CorpusRecord 81131

School Board Meeting Workshop - 1/27/26

A searchable transcript preserved as part of the Discourse Corpus. Passage numbers provide stable references within this record; verify quotations against the original recording when available.

Source
YouTube / VBSchools
Date
2026-01-29
Location
Virginia Beach city, VA
Material
Transcript
Extent
8,245 words · about 46 min
Collected
2026-06-08

Transcript

Verbatim source text

001Hey. Heat. Heat. I'm Good afternoon. My name is Kathleen Brown and  I call this meeting to order at 400 PM on this   27th day of 2026. We are going to begin with a  short close session. Um, and we estimate that   we're going to be out around 4:30 p.m. for our  workshop portion of the agenda. Um, Madame Clerk,   would you please announce the role? Thank you,  Madam Chair. Present in the schoolboard chamber   are Chair Brown, Mr. Bowensteel, Mr. Kalen, Mr.  Co Pepper, Mr. Cummings, Miss Dwire, Miss Felton,   Dr. Green, Miss Melnik, and Miss Rogers. Thank  you. Um, and Vice Chair Williams is out for   medical reasons. This time, Miss Melnik, would  you please read the motion to go into closed?   Sure. I moved that the school board recess into  close session in accordance with the exceptions  

002to open meetings law set forth in code of Virginia  section 2.2-3711 part A paragraphs 17812 and 29 as   amended to deliberate on the following matters.  One discussion, consideration or interviews of   prospective candidates for employment, assignment,  appointment, promotion, performance, demotion,   salaries, disciplining or resignation of specific  public officers, appointees or employees of any   public body. An evaluation of performance of  departments or schools of public institution   of higher education where such evaluation will  necessarily involve discussion of the performance   of specific individuals. Any teacher shall be  permitted to be present during a closed meeting in   which there is a discussion or consideration of a  disciplinary matter that involves the teacher and   some student and students involved in the matter  is present provided that the teacher makes a   written request to be present to the presiding  officer of the appropriate

003board. Nothing in   this subdivision, however, shall be construed to  authorize to close meeting by a local governing   body or an elected school board to discuss  compensation on matters that affect the membership   of such body or board collectively. Seven,  consultation with legal counsel and briefings by   staff members or consultants pertaining to actual  or probable litigation where such consultation or   briefing and open meeting would adversely affect  the negotiating or litigating posture of the   public body. For the purpose of this subdivision,  probable litigation means litigation that has been   specifically threatened or on which the public  body or its legal council has a reasonable basis   to believe will be commenced by or against a  known party. Nothing in this subdivision shall   be construed to permit the closure of a meeting  merely because an attorney representing the public   body is

004in attendance or is consulted on a matter.  Eight, consultation with legal counsel employed or   retained by a public body regarding specific legal  matters requiring the provision of legal advice by   such counsel. Nothing in this subdivision shall  be construed to permit the closure of a meeting   because an attorney representing the public body  is in attendance or is consulted on a matter. 12.   information relating to the negotiation  of a and award of a specific contract,   where competition or bargaining is involved,  and where the release of such information would   adversely affect the bargaining position or  negotiating strategy of the public body. Such   information shall not be withheld after the public  body has made a decision to award or not to award   the contract. 29. Discussion of the award of  a public contract involving the expenditure   of public funds

005including interviews of biders or  offerers and discussion of the terms or scope of   such contract where discussion in an open session  would adversely affect the bargaining position   or negotiating strategy of the public body namely  to discuss a review of draft RFQ for CIP Princess   High School project B superintendent's midyear  goals and related matters C status of pending   litigation or admin administrative cases and  D consultation with legal counsel regarding   probable litigation and pending litigation  matters. Okay. Motion made by Miss Melnik,   seconded by Dr. Green. Any discussion? And  Mr. Ken, I saw yours lit up. You don't have   any comments. Correct. Oh, okay. Just making sure.  Operator. All right. Seeing no discussion. I call   for the vote to go into close session. Madame  clerk. Mine will not connect. It says I am not   a valid somebody for

006discussion. Okay. Uh Miss  Melik, how do you vote for going into class? So,   Madam Chair, we have 10 eyes. The motion to  pass to go into close session. Thank you. where whereas the school board of the city of  Virginia Beach has convened a closed meeting on   this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded  vote and in accordance with the provisions of   the Virginia Freedom of Information Act.  Whereas section 2.2-3712D 2-3712D of the   code of Virginia requires a certification by  this school board that such closed meeting was   conducted in conformity with Virginia law. Now  therefore, be it resolved that the school board   of the city of Virginia Beach hereby certifies  that to the best of each member's knowledge,   only public business matters lawfully  exempted from open meeting requirements   by Virginia law were discussed in the closed  meeting

007to which this certification applies,   and only such public business matters as  were identified in the motion by which   the closed meeting was convened were heard,  discussed, or considered. Is there a motion   for the certification of close? Moved by  Dr. Green, seconded by Miss Dwire. Any   discussion? Seeing none, I call for  the votes to certify close session. And Miss Melik, how do you vote? Yes. And  Mr. Cummings, how do you vote? Thank you,   Madam Chair. We have 10 eyes. The motion did pass  for certification of close session. Thank you. We   are now on to our administrative, informal, and  workshop session. And we're on to schoolboard   administrative matters and reports. Um, there's a  couple updates here. I have the meetings with the   superintendent and the school visits. I'm going to  start by passing those to my right.

008Um, and also   just a reminder, statement of economic interest  forms are due to the school board clerk by Monday,   February 2nd by 5 p.m. Do any board members  have anything to report? A raise of hands would   work. Miss Rogers, my uh screen has not switched.  That's okay. Uh I'd like to take this opportunity   to acknowledge the following recognitions and  celebrations within our community. In the month   of January, the community will recognize the  following or did recognize. National Mentoring   Month promotes youth membership, a mentorship  by celebrating mentors, raising awareness of its   importance, and encouraging more community  members to become mentors by highlighting   how these relationships boost young people's  academic success, confidence, and leadership   skills. Poverty in America Awareness Month aims  to recognize the severe conditions of poverty,   including hunger, malnutrition, and limited access  to education that

009occur every day in the United   States. This awareness aims to help improve living  conditions of people in the community. On January   1st, the community celebrated New Year's Day,  which is the commemoration of the beginning of   the calendar year and represents a fresh start  of a new year and a moment of remembrance of   the passing year. On January 4th, the community  honored World Braille Day, which commemorates   the birth of Louisie Braille, the inventor of  the tactile reading and writing system designed   for the visually impaired. It raises awareness  about the importance of braille for communication,   education, and independence to ensure full access  for the visually impaired. On January 19th,   the community honored Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.  This federal holiday honors the life and legacy of   Dr. King, a civil rights leader who advocated for  the racial

010equality and civic engagement through   nonviolent protest. Dr. King is well known for his  I have a dream speech and leadership in the civil   rights movement. On January 24th, the community  commemorated the International Day of Education,   which was established by the United Nations to  highlight education's role in peace development   and as a fundamental human right for all and  focusing recent recently on youth development   in co-creating future education systems.  Its emphasis uh emphasizes inclusive quality   learning for everyone, breaking poverty cycles,  and fostering global citizenship. And finally,   today on January 27th, the community recognizes  International Holocaust Remembrance Day,   which is an international memorial day to  commemorate the victims of the Holocaust,   which resulted in the genocide of millions of  Jewish people and countless of other minority   groups. Thank you. Do any other board members have  anything to report?

011Um, and I just I wanted to   um add one thing. I am going to ask um Carolyn  Williams, the chair of the policy committee,   to ask the policy committee to take a look at our  um device policy. We've had a lot of conversations   over the last couple of years uh regarding that  and um I just want them to have that conversation   to see if they want to move anything forward to  the board for consideration. Um, so I just wanted   to make sure that the public and the board was  aware that I was going to make that request. Thank   you for that. Thank you. Okay, we are now going  to move on to striving for a competitive future,   prioritizing staff compensation while balancing  budget priorities. And we welcome Dr. Darnita   Tropman, chief human resources offer officer, 

012Judith Wood, coordinator classification   classification and compensation. And members  from Seagull, Dr. Paul Singer, Paula Singer,   I'm sorry, I can't read today. Vice President  and Andrew Canowski, associate consultants. So,   um, before I turn over Dr. Trotman, uh, just let  me share some information. So when we've worked   with seagull uh we've been talking to them since  before the holidays and the task that we gave them   was to bring a presentation here uh based upon the  information we had at the time and what we thought   was fundable so to speak. So you're going to see  some scenarios in here for staff compensation that   the landscape has changed over the last week in  a very favorable manner. So what do I mean by   that? Well, we have a Congress right now that is  poised to pass a budget that

013will keep our federal   funding that we've enjoyed over the last several  years intact. So that's a good thing. Um the VRS   made some decisions around employer contributions  that have provided us a large sum of money   um based upon some of our savings uh things that  we've done and holding positions. There's money.   So when you're looking at the presentation for  SQL tonight, know that what these scenarios can   give you is the difference between the increases.  You'll be able to easily see if the increase from   two to two and a half percent, two and a half to  3%, three to three and a half percent is $500,000,   then you can assume that three and a half to  4% is $500,000. Now, I made that number up.   It's bigger than that, but you'll be able to see  that

014increase. So this is just a area to start,   but I did want to say that when you see the  presentation from from Crystal Pate afterwards   and you see the large sum that we have available  to this board, uh I don't want anybody to think of   what were you trying to do then with the seagull  presentation. So I wanted to set the context was   their information they've been working off was  two weeks old, but things changed last week.   So I'll share it over to you, Dr. from Can I ask a  quick question of what Dr. um Robertson just said?   The money from VRS that we're saving, is that  going to be ongoing or is that a one-time deal? So, it is built into our base budget. I mean,  it they can increase the rates again. So,  

015but right now it is built into the base budget  for us to move forward. And I will say that even   at the city level when they did retreat yesterday,  they've released their savings as well. So, and so   like we can count on that though in years forward  is what my question is. Perfect. Thank you. Well,   I think to be fair, uh it can change, right?  Because we know they can. But it's a really   good question because if it changes in two  years or a year, we could be in a pickle.   And and actually even before this presentation, I  had some questions related to that. I'll I'll wait   until after the presentation, but I I do have some  comments on the VRS. So go ahead. Good afternoon,   Chairwoman Brown, members of the school board, and  Dr.

016Robertson. This afternoon's presentation will   focus on staff compensation while recognizing the  need for balancing priorities. School divisions   nationwide continue to experience staffing  challenges, particularly in high needs areas while   balancing fiscal constraints in an increasingly  competitive labor market. Our division is no   exception and this environment requires ongoing  attention to the tools and frameworks that guide   compensation decisions. As formulating the  2026 2027 superintendent estimates of needs   is underway, we are navigating both uncertain  funding and a highly competitive labor market   to work towards compass to 2030 goals. We must  remain vigilant in strengthening our ability to   attract and retain employees across all positions.  This afternoon, Miss Judith Wood, coordinator of   compensation and classification, in partnership  with our compensation consultant, Seagull,   will provide an overview of key compensation  priorities, important reminders, and cost   scenarios for the board's consideration. At

017this  time, I turn the presentation over to Miss Wood. Okay, thank you Dr. Trotman. Good afternoon.  We will start with an overview of the Compass   to 2030 strategic framework which reinforces  our commitment to cultivating a high quality   sustainable workforce. We will then review the  elements of an effective compensation strategy,   including how a competitive pay structures,  transparency, and fiscal responsibility   work together to attract and retain talented  employees. This will be followed by a review   of the school board's compensation philosophy,  which governs how compensation decisions are made.   Lastly, we will transition to Seagull, who  will update us on the current market position   for teacher salaries and present cost scenarios  align with the division's fiscal priorities for   employees on both the unified and teacher pay  scale. The compass to 2030 strategic framework   provides the basis for our work

018and guides how  we support our students and employees across   Virginia Beach City Public Schools. Within this  framework, goal three, value and invest in staff,   focuses on enhancing and sustaining a  positive work culture that attracts, supports,   and retains a high quality workforce. While  goal five, advance organizational excellence,   emphasizes the effective and efficient use of  division resources to meet the needs of both   students and staff. As we continue our work to  ensure every student in Virginia Beach City Public   Schools succeeds, we recognize that achieving  these goals depends on the people who make it   possible. Our staff and leaders are the foundation  of student success and investing in their growth,   stability, and well-being is essential. Striving  for a competitive future reflects the division's   commitment to maintaining a transparent and  fiscally responsible compensation strategy   that supports our workforce and

019guides future  efforts to improve the division's competitiveness. With this commitment in mind, it is important to  understand what defines an effective compensation   strategy for Virginia Beach City Public Schools  and how its key components work together to   support our workforce while remaining fiscally  responsible. A competitive pay structure helps   attract and retain staff, reduce vacancies, and  ensure continuity and stability in the classroom.   It also supports professional growth  by providing compensation for advanced   credentials. Transparency and accountability  are critical to building trust through clear,   fair, and predictable pay practices,  including defined salary progression. Fiscal   responsibility ensures compensation  remains sustainable, datadriven,   and aligned with long-term workforce  needs and student centered priorities.   This includes reviewing pay practices on  a regular basis as economic conditions and   funding levels change, allowing the division to  remain financially stable while working toward   improved competitiveness over

020time. The foundation  for developing and maintaining a classification   and compensation strategy is a well-defined  compensation philosophy. In short, it establishes   how employees are compensated, how pay decisions  are made, how employees are placed on and   progressed through the pay scales, the purpose of  a purpose of allowances and supplemental duty pay,   and how often the scales are reviewed, among other  key elements. The document before you and included   in your packet is the school board's current  compensation philosophy. with the compensation   philosophy establishing the principles that  guide how we approach pay. The next slide   illustrates how those principles translate  into total compensation for an individual   employee. Total compensation reflects the full  value of employment including base salary,   educational allowances and employer paid benefits.  This slide is for de demonstration purposes only   and focuses on components we can reasonably  account

021for. Specifically, slot salary and   employer paid benefits for a plan one employee.  Please note that the amount used for the health   insurance contribution re represents an average  employer contribution. Employee contributions are   based on the actual plan selected. In the  first example, the slide shows a 10-month   employee who did not elect health insurance.  The employees total compensation is $55,687. Below that, you'll see the employer paid benefits,  including VRS retirement, life insurance, the VRS   health insurance credit, and the employer's  share of FICA totaling an estimated $14,72.   Because health insurance was not elected, the  employer paid health insurance contribution   is not displayed. When combined, the total  compensation package for this employee is $69,759 with employer paid benefits being 25% above  the employer's base employees base salary.   The second example shows an employee  with the same base salary of

022$55,687 but who elected health insurance. Under  employer paid benefits, you'll see a health   insurance contribution of $12,642 towards  the cost of coverage for a total of $26,714 employer pay benefits. As a result, the estimated  total above compensation, excuse me, as a result,   the estimated total compensation package  increases to approximately $82,41 with employer   paid benefits being 48% above the employees base  salary. The key takeaway is that while salary is   an important component, total compensation  reflects the full value of employment,   including employer paid benefits and the health  insurance contribution. In addition, compensation   is experienced as a whole. Non-monetary values  such as workplace culture, the work environment,   and relationships with colleagues all play a  meaningful role in how employees perceive the   overall value of employment and are critical to  recruitment, retention, and employee satisfaction. As we prepare for

023the 2026 2027 superintendent  estimate of needs and ensuring an sustainable   compensation structure, I'd like to introduce  our compensation consultants from Seagull. Dr.   Paula Single Singer, vice president, along  with Andrew Kazinski, consultant. Their   services have been instrumental in helping the  division to align Virginia Beach City Public   Schools pay scales with market standards  while staying within our fiscal resources.   They would provide insights on our instructional  pay scale and offer scenarios based on our fiscal   resources while supporting the division's  ongoing efforts to recruit and retain all   staff. At this time, I would turn over the  presentation to Dr. Paula Singer of Seagull. Dr. Singer, can you unmute? Madame clerk, is is she online? She is online  and it looks like she did unmute. Okay. Is there any portion of this presentation  after that that we can continue with

024while   we figure out how to get her unmuted? No, keep  go. Yes, keep going. Okay. Thank you. You want   me to go? Okay. Um, let me see. Let me go down  to her next. So, let me go with their agenda.   Um we're going to start they will start with  a review of the J of the agenda for today's   presentation. They will provide a recap of their  partnership with the division since 2019 and also   remind us of their project goals and share  their findings scenarios for implementation   and the cost imp imple implic implications of  implementing each scenario. So there will be   a lot to cover as they go through this  and as Dr. Robertson already mentioned   it will be modified. So if you have questions,  please hold until the end of the presentation. Dr. Singer, can

025you try to speak? I can't. Hello. Can Can anyone hear me? Apologies. Yes.  Thank you. Great. Hi everyone. Um my name is   Andrew Kinsky. It sounds like um Paula is having  a little bit of an issue um with her audio. Um   but I am happy to um kind of continue the the  conversation until she's able to join if that   would be helpful. That would be great. Go ahead.  Okay, great. Thank you very much. All right. Um,   Mrs. Wood, if you would please, um, I know and I  appreciate you um, going over the agenda quickly.   Maybe we can move to the timeline. Next. Great.  Thank you. Um, so following a small study of   compensation of of clerical and facility staff  in 2021, uh, we began our work in earnest with   a two-phase compensation study. Uh the

026first  involved working with the school board to update   your compensation philosophy. Uh the second was  a comprehensive assessment of how the division's   pay plan compares to local school divisions.  Um that has been a goal of all four projects   uh to meet and hopefully align with or exceed the  pay rates offered by our nearest peer competitor   for teacher talent. Now, as you can see, since  the spring of 2022, Virginia Beach City Public   Schools has partnered with Seagull to complete  the following initiative. Uh, we've worked   with the school board to update and finalize  the division's compensation philosophy. Uh,   we've assessed the competitiveness of positions  to strengthen the division's market standing while   maintaining internal pay equity for employees.  We have implemented a 1.5% step increment for   all experience levels on the instructional  teacher pay scale and continue to

027recommend   increasing entry-level rates based on available  funding. Uh other results of our collaboration   led to consistent pay increments on the unified  pay scale. Uh raising the minimum wage for our   lowest paid employees and creating a new grade  level for select professional level position. Now since beginning this work uh we've  provided the division with market analyses   and recommendations to support decision making  for annual employee salary increases for teachers.   Each year's increases um shown on this chart  reflects adjustments recommended through this   partnership and ultimately approved by the school  board as part of the division's budget planning   process. Uh with the exception of the 2324  school year, the percentages shown reflect a   flat adjustment applied to the teacher pay scale.  During 2324, Virginia Beach undertook a targeted   effort to realign the teachers pay scale by  adjusting the percentage

028increases between steps.   The goal was to create a more consistent  and predictable step progression across   the scale by moving toward a uniform 1.5%  increase between steps. Um, as a result,   the 23 24 school year is reflected as an average  10.6% adjustment. Simply stated, um, over four   years, approved teacher salary increases total  26.6% averaging approximately 6.65% per year.   Uh Dr. Singer, just to check and see, I look I can  see you. Are are you here? Can you still having   audio? All right, fair enough. All right. Um  well, I'll I'll continue then. Um on this slide,   um similar to the teacher pay scale,  um this slide shows the annual salary   adjustments that have been applied to the  unified pay scale over the past four years.   uh the percentage shown represents a flat salary  adjustment applied across the

029unified pay scale.   Uh however in 2023 2024 uh is shown as an average  because that year also included in both salary   movement and a significant effort to improve  the structure of the scale. Now during 23 24   uh the division made targeted market adjustments  by moving several critical positions including bus   assistance, cafeteria assistance, custodian one  uh and the fleet shop helper from grades five to   grade seven. Uh due to the corresponding domino  effect of these adjustments, additional positions   were also realigned to maintain consistency. Um  so that included uh positions like the assistant   cafeteria managers. Uh there's the baker/cooks,  um the cafeteria managers and training custodians   two and custodians three. Um we also created  a professional level two grade for certain   certified staff and reclassified 16 additional  positions identified as below market. Um over the   past four

030years, the unified pay scale increases  total 23% that averages out to about 5.75% per   year. Uh while progress has been made toward a  more consistent 1.5% step progression like the   teacher pay scale, um realigning steps one through  14 uh from 1 to 1.5% remains an outstanding issue   and continues to be a key consideration as  we evaluate further compensation options. The two primary goals of this uh meeting today  are going to be um to develop the teacher pay   scale costing scenarios um that will improve  the teacher entry rate while ensuring increases   reflect the division's commitment to employees  while balancing fiscal responsibility and then   also uh develop uh the unified paycale costing  scenarios to provide increases that reflect the   division's commitment um to its employees while  again balancing that fiscal responsib ibility. Um,   this study, as Judy

031mentioned, was requested  in support of the division strategic plan   uh for Compass 2030. And in essence, our goals are  designed to reflect our commitment to uh employees   while being a responsible steward of taxpayer  money and improves the entry salary of teachers. All right. So, now we're going to get into some uh  of the specifics with um each um each pay scale.   So, um, so we're going to start  with the teachers pay scale. Um,   we're going to review the historical entry level  rankings for teachers relative to other school   districts. We're going to look at Virginia Beach's  current salary positioning and five-year intervals   relative to your peers and present scenarios we've  modeled and the associated employee impacts of   cost implications of those scenarios. All right.  So, this slide shows historical market rankings of   entry-level teacher pay across

032the Hampton Road  school divisions with a specific focus on how   Virginia Beach City Public Schools has been  positioned over time. For two school years,   beginning in 2021, you'll see that Virginia Beach  was clearly positioned at the top of the market.   However, by 2023, Virginia Beach's relative  position had started to shift. The division moved   fourth and then to seventh in 2024 2025 where it  remains for 2025 2026. Uh importantly this change   in ranking is not driven by stagnant salaries  at Virginia Beach um as entry- level pay has   continued to increase each year. Uh however peer  divisions have made larger and more aggressive   entry-level adjustments which has affected  Virginia Beach's relative standing in the market.   Uh what this tells us is that while Virginia Beach  continues to invest in entry- level teacher pay,   the pace of the

033increase has not  kept up with the broader market,   which has resulted in a decline in its relative  position. Uh this trend is particularly relevant   as we consider recruitment competitiveness,  especially for entry uh career um entry-   level teachers uh who are often comparing  starting salaries across neighboring divisions. Uh this next slide shows the division's  current position for teachers with a   bachelor's degree at five-year increments  compared to local school divisions across   experience levels. Um at the entry level,  Virginia Beach ranks seventh. Um overall,   Virginia Beach generally ranks in the middle  of the market across experience levels,   placing between third and seventh depending  on years of service. Um while salaries have   increased uh we continue to trail Chesapeake  by approximately 1 and a.5% at all steps   uh highlighting an ongoing competitiveness gap uh  despite recent adjustments. Um as

034we look towards   uh 2026 2027 school year. Um the next  couple of slides will outline cost   scenarios for providing salary increases to  employees by adjusting entry- level salaries. All right. Our first scenario here uh for the  teachers pay scale adjustment is scenario A.   Now this includes a 2% increase to the current  structure. Um the table on this slide highlights   the value of the increase to the structure at  5-year intervals. So moving from left to right   um what you'll see are years of service.  um the current step value associated with   each year of service uh the proposed  step value with the 2% increase to the   structure in this case and the value of the  increase to that step. So, in this scenario,   the 2% increase would provide a $1,114  increase in entry- level salaries,   um, a

035$1,200 increase at year five, and so on,  ultimately with a $2,144 increase for employees   with over 44 years of service. This supports  a 3.5% increase for each eligible employee.   um that would be the 1.5% step increase they would  receive and then the 2% structure adjustment. Uh similar to the previous slide, uh scenario  B shows the dollar difference per step with a   1.5% increase to the structure as opposed to  a 2% increase. Uh the layout of the table is   the same as scenario A. Uh and the increases for  this scenario would result in an $835 increase for   entry- level teachers up to a $1,68 increase uh  with those with over 44 years of service. Overall,   uh this is going to support a 3% increase  for eligible employees. That is again that   1.5% step increase that they

036would receive.  Um and then a 1.5% structure adjustment. All right, we're going to skip over the next  couple of slides uh based off of Dr. Roberts and   good news, right? That we seem to have more money  at our disposal um for this conversation than than   previously um discussed. So um so those past two  slides what you'll see here will include a couple   scenarios and you'll see the same on the unified  scale as well that um again the numbers are the   numbers and you'll feel free to look at them but  for purposes of the discussion we'll just focus   on scenarios A and B for now uh just kind of given  the the the financial um uh realities of of uh of   where we're at as of today. So what you're seeing  here on this slide is

037pulling together both the   scenarios uh listed in the previous two slides  so they can be seen side by side um where you   can see the value of the increase to the step. On  the left hand side you have the current step rate   uh with scenarios A and B laid out in the order  of the percentage increases discussed previously. All right. Uh this next slide provides examples of  the type of increase a teacher who's eligible for   moving a step could expect to see based on the  scenarios that we've presented. Um this slide   illustrates the movement of teachers from the  current pay scale to the proposed scenarios for   each scale. Uh it includes each of the proposed  scenarios plus a step for an additional year of   service. Um the first example we have provided  is the increase

038a new teacher could expect to   see moving from their first year to one year of  experience. Um the increase is highlighted in   the blue box and these employees would  move from a current salary of 55,687   uh to 57,653. Um that's an increase of  $1,966. Um the increase to the pay scale   of 2% in addition to the step increase  of 1.5% provides an overall increase of   3.5% for eligible employees to move a step.  Now you'll see a similar approach has been   applied to scenario B. Um, an increase to the  scale of 1.5% provides an increase of $1,683   or 3% of the elig eligible employees previous  salary which is highlighted in the purple box. And ultimately what we have here um is a slide  that provides the operating cost for uh both of   these scenarios A and

039B again as well as as as  C and D. But um we'll focus on A and B here. So   um scenario A, which is the 2% increase to the  structure, has an operating cost of $14,885,012. Uh it provides a 3.5% increase  for all eligible employees.   Scenario B is the 1.5% increase and  has an operating cost of 12,741,68 and supports a 3% increase for eligible employees. Okay. The other area of focus um  for today's presentation will be   discussion of different scenarios  for the unified scale. As a reminder,   this scale includes the non-eing positions. Um,  we're going to look at a couple of different   scenarios for updates to the salary scale  itself and the associated impacts on cost. Unified um the unified salary scale starts with  grade U7 and it goes through grade U28. Now,   for purposes

040of this overview, we're going to  look at the impacts of these structure change   options on grade U7. Um, this grade includes  critical positions such as bus bus assistants,   uh, custodian one staff, cafeteria assistants,  just to give you a sense of the types of roles   will be impacted by updates to this grade.  So, from left to right, what you'll see are   years of service, um, the current pay rate  for each year, the current step increment,   which is the percent increase in pay from one  year to the next, uh, the newly proposed pay rate,   and the proposed step increment. Um it's important  to note here that the step increment for years 0   through 14 stays at 1% and years 15 through 47  stay at 1.5% um in comparison to the teacher   scale uh which has the 1.5%

041increase between all  steps. So this first scenario uh which referring   to is scenario A uh shows grade U7 with a  2% increase to entry level pay. Now, this   uh option supports a minimum of a 3% increase for  all eligible employees. Um, this increase provides   a 31 cent increase for entry- level employees  and a 46 cent increase for employees at 30. I think you should be able to I'm sorry. Follow up with that. Um I I I I think  you can hear me. I've just got to do something.   Okay, keep going. Okay. Um so for scenario B, um  scenario B is going to highlight a 1.5% increase   to the structure. Um a half% less than scenario A.  Um the headers of the table here are the same as   scenario A. Um, and this option supports a

042minimum  of a 2.5% increase for all eligible employees   and provides a 24 cent increase for entry- level  employees as highlighted in the purple box here,   right? Uh, with a new pay rate being $16 an  hour compared to the current $15.76 an hour. Um,   and this, um, for year 30 employees,  you'll see a 34 increase in this scenario. All right. Again, we'll move past  scenarios C and D for now. Um,   and slide um is going to lay out the  cost for all of the scenarios. Again,   with a a primary focus on scenarios A and B  here. Um, you'll note that both of the options   maintain a 1% increase for steps 0 through 14  and a 1.5% increase for steps 15 and above.   Um, scenario A, uh, which is the 2% increase to  the structure, has an

043operating cost of 8,56,134, um, and supports a minimum of a 3% increase  to all eligible employees. Uh, scenario B,   which is the option with a 1.5% increase to the  structure, has an operating cost of 7,234,514 and supports a minimum of a 2.5%  increase to all eligible employees. Um, excuse me, can you cut me off from  the meeting because I'm also on my phone? If you can or not, Madam Clerk, can can we do that? Okay.  Um, I'm on in two places. Oh, wait. I'll I'll   close my black top. Okay. Is that better? Is  that better? We're still getting some feedback. I I need to be Oh, that's better. I'm in two  places. I'm on my laptop and also on my phone. You sound clear now. Yeah, that is better. Okay,  good. I'm sorry. Andrew, please

044finish. Sure.   Sure. I think we just have one more slide here. Um  if you want to move to that. So what we have here   is the um summary of scenarios for the unified  and teacher pay scales here. So in summary um the   scenarios provided for the teacher pay scale and  the unified pay scale summary costs are outlined   in each table uh for each option and correspond  to the percentage increase to entry-le pay. Uh the   overall average increase shown for each category  represents the average percentage impact across   all employees in that group. uh based on where  individuals currently fall on the pay scale.   Uh the focus of these options is to provide the  greatest and most equitable increases possible   um considering the current financial realities  uh of the division. So I think at this point   we'll

045open it up if there are any specific  uh uh questions. We're happy to answer them   um and and appreciate everyone's time. And I'm  back. Angela, you did a great job, Miss Rogers.   Hi. Thank you so much for the presentation. I did  have a couple of questions and comments. Um, on   slide six, I know we talked about you talked about  total total compensation and what that means. Um,   and the difference between uh someone who takes  health insurance and not health insurance. Um,   but some of the our health insurance and the  retirement and our life insurance and all of those   things, those are offered by every school division  in the Commonwealth of Virginia. And so for me,   I feel like these are things that we offer because  everyone offers them and so it make doesn't make   us

046any more or less competitive. Does that make  sense? like in I understand including it to say   this is what we give our employees but if we're  talking about competitive in the market every   school division is going to offer that. So if  we're talking about why would someone stay with   us versus um go somewhere else or want to be  in Virginia Beach that kind of isn't a factor   um because it's offered everywhere else. Does that  make sense? Okay. And so I just wanted to make   that comment. Um, the other thing I wanted to say  is on slides 10 and 11, I'm a little um I don't   really understand saying the total average because  those percentage increases if you total them. And   don't get me wrong, I'm a pre-K teacher. I married  an accountant. But my very

047limited understanding   is that average means you add up and divide by the  number. And so wouldn't the average be 4.43%? for   3% three repeating and not total average. Well,  it's should be cumulative. Yeah, that's okay. So,   we're talking about the total percentage, not the  total average. Okay. I was confused. I wanted to   make sure I was thinking right. Thank you. Um and  then the only thing I wanted to kind of point out   um with the market assessment um it is concerning  that we went in 2122 and 2223 from first in our   pay to seventh now. Um and it seemed like it  was a real quick um you know fall and so you   know we went from first first then to fourth then  to seventh and we remain at seventh and so that's   obviously not going

048to make us very competitive.  But I also want to point out on the next slide   um I I'm very concerned that we don't fall  into compression. If you look at Norolk, their   um rank for zero years is they are second  for their pay scale for brand new educators,   but after 5 years, they drop straight down  to the bottom. And that's not what we want   to do. Um if you look at Chesapeake, they may  be fifth when it comes to um new teacher pay,   but then they rise to third and second as you  go on. And I think that should be our goal is   while we don't want to be seventh, we also want to  make sure that we are taking care of our employees   that stay with us. So that's really what I kind  of

049wanted to just my comment is that that to me   is important that while we don't want to be the  last in new teacher pay, we also want to make sure   that we're not compressing our teacher pay for our  staff who have been here with us and continue to   be here with us. and we want to make sure that we  give them the compensation that they deserve. So,   those um are pretty much um I think all my  comments. Let me just run through because   I want to make sure I didn't highlight  anything else in this. No, that was it. So,   I just want to say those things, Mr. Cummings. Uh  thank you. And I I also had a similar question on   slide 10 with the average or cumulative percentage  increase being 26% from 2022 to 2026.

050And then   and I just need some help understanding and this  might just be something y'all help me out with.   I look at slide 14 and I look at the salaries  in in that same time frame and I don't see like   a 26% increase of salary. Help me just speak to  me about that a little bit. Help me understand,   you know, I see 26% increase and then I look  at slide 14 where the same time period I don't   see that amount of increase reflected. Just help  me understand that a little bit. And I could be   not mathing this morning, this evening correctly,  but yeah, but for the average for the historical,   that's over the entire scale, whereas the other  one is focused on different parts of the scale.   So for fiveyear increments, you're talking about  slide

05114. Mhm. So with this one, as you can see,   it might not have been 40 a modest increase to  the entry level, but this one right here really   focuses on the average increases that employees  receive overall. That's what this one does. It's   not focusing just on the entry rate increases.  Okay? So, as you can see, for 2324 is 10.6%   6% because that was the year we really went back  and we really um divided the scale up to make sure   it was 1.5% between increments. It was uh heavy  lift at that time. That's why it chose 10.6.   I think what might be helpful would be just for  further understanding that those two different   buckets is maybe just to draw a couple comparison  salaries for us from you know the 2022 to 2026   period like someone who's

052the sub five years  someone in the 5 to 10 someone in the 10 to   15 brackets and just so that we can see those you  know how those compare over time that'd be helpful   to me. Um, but I do appreciate the importance of  this presentation and I am totally empathetic to   technology issues as well with trying to connect  to meetings at important times. So, you know, I I   I hear that I understand that concern and happened  to me too as a fully tech fluent individual   helping happened to me the other day. So, I I I  definitely understand that. My final thoughts is   just I'm sitting here thinking about this in you  know retrospective the importance of competitive   pay. Uh I think it does a couple things because  I see you know the great work that

053our our staff   do. I see the great work their investment um from  our teachers to our administrators. I think that   was evident you know this past weekend seeing you  know Dr. Robertson's majority of his leadership   team present at the African-American Male Summit,  seeing the Green Run teachers there, seeing all   these folks in commitment to events outside what  majority of us would define as working hours. Um,   and really devoting, you know, a lot of  time to our students, to our communities,   to our schools. And I think that's one of the  reasons that we have such a great and unique   school system because of this investment from  folks. And I know for myself that compensation   has been something that is extremely important to  our our staff and is something I've heard from our   community. And so I

054will be definitely looking at  these options to ensure that we remain competitive   um for our educators, for our staff because I  see them showing up, you know, outside of the   scope many many many many times. And so I think  that's definitely a way that we could send value   that they matter. Um, so those are just some  of my quick initial thoughts as just sitting   through this presentation and echoing the similar  sentiment that you know I heard from Seagull. Mr. Kalen, then Miss Melnik, thank you for the presentation. Uh, I  have some not so much questions as much   as it is observations in reference  to information found on slide six. If I'm reading that correctly, it indicates that  from the employer, there is a contribution to the   employees retirement plan within the Virginia  retirement system of

05515.23%. Yes. And is it   safe to assume that that's competitive  with other districts within the region? Can't really answer what other school divisions  do. So typically for the teacher scales and the   professional scale which includes our teachers  for the school districts it's the same and then   every bianium VRS board reviews those rates with  actuarial studies and and based on the investments   in the fund and the performance of the fund and  whether they're doing well or not and that gives   them the ability to lower those rates which  is what we're seeing now for the next bianium.   For the nonprofessional folks, everybody, every  district, my understanding, gets a separate letter   because everyone's different. Those rates are much  lower, but they are specific to school divisions.   Well, I have to say having a background in  the world of

056401k plans in the marketplace   of corporations, what you typically find is the  fact that a an employer on average would encourage   an employee to contribute to their 401k plan. And  if they did, they would make a company match. But   oftentimes the match was 50 cents on the dollar up  to 6% or a maximum of 3% from the employer. 15.23%   from the employer to the employee is just enormous  and noteworthy and complimentary to the benefits   package that exists. That's just an significant  contribution that's being made. And I compliment   the HR department and the school system for that  contribution because it's very large. Rates. Yes.   Thank you. I just wanted to clarify that. Miss  Melnik. So, and I just want to clarify in order to so the cost implications for the scenarios  for both, right? So, if

057we chose scenario A   at an operating cost of $14.8 million  for the teacher scale and $8.5 million   for the unified pay scale. Then we're  looking at an ongoing cost of 23,391,166. Do we have that in our budget  this year? because it's ongoing.   We do. Okay. That's what I wanted to  know. And that'll put us number one because here's the other thing and I and I and  and I have to talk about this because we're rich   in Virginia Beach in so many ways. And I'm  not saying I don't want to do compensation,   right? Okay. I realize teachers don't make  enough. I still talk about this in in my   years. when I started at 24,030 in 1990  and ended before I left for a period of   time 11 years later making $33,000. That  was all I did

058in 11 years. Okay. However, the difference, and I hate to I I really don't  want to bring this up, but we're all in the   same boat. So the difference with Chesapeake for  instance, who's in spot of five, the difference is   $877 a year. I say we're rich in resources. And  I worry about depleting our resources and not   giving our teachers the things that they need in  addition to the salary. I worry about that piece,   too. And I hate that it's an eitheror, right?  Um, I'm I'm excusing Hampton and Newport News   because we never really include them. The  significant jumps are in Norfick, Portsouth,   and SuffK, and I have to wonder what I would  pay in gas and tolls to get to Portsouth. Um,   so just logic. I I do though want to  fairly compensate what

059I deem, you know,   the greatest teachers. Um, but I I do also  want to be cognizant of the ongoing money   because we have more employees than any any other  division, which is why this is so significant. Um, okay. I just wanted to make sure we were looking  at 23 million. Okay. Thank you. Okay. So, we're   going to do um Dr. Green, then Miss Dwire, and  I am going to ask since it's 5:28, we are going   to have to go back to workshop for budget item  three. So, um, if you can limit the questions to   those that, um, if you're able, Seagull can answer  at this time since they're are on the phone or,   um, and then that way we can return to those  questions that staff would be able to answer   um, at the end

060of the meeting. Dr. Green.  Okay. And mine may not be one Seagull uh,   can answer because it's a followup to Mr. um Ken's  question uh about the VRS and it's more of a com   um a comment um I think as we go through  the budget process for my colleagues and   and this is information um between Miss Paid  and Dr. Tropman that your offices may be able   to get back with us. I think everyone needs to  be aware that there are several retirement plans   uh option one, option two, option three. How  many options do we have now, Crystal? Uh,   and and I say that to say, is it four? I saw your  hand go up. Three. Okay. I say that because the   cost to the division would vary based on what  option the employee is in.

061I'm a dinosaur,   so I benefited from option one, which  I know they are phasing out. So ladies,   it may be helpful for us to have in the future  a breakdown of what retirement plans are costing   uh employees based on which option they're in  because there is a difference that there is a   big difference. So thank you. Miss Dwire. Yeah. I  just well thank you ladies for your presentation.   Um I see a little hope for our teachers uh pay um  which I I'm I'm going to be honest I was concerned   about and I just hope that that um continues to uh  progress in the right direction. A bigger concern   right now though is our support staff. Um, I  don't see a competitive graph for them and I   don't know how you can live on that on

062I mean  even if it's a 40hour pay week it's very low while you're in the addendum you'll see some of  those um critical u positions that we did provide   information on how we compare with our local  school divisions. Okay. I will definitely check   it out. Um yeah, I I don't know. I mean, it just  it's pretty pretty loud. Sorry. That's how I feel. Miss Rogers, is your question for Seagull or  can really quick. Yeah. So, I know we talked   about this during the um workshop about the  possibility of switching our scales to like   classified certified type things which would kind  of answer Mr. Dwire's question. Is that something   we are still consider like is that something that  is still being considered or these were sticking   with these at that time there wasn't enough board  will

063to move forward with that direction that was   and then I guess my only other comment is I know  that we've talked about our pay being 85% of our   average of our budget um but across the state  this is within average it's usually 80 to 90%   % I did some research beforehand and that's how  much staffing costs in school divisions. We are   right in the middle. So I do, like I said, want  to make sure that we're taking care of our staff.   Thank you. And um before we go, I don't have any  specific comments for Seagull, but um just in case   people are tuned in now and aren't tuned in later,  I think this is a really important topic. I think   that teacher compensation, staff compensation, and  of course, all of those supporting positions are   are

064very important and striking that balance  in a world where we have finite resources to   accomplish everything that we want to accomplish  and making sure that student achievement and our   um staff and employees are taken care of  and compensated um is is very important. Um,   I do have a lot of questions related to VRS, but  I'm going to save those for the budget thing. And   um, I am pleased with the work that we've done  with the uh, the compression that has been huge.   And so, you know, I want to make sure that we're  continuing forward and trying to make sure we do   what we can do to be competitive. But, um,  unfortunately, we will have finite resources   no matter what. Um, and with that, we are going  to res recess until 6 PM for our formal

065meeting.

This transcript may contain errors introduced by automated or source-provided captioning. Bracketed descriptions such as [Music] are retained from the source. Passage divisions are editorial aids and do not alter the wording.