001to order. Would everyone please rise for a pledge of >> allegiance? I aliance to the flag United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Let me thank everyone for coming this evening. There's a log in the front. If you haven't done so, please sign in. You have anything in particular you would like to bring to the board's attention, please also write that down. If at any time during the meeting you would like to mention something on an agenda item, please raise your hand be recognized. After the normal business, there is also time for public comment where you can bring up additional issues. Uh this meeting is being recorded. And I just want to announce there was an executive session conducted
002prior to the meeting to discuss personnel matters that Mr. We have a roll call please. >> Aaron Angel >> here. >> Michael Hess here. Rea Hoffman >> here. >> Cecilia Hall >> here. >> Jason C here. >> Jeremiah Light >> here. >> Dennisy Dishes >> here. >> Daniel Whismer >> here. >> Laurel Ziggler >> here. >> Olivia Boss >> here. >> Lindsay Schmeck >> here. >> Thank you. The first item on the agenda is the approval of minutes uh for the July 21st, 2025 schoolboard meeting. Do we have a motion to approve those moving minutes? >> Second. >> Motion second. Thank you. Any questions or comments on those minutes? Hearing none. Then stressful call. >> Aaron Angel. >> Yes. >> Michael S. Yes. Rea Hoffman. >> Yes. >> Celia Hol. >> Yes. >> Jeremiah Light.
003>> Yes. >> Dennis Udishious. >> Yes. >> Daniel Whismer. >> Yes. Laura Ziggler, >> yes. >> Jason C, >> yes. Motion carries. We will take four the treasures report and five approval of bills for payment under one motion to approve. Uh in the treasures report, A through I is listed out and A through G for the approval of bills for payment. We have a motion to approve both. I move >> second off second. Any questions or comments there? Mr. Hel Michael S. Yes. Hoffman, >> yes. >> Cecilia Hull, >> yes. >> Jeremiah Light, >> yes. >> Dennis Yudishious, >> yes. >> Daniel Whismer, >> yes. >> Laurel Ziggler, >> yes. >> Aaron Angel, >> yes. >> Jason Cuck, >> yes. Motion carries. >> Six is communications and reports. Superintendent's report is first. Christ. >> Thank
004you. Just an oral report today. Um, we are, as you know, we are excited for the start of the school year. Tomorrow is one week away from the first day of school for students as we'll welcome back our 1360 students to campus. The unofficial start of the school year for secondary students is last week when uh fall sports starts. Uh we had as of Friday, we had 155 student athletes here at the high school. That which represents about 38% of our student body and that doesn't even include marching band and you know a variety of other students who are here on campus. So you're looking at about half our students were already back beginning last week but on a pretty pretty regular basis we had 98 middle school student athletes um which you know because
005of a smaller eighth grade is more than 50% of our students you know just an incredible participation rate that we're really really excited about. Uh in addition to welcoming our students back you know we have our staff back full-time beginning tomorrow for three days of mid-ervice and just excited to get going. Um it has been a busy summer as they always are. Just like to give a special thanks to many many people are working throughout the summer, but the uh facilities and operations team with maintenance and custodial and our technology teams those they are the two that they have more work and more intensive work in summer because of the cycles that they have taking care of our building, preparing them and also refreshing devices and other technology resources. You know, that's an incredible thing.
006tell Mr. Hoffman all the time is we have very few conversations and or challenges we run into that we don't have to involve technology at some point just because there's systems involved with them um and we're grateful for um Mr. Hoffman's leadership Mr. lot of science leadership and both of their departments for all the work they do in the summer and throughout the year of course as well. So also like to welcome Olivia and Lindsay. Lindsay was going to support but Olivia two of you are here to join us as our student reps. Excited to have you as a part of the team and do we say don't feel pressure to communicate when it's your report time but anything you want to share and know the board and anyone here visiting appreciates the board. So
007thank you for your time. >> Thank you. >> That's my report. >> All right. Uh, next we have the board committee reports. First on the list, BCTC, >> there was no meeting. >> All right. Thank you. Uh, BCIU. >> There was no meeting. >> Burks tax collection committee. >> And then let's get to extracurricular and facilities. >> We did have a meeting. Um, as part of the extracurricular, we were giving the update on the wrestling mat replacement at the auxiliary gym in the middle school. Uh, I believe Mr. Yapsuga is going to be refreshing or checking the quote, but right now we're looking at about $28,000 to replace that with 14,000 coming from the Matt Club with possibility of even more through donations or sponsorships. And just one other piece I think that was very
008important and called out by the group was you know many of our facilities pieces need to be I say facilities it's a mat but as you can imagine a wrestling mat hundreds and hundreds of times a day throughout the winter you have students bodies off those mats so as mats get older they get compressed and they get harder so it's a safety thing to refresh them once in a while um you know so that is that's the impetus for this and we are grateful to the mat club you know for their contribution as they use the maths as much as as students in the school district as well. They're all in school, all the students are in school districts, but students in our wrestling program accept 12. Uh we were given a presentation from uh
009power ad about possibly replacing the scoreboards in the high school gymnasium. We decided to just table that for now because might interfere with some of our own fundraising goals and you know need more information with you all too on that. Um we were given an update on the activity feed and then uh under facilities we um were given updates on the progress at the middle school which will hopefully be wrapping up end of this week next week hopefully. Um the stage four which was done inhouse uh has been replaced. Uh, also that's wasn't on the agenda was the uh high school gym update too because that was completely sanded down to Barewood and redone. And then um the parking over on Coffee Lane by the middle school ball field with millings from Constitution Boulevard. And
010that's the rest of my report. >> Cool. Thank you. And just a update, we did talk activity fees, you know, related to athletics as of the end of the day Friday, you know, we' collected 93% of activity fees. And um I just want to say a thank you to our families for working with us. It's a new process, both the online payment part of the process, but also implementing an activity fee. Um we're very proud, you know, as this all one conversation, right? We're proud of, you know, maintaining facilities, upgrading the gym, upgrading how we request support for it. Um there's a great benefit to our large number of student athletes that participate in addition to students participating in activities. Um but our parents have been fantastic working with us to understand the quirks of
011the process. Great. >> Great. [Music] Miss PSBI >> and then last is the policy curriculum committee. >> Uh we'll have two policies for first reading tonight. And then uh just some highlights. We had a an overview of what students were signed up for as far as their use of time with the updated graduation requirements that uh we recently have have altered and it was a very positive uh snapshot of um you know really I think what we were after for. Um and then um another item is uh upcoming community discussions on the future ready students and AI the attention economy and Mr. time chat and we'll be sending out communications for that in the near future and we're hoping for some good robust it's it's a topic that you know interest and concerns everyone I
012think and certainly everyone who is raising children of just everybody's role it's it's the school's role but also the parents role and the community you know and or consumers of information and technology it's all of them so we just want to have some rich dialogue with various stakeholders on where we all feel like we are as part of this process of helping to um encourage and promote healthy development in an age of AI. >> So we're looking forward to that and then that's it. >> All right. Thank you. Student uh rep report Olivia do >> I have no report without >> I have Uh, next on the agenda is public comment on agenda items. Is there anyone on the line? >> No, there is not. >> There is none person. >> All right. Thank you.
013So, we'll move right into the new business on the agenda this evening. >> First item is a personnel. It is the recommendation of the administration that the board of school directors approve the following personnel items. 1 through 12 are listed there. We take them together this evening. I believe I'd be looking for a motion to approve the personnel uh items. >> Motion second. Any questions or comments on the house? Stress roll call, please. Rea, >> yes. >> Cecilia Holt, >> yes. >> Jeremiah Light, >> yes. >> Danny, >> yes. >> Daniel Whismer, >> yes. >> Laurel Ziggler, >> yes. >> Aaron Angel, >> yes. Michael Hes. Yes. Jason C. >> Yes. Motion carries. All personnel are approved pending receipt of all mandated credentials. B is policy maintenance. Um we will take the one for policy
014008 organizational chart first. It is recommendation of the policy curriculum committee that the board of school directors approve the following policies for first reading and policy 008 organizational chart. Do we have a motion? So move with second. Any questions or comments? Mr. House call, please. Um, can you just confirm? Is this only for one? >> This is only for Okay, I'm back here. Just one second. Just >> hold. >> Yes. >> Jeremiah. >> Yes. Dennis Udishious. >> Yes. >> Daniel Whismer, >> yes. >> Laurel Ziggler, >> yes. >> Aaron Angel, >> yes. >> Michael Hes, yes. Ruba Hoffman, >> yes. >> Jason C, >> yes. Motion. Motion carries. And then we will also be looking for a motion. It is the recommendation of the policy and curriculum committee of the board of school directors approve
015the following policies for first reading. Two is policy 006.1 attendance at meetings via electronic communications. So move mayor second motion second. Do we have any questions or comments on this policy? >> Yeah, I had uh just two comments. Um it looks like there was some good discussion in the committee meeting um on the policy. I do still recommend that for 4 um that we say it is recommended uh that the school director be visible on screen for the duration of the meeting. Um, I know there was some talk about how sometimes, you know, as much as it may be intended for the uh connection to be stable, that sometimes going off of video can allow for a stronger connection. And I think um including that as something that's recommended would be very reasonable. Uh and
016then the second point that I just wanted to clarify on um it references here that the board president if they deem that a school director violates this policy that they shall consider the school director not present then the school director will not be able to participate in the meeting. Um I guess that they're it is unclear to me how they could be deemed not present because obviously they were present. Uh so again that seems factually inaccurate. Um and I guess again what it really means to say they will not be able to participate in the meeting. I mean as an elected official we all have legal um authority and right to participate fully in every meeting. So um those were the two points that I think require you know still further refinement. So I don't
017know procedurally what the best way is to handle this. Um for point four I recommend the language it is recommended uh that the school director be visible on screen. Um and then I do recommend that that entire section be stricken from you know if the board president or committee chairperson indeed the school director violates this policy they shall consider the school director not present and the school director will not be able to participate in the meeting and recommend that sentence be >> so is that a motion you're making to abandon Uh, she made a motion. Is there a second? >> Second. >> So, you have a motion and a second on the amendment. Um, any questions or comments prior to having a roll call vote on the amendment? >> Um, can I just get details
018on what those were? I just want to make sure I'm writing it correctly. >> Number four. I recommend that it says it is recommended that the school director be visible on screen for the duration of the meeting. Uh and then I recommend that that one sentence be strengthened from the if the board president committee chairperson a school director violates. >> Which point is that? So that's still under four. >> It's not a bullet. It's not numbered. It's after eight. I mean, I think I vaguely kind of remember these. I'm just trying to get it down just so we >> just uh as the the chair of PNC, I think for future, I think it will probably be helpful for the process and productivity. Um, if you would like to continually make these revisions, we move
019that. I I well I can only speak for myself but um I did vote to move that back down in response to some of these concerns and you weren't present for that. Um a couple hours before the meeting you um >> shared with the board what you expected to happen there. Um, I think there's probably more productive ways to handle in the future. And that's fine. And everybody's welcome to handle things how they want, but um, I think probably best practice moving forward to if we're moving things back down to policy, that would be a a better place to try and in the future work out some of these. So, I will not be voting in favor of the changes at this point. >> Yeah, I wasn't expecting something would happen. I you know we
020all have the opportunity to provide feedback and so that is what I had done in email ahead of the meeting. So um I actually in my judgment thought it would be a more productive conversation if I provided my written feedback and allowed the committee and respected the committee to discuss that. So you know that was and again it certainly was a productive conversation last time. and we did discuss and we decided that what we had is what we were going to keep. So, you know, I I'm going to vote on like just moving it forward as is because we spent so much time on this already. Yeah. Um while it's true that we did discuss it at the committee level we typically do bring things it is moved to the full board so that the
021full board may give input at that time. Um additionally um wondering Mr. Manuso, if you can clarify because one of the things during our discussion at the committee on that section that says that the board president or committee chair person um can uh terminate the participation in the meeting if the above things are violated. Um I I think Mr. Tim Chatton said that you had given guidance that there needed to be some sort of >> there I just to that was my opinion that if there is um if we're going to have one through eight there needs to be a mechanism for those to be held accountable right that's the um what ID shared Mr. Vancou had shared is he has two general and he can correct it from two general pieces of advice. One
022was that anything he's seen with any any versions of capitalist policy are well within scope of the zeros within the scope of what a board can do in the zero to govern its own action which is essentially what the zeros are in policy. The other side of it is that he just reminds us that in recent years uh court rulings have sided in favor of participation in board meetings and that's both community members and um board members or committee members whatever they might be. um you know the the piece about that extra paragraph again that was my you know I was think again most of our policy is the 100s 200s 300s 400s 800s it's the administration who has to ensure that they you know that there's teeth to what it says the zeros the
023board is governing board so without that I don't know how there would be accountability to it that's that's those are my words >> so I mean from my perspective the board can can adopt rules to govern itself and you can have the board president enforce those rules, which is effectively what they're you're purporting to do as it as it sits. So, I don't have an issue with that. Again, it's not arbitrary. It's basically you would be removed from the meeting if you can't actively participate. So, I don't have definition from perspective. >> Are there going to be a similar set of recommendations for inperson meeting? I mean, you know, if someone stands up and leaves and needs to take a phone call or go to the bathroom, will they not be allowed back in? >>
024Are you asking me again? It's your policies. >> No, it's not directed to me because I'm trying to understand what this is a level of detail that is inconsistent to the level of detail that we have with inperson conversations. So, you know, I think it all sounds reasonable, but again, I think the the point that was particularly I believe Mr. Hess, if I recall, might have mentioned that sometimes going off camera is critical in order to main that maintain that stable connection. So, I thought that that was an important one to, you know, note that that one's recommended. Um, and again, I, you know, I also heard, you know, Mr. Manus's comments around the the recommendation that uh the courts have tend to lean towards participation which is why I think we align this policy
025in that direction to be saying that again we we recognize every elected official has a legal right to fully participate in a medium. So this those my two recommendations >> I just think of instances that we've experienced in the past um where there is some issue. It could be on our end or the participants end where we're losing connectivity and Dr. Myers or whoever has been running the meeting is able to, you know, restore connectivity. And obviously, while the board member isn't on at that time, they can't be voting on things that are voted on while that portion of the meeting is continuing. But we've always had if the connection has been able to be restored that then they're able to continue participation. And I think I'll just underscore the points I've made previously. I
026think the language is overly harsh. Um I understand our want to shore up this policy. Um Jason made a good point. I think this policy has been around since 2009. Um and we're just shoring it up for whatever it needs to be to meet our current needs. Um, I think it feels when when you read through this policy, we're going out of our way to try to find any way to kick people out, not people. Well, my language is persons in the meeting, but it will be overly directed towards schoolboard members that are on the meeting. Um, that's how I read the language. It's how I read it the first time around, and it's still how I'm reading it after it went back to committee. Um, I would hope that there's room for exceptions. I
027talked about I'm on online meetings all the time. Um, and even with the best servers and connections, having video on all the time for the meeting um, doesn't always allow for the best communication. Sometimes the video might have to be shut off for the audio communication to go through. Um, so I think that's why it's important to strike that language about kicking somebody out because they couldn't be on video. I think a recommendation for that language is appropriate. Um, if you're speaking, I think it's best to be on video so that we can see who's speaking. Um, but if at any moment during the meeting a video drops out, I don't think we should be immediately looking to remove that person from the meeting. Well, I will say this. I mean, I don't I don't
028read that the same way Mr. H. I mean, I don't think the policy reads that we're going to be looking to immediately kick somebody out of the meeting. I think it sets the expectation that you're not going to be um with your your off camera for the duration of the meeting or for the entire duration of the meeting. Obviously, you know, as I sit here as president, if there's someone that is visible on the camera and they're clearly having a connective connection issue, I'm not really looking to boot. That's just me speaking personally. I just don't I think you're reading it in a punitive manner that I'm not. I think it's just encourage it is encouraging proper behavior, respectful behavior to the rest of your board members because as we sit here in person, there
029is a level of the court and there's a level of respect that we have to provide to one another that prompt responses um clear responses that aren't interrupted and that allows a board meeting to move ahead timely without um unnecessary interruptions. uh if there's a if we run into occurrences as I'm sitting here where there's it's clearly that they there's an individual that's trying to be an active member you're going to give them every chance in the world to be an active member of the of the meet if it gets to a point where the meeting is getting hamstrung because the connection is that bad there's got there's got to be a way to move forward with the business and for out of respect for the board members sitting here and out of respect people
030sitting um community members sitting in the audience. Uh that's my uh feeling on that. Uh so the I guess what is it four be visible on screen for the duration of the meeting that should be the expectation should be that that's you're giving every effort to be right clearly if you're there trying to participate and your connection's bad. Yeah, I would agree that audio or audio is is best at that point, but that's a determination that we made in the middle of the meeting, not set not put in policy that the expectation or or that it's only a recommendation that you're on the screen. We should expect people to be on the screen and then work through the trouble spots if there arise. >> That's my I I appreciate that. I I actually like the
031wording that you just gave um about, you know, every expectation is to be on on the meeting this fall. I I think that's a much more appropriate language. >> Yeah. And I think, you know, it's helpful to hear your interpretation. That's a very positive interpretation to hear that you would want to work with everyone to make sure that they can stay participating in the meeting as long as possible. um you know I guess the the nature of a policy and words in black and white is that you know it they are words that withstand um good intentions and bad intentions right so someone you know and and this policy is getting extremely specific that it does provide an opportunity for someone with ill intention to look for any tiny moment and try to exclude someone
032from a meeting. So um you know again it is heartening to hear that that's not your intention serving as the board president you know Mr. But it, you know, it is the language here does allow for a a harsher action here that it does not provide for any grace. Right? So again, I do think I I have always tried to be on video whenever I'm speaking. Um, you know, and and again happy to be on on video as much as possible. Um but you know there are circumstances that might require you to go offline for a moment and I I think this the way this is phrased currently does not provide any grace. So that is why I've recommended those changes. Any other comments before we vote on the uh the amended policy? Mr. Russ.
033>> Okay. Uh, voting on the amendment. I >> We're voting on the motion. Sorry. The motion. >> Oh, yeah. Sorry. The motion. >> The motion to amend. So, a yes would be to make those changes that Miss Cer suggested. >> No. Yes. >> Jeremiah Light. >> No. >> Dennis Digs. >> No. >> Daniel Whismer. >> No. >> Laurel Ziggler. >> Yes. >> Aaron Angel. >> No. >> Michael Bass. Yes. >> Jason >> Uh, no. Motion does not carry. Um, so that brings back to the table. The motion. We have a first and a second to approve policy 006.1 attendance at meetings via electronic communications. um for first reading as it is written current please Mr. >> Sure just one second the motion to amend. Um just um I apologize the motion to amend. Uh Cecilia,
034were you the first for that motion? >> Ziggler was Oh, the Ziggler made motion. Cecilia second. Thank you. And then the actual motion itself going back to the original we had Mr. Whismer and and then Miss Hoffman. >> Start with Cecilia Holtz. >> No. >> Jeremiah. >> Yes. >> Dennis Dishes. >> Yes. >> Daniel Whismer. >> Yes. >> Laura Ziggler. >> No. >> Aaron Hel. >> Yes. >> Michael Hex. >> No. Rea Hoffman. Yes. >> Jason >> Yes. Motion carries. C is the district dentist. It is the recommendation of the administration that the board of school directors approve White Oak Dentistry in Blandon, Pennsylvania as the school district dentist for the 2025 2026 school year at a cost of $5 per student exam and mileage reimbursement for travel between KASD buildings per the IRS rate.
035The examinations will be performed by either Dr. Brent uh Valison, Dr. Michael, or Dr. Danielle Rays. We have a motion. >> Second. Yes. Any questions or comments on dentist? Very small number of students access this you know most um use their family dentist and submit but this is an option and we're grateful to white oak be willing to do perform these at this cost if necessary to thank you. >> Jeremiah. Yes. >> Dennis Dishes. >> Yes. >> Daniel Whisperer. >> Yes. >> Lauren Ziggler. >> Yes. >> Aaron Edel. >> Yes. >> Michael Hes. Yes. Hopper. >> Yes. >> Cecilia Hall. >> Yes. >> Jason Cuck. >> Yes. Motion carries. >> D is textbooks. If we take one and two together here. It is recommendation of the policy and curriculum committee that the board of school
036directors approve the following textbook purchases. Uh one and two are set forth there. Uh do we have a motion? So move. Tess. Second. Huffman, >> any questions or comments? >> So, the bulk of the purchase, the 10 books, those are going to be used year after year, right? Um, it's the the online thing that we'll probably have to buy every >> talking uh related to the courses. So, like the 1900 is just a one one time thing, correct? Yeah, every um 10 years AP the language isn't requires you to have in the text but it is it is the expectation of CP requires fixing no other questions Mr. Dennis, >> yes. >> Daniel Whismer, >> yes. >> Laurel Ziggler, >> yes. >> Aaron Anel, >> yes. >> Michael S. Yes. Hoffman, >> yes. >> Cecilia,
037>> yes. >> Jeremiah Light, >> yes. >> Jason C, >> yes. Motion carries. >> E is the KD memorandums of understanding with the good police department and the Pennsylvania State Police. It is recommendation of the administration that the board of school directors approve the memorandums of understanding with the good police department and the Pennsylvania State Police for the attached. motion. >> So move >> second. Yes. Questions or comments on that? >> We are grateful for the collaboration we have with both obviously more so uh in terms of time with the town burough police. They're frequently here on campus but also state police when we seek assistance. They're always responsive for >> Thank you. >> Mr. Daniel Wismer, >> yes. >> Laurel Ziggler, >> yes. >> Aaron Angel, >> yes. >> Michael Hess, yes. Hoffman, >>
038yes. >> Celia, >> yes. >> Jeremiah Light, >> yes. Dennis, >> Yes. Motion carries. I I should clarify too, of course, both police departments would support us whether the whether these existed or not, but these are requirements through the state to ensure that there is a flow of communication and information sharing between two plan. So that won't make it seem as though they would support good. >> Uh F is the ESS custodial pay scale. is the recommendation of the administration that the board of school directors approve the ESS custodial pay scale for the 2025 2026 school year for the attached. Do we have a motion? >> So move I hear that >> Dennis one of us >> we are the dentist. >> Any questions or comments on Facebook? >> Laurigler. >> Yes. >> Aaron Angel.
039>> Yes. >> Michael H. Yes. Hoffman, >> yes. >> Celia Hope, >> yes. >> Jeremiah Light, >> yes. >> Dennis Sudicious, >> yes. >> Daniel Whisper, >> yes. >> Jason C, >> yes. Motion carries. >> G is introduction new business by board members. Is there any new business reintroduce this? >> I have a couple quick things. One is um Mr. Pinch and I had already discussed this sponsorship program that we have in place. I tried to search it on our website today. I had a difficult time finding it. I think it would make sense that it's in the drop down on the menu bar as a line item so that people can easily find it and not only easily find it if they're looking but maybe easily find it even if they're not like as
040I don't think that needs to go to any committee I just think it's something we should look at >> it's just a good suggestion >> and then the second thing was I had conversation with a student who is a high level student that um explained to me that they felt that college level classes taken at K were discouraged if you were on the top end of the sphere um because the class wouldn't count towards your GPA and therefore it could you know hurt your chances of having a high GPA or could hurt the school's overall GPA rating or class level. Um I don't know what the solution is. I think this one is something that probably should go to committee, but I I personally feel like we should be accepting the grades from the university
041and maybe even offering an additional 0.5 or something because it's a college level class to encourage students to be able to take those classes opposed to discouraging them doing so. Certainly benefit students to be able to have college classes under their belt. So, I just want to pull up the what was moved this year. Um the this was new this year that you know with the approved um course catalog and some of the changes that we had related to uh graduation requirements that the dual enrollment courses taken at a for university do carry a 1.15 weight. They are only below an advanced placement course which 1.2 um so AP is 1.2 two dual enrollment is 1.15 and honors is 1.1. So we did slot those in between. Um so if um previous years that would
042what student shared would have been true but that would change it to me. So they would receive so for example if they got an A in their college level class it would count as an A in their in their transcript for high school. >> Yes. For the Yeah. Yes. And and it's weighted heavy. um you know it won't show up as A in their class but on their GPA they'll get the you know they will get the weighted credit for their GPA um so their GPA does benefit from taking a dual enrollment the only thing that trumps a dual enrollment or four-year university credit is advanced placement the advanced placement courses are one too but I think then there may be some people within the school that need to understand that that change has been
043made that that was advice given by someone within the I don't and I don't know the name I sh I'll make sure that's reinforced with the team that wasn't that wasn't Mr. Delicious any other board members with new business do we have any public comment on non-aggenda items will be signed up Dr. Myers. >> Uh, no. >> It's there is a I think I saw a just a typo here in the location for the committees post. They still say G7 in the high school, but I think we'll be intending here as a carryover from from the last meeting. So, okay. So, um public next the upcoming public meetings and dates are listed there. September 8th is the next monthly meeting at 7:30 here in the high school library by Zoom. The 15th we have the
044policy and curriculum committee meeting at 6 p.m. followed by the facilities and extracurricular committee meeting at 7 again the library or by Zoom and September 22nd is the next monthly meeting 7:30 here in Nashville library or by Zoom. Thought I'd be looking for a motion to adjourn.