CorpusRecord 4525

Dayton Board of Education - Business Meeting - February 17, 2026

A searchable transcript preserved as part of the Discourse Corpus. Passage numbers provide stable references within this record; verify quotations against the original recording when available.

Source
YouTube / Dayton Public Schools
Date
2026-02-18
Location
Campbell County, KY
Material
Transcript
Extent
21,779 words · about 121 min
Collected
2026-05-17

Transcript

Verbatim source text

001I like that. You can sit up here. I know you are. Call to order. Dayton public school  board. I make a motion that we make   Eric Walker our treasurer pro  tip. Second. Call for vote. Oh, Mr. Lacy. Yes. Mr. Reiner. Yes.  Uh, Dr. Bailey, yes. Dr. Goodwin,   yes. Mr. Smith, yes. Miss Garrison,  yes. And Walker votes yes. All right,   guess we go for roll call again. Uh,  Mr. Lacy here. Miss Reiner present. Uh,   Walker is here. Dr. Bailey here. Dr. Goodwin here.  Mr. Smith here. Miss Garrison present. Pledge   of allegiance. I pledge algiance to the flag of  the United States of America and to the republic   for which it stands. One nation under God,  indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Mr. Mission statement is our  mission is to inspire, educate,   empower. Our vision is

002to inspire, educate,  and empower scholars for a lasting impact.   And our purpose to cultivate a supportive  and engaged uh educational experience, direct district events. Thank you so much, Dr.  Bailey. I'd like to encourage everyone to come   out to Read Across America Monday, March 2nd. Uh  not just come out, but participate as well. Um   it's a really fun time in all of our elementary  buildings. actually 17 buildings. We do it in   preschool as well. Uh that might be one of the  most fun places to do it. So I would encourage   the viewing public to come out Monday, March 2nd  and see your children read across America. And   we have staff from central services, central  office and even from operations historically   who have come out to read with students. So  it's a team effort. Oh, and Treasury.

003David,   I think you've been out before. All right.  So, we've got a uh special recognition for   DPS grounds and operations team. We've got a  certificate. I'll read it. Uh after I read it,   then the board is going to come down front along  with the superintendent. We read your name and   then we will take a picture after you get your  certificate. Certificate of appreciation in honor   of uh remarkable perseverance and service.  We recognize the operations leadership,   ground operations, district fleet mechanics,  and custodial staff. These certificates are   proudly presented to you in recognition of your  exceptional dedication and unwavering work ethic   and sacrifice during challenging times. your  spirit of teamwork and your selflessness commit   commitment to uh prioritizing the safety of  DPS students, staff and community members   above your own are truly commended. Signed by uh  Dr.

004William E Bailey, David Lawrence. All right. over operation guys. Come join us. Somebody need some help. Lenny Allen. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. So for clarity because 12 hour days out and really getting  back up and going. I was going to say   that later. Also, this this  brainstorm came from Brandon Thomas. Robert Hunter. 23. 23. Oh, Martin. Test one, two more Braford. Earl Sanders. You already know. Thank you. Triple X. And last one, Kina Taylor. You guys stand and the custodial  certificates will be delivered to them. Come on. We'll make sure we can see one of these show. Three, two, one. Perfect. Chappelle show. He didn't send  his email. It's I thought it was   in the email. Okay. Was it for  you? No, it should have been a place. Oh, I got you. All

005right. We'll have now a special presentation. All right. Thank you so much. uh operations uh  just amazing 24/7 uh work 12 off 12 um people   uh on the outside we don't always see we think  it magically happens operations uh the drivers   are up as early as 3:30 the team is there by  5 uh it's just a lot of work that goes on over   there and I've seen it and I really appreciate the  work uh so kudos again congratulations all right   special presentation U Miss Miner, our associate  superintendent, who I I don't think there's   anybody who knows more about the organization than  her. I couldn't be more pleased to introduce her   um as the um purveyor of our DPS transformation  and reconfiguration. I think it's important to   note uh that we've been discussing this, not just 

006talking about it, but it's been on paper, it's   been in committees, it's been in subcommittees,  it's been with um individual board members 2 by   two, 3x3, it's been sent via email updates. Um  and so now is the time to present it writ large   um to the entire community and get feedback.  Uh Miss Miner, I so appreciate you. Let's take   it from here. Okay. Thank you, Dr. Lawrence.  Um, and I'd like to thank the entire board for   the opportunity to share this information. Thank  you, board president, Dr. Bailey, board members,   our visiting audience and viewing audience. It's  my pleasure on behalf of the whole superintendent   team to share with you our uh proposals and  configurations for the 2627 school year. And what   you see it's just a one page or really two pages  of detailed information.

007The top form top of the   form which outlines the building configurations  for consideration uh outlines that we'll have   one preschool center at Rosa Parks. K6 buildings  that will be nine. There will be K7 buildings that   are four that will transition up to K8, but for  next year it will be K7. Uh we will keep the K8   buildings we have and also have an additional  one that will support additional space needed   for our office of exceptional children students  and college and career programming. You'll notice   that we will have instead of 78 buildings, we'll  have three 678 buildings. Uh 712 districtwide will   stay the same and we'll have five 912 buildings  and our combined alternative program. So what I'd   like to do now is really explain in details each  configuration. The first one we're going to begin  

008is preschool. And there's been a lot of discussion  on preschool and how we're going to maintain it   and have a quality program. And one thing we want  to do is continue to serve our community. So it   will be at Rosa Parks Early Learning Center where  we will serve four year olds for a full day and   three year olds for a half day. uh the financial  sustainability because of the funding. We will   have it as a publicly funded daycare center and we  will be partnering with Preschool Promise to help   parents with tuition and that's something that's  in the works now. We'll also still support and   apply for the early childhood grants and voucher  programs. That way our families get support. Uh   having the one center at Rosa Parks will allow  and having part of it half

009day will allow us   to service more students than if everything  were full day. And a lot of people may think   well what happens to families who are maybe on  the east side. What we intend to do is increase   our presence with our feeder daycare centers. Um,  that means we're communicating and collaborating   with the private and public preschool centers  throughout the city because they're actually   our feeders for our K6 and K8 buildings. And  we do have the capacity to do that. We have   done it in the past and we're going to reestablish  those relationships so families wherever they are   have a connection with Dayton public schools. And  we're also collaborating with preschool teachers,   whether they're with our DPS certified  staff or some of the other uh preschool   teachers throughout the city. So that's um the  consideration

010for our preschool education. Our   goal is to have a premier uh preschool  center that is a model for the community.   Some strategic advantages as you can see high  ensures high quality specialized support and   transportation excellence. Transportation  department will support the single site more   reliable and efficient for those preschoolers  that do need that transportation support. And   we've been working in partnership for these  configurations with our transportation team.   So I'll kind of hesitate. I don't know if  you would want me to keep going. You may have   questions about preschool specifically. Yes. Do  we offer transportation for preschool right now?   The ones that it's required through their IEP.  Yes. Okay. Okay. I have several more questions   since we've been talking about this in committee.  But I can wait till the end to you go through the   whole thing

011or I can go. You let me know. It's  totally up to you. Can we go to the end? I do have   preschool questions. school. Before you move to K6  on preschool, how many students currently does a   district serve and how much funding is with those  students currently? So, our preschool about 700   students we're serving. Uh we're not getting full  funding for all of them and I'd have to give you   all the details. It is on a report. we get, you  know, there's we will have preschool at River's   Edge because we do get funding for that because  they're in a classroom with kindergarten. So,   that's a difference. So, um we do also have some  projections on possible um increase in funding   through being a publicly funded child care center.  We've got some projections on what we

012may bring in   as a profit for some of the preschool centers as  we charge. And then with with current preschool,   which funds um is it's basically pulling from it's  pulling from our title one funds which is really   cleaning it out and that hurts our K6 initiative.  So that's a good point. Something where we know   we need to reconsider how we're doing it. Right.  Thank you. Thank you. All right. Thank you for the   question. Yeah, I got something. So, you said that  since it's only going to be at Rosa Parks then and   you are talking about partnering with other  centers. Have you already started that talk?   Yeah. Uh, so part of the kindergarten readiness  is transitioning to kindergarten. We are required   to partner with our local Miami Valley Child  Development Centers, the Head Start programs,   and

013we also have data to show who are the feeder  daycarees around each elementary school. The plan   is to make sure our kindergarten teachers have  opportunities to kind of form relationships with   those daycare centers so those families that are  at the private daycare center or the mom and pop   down the street know that this is where I want to  send my kid to kindergarten. Not only do we intend   to work with those preschool teachers to say this  is what they need to be ready for kindergarten,   we can also invite them to train right alongside  our highly skilled certified preschool staff and   provide support that way. Um that has been done  in the past and was effective and we need to   bring that back but be intentional. So, since we  don't have it in writing right now,

014do you guys   also have a plan for, god forbid, everybody just  says no, then we don't want to work with you all,   but if they say if everybody said no, do you  have a plan to go forward? As far as our partner   preschool center saying no, um, we would have to  work with families that are in the community. We   have some really strong parent engagement people  that are having meetings all the time. We could   simply add that as an agenda item. How do you get  your kids ready for preschool or kindergarten and   these are the skills and just make sure it's out  there. One thing um as all many of the preschool   centers are part of preschool promise and that's  part of the agreement for kindergarten readiness.   So they kind of have to work with

015us in in  order to adhere to that. Okay. So that brings   that coalition that's already in place. We just  need to make sure we're doing our part and really   being strategic about reaching out. Okay. Thank  you, Chris. Yes. Thank you. We've had several   conversations about this in the school curriculum.  I don't remember the name. What's the name of it?   School curriculum program that committee Mhm.  Couple questions that now that we're here in   front of the school board. Uh just catching  them up. One of the data points that we asked   were about individuals in preschool who actually  enter into our kindergarten. During our meetings,   we were it was represented to us that twothirds  of individuals in our preschoolers don't actually   go on to be in school with us. And we've put some  requests in for you

016all for us to kind of figure   out that gap where you gave us three different  scenarios of what the investment of preschool   would be here. And from today's presentation,  it is looks like we're going with option two,   which is private pay and us doing what is  what's actually required by law. Correct.   So my question for you here is if we continue down  this model, what are we doing to shift to try to   increase because right now we're only and again  at the meeting it was represented that mainly the   children with IEPs are the ones who go on to our  kindergarten and those without IEPs. We don't know   why they're leaving us but they're not taking that  next step forward with us. How will this model   here of centralizing because this isn't a new  idea for

017us. I believe three years ago we got to   the point where we wanted to make Rosa Parks just  ours because we were partnered with someone else   at that time. How like what is our plan to take  them from those individuals that we don't aren't   required to give service to to get them to start  now coming staying with us. Correct. So what is   that retention strategy and what have we found on  that? with the configuration of everybody in one   center. We'll have staff members that are assigned  to that transition to kindergarten. So that we can   have, say, you have regions throughout the city  and within our preschool center that are assigned   to form those relationships and guarantee those  enrollments straight into our our kindergarten   programs. That's working collaboratively with  all of the elementary schools and touching

018base   with the kindergarten teachers and making sure  our families are comfortable with it. Several   uh kindergarten transition events so that  parents by the end of the year if we do   four to five or maybe even four to six if we do a  couple a quarter that no we want parents to think   there's no other option but DPS because of the  relationship we build. There's ways that we can   send. We have itinerant teachers that are in all  of our Head Start programs right now and they're   working with some of our students. And what if we  collaborated in a way that they felt comfortable   inviting them to the local school way before  it's time to register for kindergarten? So,   they feel comfortable in that environment in  any of those elementary schools. Those are the   intentional efforts that

019we have to make because  we don't want a a a family. We want them by the   end of the year and it's time to enroll that they  don't that they know I'm going to this school   because I have a relationship with these teachers  and I feel comfortable there. And that's our   administrators and our teachers. Okay. So, I hear  great ideas. I'm looking more for the planning   right now because this is the proposal for 26 27.  We're in Is this quarter three that we're in? So,   we're in quarter three right now and we have  we have preschool at I think just about every   elementary. So what what is your plan today to  implement again that strategy? Because these   children are currently in our district and if  if they go to school right now at a building

020and   they ain't they aren't taking that next step to  stay there for kindergarten, how is centralizing   them at one location and then them coming back to  somewhere else like how is that more plausible?   I'm trying to figure out what is the value prop.  I think I think obviously those students that are   at Rosa Parks, those families are going to have  we're going to make sure they're connected based   on their address where they live with the local  elementary school and have a relationship. That's   Can can I interrupt you cuz I'm asking what are  you going to do now for our existing preschoolers   based on the plan that you're telling us is next  year's plan? cuz it doesn't sound like we have to   wait a year to see if Well, that's making the  connection with them now

021as well to make sure   they intend to come to our kindergarten. That's  those kindergarten transition events that should   be happening right now and we can make sure  that they're happening. Can you tell me one   of those events right now? Um, they have they have  events at every I'll use Fairview as an example.   Fair View does a signing day for all of their  preschoolers to sign up officially kind of like   we do high school signing day to say I'm going  to be a bulldog. So that's one example of it and   there are examples like that at at the elementary  schools. So are these new examples that you giving   me or this No, that's something that's happened  in the past. That's something they do transition   to kindergarten events all the time. So, I'm  going to just ask

022your team because again,   the representation from the data is we're losing  twothirds of the preschoolers. And if what we're   doing isn't maintaining them or attracting them,  I'm trying to understand what we're going to do   differently to at least get another third back  with us because whatever we're doing right now,   well, I can tell you one one idea that has been  done that has worked. Every elementary school has   preschool centers within a 10mi radius. Whether  it's head start or private daycare, that staff,   that team that's welcoming them for kindergarten  needs to reach out to those preschool centers to   touch base with those families so they know about  the Dayton public school in their neighborhood   that's ready to welcome them for kindergarten. And  we can do that at all of our elementary, all 16   of our elementary

023schools. That can happen right  now. And that's part of the plan to make sure it   happens at all those schools. That is the plan. My  request to you guys would not just be kind of what   you're asking us for for next year, but also what  you can do this year cuz like some of these things   even this touch point of Yeah. to affect this  year. um the what are they the preschool teachers   the versus the kindergarten teachers that piece  of it again if you are able to see some success   now cuz we're still investing in something that  isn't yielding a reward for us ultimately because   again we're losing again based on the data that  you guys showed us we're losing twothirds of the   population before they go to kindergarten so that  would just be my

024request for you guys to bring us   and what we'll do is bring more detailed of the  plans on Saturday to really map it out to show how   that can work. We'll bring that. All right. Thank  you. Thank you, Mr. President. Yes. Um, yes. So,   you said for preschool across the district, we're  currently serving 700 students in preschool. Yes,   approximately. So, so if this gets centralized,  how are we fitting 700 preschoolers in Rosa   Parks? Well, we I'm not sure the exact numbers  that'll fit. will have a half-day program for   the three-year-olds which will double that number.  It looks like 179 students, 136 to 179 currently   fit in Boa Parks, right? But we'll do a half  day program. So, you can have double that. So,   it won't be the 700. We know that. But then aren't  we

025doing ourselves a disservice to the the funding   what this model is saying it's going to generate  because we're going to be serving less students   if we centralize it. Well, we're going to bring  in even with the smaller numbers, we'll bring in   income that we're not getting now servicing them  throughout the city and have because we're not   charging right now. So, we're taking a loss. And  then the transportation plan. Um I mean because   I'm I'm know we we're going to move on, but have  the current um families uh been surveyed or the   community have you guys done anything out in  the community to get feedback um as we look to   generate interest in this type of model? Um if  that's going to serve all sides of of Dayton,   east, west, south, north, to have their children 

026come on on a certain side of town for preschool.   I'm not sure if we've surveyed the preschool  families uh because this was generated based   on a lot of the funding gaps, but I can check with  the preschool team to see and not necessarily just   the community as a whole because I know when we  did restructuring in the past when the district   did it back I think in 2017 2018 there were a lot  of meetings at various uh elementary schools where   we had a lot of community engagement. Yeah.  And so those are the types of inputs because   in essence we're trying to also attract people  to the district and we've done a lot for the K8   model. There's been a lot of meetings, a lot of  surveys and a lot of conversations with families.   the preschool

027model. This focus is to make sure  we increase the quality of our preschool program   and that we can continue to service it at  all because throughout the state of Ohio,   many districts are taking huge losses because of  the preschool funding. And this is a plan where   we can balance and reduce the loss, maybe make  an income but still service and increase the   collaboration throughout the city with the goal of  increasing quality programming throughout even our   partners because we're getting their kids. They're  we're getting those students whether they're in   our preschool or not. So we need to make sure  we're touching all bases. So that's where we   are. Okay. Thank you. I I just want to clarify. We  have 700 kids in preschool right now, but they're   not going to be in preschool next year. They

028move  on to kindergarten, right? So, the number starts   over, right? It's Yes. Okay. You're right. I was  just Okay. I was make sure I was following later,   but we want to keep those that are rolling up,  right? 5year-olds that get into our kindergarten.   in that that 700 number of 700 now potentially  kindergarten potentially public schools and now   preschool it creates one specific location one  tuition based focus and I can say this on the   record city of Dayton has a levy for a preschool  that we get no funding for. Yeah. All right. Thank   you Mr. Smith. So trying to think where I start  on this one. Okay. If we're talking about the   funding, I get that. And I think for us as we look  at these funding gaps or trying to uh rightsize   things, trying to

029prepare for the future, I think  one of the things that we cannot do is make and I   don't want to say totally shortsighted things, but  make proposals or make changes that then affect us   on the back end that we weren't always ready for.  For instance, if I am say a parent at a horse man   or am I a parent at camp and I have a third grader  at camp, a fifth grader and next year I have a   preschooler coming in. Now, if my preschooler  can't go to Horus man, which is the school in   my neighborhood, I am then thinking about having  my preschooler go to a school 20 25 minutes away.   And if I'm a parent, then what happens if you  know I say I'm not going to do that. I'll put   my child here,

030but to make that work for me, my  third and fifth grader that were a horse man,   now I'mma move them over to a charter school.  And now by trying to fix one funding thing,   we're losing money in another space. And I think  that is important for me to look at because if we   know that just in Dayton in general, not just  the DPS issue, transportation is a huge thing.   We also know that we're looking at possible cuts  down the road if we don't um you know if things   don't happen the way we needed to at different  levels. So we really don't know these full   pictures of what it looks like fully to then do  transportation for preschool because we currently   don't do it now. Then if we're we're saying we're  going to partner with other

031preschool providers,   to me that lessens the ability for us to get in  there and direct children to Dayton public schools   because if I'm working with a outside provider,  they they don't have to just have us in there.   when they have their kindergarten preview,  they can have ADCA, they can have Horizon,   they can have Dayton leadership because those  places are in there now. And so I don't see   how we have that wraparound with those folk  if we saying we're not getting it done now.   And if we're saying we could do these things  at Rosa Parks, then I don't see how we're not   putting our minds to how do we currently right  now, like if we have preschool in every building,   that is an opportunity to be talking to parents  every day who are learning about Dayton

032public   schools. My child was in preschool. His favorite  person in the building was the principal at that   school. That's how we learned about what was  going on in Dayton public schools. I'm not going   to learn the same if I'm at MVCDC where I have  everybody coming at me. And that's not a knock   on anyone. It's just the nature of what's going  on. Um and so for me that is different. And then   uh when we look at kindergarten readiness, if we  saying right now that we are trying to improve   kindergarten readiness, the numbers that we  currently have for kindergarten readiness   are reflected by some of the students that we get  that come from outside of our current preschool.   our numbers are low and students are not  adequately prepared for kindergarten right now,   then I do not

033see how we're going to improve that  if we're taking away spots in what is one of the   highest rated preschools in the area. Like Dayton  public schools does preschool better than other   people do preschool. So for me, we're looking at  trading off a funding gap to lower our preschool   readiness and preschool services if we know that  we do preschool better than other people and we   know that kind uh kindergarten readiness is huge.  That K through three piece is huge. And if they're   not coming in already ready, then we're trying to  help out and work with people, which that to me   because that creates a couple another jobs because  that is heavy to get out to all of these other   providers. And lastly for me right now on this  piece is what does it look like

034if we do not fully   know because we we can take these numbers, but we  just don't know how many people are going to come   over. I like there are people who are in preschool  right now because they go to preschool and it's in   their neighborhood. They walk down the street.  Their their big brother and sisters walk them   to preschool every day. This wouldn't happen now.  Um and so if you do not have that piece happening,   then I think we're we're we're trying to just  move [ __ ] move seats around on the ship and   it's sinking if we're not really figuring out  what this truly looks like. Like, so I just   don't know if I'm ready to say for me that I will  be wanting to move everything to one centralized   location when there's so many other

035things that  we could be really trying to figure out like how   are we like moving it and working with people, it  increases the workload for our engagement teams   because now they have to go out and make new  relationships whereas we have our spaces. Um,   and then when lastly when we talk about this  for-profit model, which I totally understand and   I do think we should be partnering and finding way  to get access and get funds from these things that   have gone through the voters. But if I'm being  honest as a person who has been in that space, if I'm talking a half day versus being able  to take my 3-year-old or a four-year-old now   to somewhere where I can drop them off  at 6:30 in the morning and pick them up   at 6:00 p.m. I'm taking

036that option. I'm not  because if I drop off a kid for a half day,   I have to be able to be in a living situation  where I then pick up my child in the middle of   the day and I have them somewhere. If I'm going  to do that, I might as well take that same voucher   and put them in a program where they're going to  be somewhere from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. And so,   if we're not looking at what does that look like?  Now, if you say Rosa Parks is going to be open and   we're going to have this as a center from 6:00  to 6, that is a different value proposition to   a family than saying you can come here for half  a day, then you come pick up your child and if  

037you have to work or if you're in a situation  where you have other things to deal with,   then you need to find another provider to take  them to. And that creates another hardship for   families if we're saying, "I'm going to now go 20  minutes across the city to take my child to Rosa   Parks for a couple hours, pick them up, and then  take them somewhere else. Now I got to pick up my   other child and then get back over here and pick  them up from this provider." So, I think there's   so many pieces that just the funding aspect  of it for me isn't enough if I don't know the   ramifications for saving that money. We could get  some income. I don't see us getting income off of   like the 700 we have now because if

038people have  to go from yes I have free preschool across the   street high quality it helps me out because it's  free and I may have to use this voucher to do a   evening program or or after school care but it is  different now if I'm using my voucher for DPS and   then trying to split that voucher money off with  somewhere else to do after school like those are   the pieces that I want to see what does it look  like for Yes. Yeah. And uh we we'll take that into   consideration. One thing I do agree that right now  those preschool that are in all of our buildings,   yes, we need to recruit and retain every last  one of them to stay and go to and enroll in   our kindergarten. We definitely do. Um I would  just

039say as you as you mentioned we do have the   top quality program and we'll work in part you  there may be a collaboration we can do with the   local preschool center so there's an extended day  program um and we definitely need to work with the   local daycare centers so all the quality improves.  So thank you for your comments. Appreciate you Mr.   Walker. Again, the clarification thing, the  preschool that is operated at, for instance,   a DECA or Dean Leadership is actually Miami  Valley Child Development Center that is operating   a preschool inside of those facilities, right? I  can't speak for what theirs are. I'm just going   off of I know for sure. Okay. So, that could be  Okay. Um, one thing you all may or may not know,   we have a something called itinerate teachers  and they're

040in all the local Head Start centers   right now. They're servicing just a small group of  kids, but there may be a collaboration where we're   touching more and forming relationships with more  families than what's there to recruit into our   kindergarten programs. So, those are things that  are in the works. And another clarifying piece for   me when it comes to preschool actual funding, the  public school district is supposed to get priority   funding versus or over the privatized locations or  mom and pops and things like that. Okay. So, we're   working off that that agreement so our parents  can be compensated. All right. Thank you. Yeah.   Two more or three more requests for you guys.  one, can you find out our charter schools? So,   Mr. Smith made a comment about charter schools  and I kind of wanted to know

041our competitors,   how many of them like and where they're located  have preschool and what is that like again they   charge? My second one for you guys is I've heard  repeatedly that we have high quality preschool,   but I'm not hearing the same thing about  kindergarten. And our gap our gap is that   we're not converting to the kindergarten where we  actually do get funding. So, I would like you guys   to I know you told us that you surveyed families  and all that as well, but can you give us some   data too on our kindergarten teachers and kind  of what that relationship is right now between   the preschool teachers and the kindergarten  teachers? And my third one for you guys,   even with this proposed model here, cuz right now  preschool, I believe it's two ages. Is it three,  

042three and a half that you can start at? Three.  And kindergarten starts at what age? Five. five.   Are we going to continue to maintain the two years  of preschool that kids are eligible for? And kind   of how does how does that actually play into this  model here? Yeah, there's some three-year-olds uh   that are identified through the community through  our partners that need additional supports that   we must accept through the help me grow program.  That's where our three-year-olds go. And then our   fouryear-olds would be our typical ones that come  and they would get full day. The three-year-olds   would get half day. Okay. And I'll just wrap  up with the again, we made this statement to   you guys, which I want to echo Mr. Smith here,  too. It's going to be very difficult to for a   parent

043that pays to choose our preschool over a  full day at daycare that offers that piece. And I   still haven't seen how we are planning to overcome  that hurdle. And I kind of would like to see more   tangibles and not just the theoretical like we  have high quality. We may have high quality but   needs if I need if I need child care for the full  day. I'm going to choose a need base versus a high   quality based on what you're saying in that piece.  which would bring us back to this conversation a   year from now of we're reducing again because  we we no longer have those individuals because   they did select daycare due to the hours of  operation and other services that it was able   to provide that we could not provide. So really  want to

044see kind of who you guys are polling on   this piece. And I mean this is again these are  all conversations that we've told you guys in   committee which in the future when you guys do  a presentation please resolve the questions that   we've already asked you because I feel like we're  having the same conversation that we've had for   three weeks now and we don't have the answers or  we don't have satisfactory answers to questions   that have already been posed and yet we're here  again. you guys are asking us to consider moving   forward and we still have so many questions and  we're only at the first part of this presentation   but had use the committee time so when you get  here you kind of you don't have to have the same   conversation again because everything that's  been

045said out here you guys have already been   asked and we still have very vague answers to  those questions. Thank you, Mr. President. All   right. Uh my last thing is um I would just like  you guys to think about possibly having Rosa Park   and possibly someone another school on the other  side of the river as well. Uh so we would have   two different locations instead of just one. Just  a thought. All right. Thank you for the feedback.   Uh the next part of the so we also have you next  on the list you'll see the K6 buildings and these   configurations are not changing we have Eastmon  Edison Fairview Camp Kaiser Luis Troy Ruskin   Roosevelt and Westwood will maintain their current  structures for consistency for the families K7   which will transition addition to K8. But for the  next

046year, those that will add roll up the seventh   graders are Bell Haven, Cleveland, Horus man, and  Valerie. Uh that's driven by the parent choice.   Uh this expansion is in direct response  to families that are requesting that K8 K8   option and we know between sixth grade and seventh  grade is a risk where we've lost students. So we   want to keep that and increase the retention and  that's based on the feedback from families. Yes.   Question. What is parent I'm sorry Mr. President.  Sorry. What is parent driven choice where parents   asked us for it? They said, "I wish we could  have not a committee or a group. It's just Well,   we've had we've had a committee working for close  to a year now and the parent driven choice is a   parent group. Yes. Well, not a parent group 

047for choice. parents have given us feedback,   stood in line saying, you know, we've been out at  the open houses and all the events asking who'd be   interested in the K8 and these families at these  schools in particular definitely want the K8 and   and you So that's just word of mouth, not like a  actual survey. No, it is an actual survey. Yeah,   we link the data in to it's been a been a survey.  It's been face to face. Okay. been online multiple   ways for these schools. Okay. And so that's  to increase the retention because we have lost   um stu students at that grade going to other other  options within that are you taking questions on   are you still well I'm going to finish just this  part within that configuration at Cleveland it'll   be an in lie

048of program for grades four through  eight as you know we have alternative programming   at Jackson Center, but we currently don't have  a formalized programming for those grades and   we know we have a need for that. Um, and then  we'll also have it another option at the at   the international school for that. So, it's  one on the east side and the west side. So,   questions would you like? And then the K8  buildings will keep Charity K8, River's Edge will   remain the same. Those are our district-wide. Um,  River's Edge will keep preschool. As I explained,   there's funding that comes with those. So, that'll  be preK classrooms. Um, international school   students will remain. It'll be a K8 building. And  it we have a extreme need on the north side of the   city of the of the northwest for

049more classrooms  for the early grades. So it'll be an overflow.   We also will use international building to support  our students with disabilities for their project   life programming to maybe the coffee shop and  things for that community as well as some college   and career programming that'll extend the STEM  opportunities down to from third good because   we're we're we've got a space issue and adding the  in lie of so that would be the K8 models the first   group of schools will be K7 at first then roll  up to K8 and then these others will be K8 and   any and we also well I'll talk about that next the  68 buildings but any questions about the K8 yes   okay so we are adding now seventh and eighth  grade next year to some schools well seventh   seventh this year

050and eighth grade next year and  then we're adding sixth grade to some buildings   My my major question for you, I know one solution  that it appears that we are resolving is that   we're retaining students, which that's great.  New issue that we're creating because we we're   not at 90% staff at all at this moment, right? I  don't I don't I actually don't know the percentage   of teachers that we have staffed at this m  moment, but I don't even believe we're at 80%.   So, if we're adding these new grades here, it  it sounds as if we're going to be straining   our already strained resources when it comes to  teachers for these individuals. What you guys   plan? How are we going to get teachers not only at  the schools that are still below which our middle   schools across

051the board are low, but then adding  is it six more middle schools and a couple more   sixth grades two middle schools. How are you go  what what's the plan here and how how realistic   are we to getting actual teachers for these  buildings? Well, I think working in collaboration   with our human resources department, there's some  things that have already started this year that we   didn't have last year. For example, expanding the  relationships with our universities to increase   the number of teacher trainees, student teachers  in our buildings. Uh Sharon Goens has worked on   that and has increase those opportunities. Another  is looking at our internal uh f teacher reserve   teachers to provide them opportunities to obtain  certification and working on that and then having   weekly human capital meetings to stay on top of  it to make sure

052we're pushing it and promoting   coming to the Dayton public schools more. We know  we have a shortage and we're going to have to fill   these needs. We recognize that which is why we've  taken these additional steps. Okay. So, as a team,   at what point do you guys make a decision if this  makes sense for us right now? If yes, parents may   have asked for this, but if we don't have staff,  where where does that piece come of does this make   sense this year or is this something we need to  delay farther? Because again, we have existing   buildings that will be here next year that don't  have staff. And for me personally, it's concerning   based on other reports that I'm looking at when  it comes to what people are actually learning in   our district. I retention

053and retaining kids  is great, but in my opinion, it should not   sacrifice what people will have if we don't have a  actual plan and we're seeing some actual results.   Because again, we're in the third quarter at  this point here. You just told me that there's   some programs that are happening right now. What  is the projection of? And again, please let me   know what and so that I I hear you and that's why  we're meeting now with human resources every week   to see where we are. These are recommendations and  proposals, but if there's something that comes out   and there's a shortage and we may need to come  back and revise this, we're more than willing   to. But right now, our intentions is to make sure  that we're filling our buildings with highquality   teachers. We are we're

054currently right now we  concluded teacher organizational plans to plans   and we found that at the secondary level we are  uh over staff which means that we have classrooms   with 7 9 11 15 kids. That means we don't need as  many long-term subs that we have and we should be   we will be able to take those certified teachers  and push them down into those grades that are 72.   Um, and the licenses are changing as well. And  so we have teachers that are licensed that can   teach more students and and we are going to  do that. We're actually doing that now. So   when you guys bring this plan back to us, like  when you formally want us to take action on it,   I'm requesting to see again the number of teachers  that are required to make this

055possible and if   that is something realistically that's going  to happen cuz it doesn't make sense to shoot   ourselves in the foot if we don't have the bodies  and we don't have a workable plan to get the   bodies for this to happen. We'll be just stretched  even thinner. And we don't disagree. Thank you,   Dr. Lawrence, for that. I completely forgot but  the tenative organizations are showing us where   there are teachers that we can shift to make sure  that we have certified teachers in every and we'll   bring that information. We'll bring it. All right.  Thank you. So, Mr. Smith, you can go Miss Miner. I   didn't mean to cut you off. Go ahead. I didn't I  was going to do 68 next. I don't know if you guys   had different You can go with that 68 and

056then  I can cuz most of my questions kind of combined   anyway. Okay. Before that, Miss Garrison had  something. Yeah, I'll I'll wait as well. You'll   wait. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Go ahead.  So, we have our standalone middle schools will   be sixth, seventh, and eighth. Provides families  more choices, diverse options. Some families may   want their child to move on to that middle school  earlier. Uh it's a way that we can provide some   you know there's some kids that may be advanced  that'll take higher level the advanced math uh   some because of sports may want them in the six  through eight uh climates three three years window   will allow for relationships and develop stronger  school identity um student achievement because   they're there a little longer than just the  two two years and smoother transitions. And

057so,   uh, one of the things that this will do is  provide, uh, middle school hubs for sports. So,   those schools that are K8 that are close to those  schools will transition to those middle schools   for their sporting. So, it should strengthen our  sports program as well. Question time. Can I go   after? Um, yes. I I wanted to find out and and  let me just preface this. When I ask questions,   I I ask questions because they they usually  come from individuals that have said they   haven't been surveyed. So with the principles,  do the principles have the how do the principles   feel about these changes? Cuz my understanding is  that we don't have everybody's buy in. I um I know   I know that I can't say I did talk to the middle  school principles and actually the

058ones I did talk   to actually support the 68 because I just said  some. I didn't say all. I just said some. Okay. I   just was saying that some cuz I wanted to find out  like the data cuz I I cuz I just wanted to find   out the data cuz we do a lot of Yeah. We having  conversations like the standalone principles how   they feel about it and I'm just used to seeing  actual survey data. So not word of mouth,   not hearsay, not we've had so principal survey  data on principal. We can bring that please. We   can provide that principal survey data. Yes. For  all the all the configurations. Yes ma'am. cuz I   want to make sure the principles stay engaged cuz  we just had a retreat in December and we heard a   lot of complaints

059that we really haven't addressed  since December and I just want to make sure that   we are truly taking into consideration what the  principal the visions they have for their schools   as these plans are being laid out as well. They  can do that. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Smith. Yes.   Um appreciate that. Starting with the K through  well starting period I think all of these tie in   because we have to figure out what we're doing at  each level to be able to have capacity to do the   other things. So if we don't have like the prek  thing figured out then we're in flux of knowing do   we have an extra maybe three to four classrooms in  schools. So, I think that's where all of this has   to get flushed out really, really quickly because  I'm also

060looking at someone who works down the   hall from here who's going to have people coming  in to enroll for school in two weeks, three weeks,   maybe they're ready enrollment, unless we adjust  the time. Yeah. So, we got we got we're getting   that going. So my thing is here's that piece one  um and I will echo kind of where I went earlier   like for the K through seven then moving to K  through eight. I understand that there are parents   who say hey I would love to have my parent here  my child here but I think that's also a space to   talk to them about the why because one of those  things is the familiarity. I've been here. Um,   so then it makes me go, okay, if if you're wanting  to stay here because of the familiarity

061or you   are comfortable here or you're not ready for your  child to go here or you might have heard something   that you didn't want to hear about another option  like I think that is a opportunity for us to look   at how do we stand up our standalone middle  schools as well because if we're not addressing   that issue, we're going to continue to try to  appease people until we cannot please like we're   never going to be able to please everyone all the  time. So, you're going to have some parents that   say, "Yes, I would want my sixth grader to stay  here at say Bell Haven, but then you might have a   room full of first and second grade parents to go,  but I don't want my kid at school with seventh and   eighth graders." And so

062then what if they go, you  know what, I'm pulling my first grader and putting   them somewhere else. I'm putting them at this  school that is K through four because I didn't   want this. And so I think that's how for me it's  how are we talking to everybody and getting the   full picture. What is the real impact? Um I do  think with the K through 7 there is a space and   a need like I like the idea on paper of putting  at at Valerie because it creates the opportunity   to have a campus where I can have a child there  from kindergarten through 12th grade and they can   just go right across the yard to Meadowdale.  I like the the fact that if we're moving um   middle school out of Belmont, then we do need an  extra

063middle school option in that side of town,   but the capacity that we would be able to serve  really is dictated upon if we are moving prek out,   which is then dictated upon the whole piece.  So, I think getting that is going to be huge.   um 6 through 8. I just want us to figure out  how are we how are we changing the issue that we   started with. So I think when we look at the two,  it's like this paradox where we're saying we're   parents wanted to stay where they were because  they weren't going to the middle schools that   we had and they were choosing other options.  Then adding sixth grade to that other option,   it doesn't change a parent. Like if I'm a parent  and I didn't want to go to this middle school when  

064it was seventh and 8th, what about it is going to  make me want to send my kid there in sixth grade?   If we're saying we needed to add seventh grade to  other schools because those parents didn't want to   go there in the first place. So it's like we're  sending out a mixed message. If we're saying we   need to create seventh grade at Cleveland, Horus  man, Bell Haven, and Valerie because as we stand   they're not going to Waggamin, EJ Brown, and  Wright brothers. Then on the other hand, we're   saying we're creating another choice by adding  sixth grade to the schools that we're saying   parents didn't want to send their kids to. And  so like instead of figuring out what grades we're   putting in like that standalone middle school,  what are the supports that we're giving them?  

065Because how are we changing the narrative? Because  if we're if we're saying we want to create parent   choice, it doesn't help the narrative that the  schools that we have people aren't trying to send   their children to. And if you keep that going,  then eventually they're going to go, well, next   year we're going to have to have seventh grade at  Louise Troy. We're going to have to have seventh   grade at Kaiser. Um parents say they don't want  to leave Edison. They don't want to leave camp.   Then what happens when they get to eighth grade at  Kemp or when they get to 8th grade at Cleveland or   they get to eighth grade at Horseman? What data do  we have to show that keeping them in this building   K through 8 helps them come to our high schools? 

066Because once again, we will be keeping them in   a building like right now, we still don't know  what the benefit of keeping children at River's   Edge until 8th grade does for them going to high  school outside some saying, "Hey, will I still   be able to audition for Styver?" And so it pushes  the quote unquote undesirable. And for all these   other schools, please do not think I think that  because I love all our buildings, but we have to   address that because if we're saying we created a  situation where you can have a different option,   but we do not know that once you've exhausted  all the years that the option you prefer,   will you stay in Dayton public? Because what is  the use if you stay at River's Edge for a till 8th   grade and just go

067to Carol next? What is the use  if you stay at Valerie till 8th grade and then you   go to Horizon? we'd like to share is because we  have opened up our enrollment for our high schools   through the innovativemies and we can bring that  data to show the board how are we doing with   that because th those eighth graders have already  designated where they want to go and we have some   schools with the programming that already have  a waiting list and guess what it's not the three   it's not ponets divers and metal per se, but it's  some of the traditional high schools because of   the opportunities, they actually have some weight  lists for their freshmen. So, that's showing us   those eighth coming to 9th, we're keeping more  of those and we plan to as we build

068and expose   families to what we're actually offering. For  example, our middle schools. One thing we want to   make sure our families know is there are no other  middle schools with the number of career tech   programs in this whole region. They don't have the  IT, the business, the agriculture, and the allied   health opportunities. They don't have that. That's  only with Dayton public. So, the more we get that   message out there, the more they're going to be  selecting and feeling comfortable as we improve   all the way around our middle schools. I think  and those leaving middle school they are going   people are trying there's a wait list we haven't  opened up the doors of those coming from charter   trying to get in because we put we give preference  to our families that choose Dayton public first   but

069there is a list of people waiting to enroll  right now and I think you you're making my point   in a way because if we have these programs in  the middle schools that are nowhere else in   the area Mhm. We're not showing that if we're  saying we're opening up seventh grade in these   buildings because parents want a different choice.  Like we're we're defeating our message by saying   that we have great programs in middle school,  but by the way, if you don't want to go, we're   going to give you like it's it's it's competing.  We what we wanted to do is be the district that   gives multiple choices cuz our families are  diverse and different and they deserve to be   able to have choices and so so parents that want  to keep them in that building because

070that's where   they are and they're comfortable and there may be  some families that want to have the choice to do   the six seven and eight. Um I think it's all in  how we market it and present it to and we want   to bring people in from the outside. We've got a  whole lot of competition with KA charters right   now that could come to us and choose us. And I  think that's where I think we we are embracing   we aren't embracing the thoughts of the people who  want like it's almost like we look at some of them   as I know there's a segment of our population that  will be here. They're not going to Carol. They're   not going to Alter. They're not about to go to the  STEM school. They're not going to Miami Valley.   But

071that is not the segment of people that drove  us to put seventh grade into River's Edge. Like   we have to be honest with ourselves and say the  reason we have seventh grade at River's Edge is   because those parents said we're either going to  stay at seventh grade at River's Edge Styvers or   we're not coming here. Yeah. Like that is a real  thing. Like people said they weren't coming here.   And I've talked to some of those parents that are  excited about that. And when I ask them about,   okay, after 8th grade, because that's what we're  talking about, right? Where are you going? And   they're saying, wow, you all have provided so many  opportunities. I'm not sure which high school my   kids going to pick now. So that's choices. So I  will, Miss I will uh next.

072Yeah, he ain't next. I   thought I was next. I was I've been waiting too,  so don't think I was coming back then you. Oh,   okay. Thank you. That's a good one. Thank you.  Okay, a couple things here with the 68 which I   support the I am happy to see that option here  because I do it has been something not only with   this administration but the prior administration  of seeing if children are in the building longer,   how does that report how does it? My question  for you guys is if we're adding six through 8th,   then why aren't we also capping at least three  elementaryaries at fifth grade? Because where   do the kids come from in that point of it? It  would just make sense that if we're going to we   discussed that, too. We discussed that.

073Again,  we're on that teacher piece of it. So, that one   I would I would like you guys to consider capping  like a K5 and then a 68. We did discuss that like   yeah like Louise Troy is right there. I know.  I mean somewhere the class has to go somewhere.   So there's that one. Um, second, even though we  barely touched the surface of the athletic piece   of it in our committee work, I I don't want to lie  to people and tell them that we're going to have   this robust program of athletics in middle school  with all these additions because athletics at the   in the seventh and eighth grade, it is the wildest  place that you can actually you don't have to play   for the school. You can play for inter murals,  you can play for someone

074else, you do this other   stuff. So, it wouldn't be a great investment for  us as a district to put these things in place   knowing that kids have significantly more choices  when it when they're in middle school than they do   at the high school level. I mean, essentially,  they have the same choices that they have in   elementary. The only new choice is you may be  able to play for us as a district. So, I don't I   don't want us to give a narrative to individuals  that if a school has seventh and eighth grade,   it will automatically have traditional sports  in that one because that's just not true where   you can play for any of our established teams as  well as teams that are outside of the district.   So that piece right there, I just don't want 

075us to I don't want us to and we are working   in collaboration with Chief Jones and her team to  make sure uh we're able to fill the need of that   middle school sports. Well, I'm saying I don't see  us investing more is what I'm saying at this point   because if there's any investment that needs to  come, it would be at the elementary level in that   piece because there there just is established  programs right now in middle school that if he   got the mic back, he would take you through the  whole history of how we how we got all these other   places when we changed our model years ago when  I'm pretty sure Joe Lacy was on the board. So,   I blame Joe for that. But uh just all those pieces  there. So just that piece

076just is it's not an area   that we should invest heavily in because it  won't yield us success versus us putting more   capital into physical education or into something  at the younger level in that piece. So that's all   just really that cap at fifth grade just finding  three schools. Mr. Walker, I'll let Chief Spurlock   go and then I'll go. I'll let Chief Spurlock  go and then I can go. Miss Spurlock was gonna   talk to she was standing behind you. Oh, why did  you tell me? That's so I just wanted to address   a couple different things that we had um that  were brought up. Uh we have been doing tenative   organization charts with all of our schools. And  what we're doing is we're looking at enrollment   and we're looking at staffing to make sure that  we rightsize

077and make sure that we have enough   staff for the students that we need. In some areas  we look at enrollment and we close classrooms and   open classrooms. So any of the configurations  that we select, we will make sure that we   um staff according to students and not to be  overstaffed. So that's always a concern. So when   we look at these things, that's how we can move  staff based on lure to different locations. We are   already looking at multiple places where we can  reduce staff and then relocate them to places that   need them. So I just want to you are we've worked  many many hours on that. So, I want to make sure   you're very clear that we we want to make sure  that we're we're staffed correctly, we are working   in conjunction with all of

078the departments um to  ensure that we do that. The second thing is that   when we look at the number of students that are  in our preschools and moving over to kindergarten,   uh what we have is we have three-year-olds in  preschool and we have four year olds in preschool.   When we look at the data just on those students  that are eligible for our preschool, we can look   that just three years ago, we were in the 60s  for those that move over from preschool over into   um our into our kindergartens. And over the past  two years, we worked very diligently. So we were   in the 60s in the from the 23 to 24 school  year. from the 25 to 26 it was 70%. Last year   um this year it's 74%. What we're doing is we're  making sure

079that to retain students and we have   plans in place. Last year we asked and we had  every single one of our elementarymentaries   create preschool to kindergarten nights,  kindergarten transition nights for families   also have meetings. We also worked in a plan  for our preschool parents to know what do you   need to do in order to prepare your students for  kindergartens. We had those a little too late last   year. So in our planning for this school year,  we've moved those meetings from fourth quarter   into third quarter so they would be ready for  enrollment. So those are some of the things that   we've done. We're also working in conjunction  with Miami Valley C um Miami Valley Child Care   Centers to be a very collaborative place. Um  we've had multiple meetings um every month with   them to make sure

080that we're in conjunction and we  have worked like when we have a place that's that   um we don't have spots we we transfer them to  them. When they have don't have spots we transfer   them to us. We've also worked very collaboratively  in our principles. We gave them the number of all   of their locations throughout so that we would  invite all of those students these transition   lights to kindergarten and we are going to do  that but we moved it up from fourth quarter   to third quarter to ensure that we can make  sure to retain students and also get students   into our kindergarten programs. Thank you Mr. W.  Thank you. So for me I appreciate the data that   you all sent with the survey that you did do. I  appreciate the parents actually saying that they   um

081want their kids to remain in those buildings. I  appreciate even more that looking at middle school   being 68. When you look at the suburban districts  here in the city, all of them are 6 to8. When you   look at standalone middle schools that are charter  schools, they are 68 6 to8. When you look at DECA,   DECA is 6 to8. Triwood is 6 to8. So to look at  this now and athletics absolutely for middle   school, but we have to be clear here. Our high  school coaches don't even go and recruit our   middle school kids on a regular basis. Let's be  totally honest here. It's it's not a real thing.   Nobody enforces them to go and do it because they  play everywhere. So, they don't even recruit with   inside of our actual district before making these  high school

082chomps and actually seeing what they   want to do. Um, for me, I appreciate talking  to principles as well because everyone knows   that I'm around just like Dr. Lawrence. And I  appreciate principles saying that for 6th to 8th,   they would actually welcome it because they need  at least a year to get a student acclimated to   middle school. So that becomes challenging when  a student is just in seventh grade and going to   eighth grade because now you're leaving all over  again to go to a high school. Um even with again   your survey results, parents said the same thing  in here that I'm saying now. So I appreciate the   work that your team has done with this. I think  for me um the question I had before was about a   preschool on the other side. Um the question

083for  me was those feeder schools of international and   Westwood and things like that. So appreciate the  work that you all did on this. Miss Minor Floor is   yours. Okay. Thank you. We got another question.  Oh, you have another question? Yes. Well, just a   comment um for me and and I'm I'm only speaking  for myself. um when when and I don't know like   the team members may agree when when anybody  comes for a presentation it would be helpful   to have like all the exhibits as an attachment  with that presentation because a lot of the not   all of us sit on the committee where you guys  have been doing a lot of this work and so it's   important when you when you come to you know get  buy in from all the board members that we have

084all   that information to look at in advance so that  we don't, you know, necessarily spend an hour,   hour and a half on this particular topic because  we would have looked at it, you know, ahead of   time. Um, and and I'm just used to, like I said,  when on my job, you know, we have an acquisition   control board, we have to have references to  everything that we mention so people know the   history, the funding, the statistics, the surveys,  all the data. And it would just be helpful to   have that so that we're not, you know, looking at  this and and you know, having you guys stay here   longer than you necessarily need to because you  have done a lot of this work in the committees,   but I'm not on that committee. You know, I haven't  been

085in those meetings and not everyone, you know,   has. So, just for future reference, if you  guys could do that for me, that would be   great. Everything that they've mentioned that they  said that you guys have, if you could email that   to all of us so that we can also take a look at  it. Yes. Thank you. I'm just going to say one of   the things that I do when I see this stuff, when I  have questions, I go ahead and I'll just call you   guys and ask the questions so I don't have to ask  a lot of questions when I get up here as well. So   board members can also, just so you know, you can  call when you see this stuff on board docs. Um,   you can call Dr. Lawrence, Miss Miner, or whoever 

086uh to ask your questions before we get on the   podium as well. Absolutely. Can I be emailed?  Thank you. I wasn't It wasn't a good one. I will   say I'm very excited to see you guys' homework at  tomorrow's committee meeting because that's what   we all the stuff that Miss Gar Garrison has just  stated is where we would get it tomorrow. That's   a committee meeting tomorrow. It's not for you  guys if you're not on that committee. But this   has been really great to email. The meeting the  meeting should be so much swifter since we're   having the same conversation right now that we're  going to have tomorrow and you've gotten so much   more feedback now. All right. Okay, that's that's  it. Yep. Thank you. Thank you. We got a whole lot   of stuff on here for 30

087total. Thank you. Any  other questions? Yes. Thank you, Mr. President.   Um I have a question. Can you talk more about  the unifying bell times for schools? Um yes. Um   I would like to know a lot more about that. Thank  you. Um that is to help our routes better service   our families. Right now, I'll give you an example.  In the Dumbar area with Louise, Troy, and Wagaman,   they're on the same bell, so those families can  share the same buses and the same routes. So,   it's more efficient. We'd like to do that  throughout the city. So that would make sure that   certain schools that are close to those middle  schools like a Kemp and a Wright brothers would be   on the same tier and the routers can better manage  that and provide better services to our families.  

088So that's what that would mean the same that's  the feedback we got from transportation. Okay.   Could we get a map of that um with the schools and  Yes. Um so you guys can show how you're grouping   the schools. Um, that makes sense. Um, I was I  thought I thought we were going to go to a two   bell schedule. That's right. Maybe next time.  Right. I know. I wish. Yeah. Can I just say it?   You can. Okay. We We That's being a part of the  the meeting of that day. We did look at a two-tier   bell schedule. The issue is we have charter  schools that don't want to come to the table and   say they would be interested in doing it. Yeah.  Mr. Smith. Um, no. I was seeing if we were going   over the rest

089of what's on here. We still got  like Mound Street. That's it. Oh, the alternative   programming. Thank you. With uh combining  having Mound Street at Jackson Center. And   so Mound Street, as it says here, there's a lot  of repairs, $8 million worth in pending repairs.   uh unifying the staff. We'll consolidate our  programs and provide uh more certified teachers   for our student special populations. And so it's  operational way more efficient uh providing a   higher quality instruction because we'll have more  certified staff and be able to build on serving   that population at a at a better level. So we're  excited about that. Uh, we've talked to the Mound   Street team and Jackson, so we're putting it all  together now. Looking forward to that. Thank you. Okay. My major concern, not necessarily, like  I do support you guys sending

090them the Jackson   Center. That's great. What I don't want to happen  to another one of our buildings is what happened   to Low One when they decommissioned it and Oh,  yeah. It went from a whatever the number was   at that time to significantly larger because the  building has just sat there unused. So although I   see that savings, I do believe we have to figure  out how we can utilize this building and that   piece of it. I have on my desk to put a proposal  to Dr. Jones for us to create some type of teen   center or something like that. But if there are  other ideas out there, we can't let a building   just go to waste and that piece of it because then  we'll have another property on our portfolio that   we could have that had

091a small problem and then it  got larger by neglect and not putting into it. So   I I would like to know too what are other options  for the Mound Street location whether it is to   serve as an administrative function whether it is  something for our students to do something in just   something that gets us going so we don't have we  don't go two to three years and 8 million pro $8   million pro problem turns into a $24 million  project. Dr. a good one. All the things you   mentioned uh and a few more that we talked about  including storage, we're um going to bring those   to the school facilities committee uh to hash  that out there. Sounds great. That that was the   plan all along. Is that the building operations  committee? Yes. Yes. All right, Mr.

092Smith. Yeah,   I'm glad Dr. Gilwan mentioned that. Um not  only that, like we saw we had to do something   with high insurance skyrocketed for not using  those buildings. Um my concern there is as we   move groups together that we aren't losing what  made those things different. Like Mound Street,   I remember very vividly when we first talked about  the alternative school. Mound Street showed up in   Mass to say, "Hey, one of these options was to put  the alternative school in Mound Street and kind of   mesh the two together." And it's a different  space. You have one group of children that   are there because of behavioral incidents at their  school. Some are there for just a short stay. Some   end up staying longer. Another group are students  who have self- selected to be in this alternative   type

093of education due to life situations, things  that have happened. And so I would want to see   what does that look like for the building. Does  it look like we're meshing everybody together   in the same classes and trying to hash that out?  Are we creating um some of the same spaces that   we talked about having for the students that are  in there in lie of like what does that fully look   like? because I do understand the need to move  them into the space because of you know finances   and the work that we would have to do but I don't  want us to lose what um what made the students   stay at Mound Street because that is also one  of the reasons we got Mountain Street and there   are other people in in that space. If we

094look down  right up the road they're building a a alternative   high school. There's multiple alternative credit  recovery spaces and I wouldn't want to lose that   relationship aspect that the students have  had there. And then once again to save money,   we would be losing money because for every student  that says, you know what, Mound Street does not   serve me. Let me go to Liberty. Let me go to  Dayton Business Tech. Let me go to Rivercape.   That's money on the back end that then we would  be losing. So, I would want us to like with all   of these things really look at the impact. Um, and  I think this is one where I I don't think it's a   wrestling around on the if because I think we need  to consolidate the students in that building. For   me,

095it's more so how do we do it with that one?  Um, some of the other ones I do think having   those different pieces I thought I talked to Dr.  Lawrence about that like I think creating pockets   of communities will be important. Like I look at  if we're saying Waggleman 6 through8, it makes   sense then if Louise Troy is a preK or a K through  five. Um because now we're we're we're we're   moving people along and there that's the only  community here outside of now if we did it with   Valerie and Meale where a family could have their  child in the same environment from kindergarten to   12th grade. And so I think that piece is important  because we have to look at like just what's going   on and seeing how do we move that. Um I

096talked to  Dr. Lawrence and I I did like what we talked about   of getting some time to see what does it look like  for the future. You know, we look in our suburban   partners and and neighbors where you have some  buildings just have a 45, some have like a K3,   then a 45, then a 68. What does that look like for  us as we move forward? because everybody's doing   it different. If you in Oakwood, you might just  have seven eight. Springboro is seven and eight.   Um, Vanelia was one of the first early ones that I  saw that it went younger with the middle schools.   So, I just think it's a for me wanting to scale  up with capacity, wanting to be able to scale up   in a way that we can look at the data

097and say,  "Hey, this is what it's looking like here. This   is where we're seeing needs here." because we have  a lot of talented staff and they love these kids.   But I don't want to put them in a position where  they're burnt. And that's one of the reasons when   we look back at when we moved away from K through  8, there were parents, there were teachers,   there were principles at the time saying we have  issues with the seventh and eighth graders in our   buildings. And I think we're better equipped to  deal with that. But I don't want us to ignore that   that was a a reason when some of those same people  are in our buildings now. So I think I appreciate   all of these things and I appreciate more so the  conversation in front of

098people. So it really puts   the onus on us to really buckle down and figure  out this out because I think we we want to be in a   space where parents can make informed decisions  and trust us because that's what it's really   going to come down to is do they trust us to have  the best interest of their children? And that's   really what parents are making. They're they're  they're they're selecting where they feel their   children have the best chance of success at. And  so I think that there's so many things going on.   Miss Garrison mentioned it last week about putting  out the good that's going on. Talking about what's   really going on out here, being super transparent  about where we're trying to fix things, letting us   know, hey, what does it look like for teachers?  Some

099buildings are in a better shape right now   than others when it comes to having certified  teachers in there. Moving these things around   and doing it early enough where people can make  decisions about where they want to transfer, if   they're going to be here, on top of understanding  the fiscal situation that we're facing. So,   I look forward to getting all of these things. I'm  excited about tomorrow. Um, just appreciate the   conversation and appreciate you for standing  here and taking a lot of questions. You're   welcome. Thank you for your comments. Thank you.  So on on Mound Street, a few things for me. Um,   one would be um I think Mound Street being on  that side of Dayton would be really good. I   think for me I would be curious on the work that  Dr. Lawrence and your

100team do to really push the   22 plus program. Oh yeah. Um to get those family  members over there involved. The second piece for   me would be um we do know that Mal Street has a  lot of students who do use the RTA. So if there's   a way to get with them to survey that area to  look at a stop being closer over there. I do   know that the city has the city has a shuttle  program um with the library connecting to the   job center and things like that. So I don't know  if that could be something there. Um, and then,   uh, another piece with me is Mound Street  moving to Jackson gives access to funding   that they do not have access to while being at  Mound Street. Um, for the Mound Street location,   I know

101we voted on a lease agreement for another  storage facility, but maybe an idea here. I do   know that here in the district, there is no place  for professional development spaces or meeting   spaces. So, not sure if that can be looked at for  that area. And then last thing for me with Jackson   is can we figure out what the name is going to be.  Oh yeah. Yeah. Miss is already doing that. Yeah.   She's there's a board policy and she's already  following the guidelines of that policy. Oh,   we don't usually follow that for name recognition.  Name change. So, go ahead. As a staff, I'm just   telling you we're going by board policy.  Appreciate it. Comments. Anything else? Thank you for your presentation.  Thank you, Miss Minor. All right. Now, we are going to have hearing  of any

102of the bargaining units. Two. I see two here. Good evening, board president Bailey, Dr.  Lawrence, board members, parents, and families   at home. Uh, my name is Neil Mahoney, and I am  the president of the largest labor union in the   district, the DEA. Um, it was very refreshing  to hear the types of questionings being asked,   um, to see the board delve into areas that we  need these questions answered. My members are   concerned about what the future of this district  is. We're making decisions right now on whether   we're staying, we're moving, whether we're being  forced to move. Things along those lines go a long   way. That open communication. However, there's  some frustration within my teachers. I'm not   always aware of what the board knows and what  the board doesn't know. So, I'd like to bring   your attention

103to some issues that I'm hoping we  can get some of the same types of questioning. You   know me. You know that I'm very transparent in  everything I do. I'm very available anytime you   have a question or concern. I would appreciate  you letting me know. I'm here tonight to be the   voice of the almost 900 members of the DEA who are  feeling disrespected, undervalued, and not treated   as the professionals that they are. Recently,  the district announced the need for a levy.   And with that, there is the understanding that the  support of the DEA and its members will be needed.   We should be striving for a partnership with  the district. We should not feel an attack on   my membership and lack of communication  and clarity by the district. Recently,   the district implemented a homework policy without  any

104clear communication from the district to my   members conversations. I know it might be a  board policy. It would have been nice to have   received it earlier. I'm not even sure the board  received any of the information concerning this   earlier than what my members did. Walking into  a PD day today with the expectation is possibly   implementing said homework policy tomorrow. But  yet the district could include in that statement,   "If your students are not receiving homework after  implementation begins, please contact the parent   on budsman office." Whether this is intended or  not, it can be perceived as a veiled threat to   my members. A 1800 hotline for gotcha. This is  not how you attract and retain professionals. The union was not notified recently when one of  our members was placed on paid administrative   leave, which hampers our efforts

105to be able  to give a fair representation and due process.   simple communication. When an email can be put  in the member's file, but the union president   does not receive notification which allows me  to implement the legal defense for my teacher.   Simply due process is all we're asking. Several  of my members have been harassed by administrators   for asking that the union get involved in  protecting their rights at their building.   This will be considered retaliation for union  activity and is currently in the hands of   our council. As in my experience  with this district over 30 years,   as well as every other union president, to have  a retaliatory action for union activity because   my members simply asked for a visit by the union  president to their building, that's unheard of.   Lastly, there was a recent email from our 

106superintendent concerning teacher attendance   which resulted in the following email that I  just recently sent to my members which states,   "As you are aware, the district recently issued an  email to the building principles regarding staff   attendance. This district in the communication  stated that they are shifting our primary focus   to teacher and paraprofessional attendance. The  superintendent seems to want to be solely blame   you for undermining instructional goals as quoted  because you may use a sick leave day here and   there as allowed under the contract. In fact, he  called it the real issue. We all know that because   of this district's failure to staff our buildings  from day one, my teachers have given up their   planning time on a consistent basis. Our teachers  are burned out from all the asks that have been   made of them and requested

107of them. And now with  less than three months left in the school year,   our professionalism because we're taking a sick  time, whether it's for our member, their family,   or even their family member, seems to be the focus  of a school district. At no time was this brought   to my attention in a way that which we could work  these things out. But yet we send out a very cold   email with the expectation from my members that  there will be bullying and harassment by the   building administrators wanting to know why are  you using your sick day. Are you sure you can   maybe do something on a different day? I already  have people out. We don't staff the buildings. Our   HR department staffs the buildings. Last year we  had a need for almost 350 teachers and we hired  

10875. And we wonder why our teachers are burned out  right now. At tonight's meeting, I heard multiple   mentions of buildings not staffed properly. And  yet, we're not going to realize that that has   a consequence on the humans that work in these  buildings. My members, I'm disappointed in this. In conclusion, from a district that prides itself  on the five Cs, particularly communication,   we're not seeing that. What we are seeing is  a sense of panic, not confidence, erraticism,   not consistency, punitive, not coaching and  mentoring. We're about to make some serious   decisions in the next three months which will  shape the direction that this district is going   to go in. I believe that the DEA should be a  part of the conversations. We need to attract   and retain educators. We know that the mention of  a levy will

109at the bare minimum result in some of   our younger teachers leaving because of their  fear of job security. I don't need to remind   the board that under 500 of our members have  four years or less. They're very employable.   They're filling out the applications because  they're not feeling wanted in this district   because they're being retaliated for using  their union. They're being put on paid to   leave without the union being made aware of  it. Our curriculum team is going into buildings and spreading a me a message that our teachers  are not hearing because of the method and the   vehicle that which they're using to present the  message. This is at a time when I just sat and   listened to district plans and at no time has  the union been made aware of any of this. We've   asked.

110We're not saying that our voice is the most  overwhelming voice, but we would like a voice at   the table because right now we are experiencing  a high turnover rate of our teachers. And now   we're talking about moving them around like we're  widgets that can easily be shifted to building to   building. We're professionals. We demand to be  treated as such. This is not the path to attract   and retain teachers. And as a district, we should  strive to be better than this. And I know we are.   We have great relationships, but the communication  is not funneling down to where the rubber meets   the road. I hope that in the future my members  can be heard, that the board members are in   the buildings that are listening, that these  surveys are not only going to parents that are  

111stakeholders, but teachers that are stakeholders  because change of time affects my membership's   life outside of work. We have families, too. We're  taking care of parents, too. A simple adjustment   of a time may not seem like a big deal, but it  does to the person that has to find child care   and parental help. So, all I'm asking is as we  move forward, because we know that that levy is   going to be very important come November, we have  three months for the rest of this school year. To   be rolling out plans today shows me that maybe  we have not done our due diligence. My union   was aware of the financial shortfalls. We settled  our contract early because I did my homework and   understood what was coming down the path and now  we seem to be a little

112flustered or nervous that   we may not have the funding. We knew this a year  ago. This is leading to a frustration level not   just amongst my teachers, amongst my paras that  are out there, amongst the bus drivers, amongst   the SRO's. There's a lot of concern. All we're  asking is for a voice at the table, communication   that the district prides itself on. We are here  and we have always been here. Our teachers come   to Dayton public schools not for money, not for  sick time, because they want to make differences.   And we have that opportunity in our buildings to  make a difference in a child's life that changes   the trajectory of what that child and that  family will go to. And by actions recently,   we're pushing those people away. I'm hoping that  we can be better than

113this. Thank you. Thank you. any other bargaining units. All right. Hearing  from the public, uh, it is in inappropriate to,   uh, I'm sorry, limit remarks to 3 minutes.  The president has a discretion to extend the   time. When your time is up, you are to stop  speaking. It is inappropriate to address any   matter involving pending disputes,  grievances under a labor agreement,   disciplinary action involving an employee or  student, ongoing labor negotiations, concerns,   or matters that have already been settled and or  any matter which because of its nature is deemed   appropriate to be discussed in executive session.  The purpose of the public hearing a portion of   the meeting is for members of the public to  express viewpoints and public concerns. Do we   have anyone? Yes. Uh Mr. Jacob uh Berdick and then  is Haley coming up too. So

114Haley Reed as well. Yeah. Who's taking your time? I'm doing two jobs  right now. Yeah. He's always the time keeper.   Have three minutes. Welcome. Thank you. Um we're  very grateful to be here today to share a little   bit about our senior capstone project for the  University of Dayton's Dayton Civic Scholars. Perfect. Uh so we're we're both members  of the Dayton Civic Scholars. Uh it's   through the University of Dayton's FIT Center. Uh   so it's a three-year program focused on  civic engagement in the Dayton region.   Uh we are currently uh two of nine members working  on our capstone project with the victory project. So over the past two years our cohort has had  the opportunity to view various community assets   throughout the greater Dayton area. And one  that stood out to us was the Victory Project,   a

115nonprofit located in Dayton that empowers  young men through the three E: education,   entrepreneurship, and enlightenment. Currently,  the Victory Project boys division has two   campuses, Residents Park and Old North  Dayton. Um, the rest of our cohort was   uh serving a meal ministry at the Residence Park  location tonight. And it was recently announced   that 2026, later in 2026, a girls division of the  Victory Project will open um serving 12 girls,   girls ages 12 to 14. Yeah. So our capstone is  helping Victory Project create that curriculum   for these female students that will participate in  their programming. Uh so we are currently working   with uh the University of Dayton's IRB board.  Um and then you know a big reason why we're   here tonight is to try and find the best ways  to uh distribute a survey that we have

116uh made   uh for these students uh to to take so that we  can take this data and give it to Victory Project   uh so that they can create a curriculum that  best represents what these students want. Um,   Victory Project, you know, prides itself in those  three E, but obviously without student input,   it doesn't get very far. Exactly. So, for our  next steps, we are receiving feedback from you   on how we can support um the distribution of  the survey across five middle school campuses,   which are listed on the screen. Um, the guidance  that we are in need of is how we can distribute   this survey so that we can get as much input from  middle school students as possible, particularly   middle school girls. And then also, we're  seeking your approval of a donut party incentive,   which

117will hopefully allow us to get more survey  responses. Um, and then that donut party incentive   will be funded by the Fit Center for Community  and Leadership at the University of Dayton.   So, I um I did email the um  the survey to all of you,   but I do have paper copies. Is there someone  who I should hand this to? Our treasure pro. Can I ask a quick question? Go ahead. What's you  guys' major? I'm a political science major. Okay.   Public relations and political science. I was  hoping you were in education. Get down. Thank   you. Uh Dr. Dr. Shihi, would you be getting  with him for that? Would you be the person   get getting with them on that surveys? Yeah,  it's Dr. Shei cuz Connor who's research and   uh research and assessment works for her.  Okay. Thank

118you. So, can I I'll give these   back to you to then just get to Chief Dr. Shei  right there. Thank you very much for your time.   Thank you. Thank you. Um Dr. Lawrence, if  I may, would you also make sure that you   work with them? We try to uh see how we can  help with the students at Charity Adams and   River's Edge as well since we have middle  school age young ladies there as well. Hey,   absolutely. No problem. All more members.  Appreciate. Thank you. Uh Ebony Hastings. Ebony Hastings. Airaa Montes. Noah Euromantes and then uh Dr. Chad Sloths. Hey, greetings. How's everybody doing? Pretty  good. How are you? Good. Going well. Happy Marty,   bro. Ah, yeah. You're not going to get to go  this year. So, a whole lot of what I had come   to

119really present on was discussed earlier. So,  I kind of chopped it down into what I'm hoping   to be something as comprehensive, but I really  wanted to uh kind of put the um the attention   on the culture of these transitions if we do what  is being suggested. Um, placing early adolescence   into elementary school environments, especially  in high poverty districts, creates cultural,   developmental, and equity harms that outweigh  any logistical benefits. First, early adolescence   is a distinct developmental age requiring  increased autonomy, identity exploration,   and specialized academic supports. Scholars such  as Eckles and Rosier 2011 note that adolescence   thrive when they experience developmentally  appropriate environments uh that offer choice,   peer affiliation and subject specific  instruction. Elementary schools, however,   are designed around tight adult control, limited  independence, and child- centered routines,   conditions that research by Simmons and Ble  1987 identifies

120as harmful mismatches for   emerging adolescents. Thus, placing seventh  graders in a K6 culture creates a structural   developmental misalignment that can depress  motivation and belonging. Secondly, in high   poverty districts like Dayton, these mis these mit  matches are in intensify high poverty environments   already generate elevated stress, mobility,  and trauma exposure. Johnson 2012, Sharky 2018.   Adolescence experiencing these stressors require  specialized counseling, trauma-informed support,   and peer appropriate spaces, resources that K6  schools rarely have at scale. Research on or urban   school transitions shows that when adolescence  are placed in environments lacking these supports,   schools experience higher behavior incidents,  low attendance, um, and more disengagement. Uh,   weigh it at L 2007. Thirdly, combining 12 and and  13 year olds with six year olds generates cultural   and safety concerns. Peer cultural research Costco  and McNeely 2008 shows early adolescence naturally   experiment with

121identity through language, humor,  dress, and peer affiliation. These behaviors are   developmentally normal, yet they can be misread  as defiance or deviant or threat in elementary   cultures. By placing older kids in a system not  designed for them, the district risked increasing   disciplinary disproportionality, particularly for  black boys, a long-standing concern in Dayton and   similar urban districts. Fourthly, K6 schools lack  the structural features that protect adolescent   dignity, such as the departmentalization,  flexible schedules, electives, and privacy   appropriate spaces. Studies comparing K through 8  and K6 plus 7 configurations show that adolescence   placed in elementary settings report lower  school connectedness, lower sense of status,   and diminished academic identity. Is that my  time? Yeah, but I should have gave you a 30   second notice so I keep that. It's cool. Um, if  anyone wants any of this like in a full

122report,   um, I'm willing to generate it. I would be  interested. So, all right. Thank you. Thank   you. Appreciate you. Yeah, that was it. That's it.  All right. Superintendent, personal agenda. Uh,   I'd like to recommend for approval items  B through G. So moved. Second. Second. You can give it to Jill. Okay.  Great. Uh, Mr. Lacy. Mr. Riley.   It was a motion by Dr. Goodwine and  second by Mr. Lacy. You got the form. You're looking at like why you telling  me that again? Uh Dr. Goodwine with the   motion and Mr. Lacy with the second  discussion. Any questions or concern? All right. Call for vote. Dr. Bailey, yes.  Mr. Lacy, yes. Miss Reiner, yes. Walker,   vote yes. Dr. Gilwine, yes. Mr. Smith. Yes.  Miss Garrison, yes. Seven yeses. Dr. Bailey,   I recommend superintendent's  personnel agenda H recommend   recommendation

123to approve the following  resignations after July 10th. Second. Call for a vote. Oh, moved by Mr. Lacy, second by Dr. Goodwin.  Dr. Bailey, no. Uh, Mr. Lacy, no. Miss Reiner,   yes. Uh, Walker votes yes. Dr. Goodwin, no.  Mr. Smith, no. And Miss Garrison, yes. Five. Three yes, four no. Three yes, four no. Yeah.  Three yes, four no. Uh, I'd like the board to   take a look at the budget information and if they  have any questions to David Riley and or myself. Okay, I do have a question. Yes. And I  don't know if this is a Mr. Riley thing.   I just really would this actual field number  for teachers on which which number is right   because every report it's different. So like  last week's report it said 887 and now this   report says 8.98. So the

124one before that  said like 918 or something. So if we can   just figure out what the actual number  is or what Andrew is calculating for me. Can you hop on the mic, Mr. Ryder? Yeah.  We can't hear you. Can you come up? Don't flip your bag. You're the assistant treasurer, sir.  Get up here so I can get back down. Um,   I'll bring you up here. Yeah. So, it it it  may depend on when he ran the report. So you   might be looking at numbers from from last week.  That means he just ran a report last week. But   uh things may have changed in between that time.  People may have uh uh become inactive since that   time or people may have become active since that  time. So um right he has a note at the bottom

125of   this that says he ran that report as of today.  Yes. And these are the numbers as of today. So I I   I guess I'm confused on so if he's if he's running  the report and if last week the report said 8.87   but we're only like the number the number that  okay so last week it was 8.88. This week the   same report now says 8.98 but there's only one  person on the agenda. So where did the other nine   where is that at? Yeah. So um information may  be pending at the time also. So when he ran it   uh information may have been pending or not just  readily available at the time and now as of today   this is the information that he has that is uh  that is that is finalized for him to put

126onto   the agenda. Okay. I'll follow up because I I think  I'm just confused on Okay. what's filled and then   what's budgeted and Yeah. All right. Appreciate  you. Yep. Any other questions? All right. Oh,   you might as well stay up there. Aren't you  next? No, it's superintendent. Dr. Bailey,   I'd like to ask uh that you take  A, B, and C together. I have no new   uh information or contracts from from last week  to this week. All right. So move second. Second.   You'll take the second. Dr. Goodwin with  the motion and Mr. Walker with the second. Questions or concerns? All right. Dr. Bailey, I think you uh Oh, say  what? I thought we was doing the vote. My bad.   Does this This sound up for vote, is it? Yes, it  is. Today's usually adds on there. All

127right. Call   for vote. Dr. Bailey, yes. Dr. Goodwin, yes. Uh,  Mr. Lacy, yes. Miss Reiner, yes. Uh, Walker votes   yes. Uh, Mr. Smith, yes. Miss Garrison, yes. 7.  Dr. Bailey, that concludes my recommendations   for today. Thank you, Mr. Superintend Dr.  Superintendent. Uh, treasurer recommendations. Uh, I recommend the approval  of the following A through I.   So moved. Second. Go ahead and give  it to Jill. Moved by Dr. Goodwine,   second by Mr. Lacy. Any comments or concerns?  Well, there are. He wanted to sit down. Somebody get that assistant treasur. Oh, okay. He doing you know make him sit up here.  That's what All right. Call for vote. Dr. Bailey,   yes. Dr. Goodwin, yes. Mr. Lacy, yes. Miss  Reiner, yes. Walker votes yes. Uh, Mr. Smith,   Smith votes yes. Miss Garrison,  yes. 70. All right. Thank you,   sir,

128for sitting down quickly. Uh,  business manager recommendations. Thank you, board president. Uh,  I recommend ratification of the   following contract with the perfection  group and support for Armada Recovery   Center on Hy Street. I make a motion  for business managers A and B. Second. Moved by Mr. Walker, second by Dr. Goodwin. Any  comments, questions. All right, call the vote. Dr.   Bailey, yes. Dr. Goodwine, yes. Mr. Lacy, yes.  Miss Reiner, yes. Walker votes yes. Mr. Smith,   yes. Miss Garrison, yes. 70. Thank  you, sir. Uh, comments, Mr. Walker? None. None. Thank you, Mr. Smith. Uh, yes. Just  want to say thank you for um everybody who has   played a part in these recent events. And like  I said last week, please check your calendar   for other events. Um, Dr. Lawrence brought up  ReadAcross America. Please get out. It's really  

129awesome to get out into these buildings. I want  to say thank you to all of our staff members that   have just really been going through it. Um,  and please take care of yourselves. A lot of   illnesses have been going around, a lot of people  getting sick. So, while we're doing this work,   uh, please practice self-preservation as well.  Um, looking forward to our committees work. Um,   like Dr. Goodwan said, we have a a curriculum  committee. It's been cool talking about some   of the ways that we move in different um,  avenues to better prepare our children.   not only just be competitive in athletics, but  really how do you get the benefits of being   involved? So, how do we get more kids involved in  extracurricular activities at young ages? How do   we partner with some of the groups

130that are out  here? But I think one of the things that gets   misconstrued in our district is that the district  has to be the invest the investor and supporter   of all youth programming when in other districts  it is more aligned with a lot of parent work a   lot of community work and they partner with the  district in ways um I don't want us to go into   a space where we're just transactional partners  for people because they need something. You know,   I think we have there's things that we have to do  to look at what are the processes. For instance,   getting using a space, using a gym rental, making  sure that that process is fair and equitable and   easy to access. But I don't want people to just  come to us in a transactional way. I

131think us as   a district, we should be looking at how we create  innovative partnerships. How do we help out some   of the programs that are already out here? I've  talked to Dr. Lawrence and Dr. zones about um   looking at some of the deals andus that we have in  place um mirroring some of the things that we've   been doing with the Croc Center. How do we improve  that? because there are a lot of groups that do   the work. And over time, it's morphed from having,  you know, the Dayton Mohawks and Parkside and the   uh Dayton Flames and things to people wanting  DPS to pay and kind of carry the load and do all   the heavy lifting where we have resources, but I  think we're better served if we're partnering with   people in ways that are productive

132for us as well.  So, I'm glad that we're having those conversations   and I look forward to having more of those.  Um, and that is all I have on updates. I did   um want to bring something up and put out a motion  for the board and that would be I would want to   entertain a motion at the current juncture to  kind of put a pause on the logo survey creation   rebranding district conversation at the current  juncture. Um, that would be my motion to stop that   and then to kind of pause any even extra funding  that we will put into that. I just think there's   so many other things looking at the presentation  that we had today, looking at some of the things   that we have to get ready for. I just think it's  energy better served

133and less confusion for the   district. Thank you. Second, third question or  comments. Yes, I'm confused on the motion. Okay,   go ahead, Mr. W. I just want clarification on  what is the actual motion to stop putting out any   kind of logo surveying at the time to entertaining  changing anything at the time and to stop sending   things out and I want us to just focus on Dayton  public schools. I know we have been working with   that Ford NGL stuff and the say whatif please. No  logo, no name change, no more money, consideration   funding. There you go. That's why you my girl,  Miss K. You know, that's my answer. And I'm   looking at Mr. Riley over here trying to write it  and I'm Mr. Riley got his short hand going. It's   already gone. We got a first and

134second. First and  a second. So the motion was by Doc Mr. Smith. Mr.   and second by Dr. Good. Mr. Smith, don't call me  a wheel. Any other questions or concerns? Yeah,   I just clarify, what are we actually doing? We're  voting. You're voting. But the motion though has   funding atti tied to it. So, are we voting to  stop spending money on logo? Yes. Or what's all   included in that? That's what I'm asking. What is  exploration? Anything any activity, anything. New   new logo, right? Yes. Okay. Any other questions  or concerns? Call a vote. Oh, my bad. Dr. Bailey,   yes. Dr. Goodwine, yes. Uh, Mr. Lacy, yes. Miss  Reiner, yes. Uh, Walker votes yes. Mr. Smith,   yes. Mr. Garrison, yes. 70. All right, that is  all. But I do want to say I appreciate all of   the work

135for our PIO team. I never want people to  think that a vote means I think down of the work.   I just think there's a lot of things that we have  to button down and in this season I do not want to   have people thinking different things. Appreciate  everybody. Happy Black History Month. Thank you,   sir. I do have one. Miss Reiner. You ain't got  nothing. Thank you, Mr. President. Um there are   two things that I wanted to discuss today. The  first is we got an email a few weeks ago from   a student at the environmental club at Styver  asking some questions about our recycling. Um,   and I would like to uh ask uh our business  manager, Dr. Jones, to come up. Um,   I wanted to have some of those questions  answered publicly. Is now a good

136time for you,   Dr. Jones? Oh, tomorrow's Oh, okay. Um, okay.  Are we I thought we were I didn't I didn't I   don't remember getting an email. I don't know  what they Oh, I'm happy to forward that to you. Question. Yes. Is that okay? Yeah. Do you have  the email in front of you? Uh I have it too and   I can go over there's a couple questions and I  actually want to share it with the public. Um,   we get this asked uh every couple  years and I really appreciate the   um activism that we see in our students and how  much they care about the world around them. Um   uh so this is the email. Uh firstly, we would like  So you you did see it. Okay. January 8th. Firstly,   we would like to know if it's

137the city or a  private company providing us with our trash   recepticles. Secondly, who organizes the trash  on a school or even district level? Thirdly,   do any other schools do their own composting or  recycling? and how as it would greatly improve our   initial efficiency and lastly if there's a cost  required would the school board be able to help   fund the project for recycling bins? Okay,  so firstly uh we do have a private company   uh that provides us with the trash recepticles  uh who organizes the trash on a school or even   district level. Uh that would be our uh building  custodial staff. Mhm. Um and then thirdly,   do any other schools do their own composting or  recycling and how? As it would greatly improve our   initial efficiency. Um I am not familiar with any  schools uh that

138are uh composting or recycling.   Uh however, I know that when I was in third, uh  there was a an effort to do so. Uh and so I'd have   to circle back to the principal there to uh see  if you know that that work is continued. Um but   I I doubt it. Okay. Yeah. Um and do you know about  any potential costs? Do So do we do recycling at   all? Currently we should we should be recycling  more aggressively. Um basically there on occasion   um in our recycling bins there's actually trash  um placed in those recycling bins and so we get   charged extra for that. Uh and so I think across  the district we could do a better job of uh and   not our custodial staff but um staff outside of  the custodial staff making sure that

139only paper   products go into our recycling bins. Okay. So,  we currently pay for trash and recycling services   separately. So, we should have those available  to us, right? Yes. And it sounds like we need   to look at what we're doing at our school level to  facilitate recycling and trash. Yes. I think it'd   be a wonderful opportunity uh for our students to  uh engage in uh recycling. you know, I think that   um there's some tremendous opportunities from  a job standpoint around the area uh that our   students otherwise wouldn't be uh exposed to.  Uh and so and of course it's it's good for the   environment. I'm a biology science guy, you know,  so um anything that's good for the environment,   I'm 100% for. Okay. Is there any additional  information about this that you'd like to share   with the

140student and the public right now? Uh  you know what? I would like to sit down and have   a conversation with that student face to face.  Okay? And so, um, student, if you're listening,   uh, M A R J O N E S at Dayton Public is my, uh,  email address. And Mr. Walker, you She emailed   you. Just email her back. I'm just giving it,  you know, out there. Um, yes. And also, uh, yeah,   I'll be coming by. I'll be coming by to talk to  you. Thank you. Appreciate it. Before you move,   um, on those trash cans, is there, uh, like a  list of what can go in the trash cans in case the   students really don't know what should go in the  trash can? Uh, there's um, all of our recycling   bins are typically labeled recycle,

141right? Um, I  mean it's so particular like let's say a student   inadvertently throws like um they let's say they  have a fourth of milk still in the carton. Um that   that recycling bin is now tarnished. We can't do  anything with it. Uh it has to be totally empty   and dry. Uh and so I think we could probably do a  better job of communicating that to our students   uh throughout the school district in general.  Okay. I think you might want to put some kind   of plaque of what goes in what because I think  a lot of the times kids just see a trash can and   they just throw trash. Exactly. Think about paper  or plastic or metal or anything like this. That's   exactly what happens. Yes, sir. Adults don't.  Any other questions? Thank you. Thank you.

142I   appreciate it. The second thing I want to discuss  is the external organizations committee met.   uh there was some illness so we had to delay it  and I made sure it happened yesterday so we could   talk about at the meeting today because I know  that there are some things that um were up for a   vote previously that we have paused on and the the  information that I wanted to bring to the board is   first of all we we talked about we talked about  three different things we talked about the past   conferences that have been attended this year  and the future conferences less left until the   um end of the the school year um the the July  1 date um and what that schedule looked like   um we talked about the conference reports um and  organization

143assignments. Um we looked over the   the conferences that have happened this year and  then the future ones and um a couple of us have   adjusted the conferences that we'll be attending.  Schedules just change um and I know board member   Garrison has requested to go to one that's coming  up as well too. Um so those have changed a little   bit and we've pulled back a little bit on that.  um the funding initially as um approved at the   organizational meeting and I want to thank Miss  Kidd for this information. Um we approved um 30K   at the organizational meeting. Um the service  fund is based on enrollment at $2 per student   up to 60K. It's not a blanket 60k and I don't  think we need to go up to to that limit at all   either. But there is

144more room for us to attend  conferences. We also discussed um you know I I   feel very deeply about the opportunities that are  in front of the board for professional development   um for networking for um finding out more about  um the things that we're responsible for and   there are some really really great opportunities  at different conferences. Some conferences have   different areas of focus than others. Um I find a  great deal of benefit personally when I'm there. I   I take notes and uh last year when um we had this  same meeting happen at the beginning of the year   uh I put together a template for a conference  report. Um, it is not mandated that board members   fill out a conference report when they go and we  do want to encourage board members to attend and   we hope

145that that's not a barrier, but it's much  easier to organize that information and bring   it back in front of the board to report after we  attend a conference and then we can have it easily   accessible to share. Um I've shared several things  in front of the um at meetings for with the board   about um conferences that I found particularly  uh helpful and educational and enlightening. Um   there are a couple things that I've uh been  champion championing from finding about at   conferences. Um and I wanted to thank board member  Walker for his past uh conference report that he   submitted as well too. Um and then we talked  about the different organizations, external   organizations that we have and uh I um touched  base with you about this Mr. President. Uh but   it would be helpful uh to

146have a representative  for each organization. Uh if there is travel,   the person who represents that organization can  be prioritized, but they are not the only one   that can attend that conference. It just makes  it a little bit easier in terms of dividing out   the assignments. Um, I will represent the National  School Board Association. Board member Walker will   represent the Consortium of State School Board  Association. Uh, Dr. Goodwine will represent the   Council of Great City Schools. Um, Dr. Bailey,  you will represent the National Association of   Black School Educators. Um, I will uh represent  the Ohio School Board Association. Under that,   there are five different um uh committees  that fall under OSBA. legislative liaison   which has already been decided the southwest  and and that's me and board member Walker is   the alternate the southwest regional executive  committee

147of which I'm appointed to through OSBA   um the student assignment uh um team uh Dr.  Goodwine will head that up. Um the urban network,   I have been going to that for um six, seven  years. And then the black caucus, both board   member Walker and I are assigned to that caucus  through OSBA, but board member Walker will um   head that team up as well, too. We also have the  OMBbudsman. Um and this is not these are these two   things do not require travel, but I still think  it's important to have a representative assigned.   Um the OMBbudsman's office um we have three board  members on the committee that is relevant to the   OMBbudsman's office but the OMBbudsman's office  only needs two board members assigned to the board   from the board and Dr. Goodwine and board member  Walker

148will be those uh representatives and um   board member Garrison. I neglected to ask you this  beforehand but this is relevant to your work with   the downtown or the business advisory committee  and that's the downtown Dayton partnership. Would   you be interested in being the representative for  that organization? Yes, ma'am. So, all that being   said, um there are a couple things that need to  now have approval for some conference travel,   including um a conference, an OSBA conference  next next month. Um and I'm grateful for board   member Walker and Dr. Goodwine for meeting with me  and having these conversations. All right. Thank   you. And I believe Miss Kid, should we refresh  our screens? Is that under my name or is that   lower below? It's lower below. Okay. All right.  That is all I have. All right. Thank you.

149Um,   Mr. Walker has now done a Will Smith. Said  he didn't have anything but now does. So,   go ahead, Mr. Walker. Actually, that was Miss  Garrison. I was about to say Miss Garrison did   it. The first meeting, the first meeting of the  year, but I just wanted to say that I recognize   that many of our families are starting tomorrow  observing Ramadan. So, we honor this sacred time   of reflection and faith and wish you peace and  strength throughout the month. So that's all I   have. Mr. Lacy. Uh yeah, the finance committee  met last Thursday and went over the financial   statements and they were in good order. Um I  also um I'm going to sound old for a minute.   I was a member of the Rainbow Coalition and um  um it wasn't the first campaign that I

150worked on,   but I worked on Jesse Jackson's campaign  um in 1988 and I got to hear him speak and   um and I won the the Jesse Jackson  five mile race. Of course you did. But uh yeah, I I wanted to mark his passing today  and um in his in his words, I I hope that we can   keep hope alive. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Lacy.  Dr. Goodwin, it's good to be back with you guys.   It's significantly different when you watch  this at home. Y'all talk a lot on these mics   and I want y'all to know that. I feel like every  board member should at least watch this live one   time so you can see how we kind of look to the  public. It's a little different. Let's see. With   my committee's customer service, we did

151not meet  because I was out ill. We'll get back to you guys.   Mr. Smith gave an update on athletics at the last  meeting. We have a lot of work going on. I missed   my out of committed committee, but I heard you  guys had a great time and Sarah said how great   it was. I wasn't there so I didn't really love  that but that's okay you know think we're making   connections and now I know I'm easily replaced so  it is what it is school programming committee we   have a lot of work going on today we we saw some  of that work and we it's a reminder that there's   still much to go beyond that piece I will I would  like to note too just so anyone who is watching   this knows every board member committee is

152open  to the public. It is not a you get a wait for an   invite. Anytime we meet, whether it's virtual  or in public, anyone can come to any of those   meetings and hear any of the information that is  held at those meetings. Some things sometimes the   things in those meetings are an infasy stage.  Other times they're almost to full maturity and   then they come to the board in that piece. Take  advantage of that if you want to know what's going   on. It is not a fair assess to say that you didn't  know when every meeting is open to the public.   And if you want to know when the meetings occur, I  believe they're online. You can also reach in with   the board clerk to get on the list to get notified  when they come out

153and things like that. So,   I definitely want to see more people take  advantage of that. I will say I did see the   notice that went out last week about homework. I  never knew that we stopped doing homework. So that   was a shocker to me cuz my child just graduated  last year and he had homework. So I'm not really   sure what the disconnect is in that piece of it,  what the intent behind it was. I do think that   homework is important for students to learn  about life beyond their time in Dayton public   schools because we give a lot of chances here and  we give a lot of safeguards that if we don't help   them for those who decide to go on further with  their education, it's a disservice to them in   that piece if they don't

154learn those skills or  how to work outside of the classroom to prepare   for the classroom in that piece. So, I don't know  what's going on with the homework conversation.   Maybe other people didn't know that it wasn't  happening. I'm excited that it is if actually   I don't know any teacher that doesn't do  it already. So I I'm excited that people   are helping out in those type of ways. I will  say so this is Black History Month and this is   our second meeting and I always wear something of  my grandfathers when I come to these places which   he was a a pillar in this community. And I think  when I look at where we are today in education,   I I continue to be amazed about how far we have  come as black individuals. Like when my mother  

155was my age, there weren't people necessarily in  all the leadership roles that we see here today.   There was a time when there was only one black  administrator, which who was Mr. McFarland? Was   that our first one? Mr. McFarland was the first  principal at Dumbar. Correct. That is correct.   That is correct. So there was a time where there  was only one black administrator in an entire city   where the numbers did not equate to what the  ratios were. But you look at us today and the   majority of our administrators are not only black  men, they're women as well. We have people in all   spaces from there was a time where you didn't see  anyone in the cabinet level who was of any color.   You look at us today, we have three black district  leaders that are running

156the organization. It's   just a a big a testament to how far in a couple  of years this place has come. If you look at the   decades of what changed here, there was a time  where the school board that had a predominantly   black population did not have one black person  on it. You look up here today, five out of seven   members are elected to this body and we represent  this place. So to see how far we've come is always   amazing when you think about man just 20 years  ago we weren't in these spaces. We didn't have   these opportunities. We didn't we didn't do these  type of things. Like we are black history every   day. You see I think the part that disappoints  me is knowing how much black excellence that   we have and that we know

157about and that we lived  experience. But we don't necessarily put it out   ourselves in where we are today. I expect us to be  so much farther than where we are. I expect us to   do so much more than what we're currently doing. I  expect us to be our ancestors wildest dreams. So,   I hope that not only today and the remainder of  this month that you only not only that you reflect   on the stories that you know about those who came  before you, but you also reflect on what it means   for us to carry as we continue to move forward  with this district. We have a ton of talented   individuals of all races who work for us. We have  a ton of talented people who are going to take our   places one day. I just hope

158that not only do we  achieve what those who came before us achieve, but   that we go on to do better, to be better to each  other, to not constantly tear each other down,   to lift each other up, to respect our work, and  just go a little bit farther than what we thought   we would have gone or those before us could have  gone. So, with that, those are my comments. Thank   you guys. I hope you do something this month.  There is actually I have one more. I think it's   tomorrow. There's a uh door competition at Kaiser  for Black History Month. There actually a ton of   different events throughout the rest of the month  at schools. If you only go to one, that's one more   that you got to see something occur with our kids.  So do

159something this month to show up and not only   listen to them tell you information as it is as if  it is your first time learning it, but just being   able to pour back into our students as well to  hear their excitement about what they've learned   this month. So thank you guys and happy rest of  the month to you guys. Miss Garrison. Yes. Um I   just wanted to say that thank everyone who came  up to present today and those who who spoke.   um the business advisory committee um is kind of  uh reigniting. So, more information to come on   those meeting dates and times as I send invites  out uh later in this week to um restaff that   uh committee. And outside of that, um  I don't have anything else. Happy Black   History Month. U but I'm

160Black 365. So, thank  you guys. Miss Sarah, do you have anything? Hey, Sarah. Sarah replaced me. I want to keep telling  y'all that. You know what? I'm I'm glad you   mentioned it cuz when I walked away from  the podium last week, I was like, "Ah,   darn. I should have should have made a mention."  Uh, but no, you were missed. You were. Uh,   but good afternoon everybody. Uh, I just have a  couple of quick updates from our department. Uh,   the first is that we are in risk assessment  season. So that means that we are doing   uh 15-minute informal meetings with um director  levels and above throughout different departments,   foremen and union presidents so that we can uh  hear from different bodies of the organization   that make up the whole and better understand  different processes and in

161different parts of   the organization how they function together. Uh  it serves a great it's a very uh important step   for us when it comes to developing the audit plan  in future uh for the next future years. Uh and   then there will be eventually a risk assessment  questionnaire that goes out to many of those   groups um come March. So we're looking forward  to that and we've been able to meet with quite a   few groups already and look forward to the rest of  the groups that are signing up currently. And then   um I was able to me and my team were able to  participate in the poverty simulation today at   the PD event uh at many locations but specifically  at Horus man. It was uh I think I went last year   and it was very impactful. But

162being able to  volunteer on the other side and being able to be a   a fake vendor was really impactful and uh created  some insights as well for not only our team as we   continue to serve the district and in the maybe  behind the scenes way but then also understanding   a little bit more about what our students or some  of our staff even even experienced as well. Um   so shout out to Lean's department for heading  that and uh just the great work that she does.   It was actually really fun because I got to see  some of the treasury department there too. Um,   shout out to Sandy who was a great um, buddy uh,  where we sat next to each other and she was part   of the vendors as well as well. Um, and then I am 

163really looking forward to the legislative brunch   next week. Um, it's going to be really exciting  just to be able to see so many collaborators   in the room who have such a great voice not only  for our community but also for our district. So,   I'm looking forward to seeing you all there as  well and whoever from the community joins. Um,   yeah, and those are my updates for me.  Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Riley. Dr. Jones, I'll be extremely brief. Um, I want to thank  the board uh for recognizing the operations   team. It's not often that um that group of um  staff members are recognized publicly and it   meant so much to me and I know it meant a lot to  them uh to be recognized for their hard work. So,   thank you Dr. Lawrence.

164Dr. Bailey, thank you. Um  this is my third year. I typically don't say much   and I don't respond to things that are said out  there. It's the one of the most difficult parts   of this job because people say lots of things.  But today, I'm going to depart from that. I'm   going to start by welcoming Dr. Vernon S. Lowry,  who's going to be coming to us from Fedville,   North Carolina, as the new chief of secondary  schools. I'm excited. Uh Dr. Lowry earned her   bachelor's degree in microbiology and a minor  in chemistry. She earned her master's from SEC   in secondary biology. She earned another masters  in school administration and earned her doctor   of education from Fairyville State University in  2015. uh she comes to us with u almost 15 years   of principal experience and I flew down

165there to  watch her in action. I also went to several other   high schools while I was there. Um and we are  bringing on um I think one of the best principles   in the country to lead in that secondary space.  So I'm excited um to have another rock star as   a team member. Now, I want to say that um I am  the only person in this district um I don't know   many other that have been an elementary school  principal, middle school principal, and high   school principal. I've been a principal at every  single level. Um and during those principal ships,   I never missed a day at work, never spent  any time in my office, and spent my time in   classrooms. and I looked in book bags every day  and if you didn't have a book or homework

166there,   I walked through that class to find out why.  Now, we don't have a chief of secondary. So,   I've been kind of quasi filling in on that  role the last two or three weeks going really   deep. And when I'm in buildings checking  bags, looking at books, in the lunchroom,   uh in breakfast, and I don't see homework in a  poor urban workingclass community, it's a problem.   we're already behind and the rigor that it takes  at the next level in college, that's a whole   another story. In fact, the Luminina Foundation  suggests that in Dayton public schools, less than   10% of our students earn their degree after six  years. And part of that is because of the rigor,   the stamina that it takes at the next level to  become a college graduate. I also have a PhD.   I

167know about stamina. And I am not going to lay  down and let kids not go home and have homework.   And yes, some people have it. Some, but it's not  everywhere. It's not pervasive. And by the way,   when I'm in school buildings in 9 and 10 and 11,  teachers are out. There's not homework there or   some other places either. This is my hometown.  Born and raised here, Dumbar grad, and teachers   came to work every day and gave us homework. Thank  you, cuz it got me through UC, two other masters,   and a PhD. I want our kids to have the same chance  I had. That That concludes my comments. Thank you,   sir. I don't have any comments. Motion to adjourn.  Second. I have a quick question, sir. Dr. Jones   has something else first before you go on

168your 30  minutes. Okay. Oh, it's a question. I can ask a   question for you. Just real quick. Um Styver Cheer  uh stayed on Friday. Uh so the cheer championship and then um also uh I want to give a huge  shout out to our bus drivers. We had 69 buses   uh to get uh students to uh UD game uh last week.  So big shout out to them as well. Thank you. Thank   you Dr. Jones in that motion it included logo  and naming changes of the district. Correct.   Yes. Stick with public schools instead  of innovative at Dayton public schools. All right. Well, wait. Wait. Go ahead. Commentary.  Go ahead. Terry, that that has to be I mean Yeah.   So, uh, who had the motion to adjourn? You did.  I suck it. No. Walk again. That was me.

169So,   you got to pull it back. I pulled that  back. All right. I'd like to make a motion   to amend Dr. I mean Mr. Smith's uh motion  to include amended. What did you say? The   name change. Yes. You got it down, Miss K.  All right. Is there a second? Second. So, Mr. Smith is asking that the district not be  called anything other than the former name. So,   taking off the innovative, right? Is that  correct? Let me make sure cuz it show I'm   just trying to get up out of here. The motion  has already passed. So I make it a second to   add to that. This is a new motion. I was saying  so this is a new motion. That's what I'm saying.   Okay. Right. So it's not necessarily adding to  his. It's adding a new

170motion. On top of that.   Yeah. Okay. So that's on you vote. Well, it was  a motion by Dr. Goodwin and second by Mr. Smith.   Yes. You caught us, I guess. Okay. All right.  Dr. Bailey, yes. Dr. Goodwin, yes. Miss Reiner,   yes. Mr. Lacy, yes. Mr. Smith, yes.  Miss Garrison, yes. Walker, abstain. Motion to adjurnn. So move. There'll be a second.  Couple. I said to Dr. Goodwin made the motion. Mr.   Smith is second. A motion to adjurnn. All right.  Call vote. Dr. Bailey. Yes. Dr. Goodwin. Yes. Oh,   no. Actually, there is something else that  we need to vote. There was something else. We   didn't refresh our screen. We can do it tomorrow,  can we? Yeah, we can do it tomorrow. Yep. Thank   you. We're not here for that. I have no idea  if that's present. It's

171not my meeting. Dr.   Perfect. Dr. Bailey. Yes. Dr. Goodwine. Dr.  Goodwine. Yes. Mr. Smith. Yes. Miss Reiner.   Yes. Mr. Lacy. Yes. Miss Garrison. Yes. Walker  votes yes. 70. Bye. Good luck. Look at this.

This transcript may contain errors introduced by automated or source-provided captioning. Bracketed descriptions such as [Music] are retained from the source. Passage divisions are editorial aids and do not alter the wording.