Hi. Michael. Hi. Um Judy and I All right. The next set is 91 12 the one that

040we tabled previously kind of remember we kind of created our own 641.1 and you'd asked let's wait until the new law. So maybe this is we don't need 640.1.1 because of this. That would be our recommendation and it was still on health but once you saw 912 well my question about it like it's I'm fine with whatever what all all this says but I just am like what's the procedure for removing it? That's the part that I'm concerned about is like there's no procedure attached to this of like whose responsibility it is and like is the teacher next door going to be like you have to take that down or is it the administrator or is it a parent? what's the procedure for determining is this something like we don't want like any person to

041just be like well I think this is inappropriate and I think it should be like kind of quite a process to to make sure that we are on solid ground before we well wouldn't the princ well this was what I was I was actually going to ask that too so moving forward with this before school starts wouldn't there be like a principal when they meet with their staff they discuss removing anything align. This will 100% be on our agenda in August 6 when we have our administrators back. Um, we've even talked about doing a little walks and tours and making sure everything is removed. When I read it, I think it's pretty forward. I mean, it pretty much says it like this is what we're looking for. This is what you can have. This is

042what you can't have. Well, I just situation like Miss Ada had. I just want to make sure previously before we start the new year of the school that everything is black and white and everybody understands the law and the procedure that we have as a district. Well, I think it's like even the department of education has said it's pretty vague and they've gone to the whatever the attorney general attorney general who made a ruling. Yeah. who made a ruling and like I mean it doesn't it seems up for discretion to me and I feel like one principal might think this another principal might think that and I feel like I wonder if that principal then should you know bring it to a committee bring it to the board to make a decision so that there's

043like a unified body determining it for the whole district um so that we're not going to be in the same position like it was a disaster that we just really don't want to repeat I say no 100% agree I think that's we pay a lot of money for our attorney fees. They're going to have to give us I think we all feel that way. We don't want to end up that way. I think this is pretty straightforward. I think it's important that the teachers have an inservice those first few days and I think it's important that someone is u deemed uh to go through the classrooms whether it be the principal or assistant or whatever and and then take care of it that way. Um, but when I read this policy, it's pretty straightforward as

044to what they expect. And then I think Labrador has been very fair in his ruling and what he wrote um on what he thinks it should be. So I'm hoping and I think we all feel in this room to avoid that would be the most important thing. So, so that's my question is who's going to determine which flags are in keeping with the and banners are in keeping with this and or whose job is it? So, do you want a procedure in the policy? I feel like it would be I feel like that's the safest way to make sure everyone's on solid ground. So I hear you say that you would like procedure to follow within the policy so everyone is understanding what the procedure is. So you're saying you would like the principal to

045be the person who I'm not saying anything. I just think that I would let I don't have necessarily a strong opinion about who it should be. I just think it should be designated in this the procedure should be designated so that every school doesn't have their own. So in other words everyone has the same basis. someone is making the decision for like one body or person makes it for the district rather than like halfway through the school year we get a new principal or whatever and then it's going to be a they have different opinion of how this applies. Could do you wanna do you want to pull this one and us just do some research on how what what some of the other procedures are because I mean this opinion just came down from

046the AG like last week and we were just looking at it like um okay we're going through word by word like what what's a banner what's this what's this so we could pull it and get some help from some of our colleagues as to procedures like what's a good procedure to put because I think the most successful polic All seats have the procedure attached right to it. And I'm okay with adding a procedure. And can we can we approve the first reading of this and then have that added on the second reading or do you or should we pull it? Oh, it's up I guess it's up to you. I mean, I feel better about Well, it is state law. I mean, I guess you could approve it. We probably do need to approve it.

047Whatever we did before, we approved. pulled it and approved it for brought it back back. Whatever way is fine with me as long as we get it before it's the third read. Let's Yeah, I think Okay, I'm going to make a motion to approve the first reading of policy 222. No, I'm sorry. The first reading policy is 632.1 890 892 912 with the added things that we've talked about procedures and 914 second. All right, any more discussion? All right, Kirsty. Hi, Michael. Hi. Uh Jie Hillary, hi. And I'm an I. So for clarity, 912 will be on the August agenda as a second read as a standalone non in consent with procedures. Yeah. Correct. Correct. And you guys stand. Okay. And we'll do some research to to from our colleagues because again, like I said,

048we just came out last what Wednesday? We were looking at this and we're like, but what how do you 402? I maybe I misunderstood. Yeah. So for that one, I didn't see the substitutes when they substitute having that done prior. I did see it for certified for employees and I saw it for volunteers, but the substitute teachers and yeah, we need it for that. I didn't see that in there. Same thing that and I do agree that we they should before they meet with students they should know that they are so anywhere they had five days we put the prior two right but if you look back where it says substitutes you didn't put that is this one which is a little bit different is this one says fiveyear period but applied by the district

049will not be required to oh that's if I guess my understanding is that is if they've already done the criminal history check and it's okay they have five But I want to make sure that substitutes are not in the classroom without a criminal history check. So substitute is considered employee. So is that okay? Then if that's what it is then I'm fine. So we scratch the five days and just put prior to. Okay. That way it's finalized. Okay. Okay. That was my only question. I make a motion that we approve the second reading of policy 402. Second. All right. Any other discussion? Okay. Kirsten. Hi. Michael. Hi. Um JD Hillary. Hi. And I'm an I. Okay. Do I have a motion that we accept the consent agenda? I make a motion that we approve the

050consent agenda. Do I have a second? A second. Do I have any discussion? And Kirsty, hi. Michael, hi. And Judy, hi. Hillary, hi. And I'm so good to the order. Zone 3 and four trustee elections are November 4th, 2025. And I do believe you have to have it in by August. What date in August? Was it 29th? Is that what she told us? I think 29th of August. August 29th. Yes. Okay. And then also we have our 2025 ISB annual convention November 12th to the 14th in Celerane. I highly recommend you go. I've learned tons by going to that. Deian has made reservations already because they book up really quickly and she was nervous about it. So she's made room reservations. Oh, maybe. But okay, we can always turn back in. Yeah. Yeah. So that's

051good. I make a motion that we adjourn. Oh, by the second. All right. Any other discussion? All right, Kirsty. Hi, Michael. Hi, James. Hillary, hi. And I'm an I also All right. Can we make a note of the time? 18. Whoa. Life is good.

This transcript may contain errors introduced by automated or source-provided captioning. Bracketed descriptions such as [Music] are retained from the source. Passage divisions are editorial aids and do not alter the wording.