CorpusRecord 79042

Regular Board Meeting - June 23, 2025

A searchable transcript preserved as part of the Discourse Corpus. Passage numbers provide stable references within this record; verify quotations against the original recording when available.

Source
YouTube / Sharyland ISD
Date
2025-06-24
Location
Hidalgo County, TX
Material
Transcript
Extent
14,654 words · about 82 min
Collected
2026-06-09

Transcript

Verbatim source text

001I now call meeting school district order. Let  the record show that a form of board members is   present that this meeting has been duly called  and the notice of this meeting has been posted   in accordance with Texas Open Meetings Act  Texas Government Code Chapter 551. Uh quum   in attendance is David Kea Megan Sullivan  Andrew Riddle Julio and myself. We will now   move on to item number three. Invocation. Please  remain standing for the pledge of allegation. Please bow your heads and pray with me.  Almighty God, we come together for the   good of the children in our schools. Give us your  wisdom as we make decisions that will affect them   today and in the years to come. Help us work  well together, recognizing that each of us,   students, parents, educators, and community  members are here because we

002love children and   want what is best for. We ask for your blessing  and your guidance. In your name we pray. Amen. I pledge algiance to the flag of the United  States of America and to the republic   for which it stands. One nation under God,  indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Honor the Texas flag. I pledge allegiance to thee,   Texas. One state under God,  one and indivisible. Thank you. Item number five, public comments. Do  we have any public comments? No, ma'am. Item number six, mission statement will be read  by Miss Sullivan. Sherland ISTD's mission is to   inspire, educate, and empower all students  to reach their full potential and become   leaders of the highest moral character.  Thank you, Miss Sullivan. on to item   number seven which is public hearing  on proposed budget and tax for 2526.

003Thank you. Um Madam President, Dr. Howard, members  of the board, staff, community members, this is a   scheduled uh public hearing meeting and required  u by TA final budget presentation for 2025 2026.   The notice of the publication was uh posted in  the progress signs and it and it was on June 13,   2025. Okay, one of the first things I want to  start off with is budget assumptions. So there   are three major bud budget assumptions used to  uh project revenue. So the first one would be   uh enrollment. So so we do meet with the  executive director for data services,   Mr. Rosinski. So the projected enrollment for  for next year is 9,875. That's the top right   hand number. From that uh enrollment, we do  project what the membership would be 9,632.   That is the maximum ADA the school

004district  can generate. So from so from that membership   we applied the 95% attendance rate and we come  up with an ADA of 9,150. So this budget is based   on 9,150. That's 150 more students than what we  based the current year budget on from from last   year from from current year. The second the  second assumption is the property values. So   these are preliminary values. These are provided  by the county appraisal district. Now these values   were as of late May, early June. Uh please  note that uh certified property values won't   be final until July 2025. So the the property  values that we used were 5 bill167,292,952. Uh currently right now it shows about a 12.5%  increase, but again these aren't final. We we do   expect these values to come down after uh they're  certified by the by

005the county appraisal district.   When it comes to tax rate, we're keeping the same  tax rate that we uh use LA this current year of   9575. So again, one of one of the key notes here  is that once we receive the certified property   values, we do go through a TA exercise and we  should see some compression on the M tax rate.   Right now the M tax rate, we have it at 7552.  So we we should see some uh compression on it,   but again we can't we won't realize that until the  final certified property values are are provided.   We go through a TA uh T TA uh exercise and they'll  let us know what the compression is. So we do   expect that to go down real quick. Okay, next  question. So the board is required to approve

006the   the official budget. The official budget consists  of three uh different funds. the general operation   fund, child nutrition program and the debt  service. So here are those funds in the simplest   form what we call by fund. Uh so the first uh the  first fund general fund consists of about uh five   different funds. They all start with the 100s,  right? So that total general fund is 107,79,693. We we do uh show a balanced budget  with appropriations in the same amount.   The second fund official budget  is the 240 child nutrition program   uh 8,777,000 I mean 77,800 and again  projected appropriations of the same   amount and then the final official  budget is the debt service 11,163,468 and again it is in balance with  the same appropriations. So the   total official budget of uh 126,950,961 So TEA does require

007us to uh uh submit  that budget uh revenue by major object   code. There are three uh major object codes.  The first one would be 5700 our local revenue.   So for the general fund that represents 37,161,840 about a little less than 35% of the budget  that mainly consists of your local taxes,   interest income, gain receipts, and miscellaneous  items for the CMP program. Uh bund uh the revenue   there for local funds is 330,000. That would  be your paid meals, uh your auto cart sales,   caterings, and miscellaneous. Uh just a little  under over 4%. And then for debt service,   uh 10,180,648 about 91% of the budget coming  from taxes uh and and earned interest. Uh when   you look at object code 5800, that's your  state revenue. So for the goof 69,67,228, just a little under 65% of the

008budget. So that  is our foundation funding that we receive from   TA. For CMP, we do receive some commodity funds  uh 28,500 900% and then for debt service we do   uh receive some state uh funding 982,820 just a  little under 9% of the funding. Uh when you look   at your major obstacle 5900 that is federal  revenues. So for general fund 940,661 that   mainly consists of our charge program and then  indirect cost rate uh which which is generated   from the federal grants uh just a little under  1%. For CMP 7,719,300 so that is the federal   funding uh from the uh USDA uh department uh a  little over 95% of the budget and there is no   state funding for that service. So once again,  total official revenue budget 126,950,961. So when it comes to appropriations, uh TA  does

009require uh require us to submit them   again by object code. There are six major  object codes. Um so the first one being 61   uh major object code 6100 payroll cost. So  when you're looking at the GOF about 88,165,443 just a little shy of 82% of our budget is  payroll. When you look at CMP uh 3,350,000   um about 40 just a little less than 42% of  it being for payroll. And I'm not going to   go through all of them, but I I'll point  out a couple that I think are important.   uh when you look at the uh supplies there are  6300 for goof 5,485,866 about 5% but when you   look at CMP 4,249,300 just a little shy of  53% that would be all your all your food   uh costs uh when you look at object code

0106500  debt service go 658,495 again a little less than   1% we do have two maintenance tax notes which  I'll refer to in a few slides and then there   is no uh debt service for CMP but when you look  at our debt service fund we do have 11,163,468 100% of it goes to pay that's the  only thing that you can use that   fund for so once again we look at the  total expenditures 126 million 950,961 TA does require us also to submit  the the appropriations by major   function code there are over 20 again  I won't go through all of them but I'll   touch on a few of them function 11  instruction for goof uh 58,948,454 so that's about 55% of our appropriations  going to strictly instruction uh you see   that that does not apply for CMP

011or debt  service uh when you look at food service   function 35 we do have some costs from the  goof about 50,000 when you look at CMP most   of the appropriations are uh belong to that  the food service 1 punch code 357,782,800 and when you look at debt service uh again we  do have some debt in in go 658,495 when you   look at the debt service itself uh all of it  goes into one function 11 million 163468 I do   want to point out I should point out a couple  when you look at function 41 uh uh 3,742518   So we do get rated on the expenditure  for for administration and that's just   about 3%. So we're kind of in line  where we're supposed to be. So 3%   of it. So once again we look at total  appropriations

012by function 126,950,960. Next question. Okay. So I was curious  what I was talking about. This is our   outstanding bond or bond. So  when you look at the fourth   column there outstanding principle  currently the does have 6 66,690,000   uh dollars in outstanding principal. Total debt  when you do the the sending interest 84,87,795. When you look at how much of  it is uh or or uh tax notes,   we have about 1,980,000 in outstanding  principal and then with interest 2,191,622.   We do have one of our maintenance tax notes  2023 that is scheduled for another two two   years after after the current budget.  So we'll be done paying that off. So this is not a requirement but I do  like to uh uh provide it. This is what   we call our supplemental budget.  These are all our federal grants,  

013our active school care programs and our  insurance fund. Um again in total 17,696,457 and again they are in balance with the  appropriations for the same amount. Can   you go back one time? Yes sir. I just want  to make a comment uh on the 66 million 690   that we have the outstanding balance  on the uh bond issuance since 2005. Um   2013. When was the last bond that we did for  Pioneer? We did the Pioneer bond to 2013,   I believe. 2013. That's when it came on the books.  What how much did we owe back then? So, prior to   the Pioneer bond, uh, we owed 76.3 million. And  once we had Pioneer uh, come on, uh, we went up   to $126.2 million. So, it's been about 12 years,  13 years, and so we're back down to to 66,690,000.

014Now, one of the things that we've done, if you  look at the schedule there, is uh we have had   several refinances and most of those refinances  have been for that 51 $52 million of pioneers.   And so, we've done a lot of savings for for  our taxpayers, for the community. Uh also,   the past three years, uh we have taken advantage  of the fees. And so with our debt service,   whatever we collected, we paid down uh as much  of the bond as we could to uh to take advantage   of lower interest in those years and really bring  down that bond cost. And that's kudos to you and   to the previous uh superintendent and previous  boards also for doing that. Excellent. Yes,   sir. We work real closely with Estraosa and  they really look at our our our ins

015tax rate   and they give us give us that guidance  on that tax rate. Again, keeping keeping   uh the community uh you know how they feel also,  right, for the tax rate, maintaining it lower and   and also also being able to pay down this bond and  saving a lot of millions in interest payments. And   they're still actively looking for lower rates,  right? Yes, ma'am. Let us know. Unfortunately,   in the past year or so, the interest rates went  up. So, we haven't been taking advantage of,   but mainly what they look at there is they look  at the interest rates, and that's why I list them   there. They're looking at the five the 4%. Anytime  we can take advantage of lowering that down,   you know, we take advantage of that, pay down the  principal, and also, you know,

016refinance and and   get those bonds at a lower lower rate. If I'm in a  period of about eight, eight years, more or less,   we've been able to basically get halfway down.  Yes. And that's a short period of time. That's   that's the exact comment that I wanted to make  sure. Yes, sir. Okay, I think we got So So again,   this budget was based, as we talked about in  several of the work workshops. This budget was   based on current law. Uh I know House Bill 2  has has recently been signed. Doesn't go into   effect yet, right? But it's been signed. So these  are some of the things that are still pending.   uh as we move forward uh as I mentioned before  the certified appraised values we won't have   those till July 25th by law right once we

017receive  those values uh then we can go back into TA and do   the MCR calculation to determine what the actual  compress rate is going to be for M and we can set   the actual tax rate that we're going to need at  the same time uh we'll be working on HP2 Saturday   compensation plan well we're working on it right  now but we'll have to have it finalized by August   uh 2025. The same thing with other HB2 other  appropriations that uh are built in. And then so   in September once we go through those exercises,  we'll have to come back and approve the official   tax rate. And then also there is still something  uh up for election. That's the additional 40,000   for the home homestead exemption. So again, that  will take place in November. So all these all  

018these items uh will have an effect on the  budget we're approving right now. Again,   this budget was based on current law at the  time that we publicized it, right? And so again,   TA does require us to submit a a budget by July  1, right? Because we're July 1 school district.   So once we approve it, we'll have to come back and  amend it more likely somewhere around late August,   early September, depending on when we have  everything ready. Uh one thing I wanted to   mention uh right now this is everything I had  but I did want to thank the board superintendent   obviously the chiefs in the audience the directors  and staff my staff honor because again this this   we've had what four or five workshops and then  countless of meetings in between right so so   uh without

019their help we couldn't put this  budget together u but uh just a big thank   you this is a public hearing meeting so it is  open for questions from the board or even the Hi Matt, I'm going to take us back to the revenue  side. First slide. Um, you mentioned the tax levy   was 5 bill167,292 million. Yes, sir. If I take the  0.9575 tax rate, that equates to roughly about $49   million in taxes in levy. In 2024, our tax ro  was 41 million. Is that am I accurate? I mean,   am I accurate to be an $8 million increase? Well,  so, so, so if if you recall also when we did the   budget, there was still some compression we had to  come back and then also remember we had disaster   pennies in that tax rate. So, those

020play into we  had about 0317 in disaster pennies in there. So,   once we figure that out and then we actually get  the true preliminary values, that number should   come down a lot. So for instance, the final  certified values that we had last year were   4 bill590 59089 million. So we should see a lot  of it come down. So you won't see that that big   increase. Speaking there'll be it's still a big  surplus. So so so there'll be an increase. Yeah,   it will be increase. Yeah. And we see  an increase every year because again our   property values continue to jump. Doesn't  necessarily mean that the district's going   to see a whole bunch of revenue come in,  right? Because TU will do is say, "Okay,   you're getting more tax revenue. We're going  to send you less funding,

021state funding." So,   at the end of the day, the Yeah. At the end  of the day, the pie is a pie. It's a Yeah. So,   so let's let's let's assume it's 100 million even.  So, right now, it could be showing, you know,   $40 million in taxes. If the taxes go up, they'll  just reduce the state values or state funding. So,   we'll still be at $100 million. So, it's not  true. So, again, that's what I'm saying. We'll   we'll come back and bring it. But at the end of  the day, uh the revenue that we project should   be should be projected. And and just so you know,  uh uh sir uh what we did is what we do is we we   go through these revenue exercises with Mo Casey  and Associates who is our one of our

022consultants,   a team consultant. So we'll run our numbers  and we have them double check those numbers,   make sure that we're accounting for we're  the middle class of the school district. you don't get the help on the  housing and the food can't. So,   it's it's always incredible on how we've been  able to work the numbers and and survive as   good as we have thanks to finance and the  board including the superintendent of course. Yeah, having wonderful jobs. Wonderful job. I know  it's a lot of hard work and I say this every year,   but um you're um a plus and a treasure for  this district and I really appreciate the   hard work that you and your team have done.  Yes, sir. It's a team effort. Like I said,   we can't do it. Especially also forgot to  mention

023HR. When 82% of the budget is HR,   you know, can't do it without them. No, I tell  everybody you're only as good as your assistants. questions. One more thing on the  revenue. Sorry. You mentioned   increase of roughly 150 students. Yes,  sir. From year over year last year from the funding standpoint. Fingers crossed. Were  we going to receive the same aotment we received   last year for this year? No. So, so, so it'll  be Yes. So, that that is not calculated in here,   but what you see here is essentially yes, this  budget if you just look at straight numbers   when you take the 150 students more, you know,  that's additional revenue. So, really though,   the only way the district can really get  additional revenue is if that 80 number goes up.   And so I mentioned 95% because

024that's what we've  been trending this year 94 95%. But if we were   to go back to historical what the district  used to do about 97 98% you're talking about   a couple million more dollars just with what we  have right now you know. So so that attendance   rate is really really the true the true movement  of revenue. 95 well 95 95 is actually what we're   seeing right now. I guess accurate for now.  It's very accurate for now. it's it's still   lower than what we were precoid um and again  we can say 95% all day but if the kids don't   actually arrive at school and are there for  attendance then we don't meet those numbers so   even within the last six weeks of school we fell  into 90 93% so it's really a catch 22 we can

025say   it all day long project it all day long but it  takes everybody so what we do m is throughout   throughout the year we're monitoring that that  attendance rate. If I happen to see that we're   not even getting close to the 95% that we go back  and look at the appropriations and we actually   start you know adjusting saying you know what  we can't we'll slow down on the spending we're   not meeting it. So it is very critical but again  you know in talking to Mr. Rosinski's department   uh we think it's definitely attainable.  We've talked about it several times   with our principles to see what we can bring  different initiatives for this coming year. So,   we're hoping that we put some some of those  things into play and and we can increase that   rate so we

026can see that additional funding. Thank  you, sir. Any additional questions from public? Thank you again. We went through this with  um I'm excited about I know it always comes   down to it balance but There's so much work that  goes into it and there's been so much movement   and change inside the spreadsheet, right?  And and moving the columns and the cells   around to make things uh look the same  as the total but different inside that   um is going to be for the employees and  the students. So, thank you for for that   work because I know it was hard and it took  a lot of time. Thank you for that. And I   believe that the all the communications that we  provided to the public and to ourselves I think   tremendously. I'm not having a lot of the 

027public come here and question our budget. Okay. Then we will move on to item number eight  which is reports item 8A legislative update. Yeah. Um the uh the legislative session  just ended and there were uh almost 9,000   bills filed. Um a a lot of them having to do with  education. Um and there's a whole lot that passed.   About 30% of the state budget is going to public  education. Um which is historic and it's great.   uh uh but it also includes the state colleges, the  junior colleges. Um it's not just K12. Some of the   key bills that that were passed uh had to do with  school finance, library books, parental rights,   student discipline, safety, schoolboard governance  change changes, DEI, designated protected time for   prayer, mental health absences, standardization  of GPA and rank determination, virtual schools,   and

028prohibiting cell phones or any personal  devices that connect to the internet bell to bell   on public schools. Um, so we're gonna have have  some changes to our student and staff handbooks,   I'm sure. I know Hman, really quick, I just  wanted you to add some color to something in   the legislative update. I know it hasn't been  passed yet, but you touched on it briefly about   the the values and moving from 100 to 140. Would  you mind kind of adding some color to that just   for us and for the public to understand what  that means when that pass? Yes, definitely. So,   so our taxpayers and community, they they pay on  the value of their home, right? So, right now for   the taxes for the city, the ISD taxes, right?  They say your house is valued at 200,000.

029Well,   right now they have an exemption of 100,000. So,  they're actually paying taxes on the difference   100,000, right? So if this bill passes now,  same house worth 200,000 now they're going   to get 140,000 in exemption. So they'll only pay  taxes on 60,000 in value. So they'll apply that   to the tax rate and the state makes accept. So so  we Yes. So there's some homelessness and they'll   make that adjustment and stuff like that. So  again, if we generate less taxes, we're going   to generate more fun more of foundation fun. So So  that's how it work. Okay. Any more update? Okay,   item B, committee reports. I don't know if any  committee met besides goof I'm sorry before   you go real quick skipped over Megan just had a  couple questions on that. Have we discussed I'm   sure you

030all have on the bell to bell cell phone  and I know that's going to be well right to start   with is that we are already starting to work how  to revisit our current policy with regard to this.   We already have policy in place that prohibits  the use of cell phones during the construction   day. However, the new legislation has changed the  language and that it's really not even allowed to   be on school property. Um, all that being said,  the uh the solutions to provide secure lock down   of these devices and take them out of the child's  possession at the start of the day and return at   the end of the day is not funded. I actually  got information about that this week. Yeah,   that there are grants available. It's  first come first serve 20 million, right?

031We will notify schools with lower socioeconomic  first. So, we'll have to really look at that. But   what we are decided to do when we actually made  the decision this morning is that we're going to   convene a group of administrators and teachers  because they're the frontline for this and   um take their input on how we should best manage  it so that we can have a consistent plan across   the the district especially for parents have  kids in multiple schools so that they know   that the standard at BL is going to be the same  standard at Pioneer High School like there's not   going to be a question um and then that way  parents aren't having to jump through a lot   of hoops that they absolutely know. So, we're  already going to begin the communications with   that with our

032parents this week. Um, the  finalization of the actual plan because we   feel like the plan we have in place, the current  policy, current procedures have been sufficient,   but now we've got to expound upon that and the  enforcement has to be a little more rigorous. So,   that will be an interesting thing because um,  again, it it takes some time to write kids up   or to take phones out of their possession. There's  concern about property writing that kind of thing   for parents. We'll have something to you soon. I I  had another question about it with the cell phone.   We were I believe we approved I know we discussed  I don't remember what the final decision was the   digital hall pass. I assume a digital hall pass  goes to a student's phone. No, it could but it   doesn't.

033We're not requiring that. They'll do the  check out on their Chromebooks. Okay. And more on   hot topics designated time for prayer. How does  that how is that being outlined level? So it's it   can't be districtled, right? So we have to usually  during the advisory period or at some point during   the day. Um again, as these are coming to  us, we've not received the official to the   will be coming July 25th. Um Dr. has already  registered to attend the legal meeting on this   so that we can come back and make sure all  of our regulations and policies. So it'll   be in the nuances of the word the semantics  of each of those legis legislative action and Lastly, Megan, you talked about library books. I  didn't know if that was a positive or a negative   as far

034as funding. It's not a funding issue.  It's a requirement. Um, all of these legisl   legislations are telling districts to come up with  a policy that that does fill in the blank. Um,   and for this one, it's a requirement to uh  parent. It's tied in with parental rights. Parents   um must be there must be a portal where  parents can see every book a child uh   checks out and when they return it. They can  block they can choose to allow or not allow   certain books. Um going forward, any book  that is uh going to be added to a library   must be board approved um and must be uh It's  called a record vote where we individually vote   uh not as a unanimous um and there must be  a committee formed that includes parents,   staff and I believe

035administration um to to bring  those to bring any book to the board to approve. On the bright side we should  do a lot more return books. Okay. And you will be well ready. On that note, Megan, thank you for always  keeping us aggressive legislation. Um,   I'm going to move on to item C for  board operating procedures. And what I   would like to do is appoint uh Trustee Megan  Sullivan to um form a committee to revisit,   refresh our board operating procedures. That's  just part of our uh commitment to stay up to   date with the public's know expectations  of us and just really with as things are   changing. I I'd like to ask you to form that  committee and so we'll revisit that once. Thank you. Um, on to item nine, superintendent  reports 9A, preliminary star for

03624. So,   we're gonna just go rather quickly.  I do have Miss Martinez here,   our executive director for curriculum  instruction and accountability,   who will be sharing with you the most recent and  Mr. I believe she built in your I think it's we're   going to officially refer to that as the serta  report. The last slide for you all for you. Good evening, Madame President, Vanessia, Dr.  Howard, and board. Uh, tonight I am going to   be going over the preliminary STAR 2024 2025  school year results. Um, we will begin with RLA,   which is reading, language arts. So, what  you have on the screen is you have every   single grade level for RLA. You have the  state, regional, and district performance.   Um the district is in red and it will be in  red in all the other slides. Um

037but what I   do want to point out is that for RLA Sherland  ISD does continue to show growth in overall   reading language arts performance in all grade  levels surpassing the region and the state. So I   it was one of those tests we were really really  worried about because of the writing component,   but as you can see we're outperforming at every  single grade. Great job. We're really proud of [Applause] um math performance. Um as you can  see, um looking at the bar graphs, it varied by   grade level in all areas in the state, region, and  the district. Um we do have a couple of regional   bright spots with our six eighth grade math, sixth  grade math, eighth grade math, and algebra 1 EOCC   performance. You can see that we really uh did  well in those areas

038compared to the region in the   state. However, um we do have an area of concern  with seventh grade. Um it's not only for SISD, but   it's also for the region and the state as you can  see. Um and that was actually in the recent TAA,   the to the administrator address, they did talk  about um that 7th grade math did take a dip. Um,   this year, for those of you that don't know or  forgot the last legislative session, um, Senate   Bill 2124 in the 88th legislative session, made it  mandatory for the top 40% of the fifth grade math   star performance, those students who are current  seventh graders, to be placed in advanced math,   so that way they could take algebra 1 by the  time they're eighth graders. So you can see our   eighth grade math did

039really well because that's  a combination of seventh graders who were in that   advanced math plus the eighth graders. However,  it did have an impact on our seventh grade math   performance. Uh this is our science and social  studies. Uh fifth grade science does continue to   be an area of concern across all three levels. Um  sorry. Yes. C can we go back to that? Absolutely.   Just just just numbers, right? Yes. So the same  thing happened throughout the whole state. Yes.   So on the on the blue and the gray, it should  be up there also. So what what happened here,   Mr. Soda, is that the state changed the law  which said all the highest performing seventh   graders will go into a combined seventh, eighth  grade math, an advanced math, which left seventh   grade with with high performance. So

040it drove the  numbers way down. Sure. Um and that's what we saw.   So same thing that happened at Sherine should  have happened in the state. It did. It happened.   You can see that 31 33 and 2. So I I would have  thought that it would have Okay, that's fine. But   we're still across the state and region. Everybody  cratered because the kids were forced into   this upper math. Um, and really the parents can  choose to opt their kids out. And we may not have   obviously across the state, region or district  did our job to educate parents for the pros and   cons of leading their kids in regular seventh  grade math versus going forcing them up. Sure.   And it makes sense. But I'm thinking on the sixth  grade and the algebra uh being 10 points above the  

041state, I was thinking, okay, we should have hoped  our seventh grade as well. Um, now marry this with   next year going in that there will And so we are  very concerned. We're going to uh do a targeted   effort to communicate to parents their option  to opt out so that their kids may have a better   fighting chance. Um it it's going to be great.  There are going to be some kids that absolutely   should be up in that advanced math because if  you don't challenge a kid, they're going to get   squirly, right? So making sure that they're  there. But obviously having high performers   in a classroom helps strive up scores for all  students. Do you get to see other districts same   eighth grade math performance level based on that  opting into that? The entire state had the

042same   set of rules. The only Did you see a 23% increase  in like over over region in those other schools?   You can see that we're unique in that because our  high performers are really high performing. That's   amazing. That's a huge That was that was where  I was hitting. I would have seen we would have   been high anyways. Yeah. Um just imagine if some  of those high kids stayed back, they would have   still we would have baked the 31 maybe 40 50 kind  of thing. I was thinking 40 I mean 55. Yeah. 55 55   you know something that's huge. Can I share just  real quick also for the sake of high school just   so you know the challenge will be a lot of those  high performers will have tested in seventh grade.   So it counts as

043they were taking their you'll see  in junior high. Yeah. So, even the that takes a   lot of the high performance out of the out of the  high school. So, just throwing that out there for   and we all know how fun we all know how fun  algebra is, especially Jennifer at it. Thank   you. Thank you. Okay. Um going back to fifth grade  science, um that is an area of concern across all   levels. Um if you are not aware the fifth grade  science star test does incorporate TESS from third   and fourth grade. So it is a three grade level  uh assessment. So we are going to be working on   building a stronger foundation in grades three and  four to support our fifth grade science teachers.   Uh that is just a heavily tested grade at the  elementary because

044they do have three assessments.   eighth grade social studies. Um, as you can see,  it's still an area of concern across all levels.   However, we are excited that we did finally add  a social studies coordinator in January of this   year, so six months ago. Um, so we are starting  to see improvement with her really focusing   um on the teaching, the instruction,  and how to bundle TESS. Um, Mr. Keith,   you were a social studies teacher, you know, up in  my brain. So seventh grade is Texas, right? Yes,   sir. And eighth grade becomes US history. US. And  even US at the 11th grade level, US history, you   see, I mean 70 is better than everybody else, but  it's not quite. It was always a difficult thing   that they have to cover so many teeth. It it's  it's I

045think it's deeper than any other subject   uh more to cover and so it just makes it really  really difficult. Okay, that looks familiar. So this table here compares domain one scores  across the state region and district. Um and   just to remind you what domain one means,  it's the average of the approaches grade   level performance, the meets grade level  performance, and the master's grade level   performance. So you add all three of those  uh percentages together, divide by three,   and that's how you get your domain one score. So  I do have the 2024 information there. Um and then   I have the 2025 domain one raw score. So this is  information that I pulled off the research portal   uh for the state and for the region. So that way  we can see how we compared. Uh anybody can

046go in   look at any district, any campus and see how uh  campuses compared. Um what I do want to stress   and what we are proud of is that we do continue  to outperform the state and the region in 16 out   of the 20 assessments that are offered which is  80%. So we are doing really really well. However,   there's still some areas of concern um and areas  for early intervention and instructional system   improvements. And those areas are fifth grade, RL,  RLA, math, science, um seventh grade RLA and math,   and then English one and English 2 EOC. So,  those are part of our areas of focus for the   upcoming year. Um, as we work with our campuses  and our content coordinators, there's a I'm sorry,   there's a writing component to English one,  English 2, USC. Yes, sir.

047Yes. They actually   have two writing components. They have a short  constructed response as well as an extended   constructed response because I have a daughter  in high school and she came home from that and   she said five words. She was short of the amount  and that went from a five to a four. And I'm like,   "Oh, come on. You got another word count. You got  to count it." So like the formula was good, like   her writing was good, but five words short created  a a discrepancy. So and that's teachable. It's an   easy fix, I think. And so at least in my mind, it  seems like, hey, count your words, test, you know,   come on, there's word count to this thing. So um  and that's a very minimal amount. Yeah, the word   count not necessarily. They are

048judging it based  upon the content and are you truly answering the   prompt and providing that? She was told that she  came home to me and I'm not an English teacher, so   I was like, "What? Why didn't you count?" And  parents can actually see their students ECRS   and SCRs um by logging in and taking a look at the  at uh the student responses, you can see exactly   what they wrote. Um we did send out a Sky Alert  with the instructions on how to access it through   Skyward. Uh you just click on the little link um  next to your child's name and it will take you to   their their portal that has all their information.  English 2 is juniors, sophomore, sophomore. Okay.   Thank you. The next slide, um, this is getting to  the start of Mr. Seda's,

049uh, graphical data. Uh,   this is our five-year longitudinal comparison.  Um, if we go back to 2019, um, that's when we   were at our peak performance. Then 2020, we all  know what happened. Uh, 2021, that was the year   of optional STAR. So that's why you see that huge,  huge dip. And we only had a 77% participation rate   that year. And then um STAR 2022 was we're back to  normal. We're back in session. And then the state   decided you know what STAR 1.0 wasn't good enough.  We now need 2.0. So you can see how we are doing   um in STAR 2.0. There is you know some progress  but there is still lots of work um for us to do   and to gain. Here is a graphical representation  of of our performance. since 2019. The first blue   line,

050the big thick one, that is COVID. And then  the second one that happens between 23 and 2022,   that is the change from 1.0 to 2.0. And that  struggle with RLA is pretty consistent across   the state from what I've heard. Yeah. And and  there were increases across the state in RLA.   Um this is just our performance. Um there's, you  know, our goal is to get to a domain one score of   a 60 because a 60 equates to an A. Thank you for  doing this because really comparing ourselves to   the state of always seen the same thing over and  over. It's always the the previous slides that   we always see. We're above the region. We're  above the the state, you know, but we have   never basically look at ourselves to see how we're  doing. I'm just going

051to title this the Mr. Said   this too. So I'll take I'll take a piece of the  just the idea is for all of us to be on the same   page and understand exactly what we're doing here.  Comparing ourselves and you got to compete against   yourself. Yeah. We're competing against ourselves.  When you're the top guy, you can't get any lower   than just competing against yourself. When you  start going the other way, but back to me this   way is freaking me out. But and it doesn't look  pretty, but I know it's fixable. Yeah, we have   a fantastic group of people that can fix it. So,  do you see the the star 1.0 in 2019 those scores   is that attainable with the star 2.0 or have they  just complicated things like they did with theirs are different, the

052testing methodology is  different. We're now in a digital world   like it will never be like that again. Star  1.0 for all subjects was primarily multiple   choice. The only writing component was in  English one and in English two. And then   here comes star 2.0. Not just the multiple  choice, but now we have hotspots. We have   uh text responses in all subjects. Uh we have  inline choice. So it really does be and we have   writing. I I forgot to mention we have the short  constructed response uh not only in English but as   well as in biology and US history as well. So,  it really does become a reading comprehension   test and you do have to be very very careful in  terms of how you you answer the questions. And so,   I really do encourage all parents, uh,

053staff  members, especially if you've got kids. Right now,   you can log into your students portal. You can see  the exact test questions and you can see how easy   it is for a student to get tripped up. They may  know the skills because they've been taught them,   but once you're put in that situation and  it's just a difference of a word or two,   for example, in the inline choice, it it  it's basically complete the sentence when   you drew a drop down and okay, do you choose  the top word or do you choose the bottom word,   it becomes really really difficult um to decipher  and then if you lose focus for even a second,   it it can make the world of difference. So  you you go from star one op out to star two   harder. Yes. That's

054a huge mountain to climb.  And that explains those lines. Well, to me,   okay, let's look at the red, right? Or pink  or whatever that color is. And and we're we're   dipping. We're going down. Yes, sir. And and and  that's what I wanted to make sure that we looked   at to to compare ourselves to previous years  so that we can Yeah. Like they say in Spanish,   let's put the batteries on and and and get this  and we have three years of data to work. Yes, sir. What? Thanks. Thanks, Jennifer. Okay,  so now we are at 9BH2. Um,   I was just gonna circle back around and just  as a reminder, um, HB2 does not go into effect.   September one. So all of the budget presentation  that you saw this evening is for current law. I   just wanted

055to make sure that there was a clear  understanding. Um the nuances of HB2 are still   teased out. We've done a lot. Uh we'll talk to you  a little bit later on in this meeting with regard   to employee compensation. Um but there are some  other caveats for increased monies that will be   coming to the district. um but not in a linear  line. And that is for CTE, special education,   and early childhood education. And so as we become  um a little more adept and understand how we're   going to get our hands on that money, we'll be  bringing that back to you. But it um in most of   those cases, it's going to require that we start  school, the kids enroll, and then we qualify.   and it will be based entirely on enrollments  in those programs. So obviously

056um and then   it will not necessarily be earmarked for pay or  um it may only be earmarked like the early child   some of it's earmarked for actual materials.  Um CTE has some that's going to be earmarked   for actual facility improvements but again  for our district lower middle class it does   not look like huge money. So, I don't want  anybody to be waiting in the wings thinking   that we're going to get a windfall. Um, it  was barely operational what we're seeing. So,   I'll have some more detailed numbers. Again, we're  waiting for the official um direction from TEA,   the state has been to give us appropriate guidance  on our implementation. We've already started HB2   though specific to HB2, but in addition to all  legislative action implementation plan. So that   is where we are scripting out what we

057know the  law is going to require and then putting into   place um administrative responsibility of who's  responsible for the implementation of that portion   of the legislative change to the school district.  So I should have a report to you by mid July   um that will show all legislative action and what  our current response from the district will be and   then we'll be sharing that out. Since you touched  base on that, I know there was a big talk about   the $88 billion that was divied out last month.  Um, I wanted to clarify that it was divied out,   but it came with designations and they referred  to as buckets and the state decided this bucket   is going to, you know, certain percentages bucket  and that bucket. Um, yeah, I guess I just wanted   to clarify that it wasn't

058a free-for-all check  written. No, I I didn't get that email, but uh,   yeah, it's it's definitely none of it. It's  never linear and um some of the concern is is   that equally with passing for additional money  that then they hear tag and we don't actually   get unless we qualify um they also pass a lot of  legislative mandates that are not funded. So now   we're tasked with having to figure out a way to  implement or enforce and we don't have additional   resources to do that. So, I will continue to say  that help us buy toilet paper um still needs to be   a conversation because we don't get additional  monies to to operate and unfunded mandates is   like sending your kid to go get the groceries  without any money. No, but they have to get the   food.

059They have It's a requirement, but we're not  going to give you the funds to do it. Yeah. All right. So, we're gonna move on to consent  agenda. And before I go and read everything   on consent agenda, is there anything that anybody  wanted to pull out to discuss the consent agenda? Yeah, I'm still I'm still a little bit  confused on the tax collection report. In 2024,   it reads that we had 41 million. Okay. Well, let  me pull it out first and then which one is it? So,   item B. Yes. Okay. So, we'll pull item B and  then we'll come back to discuss that in just a   second. So, first let me move through um item 10,  consent agenda. 10 A, May 2025 month end bills.   10 C May 2025 financial reports D May 2025  investment reports

060E final budget amendments 2526   F previous meeting minutes F1 special meeting May  125 F2 regular board meeting May 19th 2025 uh G   approval to renew RFP 2115 college board services  H approval to renew RFP 212241 physical therapy   services I approval to renew RFP 20 2223 -01  athletic student athletic and accident insurance.   J. Approval to award RFP 24230 to technology uh  technology supplies and equipment. K. Approval to   renew interlocal city admission for six education  resource officers for fiscal year 2526. L approval   of interlocal agreement with South Texas College  and Sher Advanced Academic Academy. M. Approval   of agreement between city admission and shar for  use for school year 2025 26 and amen approval to   purchase branching minds and success package  using a cooperative approved vendor. I will   now a motion for consent agenda as well. I move 

061we accept the consent agenda. Okay. I motion by   second by Mr. Hector. Any further discussion?  All in favor signify by saying I posting sign   passes. Now we can discuss item 10B May 2025  tax collection. Sure. I'm going to put you on   the spot real quick. Um okay. So looking at this  2024 tax roll says our tax levy was 41,429,675. Yes sir. That was based off of a total taxes that   were collected or budgeted to collect in  2024. For 2025 we have 5 bill167,292,000 estimated to be flooded. So that n575 tax rate.  Yes sir. So when you when you break up the tax   rate when you look at the INS tax rate from  current year right the current tax rate for   the current year was703 right because remember  because the disaster pennies what we did is

062we   took disaster pennies from the INS tax rate we  moved them up to the M that was a one time deal   we write so this year we work back to the 2023  tax rate so our tax rate actually goes up right   and because you're if you're using this instead  of 4.5 billion, we're using right now preliminary   values of 5.1 billion. So you you have a higher  tax rate and a higher preliminary number for for   values and that's how we're calculating out the  uh the tax rate. So it said that's 0 N575 figure   fairly accurate as a tax rate. Yeah, that is  correct, sir. But but I guess what I was saying   a little while ago is we know that all that is  going to change once the compression comes in.   We'll come back and figure

063it out. And then once  the uh once we have the actual certified values,   then what we do is we meet with Esta and Hosa  again and we look to see okay what is now the   tax rate that we want to look at how much we  and we adjust that. That's why we're going to   come back to to the board with uh a tax rate  in September that we'll officially adopt. So   for budget purposes today assuming that 5.1 and  that total taxes out there and that tax rate   Is that accurate? Yes, sir. Is that  accurate? That would bring in $49,476,830. That'd be an increase of roughly $8 million. Yes,   sir. Now, I know I got somebody mentioned  that that's not exactly That's where I'm It won't be because once the certified values  come in, they're going

064to So, right now,   the certified values are showing a billion more  than we would actually get from from the actual   keep. ran the delinquencies the delinquent pays  also and those hit us too. So the reality is is   that we have to approve a budget because of  our fiscal year and we have always and will   continue to always bring amendments back  once we get certified values. So this is   the norm we have to know it's completely  on assumptions and not actuals until we   get certified values. Yes sir. I think another  thing also the homestead exemption kicked into   that because again we approved it last year  and they came back and adjusted let's say   40,000 I guess. Yes sir. So yeah, as much as  I would love to say an increase to the budget   and if it's

065gonna be and what they were what um  H was saying before as our local funds increase they don't get bigger it's just split out the   difference the more money  you bring in the less they will take action on May 23rd by tax collection  report. I've got a motion to approve a motion   by a second by any further discussion. Just a  comment, Andrew. Thanks for bringing that up.   Like you do it consistently and appreciate  it and I think the link is key. Um yeah,   it's good. Thank you for doing that. All  those in favor signify by saying I sign. Item 11. We will uh be splitting our closed  session into two different sessions. Um our   first session close session 11. I'm  going to go through some items that   we will discuss which is 11A personnel  matters

066Texas government code 551.074   A1 resations. A2 employment of personnel. A1  no A2 A consider superintendent recommendations   regarding employment and contract status  administrative professional personnel. To B   delegate hiring authority to superintendent for  contractual personnel. Um A three discussion of   employee public officer and or board member. A4  deliberation regarding appointment evaluation   assignment duties discipline and or dismissal  or district employee public officer employed by discussion. So you're just pulling C. Well,  no. And then also okay C and those in a second.   Correct. Um so I'm sorry. All those in favor  signify by saying I Motion passes. session session 12 a discussion possible action  on closed meeting items. Yes. I uh madam   president I move that the board that the  board of trustees approve the administration's   personnel report including the assignment of  certified staff resignations and employment   contract recommendations

067for the 202425 and 2526  school years. Motion by Mr. David Ke. Second by   Mr. Winda. Any further discussion? All in favor  signify by saying I. Opposing sign passes. Yes.   Uh second motion. I move to delegate delegate  hiring authority to superintendent Dr. Howard   for contractual personnel. Okay. I've got a  motion by Mr. David Key. Second. Second by. Any further discussion? All those in favor signify  by say I post sign passes seven. Madam President,   if we could take a moment to introduce some  of the um wonderful hires uh in tonight's   uh personnel report, I'd first like to start and  this one is bittersweet. Um uh but I think that   when we think about who we are as a district that  we can look within to find talent and to move that   talent to a place to better

068serve the district.  So, uh, tonight we are announcing Miss Laya Cobson   as the new director of campus improvements.  [Applause] She has served our district as a   teacher, an assistant principal, a principal, and  now as a director um at the service center. We   gave her every option to change her mind, but she  still said yes. So, we're excited about that. Um,   Miss Cersonson will be assisting um uh our  administrative services department and offering   um compliance oversight for the uh TIA or  the teacher incentive a lotment program.   Um she will also be supporting with professional  development um implementation of of initiatives   at the district level, I'm sorry, at the campus  level and then also um just providing some student   support as well. So uh she just put on a really  big hat and so we're very grateful

069for you Miss Congratulations. I know a word of he will  never be the same without you and that   leadership and you'll be missed, but thank you  for stepping up for to take this position. So,   congratulations. Congratulations.  Absolutely. Wonderful job at you've been there for a while. She opened it  years. How many? 18. We should change the name and the only to and I'm also very excited to announce Mr. Um,  George, uh, I'm sorry, I'm drawing blank. Gonzalez   Gonzalez, I almost called you Selenas, but it's  because I'm looking at somebody else. George,   if you would stand up. Uh, and he actually goes by  JL. J. Yeah, JL. So, Mr. Gonzalez is joining us as   our new director of safety and security. Um, we  are very excited. Uh, he has an extensive history   in law enforcement and

070most recently with Border  Patrol. Um he is a proud father of Cherryland ISD   students and a proud husband of a Sherland ISD  wife and so we are excited to have you joining   our team. Uh Mr. Gonzalez will also be serving  in our administrative services department with   Dr. Henohosa. Um safety will continue to look very  different here in the district and uh we have been   so impressed with his connections. He's already  established connections with law enforcement and   um his awareness and and his comprehension of what  new safety requirements for school districts uh   look like in the future. And so we are excited to  have you joining our team. Both of these positions   will um transition to um the service center at the  return from our break. And so we are very excited.   But as officially tonight,

071we will be making  those public announcements. Um the next position [Applause] um we are also though they're  not with us in meeting tonight would like   um introduce our new director of accountability in  our curriculum and instruction uh department. This   gentleman is Mr. Sebastian Bouet and he is coming  to us also from La Hoya ISD having had extensive   uh uh experience with um not only content um  work but also in testing and accountability.   I can't underate what that actually  means because at the end of the day   it's all of the performance data for the  and how that's reported to the state. Um,   and so his extensive data analyst background is  going to serve us well. So, we're really excited   that he is joining our team. And then I would also  like to introduce our newest assistant

072principal   um with us tonight. We will be hiring two.  Um, the first one is Mr. Alejandro Karanza.   Not related to any Karanza, but he will  be working at Pioneer. So, Mr. [Applause] So, I I have this little thing where I interview  people, but it's actually they've been through   one or two interviews and then he come meet  with me. And I can tell you that uh I I just   felt such a connection with with the educator  heart that this gentleman carries with him,   his passion for students, um especially for  um migrant students, bilingual students,   um and students at risk. I think that he really  has a place to be able to them uh from a genuine   um experience and so I'm grateful for that.  So congratulations Mr. [Applause] and then   um not present tonight I don't

073think um is Mr.  Abel Selenus he will be joining us as well as   an assistant principal at Pioneer High School  and uh then to announce that Mr. Andres Benz   is transferring to Sherry High School. Um so  he is the newest assistant principal there but   an experience um but he is uh really excited to  one be at the same feeder pattern as his children   but also to be able to contribute to the campus  and so we're really excited to announce that   change as well. Um and then the last but not  least is uh we would like to formally announce   another principal change in our district. Uh, Miss  Diana Montes has been named as our coordinator of   intervention for the district and uh, so she will  be relinquishing her duties at the campus and we   will be

074in the process of making sure that all  of the teens are notified and everybody will get   to be a part of the hiring profile uh, building  process so that our next generation of leaders   as we bring them in meet the expectations  of the communities they serve. [Applause]   Oh yes, thank you. And last but not least, um Mr.  Zara, you would stand. I would like to um announce   the promotion of Miss Garza from a director to a  chief of human resources effective immediately.   Um, I think anybody who can put on  training wheels and do what she's   been able to do in her capacity, I think  the years of her education background and   administrative background has spoken  well into her position now. And so,   um, thank you and I'm honored to be working  with you um, as

075an executive of our district. [Applause] Okay, that is All our introductions.  Congratulations to everybody. We're going to   uh move on into item 13 business.  The 13A discussion consideration   to approve to amend 2526 comp and salary increase. Good evening, President Venia, Dr. Howard, members  of the board. Um tonight we bring to you the   amended salary increase and compensation plan  for the 2526 school year for your consideration   which includes um updates that are aligned with  the implementation of House Bill 2. Um on May   19th we did bring to you three salary increase  scenarios to consider under current law and um   option C was approved at that time which included  a 2% raise for all employees. This resulted in a 1   $167.92 increase for all employees that were  under the teacher nurse librarian schedule.   Um and it also

076included a 2% increase based on  the pay grade midpoint for all of our auxiliary   paraprofessional um clerical paraprofessional  instructional and professional staff. And   um that total impact to the district was $1.4  million. The options were presented to you prior   to any state legislation and were approved pending  the outcome of the 89th legislative session. Um,   with the recent passage of House  Bill 2, we're here today to present   two updated options to amend our previously  approved salary increases for our staff. Um,   so I'm going to go over the two options um in  detail. Option D, um, do you have the slides? So that was option C that was approved. Option D  um this is the first option that we present to you   today. It it reflects the required increases  for teachers based on years of experience.   The

077increase for teachers under House Bill 2 with  three to four years of experience would be a total   of $2,500. And any teacher with over five years  of experience would be um an increase of $5,000.   the state under house bill 2 did not allow  funds for our zero to twoyear teachers   um that were or for teachers that were not  classified as classroom teachers. So those   would include employees like our nurses, our  librarians or athletic trainers. Um so their   increase would remain at the 1,1672 cents that  was approved um in May. Additionally, in option D   for our auxiliary and para instructional staff, we  are proposing the 2% midpoint plus the difference   of a dollar to equal a dollar an hour uh per  hour increase. So what does that mean? If our   um par instructional staff got a

07830 cent increase  at the 2%, we would subtract that from the dollar,   give them an additional 70 cents, so at the  end they their um hourly rate would increase   by a full dollar. Um for our para clerical staff,  this is any employee who is compensated under our   clerical support pay band. We are looking at a  two the 2% increase from the midpoint that was   approved in May plus additional uh adjustments  based on the changes to their work calendars.   Um this year most of our clerical staff will now  be working less days in the coming school year.   We adjusted their calendars but we made them we  held them harm harmless and we kept them whole   meaning that their annual salary did not change.  So that automatically provided an increase in   their hourly amount. Um and that

079was for most  of our um paracclerical um staff professionals   again any employee under the administrative  professional pay ban would remain with the 2%   uh midpoint that was approved um in May.  Again, House Bill 2 specifically stated   that administrative or professional staff um  would not be included in any of the increase   scenarios or any of the a lotment provided under  House Bill 2. Option D is a financial impact   for the district of $4.34 million. Our second  option that we're excited to present to you is   um option E. Option E I think is a robust option  um which provides similar increases for teachers   as an option D with the only difference being that  as a district we would offer an increase for our   teachers with zero to two years of experience and  any employee under the teacher

080nurse librarian u   matrix. So our um nurses or librarians or athletic  trainers they would be included in this increase.   So our zero to you zero to twoyear teachers we  are proposing that um their total increase would   be 1,500 and our employees who fall under that  same pay scale would be treated as if they were a   teacher. So if I have an athletic trainer that has  5 years of experience or more they would get the   5,000. If I have a nurse that has four years they  would get the 2500. um for our parah instructional   stat. This option includes um the 2% from the  midpoint plus an equity adjustment based on 4%   of their midpoint pay grade. Um and we also did a  position reclassification on this pay band. Um and   we completely it was a completely

081restructure of  the pay band by updating the minimum the midpoint   and the maximum pay rate. um to match current  market values from neighboring districts. Maybe   you can go to the next slide real quick. So an  example of this is this is our instructional pay   grade. If you look at the you can um kind of  see on pay grade 2 the slightly shaded gray.   If we look at the midpoint it was at 1520. We  took 4% of that and that equals 1588. And then   we took that midpoint and we established the  new rate for our minimum and our maximum rate.   We did this across all five pay bands for the  um instructional staff. Um in addition to that   um if you can go back to the next slide. Um  these adjustments helped align again with   current

082market value for our neighboring district.  In addition to those pay grade adjustments of the   minimum uh midpoint and the maximum uh rate, we  class reclassified all those positions based on   the intensity of the position and the skill  set required. So we looked at each of our   instructional support um and we took our special  ed um aids. Right now in the current model,   they're all a pay grade three. So we looked at  those aids and we said, "Okay, an inclusion aid   versus um a life skills aid." and we kind of you  know we started looking and seeing what is the job   responsibility, what is the skill set, what are  we asking and we completely reclassified um those   positions. Then we went a step further and we took  every single one of those employees. We have 158  

083staff members under um the instructional support  band. Um we looked at their years of experience   even if they've been with us for 30 years. We took  their 30 years. We recalculated all their salaries   using our new salary calculation formulas and we  equitized their um salaries. So some of our para   instructional support staff will be receiving  anywhere between a 4% raise all the way up to   close to 10% of a raise depending on you know  where they're at. Um, so the the work that we   did here is um the start to the work that's going  to be done for all of our other employees. Um, and   then again, as in option D for our paracclerical  staff, we're looking at the 2% increase from the   midpoint plus additional adjustments based on  the changes to their work calendar.

084And again,   our professionals remain the same, just the 2%  midpoint that you all approved in May because   do not provide any allocated funds for  professionals. Um, and the impact on   uh option E is $4.49 million. Um, you can  go you can skip the next slide and go to the   right there. In addition to the amended salary  increases, we want to bring to you a few changes   um to our siphons for next year. This is just a  few changes that we identified based on um some   immediate need, immediate market value. um work  that we're starting to do our work with salary   with stipens will continue into next year. Um so a  few of the changes that we are proposing is in our   CTE a animal sciences for anybody hired after the  2425 school year. Um the

085stipen would increase to   $7,500. Right now it is $2,300. Um in addition  we are doing a CTE a barn manager in lie of the   grandfather days. Um so currently if you remember  from our B board workshop a lot of our employees   do have additional days as part of their contract  or their stipen and we are grandfathering those   in so that we can start the work on having very  competitive stipens. Um our mariachi assistant   director we are proposing to increase that from  1500 to 2500. um our departments and grade level   chairs. We are proposing to make a one standard  um stipen of 1,200. Right now currently are the   way our stipend is for our department or grade  level chairs. It depends, right? So if I'm a   um dance teacher and there's three people in  my department,

086well I get a certain amount. I   get $300, $400. If I am a science um manager and  I have 10 people in my department, well then I   get $800. So, it just depends how many um people  are in that department. Um the work is the same,   the meetings are the same, what we're asking them  to do is the same. So, we're asking for this to be   a standard site of $1,200. Um and then the finally  the last change is our additional days employees   employed prior to the 2526 school year if they're  currently employed with us. We are grandfathering   those additional days and it varies based on what  their um daily rate is. We are taking a snapshot   of that daily rate and we're locking it in. As  long as they remain employed with the district  

087in the same capacity, they will continue to  get that amount. Um and again the reason we   are doing this is because next year the real  work When we look at our siphons, we look at   market value and we make those competitive without  having to add additional days to be a little more   um attractive to a candidate. Um so at this time  um the administration does recommend um your   consideration for approval for um option E for  salary increases. Option E um will ensure one that   we are in compliance with the mandates of House  Bill 2 and it It represents an opportunity for   us where we can begin the work on restructuring  pay bands and building a compensation model that   in the long run is competitive and sustainable.  Um and then it it is I wanted to

088just say that I   know in working with Dr. Howard. Um, option E is a  rare occasion that we can be able to do this in 19   years um in one year to go in and comprehensively  not just give the increase but then also do   the work to empathize and reclassify all at  once. This would be monumental a monumental.   Can I ask a clarifying question here? Am I  understanding correctly that the steps now are are   and and they're in line with because there were  some steps that you would go from one year to   the next and have like a $300 rate. Okay. So, the  teacher step scale um we continue to decompress   that work on that. So, that will take more than  what the state's given us to make that happen.   I've already started the work.

089We did last year we  did decompress zero to eight. Okay. Um now there's   some compression at the far end with people over  25 years. Um that will need to be addressed. We'll   come back again and ask for that next year.  Okay. But um with regard to recommendation E,   this is putting the pay bands for instructional  aids to market value for our region. Yeah, the   the pair professional pay that's um I I'm really  pleased to hear about that change particularly   with the the special ed life skills um aids the  the yes and the responsibilities that they carry.   One of the things that was very important to us  was to be able to take it a step further and do   the equipation because we had employees coming  from you know let's another district that had   nine years

090of experience. we have a current staff  member that has nine years of experience and the   new one is making more money because we have not  done that work. So being able to do that for them,   the the staff that is the closest to our students  um is, you know, it's something that we would like   to look forward to. And along with what Megan  said, 100% support where she's saying that um   par instructional equitization and because they're  not all the same. Uh those who know and so it's   wonderful. But to clarify for anybody that wants  to know what's going on with the misunderstanding   between a 2% raise that we were pushing for  regardless of the state's help and then it   was after that 2% that we were given regardless of  what the state did that the

091state then threw this   in. And then you see E come in. So no, you're not  getting 5,000 more dollars than the 2%. It's going   to equal to 5,000. What you would have gotten had  we not done a 2% initially. That was kind of a   safety net. But then you look at the equitization  piece for pair professionals, the very valuable   pairs that we have in this district and like  you said, you don't see that happen. So this is   a magical point. It's similar to the bond that we  pushed four or five years ago, six years ago where   it lost five, six votes or whatever where that was  a no tax increase kind of bubble that you could   grab it. This is one of those bubbles and we can't  miss something like that because that's vital to  

092right what it does for our zero to2 teachers what  it does for every other teacher after that and   equitizes the paris and supports everybody along  the lines of student support and teacher support   so that's it and this is not a one and done this  this is just the beginning of the work this is an   example of we will get to you know part of the  compensation plan build out and the phases that   we're going to go through we did phase one through  all at once, right? For par instructional, but the   work is going to be done for our parclerical and  our auxiliary and eventually our professionals.   Um, but in to have that opportunity and that  window of okay, we can we can do this. You know,   when we saw the numbers and say, okay,  this

093is a possibility like let's pause,   let's go do the numbers like can we make it a  reality? And didn't have a heart attack. So,   no, he did not. You guys said it was coming.  And so to see it actually a real possibility   right now where we're going to actually vote on  this thing. I'm excited about our district and   excited about our employees, too. With that being  said, I'd like to make a motion. Okay. I mean,   uh, we can we can have some discussion after  the motion, but I've got a motion by second. I'll clarify. My motion is to uh uh option  discuss and vote to approve option option. Okay,   so I've got a motion to approve option E second by  Megan Solen. I've got a second by Mr. David. Do we   have any further discussion?

094No, I think everybody  said I'm glad. I'm excited. I'm very excited for   everybody. So, especially because there's other  industries that that pay a lot more than than   some of our clerical stuff and I'm excited for  them, too. This is this tedious work. Thank you   for taking the time, you know, dive in, take a  deep look into it. So, I think we're taking a   step in the right direction. Yes. I couldn't have  done it with my HR team. Like, I had them like,   you know, all uh within I think four hours we  recalculated 160 um salaries. So cool files,   look at their years of experience. We wanted  to make this happen for them. So we're we're   excited. Um on your motion just to communicate  this type of changes as well. I Okay. Is that   part of

095the compensation? So it's not separate.  But I do want to say, you know, taking like the   window of opportunity to do the equization. I know  I know it's hard. I know I I' I've been listening   to the work. Um I think that you're doing the  work so that we can be like the best version of   ourselves. sustainable version of ourselves. Um,  competitive salaries is what we ask you for. Uh,   teacher retention and employee retention. And  I think this being all-encompassing to not only   include our educators but include all of our  staff, um, is nothing short of monumental and   taking this window of opportunity. So, you  know, having positions that are now going   to be in support of of TIA and doing that  for our educators and a position, you know,   to to take our safety

096to the next level. I think  we're doing a lot of growing up and uh really just   solidifying. I I just I I just want to compliment  you, your team, and and Dr. Howard. It's it's   a lot of work that you guys have done. It's  encompassing so much and um I'm really excited   about this. So, that being said, I have got a  motion by Miss Megan Sullivan, a second by Mr.   David to approve to amend the 2526 um compensation  plan and salary increases to uh presented option   E. Any further discussion? All those in  favor signify by saying I. All opposing sign president before we move off of this topic um I  would uh appreciate Mr. Newton to please stand.   Mr. Newton is a par professional in our uh 18  plus program at Pioneer High School. He's

097also   been a faithful member of my staff advisory  and um the manifestation of this work has   been directly from some of the feedback  that I've received in our staff advisory   um to be able to make sure that we stay lock  step that we move all of our employees together   at the same time. So Mr. Afternoon the team.  I see you back there. Stan, I have two more.   Thank you. Introduce yourself. Uh, I'm Jennifer  Staley. I'm also in the life skills unit. Been   here for three years. Thank you. I'm Rebecca.  I've been with the district for going on nine.   So on behalf of the district and obviously now  the school board, please know that you matter   and your work is significant and we will continue  to keep you guys at the forefront of what we do  

098when we make decisions with finances. I  honor you tonight. Thank you. Great job. Want to give credit where credit is due. Um Miss  Garza, if you would please stand. I wish I could   take credit for this phenomenal recommendation  tonight, but this absolutely was the brainchild   of our new chief of human resources who on her  own saw a window of opportunity and just asked   what if and to be able to come and one to get me  to sit still for five minutes um to to get the   work going in this direction. But um Susie, thank  you for looking out for all of our employees. What   you were able to do tonight unprecedented. I never  did as a chief of HR. And so, um, thank you for   the level of care and thoughtfulness that this  took to

099this recommendation. [Applause] Comment   comment for Susie because I can't say anything  about somebody in private that I wouldn't say in   public. I called you a grinder, like somebody that  worked hard to get where they are right now in the   Sherland ISD school district. Congratulations  on your promotion tonight and thank you so   much for the hard work that you and the staff  of the of the special ed and all of that that   you put together this package. I'm really excited  about it. I think it's so neat that it's awesome.   So congratulations for all of it. Thank you.  Thank you. Okay, we're going to move on to item   13. B discussion and consideration to approve the  202526 school year annual budget. Madam President,   as uh just presented in the public hearing  meeting for the 2025 20226 uh

100budget, we are   recommending that the board approve the general  operating fund, child nutrition program fund,   and the debt service fund total official  budget in the amount of 126 million 950,961. I'll make a motion to approve. Okay, I've got  a motion by Julio. I will second the motion.   Okay. And a second by to approve the 2526 school  year annual budget. Any further discussion? All   those in favor signify by saying I sign. Motion  passes 70. Thank you very much. Oh, I'm sorry. 6. I've been writing 70. Thank you. Sorry. Yes, he is. Thank you again for  all your work. On to item 13B.   discussion and consideration to approve  cab policy update 125. Madam President,   the administration provided you a um uh redline  document to show the possible changes with the   text to BDAA officers and officials duties 

101and requirements of board officers. Uh this   uh board internal organization committee, BDF,  board internal organization advisory committee.   EI local for academic achievement, FDE  local for admissions and FC local for   attendance. This was an update provided to  the district in March this year. I mean,   excuse me, May. This came this update came in  May. Um, and so we are recommending as presented   um in attachment A and attachment B the notes  that were provided for our local policy updates. Mr. President, I'll make a motion. Okay. A motion  by Mr. Hector update got a second by Mr. Riddle.   Any further discussion? All in favor by  saying I post sign. Motion passes 6. 13.   Discussion and consideration to approve to opt out  of allowing homeschool athletic participation. Oh,   go ahead. No, you go ahead. Oh, ladies  and gentlemen, our

102athletic director Good evening, Madam President. Dr. Howard, school  board of administrators. Um, I am here just to uh   uh mentioned the uh the one of the newest  legislative um acts had passed. Last year,   this was known as House Bill 547 and  this deals with homeschool participation.   uh last year the option to allow homeschoolers  to participate not just athletics but in all   extracurricular activities light in the hands  of the superintendent of all of every district.   It's pretty much the same this year.  The only option is instead of opting   in and allowing homeschoolers to participate in  extracurricular activities now school districts   are tasked with opting out and that decision  lies in the hands of the school board. So, just   um we heard about this a couple of weeks ago  at at our Texas High School Athletic Directors  

103Association, and most if not all of the of the  uh administrators at the uh at the conference   kind of felt the same way. Um you know, in the  in the fact that some of the concerns that were   mentioned were the lack of ADA money that these uh  uh homeschoolers would not bring to the district.   uh following uh strict guidelines as far as  grading uh the eight hour rule. Uh these were   concerns that were brought forward uh when we  discussed this in cabinet. One of the things   that was that was that was mentioned is if our  curriculum is not good enough for homeschoolers,   how or why can our extracurriculars be? So,  uh, I just want to inform you guys just, um,   in speaking to athletic administrators around the,  uh, the valley, most of them are are

104going to, uh,   encourage their school boards to opt out. Okay.  Now, if a student that lives in a district is is   trying to, uh, gain access to to extracurricular  activities and the district that they live in does   not allow that, then they have the right or the  option to go to a nearby district that does. But   just talking to uh surrounding school districts,  most if not all of them are going to opt out. So,   I just wanted to inform uh you guys about this and  then uh entertain any questions that anybody may   have. I was just at a TASBY conference this last  few days and um I I went to the one in Fort Worth,   so it's a lot of North Texas districts and there  was not a single district there uh planning to   not

105opt out. the the thinking was what you were  saying. It's I think if you're not going to come   to school here, what you know, we're not why and  and the funding that didn't even get discussed,   but that's an excellent point. Right. You said I'm  sorry. I got a question actually. You said most So   what schools are I don't uh Mr. Keith, I don't  know. I can't answer that question. Okay. So,   we could assume that those that are in the really  athletic high schools and high schools that are   operating in the UIL and probably even taps  are not going to allow home school students   to participate. They have their own leagues to  participate. There's a small minority that are   going to allow I think one of them may be HUD.  Okay. From based on the research

106that I've done,   but here in our region, in our area, the  surrounding districts are going to opt out. And in   the policy, how specific are they in terms of the  curriculum piece and the it's not very specific.   It's just allow homeschoolers to come in, right?  And one of the things mom grading the homework,   one of the concerns is just the strict guidelines  that we use for our students that are enrolled,   right? And the grading procedures and policies. Uh  here's another one, the eight hour rule. You know,   you're you're or the 300 minutes, right, during a  school day. Who's going to monitor that? who ends   up monitoring that is going to be us. Is going to  be myself or my staff. And so that's going to be   tedious. Okay. U you know what's going to happen 

107to that freshman football player that's given $800   of equipment and then decides to quit the third  week of the season. Who's going to pick that   equipment up when they're enrolled here? Uh we can  hold their their certificate or we've got leverage   to get the property back. So these are some of the  concerns that have been commonly expressed. Thank   you. Any other questions for Okay, I'll entertain  a motion uh consideration to approve to opt out   of all I'd like to make a motion to approve the  opt out home school participation by a second   by any further discussion. All those in favor of  saying I sign motion passes 16. Thank you, coach.   Yes. Thank you. On to item B. discussion and  consideration to approve award to CSP 2425-28 at   OAR to paving improvements. Madam President, Dr.  Howard,

108school board members. So, this proposal   is for paving improvement at Oak Garza Elementary.  A notice inviting bids was published in the modern   newspaper on May 24th and May 25th. Proposals  were due Tuesday, uh, June 17th, at which time   they were publicly open and read aloud. The recap  is a total of seven proposals were received and   thoroughly evaluated. Three proposals failed to  submit the required information outlined in the   bid solicitation and were deemed non-responsive.  Four proposals were considered responsive and   met the district's stated requirements for the  responses proposals. Three were within district's   budget. The lowest cost responsive proposal also  received the highest overall ranking based on the   evaluation. So uh we are recommending Rio United  Builders that had an original price of $336,12320. We did for best and final and it did come down a  little

109bit. So the new product now is $331,12320. So we are recommending approval. Okay,  Mr. President, I'll make a motion. Okay,   I've got the motion by Mr. to approve and this  was discussed in detail in the finance committee   workshop. I've got a motion second by Mr. Any  further discussion on this item. All in favor   signify by saying I post sign. Motion passes  60. Um on to item F discussion consideration   to approve RP242-29 on property insurance. Okay.  Thank you. Again, the proposal for the district   car insurance policy, a notice inviting bids,  was published in the monitor newspaper on May   17th and 24th. Proposals were originally due  by June 12th. However, an addendum was issued   and extended to the deadline of Tuesday,  June 17, 2025. Proposals were open read.   We only got one proposal, but uh I think

110that  the board will be very happy with the proposal.   Right now, if you look at proposals on the  second page, our building values are 247,266,83 plus we have values of 52, or  content values of 52,484,496 as well as other values at totaling 18,292,580. So, it gives us a total  insured value of $318,43,269. So, the original proposal had a coverage limit of  $100 million and that came in at $998,1 which is   a decrease of just a little over $500,000. Um,  there is there was a little small catch to it   and that was that our deductible went up from  a $50,000 deductible to a $250,000 deductible,   but still the cost savings in there far outweighs  the increase in the deductible. They did offer a   second proposal and this is the one that we  are asking for approval

111and that is to take   the coverage limit from a hundred million to $200  million. That will cost the district approximately   $106,000. Uh we feel that with the environment,  with the weather, the storms coming in,   we're we're at hurricane season that that would be  a safe bet for the district. Again, we are still   well below the budget that we had just last year.  So, They're asking for approval for that option.   Okay. So, just in summation, 9998,000 which is  a five uh which is a $500,000 savings for $100   million. We have the option forundred how much  extra for 200 million for $100 million more. So,   we're going to be total $200 million. 200 million.  But what's the extra cost? $106,000. $106,000. So,   if we choose the $2 million policy, we're  still at $394,000 from last year. If

112we   choose the the 998 policy, we're at $500,000  savings from last year. A little bit higher.   Yes. Somewhere in there. Yes. But one is 100  million and one is 200 million. Yes, ma'am.   Okay. Deductible is the same. The deductible did  go up from 50,000 to 200,000. So, but for 100.   Yes. Yes. Deductible is the same. Everything  is the same. Just what we're buying is more   uh coverage to the policy. You are recommending  the $200 million. Yes, ma'am. I am just because   of the storms that we see brewing out there and  the damages that we've seen. You know, we saw   earlier this spring town get wiped out in North  Carolina. So, those things like that and then the   cost to rebuild have just been skyrocketing. So,  Madam President, we just discussed this at like   recommendation of

113the 200 million coverage.  Okay. For the 1.1 million a second. Okay. So,   I've got a motion to approve for 200 million  coverage by Mr. Julio Sa and I've got a second by   me David. Any further discussion on this item?  How many times we use the insurance last year?   Uh this past year, no. The previous year we  had about a million52 million policy coverage the deductible at that point was 50,000. You know, the day we hit 200 million, we're  all going to see the same. Yeah. Anyway,   it's good. Well, we say that, but then  when you saw all the hit a few years ago, not so then it's about 200 million about $200,000.  If we don't, it's about $450,000. I know. Yeah,   it's kind of one of those. My concern would  be just seeing what the

114cost replacement cost. Okay, I'll take the vote. I've got a motion by a  second by David Ke. All those in favor signify by   saying I see sign. Motion passes 60. We are  on to our final business item which is item   uh 13G. Discussion and consideration to approve  award RFP 25 2425-32 security guard services.   Madam President, this is another bid that  was discussed at the BOF. Once again, we did   uh advertising the monitor newspaper on May  31st and June 7th. Uh district did receive 17   uh proposals. All proposals  met the district's requirement. So we did have uh two uh vendors who submitted  a lower bid than what we're going to recommend.   The reason as we discussed at the uh at the BF  was just experience honor. So administration   is recommending protected uh protection  services for a

115contract in the amount of   877,448 and that is based on 169 days of  uh instructional uh days. Madam President,   we did discuss this in BOF extensively  and I I go with the recommendation of   MLG protection services. Okay. And I will  second. Okay. I've got a motion by Mr. and   a second by Mr. Hector to approve award to MLG  protection services. Any further discussion?   Okay. All those in favor signify by  saying I. All sign. Motion passes 6. We are now Welcome back to item 14 part  two. No, I'm sorry. Item 11 part two   close meeting. In this closed meeting, we  will be discussing student I'm sorry. Um   item AC superintendent evaluation and contract  student discipation regarding security devices   and or security audits. Diberation regarding  real property Texas government code 551.072   Z one possible sale of easement

116to county  drainage uh district number one through an   interal agreement and E consultation with attorney  regarding A conflict litigation B a settlement   offer C a matter of duty of the attorney to ship  District under the Texas disciplinary rules of   professional conduct of the state bar of Texas  conflict with chapter 551 of the Texas government   code Texas government code 551371. Um I will  now entertain a motion to go into close meeting.   Who said that? David. Okay, I've got  a motion by a second by any further   discussion. All those in favor say I. All  those we will now close at 8:35. Thank you. David and waiting for Mr. Sure. Item 11 A 2 C superintendent  evaluation and contract. The motion will be   to approve the evaluation with revisions as  discussed in executive session and authorize   board president,

117board vice president and trusted  sin to review evaluation with superintendent. Mr.   President, I make a motion to approve as stated by  Mr. I have got a motion by Hector and a second by   David Keith. Any further discussion? All those in  favor sign. All oppose. Same sign passes. [Music]   don't be too vocal. And then we have item 11  is it D 11D one possible sale of easement to   county drainage district number one through anal  agreement and the motion will be to authorize   the superintendent to engage appraiser  and negotiate terms for the district.   Second. I've got a motion by Julio and a second  by Hector. Any further discussion? All in favor   say by saying I. Motion passes 60. It is now  time for German. I will now accept a motion to   the meeting. So move. I motion

118by second. Second  by David. Any further discussion? No later. All   those in favor signify by saying I sign. Motion  passes 6. This meeting is at 10:37 p.m. record.

This transcript may contain errors introduced by automated or source-provided captioning. Bracketed descriptions such as [Music] are retained from the source. Passage divisions are editorial aids and do not alter the wording.