CorpusRecord 70274

9/23/2025 CDSD School Board Meeting

A searchable transcript preserved as part of the Discourse Corpus. Passage numbers provide stable references within this record; verify quotations against the original recording when available.

Source
YouTube / Central Dauphin School District
Date
2025-09-24
Location
Dauphin County, PA
Material
Transcript
Extent
4,438 words · about 25 min
Collected
2026-06-08

Transcript

Verbatim source text

001Good evening. Like to call the meeting to order for Tuesday, September 23rd, 2025. The Central Dolphin School District Board of Directors. Miss McConnell will call the role. >> Mrs. Bingaman >> here. >> Mr. Dornan >> here. >> Mr. Epstein. >> Mr. Gordon >> here. >> Mrs. Hanford >> here. >> Mrs. Haw >> here. >> Mr. Jacobs >> here. >> Mrs. Silvers >> here. >> Mrs. Webster >> here. >> There are eight board members present. >> Um before we move on, I just want to remind board members um to please get very close to your microphone when you're talking only because it's very hard for those joining us online that they can hear us um uh make comments or talk. So please throughout the meeting make sure you get close to the uh microphone. Um, moving

002on to item uh 3.01 uh pledge of allegiance. For those able to stand, please join us. >> I pledge algiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Item 401, additions, deletions, and modifications. Do any board members have any additions, deletions, or modifications to this evening's agenda? >> If it's appropriate to do so now, I'd like to vote in the personnel. Um, >> closer, closer, closer, closer >> personnel item number five. If we could vote on that separately. I can withdraw withdraw. So, um that is permitted. Um I mean you obviously have the opportunity on the personnel agenda to vote up or down um on the personnel agenda which includes you know the individual and

003and the position that you're you're discussing. Um but it is uh permissible to um pull that individual out and and vote on that separately. Um we would just need um a second to the motion and then um majority vote. >> So motion >> that well there's a there's a motion to uh change the agenda um to alter the personnel agenda item number five to pull it out and vote on it separately. Is there a second? >> Uh just just out of respect for you, you know, since that's something you want, I would uh second that for you. >> Thank you. >> We have a motion in a second. Um any further questions on the motion. I think we'll do a roll call vote. Miss McConnell, you call the role. >> Mrs. Mrs. Bingamin. >> So,

004wait. So, a yes vote, a yes vote is to amend the agenda to pull out the person from the personnel agenda to vote. Then we'll have a vote on them at that time. It's just on the motion to pull them out. It's not on >> I thought you just needed a first and a second to pull it out from the board. >> You do need All right. >> So, go ahead. >> Mrs. Bingaman. >> Yes. >> Mr. Dornan. >> Yes. >> Mr. Epstein. Mr. Gordon. >> Yes. >> Mrs. Hanford. Yes, >> Mrs. Haw. >> Yes, >> Mr. Jacobs. >> No, >> Mrs. Silvers. >> Yes, >> Mrs. Webster. >> No. >> The motion passes with six affirmative votes. >> Yeah. Okay. So, then that'll happen when we get to the personnel agenda in the meeting.

005So, so just for the board members, what we'll do is 801 is the personnel report. We'll do that first minus number five and then we'll do number five after that just so everybody's aware. Okay. Any other additions, deletions, or modifications to the agenda? Moving on to item 501, approval of the September 9th, 2025 meeting minutes. Mr. Turman, >> the administration is recommending approval of the September 9th, 2025 meeting minutes. >> May I have a motion to approve the recommendation? >> Motion. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Any questions? All those in favor signify by saying I. >> Opposed? >> Moving to information and proposals. I'd like to announce to those of us joining here in person as well as those joining us online that uh the board met prior to this evening's meeting

006in executive session to discuss various personnel as well as legal issues. Moving to item 62. This is the first of two opportunities for the public to address the board. The first of which is for agenda items only and we have no one uh signed up to speak. There is no unfinished business. Moving to new business. Item 8001, personnel report. Mr. determined. >> The administration has been recommending approval of the personal report as discussed in executive session. >> May I have a motion to approve? >> Motion. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Any questions or comments? Again, just for clarification, this does not include item number five of the personnel agenda. Any questions? >> Just a just a comment. you know that all of us have gotten um emails and messages from the community

007on some of the um hiring of some of our coaches uh and also just in general is our athletics. I'm getting a lot of messages from parents, teachers, even some coaches about some issues that we're having. So um you know I agree that this shouldn't be bubbling up and uh we have a lot of other big things like you know our test scores and our students our capacity to deal with and for me it's just been a lot lately that I've been hearing from a community. I know I'm um in the Central Dolphin High School side, so most of that's coming from that side. But for me, I feel like, you know, maybe we need to relook at our structure. So, I would ask the personnel um committee to at least consider maybe moving some

008of our our structure and reporting so we kind of have more accountability and and we've heard a lot from our music and our arts that, hey, they need help. And so, maybe it's a position that we have a director of extracurricular. And, you know, then we can have athletics and arts and everything go there so they get some additional support. and then we can also have some more um accountability on some of those things because some of the things we're we're hearing and and seeing is we're not hearing the same thing from when we bring it up to the administration. So, I would ask that you at least consider that if I'm not on that committee, so if you so choose, I would appreciate it. >> I will take that under adisement. I know I'm

009really concerned about the budget and like what we have allocated for positions and I know we have to be really mindful about what we add in administration and I really want to see, you know, positions helping our students directly. um and and giving them that direct assistance. And it's always that balance, you know, that we have to strike as a board. So, um I at this point I think it's appropriate for me to also say it's it's hard for me um as a board member when we get these emails because I I think sometimes the perception is that we um will override or or do something different and and it really is about trusting our administration and the people who are making those hiring decisions and supporting them. So once we get to that, you

010know, point of executive session and they're saying this is who we're going with, you know, when we vote on this personal personnel agenda, it isn't, you know, that person's already been offered a job, you know, pending board approval, but they've been chosen by our administration and, um, they have the full support of those people who are choosing them. So, um, I feel like it's my role as a board member after that decision has been made to support them because I'm not the final say, and I'm only one one of nine in that position. So, just I think that's a good thing to remind the public about. Um, as far as our role, um, we are not directly hiring. Thanks. >> Thank you. >> Other questions or comments about the personnel report? Again, minus number five.

011>> We have a motion in a second. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. Opposed. >> Thank you. Um uh as the as the agenda was amended um we'll now insert um consideration of number five transfer act 93 uh uh by itself. Um do I have a motion to uh consider that? >> A motion. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Wait a motion. >> Now we're having discussion >> now. Now we can have now we can have discussion. What is it? Motion to approve. >> Is it a motion to >> Oh, I'm sorry. A motion to approve. Yes. >> Okay. And >> make sure I got that right. >> So, you're in favor? >> Motion >> of number five. >> I have to think about that legally. >> You can

012resend. You can resend that motion. That's fine. That's fine. >> Motion. >> So, there's a motion on the floor. Is there a second? >> Second. >> What is the motion? The motion is to approve number five from the personnel agenda. >> Okay. Thank you. I'll second that. >> Thank you. >> We have a motion in a second. Um any conversation, questions, comments? >> Yeah, I I I I wanted to do this. Uh I I I respect the administration and the explanation they gave me was very logical. I just don't think it's money wisely spent. I think it should go somewhere else. I'm not sure how this is going to fix any problems. >> Other questions or comments? >> Well, I would say this is a very hard one. I'm still undecided of how I'm going

013to vote, even though this is obviously the next thing we're voting on. Um, but it was not money that was budgeted. It's going to be a challenge to budget for our kindergarten centers and all the new positions that we have to absolutely um include next year. So I think any of us it's it's a money issue more than a position issue and personnel. >> Other questions or comments from board members? >> Um and I just wanted to clarify um your explanation also was that the position that would be vacated by this fulfillment is not going to be filled. Correct. >> That's correct. >> Mr. Jacobs, we can't hear anything. It's terrible. It's like you guys are doing your own thing and we're back here. >> No speakers. We can't hear. >> Yeah, it's it's really

014difficult. >> Okay. Sorry, I didn't >> I mean, >> thanks for letting us know. I Is that better? >> Sorry. I just I can't be the only one that feels this way. >> No, it's okay. Is that better if I'm louder? Is that better? >> Follow along. Thank you. >> Is that better if I'm louder? >> Everybody has to have that microphone probably. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you. Thanks, Joe. Other questions or comments from board members? >> Okay, we have a motion in a second. We'll do a roll call vote. Miss McConnell, will you call the role? >> Mr. Dornan, >> yes. >> Mr. Gordon, >> no. >> Mrs. Hanford, >> yes. >> Mrs. Haw, >> no. >> Mr. Jacobs, >> yes. >> Mrs. Silvers, >> yes. >> Mrs. Webster. Mrs.

015Webster. >> Yes. I'm sorry. I was having problems with my phone. >> Mrs. Bingaman. >> Yes. >> The motion passes with seven affirmative votes. >> Thank you. like it. >> Moving on to item 8002, treasuries report for month ending August 31st, 2025. The administration is recommending approval of a treasures report for the month ending August 31st, 2025. This item will appear on the October 14th, 2025 board agenda for approval. Um, I failed to um um mention two individuals um that were approved as a result of the personnel agenda um as well as the separate vote. Um I'd like to recognize Dr. Micah Beaston, now the executive director of student services, as well as Seth Leonard, who's the uh new basketball coach for Central Dolphin. Mr. Mr. Jacobs, I think the uh new lacrosse coach is

016here, too. I don't have a name. I apologize. >> Uh, Kyle. Where's Kyle? >> Hey, Kyle. >> Thank you. >> Sorry about that, man. Thank you. >> My apologies. >> Thank you for for joining the district. We appreciate it. Moving on to item 8003, adjudication of student cases 1317, 1318, and 1319. Just for the public's knowledge, we do not use student names uh due to privacy concerns and so every student is identified by a number. Mr. Turman, >> the administration is recommending approval of the adjudication of student cases 1317, 1318, and 1319 as discussed in executive session. >> May I have a motion to approve? So move. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Any questions or comments from board members? All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> Opposed. >>

017Moving to item 8004, bond refinancing. Mr. Bard, the administration is recommending approval of the following resolution. Resolved. The Central Dolphin School Board does does hereby authorize the administration to work with PFM Financial Advisors LLC as a financial adviser. McNees Wallace and Newark LLC as the bond council and RBC Capital Markets LLC as underwriters to proceed with preparations for the issuance of one or more series of general obligation bonds. The proceeds of which will be used to finance one certain capital projects including the design, planning, acquisition, construction, andor equipping equipping of renovations and improvements to two elementary schools of the school district as well as other school district schools and facilities. Two, the refunding of all or portion of the school district's general obligation bonds series of 2016. Three, the refunding of all or a portion

018of the school district's general obligation bonds series A of 2018. And number four, the refunding of all or a portion of the school district's general obligation bonds series B of 2018. This item was reviewed at the September 10th finance committee meeting. This item will appear at the on the October 14th, 2025 board agenda for approval. PFM is also here along with our bond council and RBC capital to present any question answer any questions or comments that the board has regarding this resolution. >> So, real quick before you get started, um just for everybody's uh knowledge, uh this would be uh we just finished uh two air conditioning projects in two of our elementary schools where we had six buildings that were not air conditioned. So, two have been now completed. This is an effort to

019complete the next two uh that would be done before the start of next school year. >> Okay, great. So, the green light's not on. Is this working? Okay. >> Yeah. So, that what Peter just said, that's a mouthful. So, Mr. Jacobs, that was a good reminder, but let me just take 20 seconds to kind of walk back before we go through, you know, what what Peter said, and then I'm going to hand it over to Erica from MCNE to answer any questions. But so again, Zach Willard from PFM, Carly Keiesling also from PFM, Eric Wyel from MCE, your bond council, Jay Wanganger, your bond underwriter from RBC Capital Markets. So just for the public, you know, we've been talking about this and coming to finance committee meetings going way back into early 2024. And what

020we came up with was a threephased plan as far as both the projects, phasing the projects in and when we borrow the money. Okay, so this is phase two of the borrowing plan. We executed the first piece back in March. This piece, we're we're talking about it and it's going to be available for you to vote on at your October 14th meeting. We would not actually borrow the money until early January of 2026. So, we're kind of getting everything teed up ahead of time so that we're ready to go um come the new year. What we're talking about is you're there's a resolution that's going to be in front of you at your October 14th meeting for $104 million. Okay? Okay. And it's going to do it's going to be available to do all of

021the things that Peter just rattled off in that authorizing motion. So, let me walk through them. Okay. So, the 104 million is going to be broken into two borrowings. All right. The first one is set to take place early January. And what that would do is it's going to borrow approximately $35 million for new projects, mainly HVAC projects, as Mr. Jacob just said. The second part of that borrowing is going to be able to refinance all or portion of the 2018A and 2018b bonds. So that part of it is simply to take the old bonds that you already have outstanding. We're going to take the interest rate that those bonds have and replace it with today's new lower interest rates and it's going to save money. It's going to generate savings. So there's no new

022borrowing to that component of the bond issue. Okay. So that's that's step one, assuming that you pass this. Step two would be in May of 2026. Step two has no new borrowing in it. We're not borrowing any money for projects there. All we're doing is then refinancing the series of 2016 bonds and we're doing the same thing. We're taking the old higher interest rate that was issued in 2016, replacing it with today's new lower rates, and it's going to generate a savings. On both refinancings, we are not stretching the debt out. It's going to have the same final maturity, but we're just going to replace the old higher rate. So, by passing this one resolution, it's going to authorize the team to prepare to get all the documents ready to do the things that I

023just said. Phase one being in January of 26 and phase two being, you know, sometime kind of Mayish of 2026. At the end of the day, you'll have 35 million for new projects, and we'll have refinanced about $60 million worth of existing debt. That'll be the end result of this resolution. So, that was my version of the summary. Can I answer >> one thing? I'm since um Mr. Epstein's not here today and I'm on the finance committee is that refinancing. It saves close to a million dollars. Um there's a little savings next year and then it kind of flattens out uh for four years and then we start seeing it's like 184,000 uh after that. So, it's just kind of moving some of the money around, but net savings, right? It's close to a million

024dollar. >> Yeah. And if we did it today, I think it would be higher. But that's a good point. When you refinance the debt, you don't get a check. settlement for a million dollars. What happens is is you save the money over time in the form of budgetary savings. So if originally if you had budgeted $500,000 a year for the bond issue to make payments, we're going to lower the rate and now you're going to pay I'm sort of making up the numbers a little bit. You're going to pay, you know, $400,000 a year. That's how you achieve the savings. It's not a check um after you do it. It's a good good point. Thanks. on the uh air conditioning. Uh the two schools that we've already uh put some money down to for basically

025a plan to to see what that is is Paxtonia and EH Phillips. Um and then hopefully it depends on how things go in two years. Um it's North Side and Lingan will be our our final two that are in there. So uh those are the schools and the plans that we have in place. Um just for the public's because not everybody goes to the almost nobody goes to the buildings, ground and finance committee. So um usually one person uh shows up. So just wanted to make sure everybody understands what >> Yeah. We have a plan for that next step, but that is not what is kind of in front of you here tonight or your October. >> And this is not voting to approve air conditioning or there it's this is just a resolution to

026allow us to do that. So, >> correct. >> So, hopefully that was a helpful reminder. Um, if you have any questions, I'm I'm happy to pass it to Erica if you would like her to answer any questions about the debt resolution. >> Any questions from board members? Just an FYI, the second resolution is a uh reimbursement resolution for would be that if the district uh incurred any costs relation to any of these projects listed on the screen, um we could reimburse ourselves out of the bond issue. Um within how many days is it, Erica? >> For any costs that are incurred within 60 days prior to the adoption of the reimbursement resolution. So if you adopt it at your meeting on October 14th, you could look back 60 days prior and then anything you spent

027in that period up till the time the bonds are issued, you could reimburse yourself for. And it doesn't require you to reimburse yourself either, but it does give you the flexibility to do so. >> Questions from board members. >> Thank you guys for coming. >> Thank you guys. Appreciate it. >> Thank you. Again, this item will appear on the October 14th board agenda for approval. Moving on to item 8005, alternative transportation for special education. Mr. Bard, >> the administration is recommending approval of the contract with Kinaare home health for alternative transportation for special education students. This item was reviewed at the September 10th, 2025 finance committee. This item will appear on the October 14th, 2025 board agenda for approval. questions from board members for Mr. Bard at the moment. If not, >> I have a

028question. Go >> ahead, Jeie. >> I can you just explain who's currently doing that now and why why we need to do this? Are there any cost savings to going with this carrier? >> There is no cost savings to going to this carrier. It's just that we have a need for transporting our most um vulnerable students um because we can't find anyone to transport them right now. So, we need this contract to fill a need in the district. Um, we just can't find anyone to do it. So, that's why this uh this carrier was was selected. It was vetted and and selected out of the uh out of a very very finite number of people that were available to do it. >> So, I guess my question is how are they being transported? Now, >>

029we currently are working with um a company and the company is not able to meet the needs that we have within our district. So because of that, our special education department went to see what other other companies were available. And this company is able to meet the needs. The other company we were working with um did not have the manpower or vehicles to be able to meet the needs of all of the um the of our most fragile students that need this transportation. >> Okay. Thank you. Again, if you have any additional questions between now and October 14, uh, please direct them to Mr. Barton. Item 8006, budget management software. Back to you, Peter. The administration is recommending approval of the agreement with frontline education for the bud budget management software at a cost of

030$7,5944 the 2025 2026 fiscal year and an annual cost of $8,855 even. This item was reviewed at the September 10th, 2025 finance committee meeting. This item will appear on the October 14th, 2025 board agenda for approval. >> Peter, you just want to real briefly just describe the purpose of the software. >> This software analyzes our budget and gives us a forecast uh based on spending, based on our income, our revenue, and our spend based on where we're going to end up for the fiscal year. that will give us a deeper insight as to where we're trending for the year and will allow us and the administration to make a recommendations to the board on projects on um things that we can move forward with in the uh before the end of the year to give

031us better insight as to where we're going. So if there are certain projects especially in buildings and grounds um that we need to move forward on, we can do that. What this particularly helps us as in is um in personnel where we have a a a myriad of open positions and we experience savings in those open positions. If we have several million dollars in savings, we can say to I could say to Mr. Cresley, um you could move forward with a particular project because we have savings. We don't have to wait for the budget cycle to roll over into the new fiscal year. We can use some of those savings that we're experiencing to roll over into um future projects so that we can move forward with that. Or I can tell um Dr. box

032and the curriculum team that they can move forward with the curriculum purchase and not have to wait for other money to become available. So, I think it just provides more insight into different things that we simply don't have in the in the in the financial office at this point. Um, I've used this software in other districts that I've been at. Mr. Turman has used it as well and uh it's a very very solid software. >> Thank you. >> And and we did get a discount because we use them for some other um software services. Correct. Yeah, we use it for our time clocks and we also use it for absent management throughout the district. >> So, Peter, if you needed to do that now, that would all most have to be done manually. >> Correct.

033It's it's done manually. And we also have a um we have a five-year tool, but it doesn't provide the in-depth uh services for the uh just a year-over-year tool like this one does. >> So, we would basically have a cost savings with time and and labor. >> Correct. that would probably like neutralize this cost. >> Well, it I don't want to say I don't want to give false hope to a cost savings from labor from a labor perspective um because I just don't promise things that aren't that that aren't really uh that can be really measured, but this is something this software provides a uh an insightful tool that I could present to the board and show them and give you a a financial picture and a forecast as to where we're going. that simply

034has not been done in the past uh since you guys have been here that I've ever that I've seen through financial uh reports and tools. So, it'll be something in addition um that we can that we can look at and I'll do my best to make it um financial neutral in my budget for 2627. >> Understood. Thank you, Peter. >> So, are there any of those other programs that you were talking about that we won't continue to renew? >> Uh I'm going to review that in my budget for this year. um because I'm still getting a p a handle on what was done cuz I started just in June and everything was kind of sewed up by then. >> So there are there are opportunities to probably reduce some of that stuff. So >> we

035we did ask to the finance committee to review all of our software to ensure that everything's being fully utilized and we've already had some savings in some other areas but you know now that Peter's on board we can uh spend real deep in make sure we're not >> spending on something we're not actually using. Because I know front line can be used for other things too and if we can go for the full package maybe we could save even >> correctly. We are as administration looking at everything that that we are spending money on that's not being used. I mean Dr. Box has been phenomenal at finding stuff as well. It's not being used and cutting it. >> Again, this item will appear on October 14 board agenda for approval. Any questions between now and

036then? Certainly direct them to Peter. Um, item 8007, reconfiguration resolution. Mr. Chairman, >> the administration is recommending approval of the rec reconfiguration resolution to change the district's official address and change the official name of EH Phillips Elementary School with the Pennsylvania Department of Education. This item will appear on the October 14th, 2025 board agenda for approval. Um, we need to approve that the administration move from 600 Ruford Road uh to 75 South Hawks Road. And also, we did find something out uh as we were preparing uh for uh getting prepared for a full day kindergarten next year is that PTE has eh Phillips Elementary School as just Phillips Elementary School. So, we just want to make that change within PTED. So, the correct name for Phillips they have. >> Thank you. Again, this item will

037appear on the October 14th, 2025 board agenda for approval. Moving on to item 8008, agreement for services. Mr. Turning, >> the administration recommending approval of the agreement for services with Creative Therapy Solutions LLC for speech language services. This item will appear on the October 14th, 2025 board agenda for approval uh within the special department. Uh more resources are definitely needed to offer speech language services to our students. uh and this will be another opportunity to do so. >> Moving on to item 8009, public speakers for non-aggenda items. This is the second of two opportunities for the public to address the board. Um on this can be on any item that they wish and we have one individual signed up to speak. Uh Mr. Jean Stoope. Jean Still from Fishing Creek Valley. Two weeks ago, I

038had the opportunity to stand before you and go over the risks that a school board and school system face. I listed the numerous risks that you are faced with and the obligation to minimize and any that are on the horizon. The bottom line is that any risk that can be done away with should be done away with which protects the students, teachers, staff and property. The one overring risk that is on the horizon that can actually be dealt with is the elimination risk of the evacuation plans for the reopening of three mile unit one. I say that you can take and you can take my word but you have a uh a role in the process to eliminate that risk or you can ask a trusted adviser. As a matter of fact, you have a

039trusted adviser because you um as a matter of fact, you have to ask your trusted adviser because you'll be asked by parents, teachers, even students why you did not take the protective proactive role in stopping the risk. So, who's this trusted adviser on the board? I believe we mentioned two weeks ago, it's your trusted legal advisor. He sits right there next to you. Has a duty to research and formulate answers to your questions. Don't think that you know the legal answers to the questions that must be asked because you have a you have clearly not formulated the questions about your rights the rights the parents rights students rights the evacuation process I'm sure you can suggest questions but if I may be helpful let me suggest a few was the Duff and Dolphin County Public

040Safety Department correct when they sent you a notice last spring that said that you had to mandatorily participate in evacuation plan planning was the department public safety department correct when they had when they told you to start contacting host schools for evacuation destinations? Who scrutinizes the personnel at the host destinations for criminal backgrounds or risk to student safety? What is the relationship that evacuation planning has with the parents and guardians of students? What role the parents and guardians play in deciding what role the school district should play? Do they the parents and others say get to say in the overall proc overall process of deciding who should part who if you should participate or not? Since they have precluded any vote on the on the reopening of Three-Mile Island at the local, state, and federal

041level, do they at least get a say at the evacuation planning level at the school district level? What do you think? What are the rights in any otherwise totally barren landscape void of the democratic voting process? What actions or inactions on this matter actually land a school district in court? I had a brief exchange with one of your board members after the meeting last week, very cordially. Correct me if I'm wrong, whoever it was, but I went it went something like this. This board member said, "We already have a plan." I asked, "Does it work?" At that point, the board member said, "I am not par and I'm not and I'm paraphrasing. We'll have to see when the e we have an emergency. If I misspoke, please correct me now. Uh, what is needed now

042is for you to formulate the questions that must be eventually answered. But before but before that, in order to start a board action, you must have a resolution drafted and voted on by the board that starts the process. Good luck drafting such a resolution. It should be easy, counselor. I'm sure you can draft a resolution that puts you to work in finding the answers. Let me suggest a few questions. Where in the federal, state, and local law does it say that school district must participate in the evacuation plan for a nuclear emergency? Does not participation in a forced evacuation plan have the effect on the restart on on re on the have the effect on the on have the effect of denying the restart of a nuclear plant? What have specific school district decides not

043to participate nuclear evacuation plan? Do they have to go to the principal's office, stand at the corner, or get a swift wooden ruler on the knuckles? All kidding aside, you don't have to answer the questions. You don't have any answers to the above questions or the ones that you should be asking. So, I'm asking you to do that. Pass the resolution, start looking for answers, and uh good luck respectfully. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Moving on to item 8.10. 10 board representative reports. Are there any >> hearing? None. Moving on to item 8.11, board committee reports. Are there any? Just um bringing up that we do have a personnel uh committee meeting on September 30th uh Tuesday starting at 4:30 and followed by >> and then we will have board policy following that at

0445:00 here in this room. >> Miss McConnell, are the board committee meetings on the website? >> Yes, they are. They're on the calendar on the district website. >> Thank you. We should have scheduled for buildings ground October 6th. Um and then we'll have the November and December. So for the rest of the year, those will be posted hopefully. >> Do you have a sign for that meeting on October 6th? >> Uh we are still working through that. Probably four o'clock. [Music] >> Uh any other board committee reports? Moving on to item 8.12, sympathy resolutions. Mr. Chairman. >> Sympathies are extended to Robin Chisum, teacher at Central Dolphin Middle School, on the passing of her husband, Germaine Chisum. Sympathies are extended to Hope Nace, teacher at Central Dolphin Middle School on the passing of her father-in-law,

045John Nace, Jr. Moving on to item 901, adjournment. May I have a motion to adjurnn? >> So moved. >> Is there a second? Second. All those in favor? I opposed. Meeting adjourned.

This transcript may contain errors introduced by automated or source-provided captioning. Bracketed descriptions such as [Music] are retained from the source. Passage divisions are editorial aids and do not alter the wording.