001end Good evening. It is now 5:30 p.m. on June the 8th. It's time to call this um budget workshop special called schoolboard meeting to order. Um the meeting has been duly posted in accordance with Texas Education Code Chapter 551 of the Texas Open Meetings Act. Mr. Secretary, if you'd call a role. Miss Becky Luna Chavez is absent. Mr. Brian Weston here. >> Myself Manos is present. Mr. Josh Overfelt >> present. >> Mr. Emilio Galindo >> present. >> Miss Amy Haynes >> here. >> Miss Linda Wanowat Webb >> present. >> Sir Yokorm. >> Thank you. At this time we'll start with opening ceremonies. We'll start with the moment of silence and then followed by the pledge of allegiance. If you'd stand at this time. Thank you. And now the pledge of allegiance. >> I pledge allegiance
002to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you. >> We will open the budget workshop u portion uh with three budget workshop a 2026 2027 revenue and expenditures. Miss Amy Childress. >> All right. Good evening, pres president Overfelt, Dr. Rios, and members of the board. Um, first of all, I'd like to thank each of you for meeting with us to go over your individual interactive workbooks. And at this time, um, I'm going to present kind of a cons we took all of, uh, your interactive workbooks, the recommendations that you made, and we put together a consensus of of those um, recommendations. And so, at this time, we're going to show you the interactive
003workbook based on the recommendations that y'all provided. So the first tab is the general pay increase and again the uh three TASBY models that were presented were a 2% a 3% and a 4% increase based on your individual recommendations. Uh for the purpose of this uh demonstration or interactive workbook, we are selecting the 3% increase which would be a additional cost to our current budget of $2,611,324. On the personnel tab, uh the items that we had were an increase to the athletic stipens. uh at this time selecting no for both the 50% and the 100% increase to those uh yes savings for the curriculum and instruction director. Yes for savings for deleted positions that were on hold uh due to the middle school redesign and district reorganization on the oops on the reduction of the
004critical needs assistance. At this time uh the selection is no that we are not going to um select those for savings and then a yes for savings at for the math curriculum coordinator which is moving to a grant position. So for the purpose of personnel it represents a savings of $680,758 for employee travel. At this time for this interactive workbook we have selected no for all of those. So at this time we are not reducing any of these workbooks for the employee travel. So uh there will be no savings generated from these. For student travel also at this time for this workbook we have selected no again. So these student travel for these trips overnight trips will not be um reduced at this time. So it does not generate any types of savings or additions
005to the general budget. Under the savings tabs, we have a yes for the reduction of the campus library book funding from $6 per student to $3 per student. So that will generate a savings of $29,538. uh we are currently selecting a yes to reduce the student drug testing from 550 students to 250 students. So it'll be a savings of 47,185. We are also uh choosing yes to reduce the chief administrator workbook in the area of the strategic planning consulting. So that will generate a savings of $45,000. We are also selecting yes to reduce the gifted and talented workbook funds in the area of the GT testing consultants which would generate a savings of $22,324. And we're also selecting yes to reduce the curriculum and instruction workbook in the area of the GT refresher training extra
006duty pay which will generate a savings of $30,000 for a total savings of $174,047 for personnel. Uh sorry save on the savings on the operations tabs. At this time we have no of the items selected. So there is no um no increase nor savings uh to the general fund at this time based on those selections. For technology we do have we have no for the um HVAC MDF and the desktop computer refresh but we do have a yes selected on the -ate funding. So, we will uh at a cost of $60,000 to the general budget for project financing. Um based on your recommendations, we currently have selected no for all three of those items. So, there will be no increase to the budget based on project financing. And then that brings us to our proposed
007budget for this interactive workbook for revenue. Um, we do have one update. Uh, based on our historical information, we did increase our interest earnings from a million to 1,250,000. So, uh, based on this, we have a proposed revenue of 17,720,616. And based on the selections for the expenditures, we have a total projected expenditures of $110,419,922, which brings us to a deficit budget of $2,699,36. Any questions? >> Dr. Mr. Overfel, members of the board, one of the first questions that is probably on on your mind as it was on ours is how is it that we were at a balanced budget last year, but now we're projecting a deficit budget? The first part is the the the obvious one is that we gave the maximum raise we could last year. Meaning any raise we give this
008year was going to add to the uh deficit because we we maxed out on raises last year. Uh the second part u is that our projected revenue went down approximately half a million dollars because of student enrollment. We have decreased student enrollment. Why do we have decreased student enrollment? Well, the first and obvious part is because of the lower birth rates and I think that there was some articles about how everybody's experiencing that across the state. There was some expenses that um are just reflective of the times. I'll have to ask you to refresh my memory, Miss Childers. How much more are we paying for fuel this year than we have budgeted? >> We're paying about 200 250,000 additional >> 200 to 150,000 plus the the the half a million that that we were reduced
009in revenue because of decreased enrollment. that's already $750,000. Uh you add um the the raise and and we get very close to that point. There's other increases whether it be parts for um repairs for buses, wrecks, none of which were the the fault of our of our drivers. But it was the increased cost and no additional revenue because we gave out a max raise last year. Now this projected um deficit u there's enough money in fund balance. We have approximately $8 million in excess fund balance. However, we have to consider that on top of this 2.8 million I believe. I can't see very well from here. What is it, Amy? >> 2 point 2.7 2.699 >> 2.7 million. We have to consider what we're going to do with the health insurance fund. The health insurance
010fund to stay solvent, we are more than likely going to have to carry all of the increases through fund balance or do a combination of fund balance and some pass on to the employees. It's probably going to cost us about 1.2 million for this coming year. One million to 1.2 2 million. So now we're talking about increasing the deficit or or the U money from fund balance to almost $4 million. That would mean that if we did that in two years, we would be back to considering cuts that we had to do two years ago, which were reduction of librarians, reduction of either art or or music, all those hard decisions that we had to make a couple years ago. And because I know that that none of y'all want to get to that point
011again because I remember how difficult it was to balance a budget, we are um we have an alternative for you to consider um so that we can discuss again because we have to figure out how to make the fund balance go as long as we can so that during the next um legislative session hopefully hopefully that there is more money for increases for inflation and then we can be at a place where we can provide a sustained um budget with increases. I'm going to I'm going to go through what would be our recommendation. I'm going to ask Amy to help me out. Amy, can you bring out the second workbook that administration worked on? I as as a superintendent, as a deputy superintendent, we cannot recommend an increase for money that we don't have. However,
012we would like to recommend an option. Um instead of providing a pay increase that we have to sustain year over year over year uh I would ask the board to consider giving uh two stipens. One on September one a check of $500 across the board and this is no taxes included. We would cover the taxes on our end. Uh and then another $500 check on January 15th. it wouldn't be quite as much as the uh cost of a raise, but for the employees on the average it would be about the same because they wouldn't be paying taxes on it. We would have paid their taxes upfront on on behalf of the employees. So, they would get two $500 checks. It's still money out of fund balance, but it's not money that we're committing for next
013year and the year after that. Okay? So, we would not recommend a general pay increase. Instead, we would recommend two $500 checks to 100% of our employees. And then under uh personnel, >> it would stay the same. I don't think there's any changes to it. Is that >> the house bill? >> The house the mandated. >> Yeah, there are two changes. uh without a raise, we are required to give certain raises to employees in their um first and second year. >> Five plus and those that are transitioning from the two to four and the five plus. >> That's right. It's a house bill requirement and they funded us for that year. So, if we don't give a raise, we're still obligated to give that money. So, we have to account for it, but it's it's
014about $100,000. And then in terms of the of the CNAs, rather than go to 40% an option is to go to 20% reduction on it. Uh again, there's already five vacancies. So shuffling of the other seven people. We would be committed to finding them a job somewhere in the district. Um maybe not immediately, but definitely uh on a a priority basis. Okay. And it could be in any job that's available. I would even go as far as saying that for some individuals, even if we were going to cut back on custodians to move more contracts to DLP, we would halt that to give people employees if they were willing to take those jobs. So, we're recommending a 20% reduction there rather than 40%. And I I think that's the only change to that one. Is
015that correct, Milders? Can I ask a quick question? >> Yes, ma'am. Go ahead. >> Um, just explain to me again about the the House bill mandate just one more time. >> Go ahead, Mr. Childers. >> So, as part of the the legislative session, as part of House Bill 2, when they gave us they increased our basic aotment, they gave us additional funding, they came in and said, uh, it's part of the, uh, teacher retention allotment funds that we receive. We get funding for it from the state. And so, but it was a mandated teacher increase they gave those who were I believe it was the Zero to two one and two years was the 2500 and then five and over was the 5,000. So those that were maybe in between those steps that didn't get
016the full between these two years between last year and this year if they fell within those credit years of service they have to receive those raises. And so we have about 58 teachers that either they got the 2500 last year but now we're moving over to the five plus. So we have to make them whole the full 5,000. Um that is a meant a state mandate. So we have about 58 teachers that we have to give the house bill to increase for for the teacher a lotment. >> Okay. >> Teacher retain aotment. >> Thank you. >> Yes ma'am. >> Thank you. Let's go to the next uh on travel. We're not recommending any changes to travel both for employees and students. So that that stays the same as the recommendation that you all provided on
017the savings that stays the same. We clicked yes on everything. Correct, Miss Childers? >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. And um on projects, there are a couple of of situations that that if we don't plan for and move forward, then we're not going to be able to handle them. Garfield Elementary does have some ACs that have to be repaired one at a time. And we had wanted to repair three units, uh but 100,000 would give us enough to repair one unit. So, we decreased that from 300,000 to 100. And then our fire inspections have uh just a whole lot of small items that have to be repaired in order to pass the fire inspections. And I want to a lot money there. The reason it's important to lot money there is because the operations budget and
018the technology budget in both workbooks, the one that the board recommended and the one we have, we had already decreased each of those budgets by $100,000 already. So, I can't ask them to take on more expenses to fix items when I've already cut the operations budget by $100,000 and the technology budget by 100,000. Now on the technology side, we decreased it by that much because we are using a lot of the uh money provided by the state to buy Chromebooks for the students. So that's that's why we're recommending that >> technology technology I'm removing the um the rate for this coming year. nothing on the on the projects and then that gives us a that gives us a balanced budget. However, we have to keep in mind that after you whatever budget you adopt, we
019have to come back and make amendments to provide a stipen for the teachers, as I described earlier, $500 check each semester. And then we got to come back and do another amendment later on for whatever money um is required to fund the health insurance based on your decisions. Now, I I know that it's it's always difficult to say we're not going to provide a raise, but I have to remind all of us that we gave a significant raise last year, that we're still going to give a stipen this year and that we still have to cover health insurance. And more importantly, we do not want to get ourselves in a situation where we're having to talk about what reductions in personnel we're going to have because it was a difficult conversation and I would hate
020to take you down that road again. >> And and uh Mr. President, that that's our recommendation. We can go with the consensus if the board came up. I'd love it if we went with a recommendation we just shared with y'all or you want to come somewhere in the middle. Um that's it's the budget is the budget is a boards. Okay. Um now ultimately because I just want to make sure uh workshop that's everything's strictly discussion tonight. There's no action, >> correct? >> Formal action aside from maybe directing which one to publish. >> Uh yes, sir. Based on the consensus at the end of the meeting. >> Okay. >> That's what Miss Childress or Mr. Sanchez will publish and uh we will then have a meeting to adopt on >> the 25th. >> June 25th. >>
021Okay. So, I'm going to go down the I'm going to go down through the um each member and ask them for comments and questions and stuff like that. Uh if my fellow members will if y'all will just pull the mic closer uh when you're talking is I have had some I had to get some comments from the public that they weren't able to they haven't been able to hear. So, if y'all can just do that as a a favor. Um so, we'll start over here. Mr. Weston, >> if you have any comments or or questions or or concerns uh on the two things that are presented, now would be the the time to ask them. >> I mean, I like this the stipend ideas. Excuse me. I do like the stipen ideas. Or are you
022calling it a stipen or a bonus? >> Stipen. >> Uh I mean, in my opinion, the timing of it is always good right before Christmas. I mean, is there a reason to do two instead of just one at a certain point of the year or at the end of the year? >> At the end of the day, it costs the district the exact amount of money. >> Spreading out the calendared year for pay increases officially began September 1. That's why I said September 1. And then in January, it's always a good return to work, which means that if you resign before January, well, then you wouldn't get the stipen. >> I got you. >> That's the only reason we could do it before Christmas and then just hope everybody comes back. >> I mean, I
023think I think especially if y'all gave a big raise last year, I think it'd be smart to try to find a workaround like the stipen seems to work in my opinion. Um, a couple of years ago when we did do this typing, what was the amount that we gave our employees? Do you recall? >> Was it five or 750? It was around the same. >> Around close to the same. >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. And the CNAs, we have seven vacancies currently. So, we'll >> five vacancies. Okay. >> So, we have to find jobs for the other seven. >> Okay. Mr. Lindo, >> it's it's always a a difficult time. and and when when we're having to talk about having a deficit budget, the the one avenue I think we don't want to go down
024is what we had to experience in 2024, having to reshuffle librarians, art teachers, music, cuz that affected majority of all of our students in the elementary level. Um, and then the other hard part that to to also look at is we're still not done because we're still waiting for insurance to come back. And from what we're looking at just across the state when we spoke about it two sessions ago, we're maybe at about a 39% increase when in other areas are at 45% 49% and so forth like that. So this is um a a very tough situation. Um but at the same time don't want to go down the road of nobody not having a job in a year or two. And I think when we went back again, going back to 2024, that was
025one of the main efforts that we that we wanted to make sure that nobody was to ever lose their job with the district because of a budget deficit or anything like that. Um, you know, as we go along, continue looking at it, um, we're going to have to decide what's going to be the the the best solution. Um, But ultimately, we we want to make sure to make a decision that that also doesn't have strong implications for the negative in 2027 and 2028 as we move forward um as we wait for state funding next year. So, um and so the for the $500 checks when we're looking at the amount being totaled, I know it's 500. So then would it be about six 650 total and then the taxes would be pulled back and so
026then about fund balance maybe about 1.5 1.6 would be taken down and put us about 6.5 estimated >> 1.5. >> Okay. And so the other question um I know you included one AC Dr. Rios. >> Yes sir. in the event that other ones were to go down, we would pull from there and and hope to be able to make sure we continue cover it in the event of an emergency because comfort is also another thing for for the buildings here. And um want to make sure that is not put into jeopardy as well to make sure all the kids and the staff are comfortable inside their their buildings where they sit for 8 to nine hours a day. So, um I'm just going to have to continue looking. Yes, sir. >> Um, I do agree
027with Mr. Galindo on um not going back down that road of having to move or put people on hold. And I I'm not for anybody, you know, losing their job as well. Um, I wrote down five vacancies. Is that correct? Did I write that right? >> For the CNA. >> For CANAS, >> yes, I lose. Yes. >> Okay. So you have five vacancies now >> and then you'll just have to you'll fill those. Correct or no? Explain it to me one more time. >> We will reduce all CNAs by 12 positions. >> Okay. >> Of those 12, five are already vacancies. >> Okay. >> That leaves us seven individuals. >> Mhm. >> And it'll be the seven that were hired last. >> Okay. to find jobs for them in other areas in the district if
028they're willing to accept them. But I want to be clear that the seven vacancies uh they may not be qualified for a secretarial job because you you need to type so many words per minute, >> right? >> Um we could do a waiver if they're somewhere close to it and we would just be transparent about it. >> But it would have to be for for a certain job. there would instead of giving a contract to DOP, we we could offer a custodial work to to some of the individuals. >> It would be any job that pays as much as a CNA would, which is every job in the district that that's that's above a CNA. I just wanted to be I just wanted to be clear for myself because I don't I also don't if
029we are able to you know place them somewhere you know if they're experienced as well. I'm glad you made I mean I'm glad you said that so we can be clear on that. Um I I'm a little with the stipen was all was that all we could do was the 500 and the September 1st and then in January or December that's all we could do at this time. I would recommend that we do 500 now and then before we do the other 500 you we could look at see how our interest accounts have generated funds or or maybe maybe see if there's a vacancy pool that has generated savings and and make that decision one month commit to 500 now >> okay >> and 500 month uh 500 later but also commit to looking at
030our balance and see if if there was some savings where We could perhaps go 750 if we could, >> right? >> If not 600, but but definitely commit to looking at it again. >> Okay. Okay. Thank you. >> Excuse me, but I'm sorry. Could I >> ask a question there? >> But the the $1,000 roughly equates to a 2% raise, right? Is that what you I mean because they're it's taxfree to the to the employee. >> When we look at taxes uh would be approximately a 2% rates except it I'm sorry it equates to a it equates to the same expense to the district but obviously to our lowest paid employee it's a lot more than they would otherwise gotten. and to our uh higher paid employees it would be less than a 2% raise
031>> but it would just keep everybody at the same amount. >> In the past we differentiated and uh it it it hurt some feelings and the board asked us to come back and change it. >> I guess my point is it's not an insignificant amount. I mean it's >> compared to what a raise would be. Yes, >> sir. as well. >> I agree with the fact that we can look at the 500 and then look to see what else we can uh generate for them as a stipen and I understand the fact that it equates to a 2% increase. However, it does not give any of our employees anything that they can add to their retirement aspect of it. So this is why uh we need to look at to see what else we can
032give them if the money is available for them and uh the other question I had was what happened to the wind farm allocations. So we have started receiving those. We've received about 4 million so far and but we have due to some projects we had this year we have also used some of that funding. So we are expected so right now we have a fund balance of about eight million. We are estimating another mill to add another million and a half hopefully maybe two million due to the wind farm project. Um our audit is done in no completed in November. So once we get that's about you know before the semester would go. So once we have our audit complete, we can then look that will give us a true picture of what our excess
033fund balance is for the year and we could look at that time to make I definitely don't want to go back to what we had to do as far as uh moving art teachers and music teachers and librarians. I don't want to do that at all. I mean it it's not fair to them. Um, but I do want to see what else will be available after we uh after we like if I'm going to go do it uh after Miss Amy does her her mathematical calculations on on the wind farm allocations etc. >> Yes sir. >> So >> okay you follow up Dr. before I >> Well I I know Mr. Overfelt that you still that you're going to make some comments. I would only remind the board that the more fiscally responsible we are
034right now, >> the the better the position the board will be in when we have to make a harder decision on health insurance coverage, >> right? because there will still be money in fund balance to where you can consider doing as much as possible or more than you otherwise could for health insurance at least for the first year. So that's it's just it's because we know other expenses are coming. I would just encourage the board to to be mindful of that. >> Thank you sir. So when we when we look at what's as as a history lesson or a politics lesson, when we look at what's going on around the the state of Texas right now, even though uh last year we saw the passage of the particular House bill that um was supposed to
035dump X amount of billions of dollars into public education. uh the interim committee on education last week met and has there have been there's evidence that shows that all of that eight or so billion dollars never actually showed up. So it's it's not just us in this district facing it. It's it's districts across the entire state of Texas that are having to deal with declining enrollment. the voucher program, not going to call it the other thing, but it is a voucher program uh that's taking money from public ed. And we we also have to be cognizant and I want our employees to be cognizant of the fact that uh when we're looking at either trying to balance or we're looking at a $2.7 million deficit u while any deficit's bad, we're in a much better
036position than a lot of districts around the state. uh you know there's uh there's a a district close to us that at the end of May only had $500 in its operating budget um and and had to lay off um 72 individuals. There's um districts around the state that are facing tens of millions of dollars in deficits and having to let people go. Um yes, absolutely. two years ago was probably the roughest or not probably was it was the absolute roughest um budget cycle I had ever been through in the time and that I've served on the the board >> and the um the and it comes it comes with being an elected official but the the people that said stuff to me and there are some that still really won't talk to and that,
037you know, I' had been friends with years before. Um, it it, you know, that that hurt. Um but we we we as a board ultimately made that decision and kept our promise that when the state did finally fund us that those individuals that had been displaced but got to keep their job a job would go back to where they had um they had unfortunately been moved from because of lack of funding from the state of Texas uh and the legislature in in Austin. Um, so yeah, that that was an absolutely painful year. Uh, I definitely don't want to go down that road. Uh, but I fear what's coming in the next um the next session in in 27 with what's already kind of being projected. Um and with the models that they're they're using with
038TEA pushing um to fund only on TIA uh the teacher incentive aotment and reduce the amount of funding that it gives districts to be able to pay those who aren't qualified for for TIA. Uh and again those are decisions that are being made by um 181 individuals in Austin every other every other year. And unfortunately it trickles down and we're the ones who get yelled at or bered and whatever it might going to be. Um I I I do remember the that year that we could not give a raise in doing the the the stipen. Uh, and while it may not have been what it may not have been what everybody wanted within the district, at least we were able to give something and it wasn't a what I would call a zero year where
039nobody got anything. And if we're at that that point again, because again um we gave the maximum last year um because the money was was there and the state for the most part made us somewhat whole on it. So we were able to do that. Um it is unfortunately something that we're going to have to seriously seriously consider. I I know we've administration would like to do 500500 um you know in in a more ideal setting. I wish it was 750 and 750 but I understand the finances of it because we also have to anticipate what insurance is going to do what we're going to have to put into the insurance. And I know the comment was made several sessions ago of, you know, we'd jump for joy if it was only a 10% increase
040and it came back at 39. Um, and I know we're still waiting on the the others. And I think there would be jumping for joy if any of the others come back under 39%. But when we hear of other districts where it's going up 40 plus 60 something% um it's not. I I I know the the county uh is the county just had to approve that its rates were all going up because it paid out more in claims than it did in what it it took in and we were we're we're basically there as as well. Um, I guess what I want individuals to understand who may watch this later is the the board's committed to giving at least something this year. Uh, whether it is a stipen um whether it's a stipen and then
041also not having to lay off individuals. That's collectively what I hear from the the other six of us, other five of us up here, and I'm sure Miss Chavez would speak the same. um just like we had to do two years ago in in going in and it's going to be a it'll be a rough year, but if the state goes in and and and does what it should do constitutionally, which is fully fund public education, then we'll be able to do um we'll be able to do more. Um but yes, we don't want to be in two years where we do have to let people go because that is a is a horrible feeling. We we came close to it two years ago and were able to not let it happen. Uh so I
042I think for the most part we are we're committed to if it has to be the if it's the zerobased one that we that we publish that um we look at as a 500500 as we get a couple months into it and like you said as we get closer to the the new year and our interest statements come back or if there are vacancies that have pulled money. If we're able to increase, um, that would be that would be a a good thing to to go in and and do to show to show our employees that we're going to do everything that we can to ensure that you're getting something and not nothing and we're not having to lay people off. I know that was a long roundabout way of going in and saying that,
043but I think again people need to understand that it's decisions that are made in in Austin that ultimately affect what we have to do and unfortunately we're the ones that bear the the brunt of it. So I kind of So is that kind of the the direction that I get from my fellow board members is looking at the 500500 with going in and possibly as we get closer to the first of the year in seven if it allows coming back restudying and and possibly upping that. uh and excuse me and then waiting to of course have that very difficult conversation when the final insurance numbers come back and again as Dr. Rio said a little more fiscal responsibility right now leads to a little bit less stressful decisions um here in a couple months when
044we have to look at at insurance rates. So that kind of the consensus of Okay. So I think what we I think the board will go with this go with the zerobased publication uh or the zerobased one as presented for for publication. uh with those hopes and caveats in there as opposed to a $2.7 million deficit budget to be published. >> Thank you. U Mr. Board President Overfelt and again I want to share with with the trustees and with anybody watching this budget is after we did significant reductions to the budget. For example, uh aside aside from reducing the technology budget and the operations budget, there's also money that we would give the campuses discretion to do incentives, whether they be for teachers or for students. And even that was reduced by $100,000. Uh it's
045just a difficult year for those reasons that I mentioned earlier. But this guarantees that we don't have to cut programs that we still uh that you're still able to compensate employees something and it puts us in better position to tackle the insurance in the next couple of months. Thank you, Mr. Thank you. Um, >> so that'll be sent out to wherever it has to be. >> Yes, sir. >> Published, correct? >> Yes, sir. It'll be um we we will publish the public hearing notice in the newspaper this weekend and we will post the proposed budget on our website by the end of the week. >> And the final proposed hearing will be the 25th. >> The 25th will be the public hearing to adopt the budget. Yes, sir. >> Okay. And that is a >>
046I believe it's a Thursday. What is that? >> I believe it's a Thursday. >> Is a Monday or a >> I believe it's a Thursday. >> A th >> It's a Thursday. >> The 25th. >> 25th. >> Three Thursdays from >> Thursday. >> Okay. Um Okay. >> All right. Thank you. >> Um so that'll adjourn the budget workshop. I don't have anyone. All right. Okay. >> Um nothing in five through >> 22. >> We have no personnel recommendations. >> We have no personnel. >> Okay. So, there will not be close session uh tonight because there are no recommendations being brought forth tonight. Uh, are there any other items to be brought before the board for the good of the district? No. Is there a motion to adjurnn, Mr. Golindo, second by Miss Haynes? All in
047favor? Um, motion carries unanimously adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Did you get with Melissa about when we're going to review the agenda tomorrow? >> On the 25th. >> No, she did not. She's probably upstairs. Let me ask her.